Re: D1 polytope
- From: Mariano Suárez-Alvarez <mariano.suarezalvarez@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2008 08:26:59 -0800 (PST)
On Dec 25, 2:29 pm, beewo...@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
On Dec 25, 6:58 am, Denis Feldmann <denis.feldmann.sanss...@xxxxxxx>
wrote:
beewo...@xxxxxxxxxxx a écrit :
On Dec 25, 6:25 am, Denis Feldmann <denis.feldmann.sanss...@xxxxxxx>
wrote:
beewo...@xxxxxxxxxxx a écrit :
On Dec 23, 1:30 pm, Axel Harvey <x...@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:Perhaps you should check before answering (or read the whole thread)....
Is a line segment considered a 1-dimensional polytope?Axel,
A line segment is not a polytope in one dimension. The end points of
a line segment is. Just as a triangle consists of its sides and not
its interior, a 1-D polytope consists of the end points of a line
segment, but not the points between those segments.
- MO- Hide quoted text -- Show quoted text -
Perhaps. Mariano asked a question whose answer would indicate that a
1-D polytope is just two points. But then Axel responded by saying he
was not a mathematician. Which indicated to me that he was looking
for an intuitive answer to his question, rather than a formal one.
David chimed in nicely by writing (allow me to paraphrase) that if
Axel was using the term "polytope" he should know the definition of
it. Well, that did not seem to me to be of much help, because it
seemed that Axel was seeking to check on his understanding of the
definition of polytope. Spudnik's third reply seem to offer some
correct and more or less relavent information, but again, like
Mariano's, it was steeped in formal mathematical jargon rather than
offering an intuitive answer. In reply to Mariano's third reply, Axel
reitierated that he is not a mathematician, and indicated that he was
looking for an intuitive answer.
So I offered an intuitive answer that was the "Polytopes for Dummies"
version of Mariano's.
- MO
Except your answer is wrong (or at least doesn't agree with the usual
definition, which is anyway easier) : polytopes "should" be convex hulls
, not skeletons, or more generally objects of the same dimension that
the embedding space, not one lower. Otoh, it is hard to define, say,
concave polyhedrons that way, and next, we enter the simplicial complex
definitons, which are surely not appropriate for a beginner :-)- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
My understanding is that a triangle is three connected line segments
and does not include its interior. You are telling me that a three-
sided polygon is a triangle ~and~ its interior, rather than just the
triangle. Is that right?
"Triangle" can mean several things, depending on the context.
Dennis is indeed correct that your answer to Axel was wrong.
A segment *is* a polytope. And, in the context of polytopes,
a triangle most often means the "filled" triangle, and is
pretty much the same thing as a 2-simplex---indeed, one speaks
of "triangulating" a surface, for example.
-- m
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: D1 polytope
- From: spudnik
- Re: D1 polytope
- References:
- D1 polytope
- From: Axel Harvey
- Re: D1 polytope
- From: beeworks
- Re: D1 polytope
- From: Denis Feldmann
- Re: D1 polytope
- From: beeworks
- Re: D1 polytope
- From: Denis Feldmann
- Re: D1 polytope
- From: beeworks
- D1 polytope
- Prev by Date: Re: [ OT ] history of science: cases of mainstream in error
- Next by Date: Re: Proof that a Number is a Multiple of 3 If the Sum Of Its Digits in Decimal Notation Is a Multiple Of 3
- Previous by thread: Re: D1 polytope
- Next by thread: Re: D1 polytope
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|