Re: necessary or sufficient properties for 'greater than' ( >)
- From: "G. A. Edgar" <edgar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 02 Jan 2009 09:02:38 -0500
In article
<fa5d5b1b-80ea-45af-88bd-c0d12c7652eb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
nukeymusic <NuKeyMusic@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I wonder which properties are necessary or sufficient to define
correctly -i.e. in a way which makes sense mathematically- 'greater
than' for a given set. I have been searching a bit already on the
Internet and thus far I came to the following conclusion (but I'm
rather unsure about it):
1. not (a<a)
2. if a<b then not(b<a)
3. if a<b and b<c then a<c
4. if a<b and c>0 then ac<bc
Your 'given set' has multiplication? and 0? Why not addition?
can anyone on this list comment whether these four conditions are
sufficient and/or necessary?
thanks
nukey
--
G. A. Edgar http://www.math.ohio-state.edu/~edgar/
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: necessary or sufficient properties for 'greater than' ( >)
- From: nukeymusic
- Re: necessary or sufficient properties for 'greater than' ( >)
- References:
- necessary or sufficient properties for 'greater than' ( >)
- From: nukeymusic
- necessary or sufficient properties for 'greater than' ( >)
- Prev by Date: Re: necessary or sufficient properties for 'greater than' ( >)
- Next by Date: Re: Help needed in understanding a definition of vector space
- Previous by thread: Re: necessary or sufficient properties for 'greater than' ( >)
- Next by thread: Re: necessary or sufficient properties for 'greater than' ( >)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|