Re: -- sequences of integers, closed under some operations
- From: William Elliot <marsh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 05:08:43 -0800
On Wed, 7 Jan 2009, quasi wrote:
Fix a positive integer n.How am I to understand S? The best possible interpetation that seems to fit the context is S = Z^n. That you are considering finite sequences.
Let S be the set of all sequences of n integers.
Call a subset A of S "closed" if
(1) if a is in A, then p(a) is in A, where p(a) is any permutation of a.
(2) if a is in A, then for any f in Z[x], the sequence
f(a[1]), f(a[2]), ..., f(a[n])
is in A.
Remark: It's easily seen that the closed sets, as defined above, yieldAn Alexadroff space, that is space in which infininte intersections of open sets are open. Thus your spaces they are either discrete or not T1.
a topology on S.
Do you intende the closed sets to be the topology, ie the open sets of the space, or do you want them to be the collection of closed sets of the space? I'm naturally assuming the former.
Question: Does there exist a finite subset of S whose closure is S?The subspace of constant sequences is discrete.
If A is a subset of S and k a constant sequence of S,
then k in A iff k in permutation closure of A.
Since there are infinitely many constant sequences, the answer is no.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: -- sequences of integers, closed under some operations
- From: quasi
- Re: -- sequences of integers, closed under some operations
- From: galathaea
- Re: -- sequences of integers, closed under some operations
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: Most radical and stupid thing I ever said. Also the most correct.
- Next by Date: Re: Most radical and stupid thing I ever said. Also the most correct.
- Previous by thread: -- sequences of integers, closed under some operations
- Next by thread: Re: -- sequences of integers, closed under some operations
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|