Re: Lagrange Polynomial, Taylor's series, e^ix



On Jan 8, 1:53 pm, Matt <matt271829-n...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Jan 8, 10:06 am, Nimo <azeez...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:





On Jan 8, 1:06 pm, galathaea <galath...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Jan 7, 9:53 am, Nimo <azeez...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

1Q)  If the equation is like this
       e^ix-100=0
       how to find x value ?
       Is it possible to do that ?

e^(ix) = 100

but also

e^(i(x + 2 pi n)) = 100
  by periodicity
(this is to reveal the multivalued inversion)

take lns

i(x + 2 pi n) = 100

x = -100i - 2 pi n
  for all integers n

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
galathaea: prankster, fablist, magician, liar

thanks for the help

what about 3Q) ?
is it confusing
-=-=-=-==--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
/*In a single line the problem would be like this*/
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Given Taylor's polynomials for a function f(x) in [a,n]
if taylor's polynomials at all points are given
T(a),T(b),T(c).......T(n)

how to construct the precise function.
what should I do ?

Ignoring for these purposes issues to do with convergence or non-
convergence, the Taylor series (I assume that's what you mean by
"Taylor's polynomial") at any point defines the *whole* function. So,
you only need one of them, say T(a). Given T(a), constructing f(x) may
be anything from trivial to extremely difficult, depending on whether
the series has a finite or infinite number of terms, whether you have
the coffecients of the series symbolically in terms of a or only
numerically, and whether the series is in a plain or obfuscated form.

Oops, sorry, scratch that reply... I guess you mean you have the terms
of the Taylor series up to a certain point, but no further.
.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Lagrange Polynomial, Taylors series, e^ix
    ...   for all integers n ... Given Taylor's polynomials for a function fin ... how to construct the precise function. ... Ignoring for these purposes issues to do with convergence or non- ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: field generated by the set of roots of unity
    ... there is a sense in which these generalised polynomials ... in that world beyond algebraic extensions of Q ...   which really isn't that long of a proof really ... rings - should be defined using some sort of Cauchy product ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Compression by descent
    ... polynomials using Newton's method and saves ... the convergence of the fractals taylor series chosen will decide the ... as i seem to think you are quantizing the complex plane ...
    (comp.compression)
  • Re: understanding formal objects in computer languages
    ...   was using that as an illustration ... in the ring. ... we should freely replace this value ax with two polynomials ... many writers will skip the formality of the "marking of elements" ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: solving the equation
    ...    to have to deal with? ... They are not necessarily linear functions. ... independent functions, which means that no linear combination ... An example set might be the polynomials: ...
    (sci.math)