Re: direct product and tensor product
- From: Mariano Suárez-Alvarez <mariano.suarezalvarez@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 09:30:48 -0800 (PST)
On Jan 23, 2:26 pm, w...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (J. B. Wood) wrote:
In article <glckt3$1nn...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, magi...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
(Arturo Magidin) wrote:
Now, if you will get your panties untied for a second, you'll note
that I said that it was possible to talk about the uniquely determined
element of the tensor product of the vector spaces that "corresponds"
to particular vectors in the two spaces and the like.
Hello, and except for your underwear reference I don't have any idea what
the above is supposed to mean. I consider myself an applied, rather than
abstract mathematician. I think I have a decent understanding of vectors
and elementary tensor analysis. I'll leave the manipulation of "vector
spaces" to others.
This is simply meaningless ;-) You cannot manipulate vectors
and not vector spaces, for belonging to a vector space is what
turns an object into a vector.
-- m
.
- References:
- Re: direct product and tensor product
- From: Aleks Kleyn
- Re: direct product and tensor product
- From: J.B. Wood
- Re: direct product and tensor product
- From: Arturo Magidin
- Re: direct product and tensor product
- From: J. B. Wood
- Re: direct product and tensor product
- From: Arturo Magidin
- Re: direct product and tensor product
- From: J. B. Wood
- Re: direct product and tensor product
- Prev by Date: Re: discrete mathematic - some difficult problem ;/
- Next by Date: Re: fractional iteration of f(x)=1/(1+x)
- Previous by thread: Re: direct product and tensor product
- Next by thread: Re: direct product and tensor product
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|