JSH: James Harris cannot even factor 1,111 proving he is total trivial troll
- From: "LooseFeather" <rolf183@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 23:09:21 -0600
(JSH REPOSTING SERVICE. SEND REQUESTS TO JSTEVH@xxxxxxxxx )
JSH: Four years plus of failure
It has been over four years since I found what I call my prime counting
function.
It is still an open question how closely the partial differential equation
that follows it maps to the prime distribution because the current math
world is broken, and rather than consider the answers to that question, most
mathematicians have ignored me, while you can see the posters here who just
work to dismiss the research.
The lack of answers is the fruit of their labors.
That's what such people are about, no answers, no solutions, ever.
Has it occurred to any of you that you could die, and a day later, some
person or persons could finally look into that partial differential equation
I found, and answer huge questions in mathematics, and the world go on and
on about this amazing thing that research thought quack from some crackpot
turned out to be important, but no one knew, because no one checked.
And mostly in looking over the history, they could see years of posturing
from people who never did anything of value.
ANYONE can criticize.
You have four years plus to see the value of posters just calling me names
and claiming my research is not new, as now you may know that yes, I did
find a partial differential equation that follows from a prime counting
function.
And it's an open question as to how closely integrating that partial
differential equation gets you to the prime distribution.
STILL an open question, over four years later.
Still there are posters who seem to think this is just about posturing on
some newsgroups as if no one cares if the question is EVER answered.
Ever.
What kind of human beings does this make you to be, when you are so
incurious, so incapable of wondering at the miniscule level necessary to get
some answers?
Instead you sit by and either promote or are in complicit in just blanket
do-nothingness.
A world of no answers, just talk.
Four plus years of total failure from your group and your community.
That's what the world has today.
Four plus years of total failure to find any kind of answer.
[A reply to someone who asked why is it that this is not a failure from
James.]
You fucking idiot I TESTED IT AND NUMERICALLY INTEGRATED IT AND FOUND IT
CLOSE!
You are the goddamn fools who refuse to check and then keep going on as if
you are intelligent when you will NOT EVEN FUCKING CHECK!!!
# posted by James Harris @ 21:13
http://www.blogger.com/post-edit.g?blogID=28273842&postID=6630068835755519569
http://www.blogger.com/post-edit.g?blogID=28273842&postID=6630068835755519569
.
- Prev by Date: Re: Question on algebraic numbers
- Next by Date: Re: call for help:what is the definition of n^z,where n,z are complex numbers?
- Previous by thread: Paul Smith apparels and bags
- Next by thread: CHINA PET BEDS FACTORY www.petbed-cattree.com DOG BED CHINA PET BED Boat Plane Car dog bed China pet bed supplier WWW.PETBED-CATTREE.COM China pet products factory China Pet Dog bed www.petbed-cattree.com Wrought iron dog car china pet bed pet supplies factory manufacturers pet product cat tree pet furniture pen supplier
- Index(es):