Re: 2 backview questions
- From: Ken Quirici <kquirici@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 09:05:50 -0800 (PST)
On Feb 12, 3:25 pm, Ken Pledger <ken.pled...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
In article
<32ada91d-247f-42cc-9f06-ba9eee409...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Ken Quirici <kquir...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
....
My purpose was to hold these concepts up to scrutiny so that
that person (not me) would see they were nonsense.
....
You can believe me or not but I was NOT proposing seriously
that backview or frontview were viable concepts....
In the past I've got into trouble in a news group by trying to be
too subtle. There is actually some value in emoticons, even though
they're so corny. A "winky" can make a big difference. ;-)
Ken Pledger.
Well I was certainly much too subtle ;-)
.
- References:
- 2 backview questions
- From: Ken Quirici
- Re: 2 backview questions
- From: Arturo Magidin
- Re: 2 backview questions
- From: Ken Quirici
- Re: 2 backview questions
- From: Arturo Magidin
- Re: 2 backview questions
- From: Ken Quirici
- Re: 2 backview questions
- From: Ken Pledger
- 2 backview questions
- Prev by Date: Re: 2 backview questions
- Next by Date: Solutions manual to Auditing and Assurance Services 12 th by: Alvin A Arens, Randal J Elder, Mark Beasley
- Previous by thread: Re: 2 backview questions
- Next by thread: Re: 2 backview questions
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|