Re: 2 backview questions
- From: Ken Quirici <kquirici@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 09:05:01 -0800 (PST)
On Feb 13, 9:49 am, Arturo Magidin <magi...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Feb 12, 1:25 pm, Ken Quirici <kquir...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
To put it another way, I asked these questions of the group at
large in the hopes that someone who wasn't 'trapped' in
the thread in question would bring some fresh light to
bear.
My apologies if I misjudged where you were coming from, but you made
all pretense of coming from there in your post. As such, I do find
myself feeling somewhat ill-used: in essence you misrepresented
yourself in order to elicit responses.
In the future, you could identify similar queries as questions raised
on another thread that you wish addressed by someone who is not
participating in that thread, without having to "tip your hand" if you
don't want to, but making it clear to potential repliers what is going
on, to decide whether they want to wade in or not.
--
Arturo Magidin
OK. I apologize if you feel ill-used. Amazingly enuf, I actually
assumed
everyone reading those first two statements would know immediately
where I was coming from. I think I was still in the mind-set of the
other thread. But looking over that first post I can see how I could
be misinterpreted.
Your suggestion was good. I should have been much clearer.
.
- References:
- 2 backview questions
- From: Ken Quirici
- Re: 2 backview questions
- From: Arturo Magidin
- Re: 2 backview questions
- From: Ken Quirici
- Re: 2 backview questions
- From: Arturo Magidin
- Re: 2 backview questions
- From: Ken Quirici
- Re: 2 backview questions
- From: Arturo Magidin
- 2 backview questions
- Prev by Date: Bundle T(U), for U open in R^n is trivial. Please Check.
- Next by Date: Re: 2 backview questions
- Previous by thread: Re: 2 backview questions
- Next by thread: Re: 2 backview questions
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|