Re: Suggesting a Poll
- From: bananacanaan@xxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 14:31:44 -0800 (PST)
On Feb 17, 2:18 am, Bill Dubuque <w...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I doubt Google Groups star ratings are useful since many experts read
sci.math not through Google Groups but rather with real newsreaders.
But someone with some spare time might investigate how Google Groups
star ratings compare to the CRAP scores tabulated below.
Last year [1] I gathered some crude statistics that may be useful
in this regard. I noticed that there is a fairly strong inverse
correlation between the mathematical quality of one's sci.math
posts and the percentage of one's posts that are "crank bashing".
Below are the statistics, gathered crudely by simply computing the
percentage of posts in the Google Groups sci.math archive that
involve telltale crank-bashing keywords (crank, loon, crackpot...).
This CRAP (CRAnk-bashing Percentage) score is tabulated below.
A '*' denotes a known/suspected professional mathematician/PhD.
Notice almost all the professionals/PhDs have less than 0.4% CRAP,
whereas the high-CRAP offenders exceed such by an order of magnitude.
If nothing else, this might prove useful for constructing killfiles,
"scoring" posts in various newsreaders (e.g. Gnus), etc.
[1]http://google.com/groups?selm=y8zwsjtbxmf.fsf%40nestle.csail.mit.edu
6.5% 72/1100 Tonico, tonio, Tonicopm (Jose Antonio Perez)
4.4 98/2204 tommy1729, amy666
4.1 202/4910 uncle al
3.8 54/1420 galathaea
3.7 67/1790 Larry Hammick
3.2 214/6670 *Chris Hillman
3.0 126/4240 MoeBlee
2.9 178/6220 *Proginoskes (Christopher Heckman)
2.9 110/3790 Denis Feldmann
2.7 35/1300 Angus Rodgers
2.7 278/10300 Lester Zick
2.1 42/1960 Will Twentyman
2.1 41/1890 Aatu Koskensilta
2.0 99/4910 Mensanator
1.8 85/4710 Ross A. Finlayson
1.5 104/6920 Archimedes Plutonium, Ludwig Plutonium
1.5 13/866 Tim Smith
1.5 15/986 *Chan-Ho Suh
1.4 48/3390 Phil Carmody
1.4 12/877 *Edgar E. Escultura
1.3 46/3630 The Ghost In The Machine
1.2 19/1530 Michael Press
1.2 65/5280 *Pertti Lounesto
0.8 14/2600 *Robert Silverman, Bob Silverman, Pubkeybreaker
0.8 250/29500 Virgil
0.8 59/7790 *** T. Winter
0.8 24/3050 *Daryl McCullough
0.8 74/9580 Bill Taylor
0.8 22/2870 *Torkel Franzen
0.7 6/822 *Alexander Abian
0.7 23/3070 Dann Corbit
0.6 18/2880 *Dave L. Renfro
0.6 37/5880 quasi
0.6 12/2093 John Ramsden, Owlhoot
0.6 43/7160 *Robin Chapman
0.6 171/29500 *David C. Ullrich
0.5 31/6690 *John Baez
0.5 29/5980 *Gerry Myerson
0.5 16/3030 *Doug Norris
0.4 1/283 *hagen <k...@xxxxxxxxxxx>
0.4 8/2010 *Keith Ramsay
0.4 11/2590 *Matthew P Wiener
0.3 51/16400 *Arturo Magidin
0.3 5/1570 *Derek Holt <ma...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
0.3 7/2280 *Ilias Kastanas
0.3 26/9710 *Peter Nyikos
0.3 3/944 *David Eppstein
0.3 3/1080 *Tal Kubo
0.2 4/1760 *David Bernier
0.2 4/1890 *Bill Dubuque
0.2 9/4160 The World Wide Wade
0.2 9/3690 *Dave Rusin
0.2 11/7050 Dave Seaman
0.2 7/3450 *Lee Rudolph
0.2 6/3310 *Ronald Bruck
0.2 4/2120 *Timothy Murphy
0.2 2/1160 *Ed Hook
0.2 4/1900 *Toby Bartels
0.2 2/1230 *Timothy Y. Chow
0.2 3/1490 *Paul Sperry
0.1 3/5920 *G. A. Edgar
0.1 1/1097 *Mariano Suarez-Alvar
0.1 1/952 *Michael Barr
0.1 5/4800 *Zdislav V. Kovarik
0.1 1/1160 *John Conway
0.1 12/1880 *James Dolan
0.1 1/1210 *Noam Elkies
0.0 0/1180 *Axel Vogt
0.0 0/4860 David Cantrell
0.0 0/1230 *Jannick Asmus
0.0 0/2150 *Peter L. Montgomery
0.0 1/2210 *[Mr.] Lynn Kurtz
0.0 5/13500 *Herman Rubin
0.0 0/1900 Rob Johnson
0.0 1/3070 *William C Waterhouse
0.0 0/2210 *Greg Kuperberg
0.0 0/1090 *Miguel A. Lerma
0.0 0/2190 *D. J. Bernstein
0.0 0/1220 *Edwin Clark
<blows raspberry>
:-)
--
Canaan Banana
.
- References:
- Suggesting a Poll
- From: Pubkeybreaker
- Re: Suggesting a Poll
- From: Ioannis
- Re: Suggesting a Poll
- From: Bill Dubuque
- Suggesting a Poll
- Prev by Date: Re: degree 61 polynomial
- Next by Date: Re: Question on Formatting
- Previous by thread: Re: Suggesting a Poll
- Next by thread: Re: Suggesting a Poll
- Index(es):