Re: Why is the tetration so much harder to extend than the factorial?
- From: "G. A. Edgar" <edgar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 01 Mar 2009 06:41:30 -0500
I think you are correct.
Question...
In article
<32a24a42-59da-484f-981e-bb9b00d2db90@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
mike3 <mike4ty4@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
How come [...] there is _no_ well-accepted
extension for the tetration?
Answer...
In article
<32a24a42-59da-484f-981e-bb9b00d2db90@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
mike3 <mike4ty4@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
there are no proofs yet
--
G. A. Edgar http://www.math.ohio-state.edu/~edgar/
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Prev by Date: Re: Why is the tetration so much harder to extend than the factorial?
- Next by Date: Re: Linearly independent vectors/mystery behind it
- Previous by thread: Re: Why is the tetration so much harder to extend than the factorial?
- Next by thread: Re: Why is the tetration so much harder to extend than the factorial?
- Index(es):
