Re: Godels theorem is meaningless
- From: MoeBlee <jazzmobe@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2009 11:26:41 -0800 (PST)
On Mar 5, 9:07 am, Don Stockbauer <donstockba...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Then Godel came along and arranged the tools to spell out
the sentence "This sentence is false".
No, he didn't.
Anyway, one of the most prized questions in technology and business is
(stated quite loosely) whether all algorithms can be reduced to
polynomial time. This question has scientific and financial importance
thus the large prize for solving it; and it is a question in the field
of recursion and computability whose context and methods arose from
Godel's proof.
MoeBlee
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Godels theorem is meaningless
- From: Don Stockbauer
- Re: Godels theorem is meaningless
- References:
- Godels theorem is meaningless
- From: byron
- Re: Godels theorem is meaningless
- From: Rupert
- Re: Godels theorem is meaningless
- From: byron
- Re: Godels theorem is meaningless
- From: Rupert
- Re: Godels theorem is meaningless
- From: byron
- Re: Godels theorem is meaningless
- From: Rupert
- Re: Godels theorem is meaningless
- From: byron
- Re: Godels theorem is meaningless
- From: Rupert
- Re: Godels theorem is meaningless
- From: byron
- Re: Godels theorem is meaningless
- From: Don Stockbauer
- Re: Godels theorem is meaningless
- From: byron
- Re: Godels theorem is meaningless
- From: Don Stockbauer
- Godels theorem is meaningless
- Prev by Date: Re: divisibility problem
- Next by Date: minimum of two numbers
- Previous by thread: Re: Godels theorem is meaningless
- Next by thread: Re: Godels theorem is meaningless
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|