Re: Test run results (was Re: JSH: Factoring solution test run, Fermat primes)
- From: JSH <jstevh@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 18:32:40 -0700 (PDT)
On Mar 16, 6:27 pm, Tim Peters <tim....@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
[JSH, thrashing like a fish in desert sand]
...
I think it quite possible you are lying, so I'll code it myself later
today, and end this nonsense.
So did you? It's the only way you can ever be convinced that you're wrong
-- and something any sane person would have tried at the start.
Just getting started.
So one of two things will happen, after you find your code doesn't work and
can't be repaired: (1) you'll pretend you never made this promise, and
continue ranting like a lunatic hoping no one will notice; or, (2) you'll
start deleting all your posts on this topic, and never mention it again.
I worked on the proof first. Next I focused on the algorithm.
Now I'm working on test code.
Methodical process.
Class act either way ;-)
And your mocking is adult behavior?
More and more I'm fascinated by how many of you are obsessed now with
trying to psych me out.
Story here is, about a month ago I finally focused on this dual
factorization with Pell's Equation. After all kinds of arguing over
equations, I've settled both theory and implementation, and am ready
to code.
You, on the other hand, are mocking me.
You call that a class act?
James Harris
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Prev by Date: Pythagorean Quadruples in a 3d grid
- Next by Date: Neat way to save "your" money ?
- Previous by thread: Pythagorean Quadruples in a 3d grid
- Next by thread: Re: Test run results (was Re: JSH: Factoring solution test run, Fermat primes)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|