Re: .9 repeating
- From: "Jesse F. Hughes" <jesse@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 09:50:08 -0400
"Jesse F. Hughes" <jesse@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
Let's let R' be the set
{f | f: (w + 1) -> {0,...,9}} u {1.000...0}
Oops. Ignore the {1.000...0}, since that came from an earlier draft
and merely complicated the presentation.
--
That is, let R' be the set consisting of "(w + 1) digit sequences"
(this is, according to some, an abuse of the word sequence, but let's
continue).
Jesse F. Hughes
"Of course, my ability to admit my mistakes and correct them is a
trait that many of you seem to never have properly appreciated."
-- JSH, discussing his 1463rd "proof" of Fermat's Last Theorem.
.
- References:
- Re: .9 repeating
- From: Jesse F. Hughes
- Re: .9 repeating
- Prev by Date: Re: .9 repeating
- Next by Date: Re: Kant and Hilbert
- Previous by thread: Re: .9 repeating
- Next by thread: Re: .9 repeating
- Index(es):