Re: Inconsistency of the usual axioms of set theory



On Mar 20, 5:12 am, "Jesse F. Hughes" <je...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
lwal...@xxxxxxxxx writes:
Then I pointed out that even with Aatu's proof, someone
would eventually question whether the existence of any
infinite set implies the existence of omega. And sure
enough, this is exactly what Little has done.
You seem to be confused.
Tommy insinuated that the *definition* of infinity (not the axiom, but
the definition) "leads" to N.  Evidently, he meant that one can prove
N exists just by defining infinity.  (If he meant something else, I
don't know what.)
Tim is asking something else entirely.  He is asking whether a
particular axiom of infinity (different than the most usual axiom)
implies the existence of N.

I thought that Little asked his question about an alternate
axiom in direct response to tommy1729's post because
tommy1729 was talking about that same axiom.

You do understand that Dedekind-infinite is not the same term as
infinite, right?

Of course! Indeed, I address this in my earlier post below:

[W]e don't even need it to be a Dedekind infinite set as
Ullrich has given, but even under the weaker assumption
that a Tarski infinite set exists -- then one can prove
that omega exists.

Aatu's proof only requires that the set be Tarski infinite,
not necessarily Dedekind infinite. In ZF+~AC there exist
T-infinite sets that are D-finite, but in ZFC every
T-infinite set is D-infinite.
.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: "Choosing" the choice relation
    ... deterministic infinite choice is not a problem. ... If determinism is what you crave, ... since you deny the existence of elements you can't specify, ... consider Godel's axiom of infinity (this is different from the ZFC axiom ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Cantor Confusion
    ... And the number of digits is omega. ... why I insist that an actually infinite set of natural numbers must ... If your axiom contradicts this, ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Z-Infinity
    ... of an infinite set omega, I have a new type of infinite set, which I ... the properties that alpha is supposed to have. ... the Axiom of Regularity literally states that every set must be ...
    (sci.logic)
  • Re: Z-Infinity
    ... of an infinite set omega, I have a new type of infinite set, which I ... the properties that alpha is supposed to have. ... the Axiom of Regularity literally states that every set must be ...
    (sci.logic)
  • Re: Skolem paradoxical state of affairs
    ... In ZFC, the notion 'natural number' is defined as 'element of omega', where omega is defined as the smallest set satisfying certain conditions. ... F would not have a bijection to a natural number. ... No matter what definition you choose, as long as it's first order expressible, the above idea gives an F that satisfies the condition, but is infinite in reality. ... axiom of infinity and replace it with the axiom asserting that every ...
    (sci.logic)