Re: JSH: Why they lurk
- From: JSH <jstevh@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 17:31:33 -0700 (PDT)
On Mar 31, 12:20 am, Peter <pwoly...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mar 31, 12:07 am, JSH <jst...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mar 30, 9:02 pm, Tim Little <t...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 2009-03-31, JSH <jst...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
So stay in school, for what?
For one thing, to learn about mathematical techniques known for more
than a thousand years so you don't stupidly go strutting around
claiming that they're brand new.
Also to learn what constitutes a mathematical proof.
- Tim
I defined mathematical proof. Google: define mathematical proof
Or Google: definition of mathematical proof
James Harris
You are so dense that you don't even realize the example you cite just
highlights OP previous comment. Mathematical proof was also defined
long long ago and was defined better than by your efforts. You'll
Cite.
Better yet, give your preferred definition of mathematical proof in
reply.
My definition is simply being voted on by whatever Google uses as an
algorithm.
It's a modern thing that I'm sure can leave completely nonplussed
people who don't like the new Internet era.
Of course I like it as no other human being on the planet can do the
same thing.
To you that means nothing, but maybe it means something to more
objective people.
Google: definition of mathematical proof
And you get MY definition.
No other human being on the planet can say the same, anywhere in the
world.
And there are a few people on this planet, you know?
never get this simple fact into your thick skull: that people have
already done the math you're doing, they did it better, and the only
way you even have a prayer of every doing anything original is to
first learn some math.
Why learn YOUR math, when I can do mine.
Google: mymath
See where I stand.
Votes for me are from the world.
People like you have, what? Half a dozen people on newsgroups who
pump you up as their buddy?
You argue with me because you can't comprehend 6.6 billion people plus
on this planet.
So to you, Google results must be meaningless because your brain wants
it so.
Which is primitive, but I understand it.
James Harris
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: JSH: Why they lurk
- From: Peter
- Re: JSH: Why they lurk
- From: Jesse F. Hughes
- Re: JSH: Why they lurk
- Prev by Date: Re: JSH: Could they be aliens?
- Next by Date: Re: Godel Incompleteness Theorem
- Previous by thread: Re: JSH: Why they lurk
- Next by thread: Re: JSH: Why they lurk
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|