Re: The Mathematics of Ignorance
- From: KMF <teech7@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 08 Apr 2009 14:31:16 EDT
"jewsforjesusalou" <abacad@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in
message
news:32946245.11535.1239138464800.JavaMail.jakarta@nit
rogen.mathforum.org...
Nice job of asking for a rational response, thenare
ignoring all arguments.
Nice job of using the straw man: which liberals
you quoting?. Have you actually talked withliberals
or are you just putting words on their mouths?.
You have not replied. You are dishonest, on
top of obviously not being very bright.
In addition, it is rich to call a whole group
of people (none of whom you have actually talked
with) stupid, while RE-electing a president that
personifies stupidity, and while misspelling even
the most common words in english.
You may also want to articulate sentences
in a coherent way before accusing others of
stupidity.
I'm not hear to respond to you. Your logic is totally
different from mine
and from reality.
No. You are here to falsely attribute views to others,
lie about them, insult them and then refuse to address their disagreements. And this seems a natural thing
to do that those weird liberals get upset about.
It's an intractable situation. I
would put my logic up
against your using a physical reality model anyday.
We could, for example,
be cast on a desert island. In such a case you would
spend your first week
bitching about how it's Bush's fault and whining
about all the rich people.
When you get hungry enough you'll then come over to
me and try to convince
me how I "owe" you my food(that I got from scavaging
and fishing). When I
won't give it to you then you will attack me. If you
are successful you will
simply kill me and if not then I will kill you. If
you kill me you will
eventually die because you do not have enough common
sense to survive on
your own.
I, of course, did try and reason with you when you
are demanding food and I
told you I would teach you how can get it on your own
but you didn't want
any part of that. You simply wanted to take what was
mine and for me to keep
supplying you. Of course when you got angry and
killed me you didn't
realize that now there was no one to feed you.
Fortunately for me I stopped trying to argue with the
likes of you a long
time ago. I realize that we live in two different
logical worlds. I also
know that such logical structures are not
compatable(godel)
Godel neither says nor implies that. And there
is no difference in logic, only in basic premises.
and it is
impossible to try to prove anything to you using my
logic(and vice versa).
The difference, I believe, is that my logic is based
on reality(physical
reality) while yours is based in fantasy/delusion.
And of course, you will not bother to argue this
point (because you really don't know how.)
Of course depending onYou obviously have problem with _any logic_.
what is important to you determines which system you
prefer to be in. What
I can do is promise that people like you would have
an extremely difficult
time surviving on their own or in a society based on
that logic.
Starting from the fact that you use terms very
loosely, and then repeatedly equivocate.
People like you have the benefit of riding the backs
of people like me.
Please don't comment on your sex life in here.
This is the reason why you have not developed common
sense and a good
understanding of logic developed by interaction with
the physical world.
Yes, no liberal can be a mathematician nor philosopher,
right?. Your statements are ambiguous at best, if not
nonsensical.
Simply because we no longer have to think that way.
It is unfortunately and
I realize it is not your fault.
Take a few philosophy classes and get back to
us with something that can actually be argued about.
.
- References:
- Re: The Mathematics of Ignorance
- From: Jon Slaughter
- Re: The Mathematics of Ignorance
- Prev by Date: Re: Locally Compact Hausdorff Space?
- Next by Date: Re: Locally Compact Hausdorff Space?
- Previous by thread: Re: The Mathematics of Ignorance
- Next by thread: Re: The Mathematics of Ignorance
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|