Re: Inverse Fourier Transform by Residue Theorem and Contour Integration




"neonstarfish" <oliver.bonner@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:12725494.60028.1241552002836.JavaMail.jakarta@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Q) Use the Residue theorem and contour integration to show that the
inverse Fourier transform of the function

F(w) = (1/Sqrt[2*pi]) * (1+jw) / (1+w^2)

is given by the function

f(x)= e^x for x<0; 1/2 for x=0; 0 for otherwise

-----------------------

My current strategy is to integrate about a closed contour around the pole
at w=-j, which would then equal 2*pi*j times the residue at that point
(e^x). This would then equal the integral along the real axis between -R
and R, plus the integral along the open path given by the semi circle
under the real axis which encircles the pole at -j. I would then
rearrange to solve for the desired integral.

My question is, am I going about this the right way? I've attempted to
follow the method described above, but it leads to what seems to be a dead
end (I get a horrific integral with exponentials of exponentials)...

Any help would be much appreciated!

As Wade pointed out, use the fact that exp(ixw) = exp(ixrcos(t) - xrsin(t))
and note that x*r*sin(t) is positive for 0<t<pi. so if x>0
exp(-xrsin(t)) ->0 for 0<t<pi. this is why you close in the upper half
plane. but that only works when x>0. for x<0 you observe the sign change
and so need to close in the lower half plane in order to make
exp(-x*r*sin(t))-->0 (because x<0, r>0, sin(t) needs therefore to be <0).

looks like you already have the residues worked out, so now you can see that
for x>0 f(x)=0, and x<0, f(x) = exp(x)

....so for x=0...

hint: 1/2(f(x+0) + f(x-0)) = 1/(2*pi) lim (L->oo) int(-L,L) exp(-i*x*u)du
int(-oo,oo) f(t)*exp(i*u*t) dt

....which, if you are doing fourier transforms, you already know.


.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Inverse of Non Minimum Phase System
    ... lie outside the unit circle (inversion will lead to unstable impulse ... The only poles that really give the Fourier transform ... but every pole with a real part is ...
    (comp.dsp)
  • DT and CH on the Sphere (redux)
    ... Recall that I want to compute Delaunay Triangulations of a "convex" patch of points on a portion of the sphere - specifically, excluding a region near one pole. ... All of this will work just fine, but I was reluctant to abandon ancient 2D DT code for points in the plane. ... This projection "emphasizes" the region near the INcluded pole while de-emphasizing the region near the forbidden pole. ...
    (comp.graphics.algorithms)
  • Re: The physics behind depth-of-field...?
    ... I also know that the width of the aperture has an inverse effect on the ... system- the entrance and exit pupils, and the image plane. ... planes are Fourier transform pairs of each other. ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: GPS Horisen magnetic not G horisen
    ... THIS pice of physics CHANGES evy plane in the sky just a tad and makes ... Planes dont use magnetc horisen,,it uses a gravity and float horisen. ... so hard to find and maintain without a magnetic pole to pole horisen. ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Control with Big Polynomials
    ... > when the characteristic equation is quadratic. ... > pole on the real axis, and that becomes a design constraint. ... Bode plot and design a compensator in the frequency domain. ...
    (sci.electronics.design)