Re: What do you think of this argument
- From: Denis Feldmann <denis.feldmann.sansspam@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 30 May 2009 14:57:39 +0200
Ludovicus a écrit :
Dennis Sciama as cited in Gardner's "New Mathematical Diversions"
arguments:
...consequently if the assertion is undemonstrable it must be true.
The same is valid for any assertion whose falsity can be verified by a
counterexample.
Marcus de Sautoy in his book :"The Music of the Primes" arguments:
If someone succeeded on demonstrating that the hypothesis is
undecidable from
the Mathematicsl axioms then the hypothesis results demonstrated as
true.
Ludovicus
I think it is a classical statement, but it is not an argument (the argument would start by defining clearly what means "true" in this context, then giving a demonstration). As you are a troll (or crank?), I understand that this distinction might let you confused...
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: What do you think of this argument
- From: Ludovicus
- Re: What do you think of this argument
- References:
- What do you think of this argument
- From: Ludovicus
- What do you think of this argument
- Prev by Date: Re: What do you think of this argument
- Next by Date: Re: coin tossing, again
- Previous by thread: Re: What do you think of this argument
- Next by thread: Re: What do you think of this argument
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading