Re: Understanding the quotient ring nomenclature
- From: Brian Chandler <imaginatorium@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 06:33:17 -0700 (PDT)
Tim BandTech.com wrote:
On Jun 16, 5:22 am, Brian Chandler <imaginator...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx><snip>
wrote:
, or are you telling your own story"Criticism" isn't the problem. But you still _haven't_ explained. Do
you understand why saying "the (set of) polynomials form a ring" is
true, and the bits about "polynomials are not rings" is not false, but
just meaningless.
You still don't appear to intend to tell us. Never mind...
The definition of ring provides superposition and product operators.
It does? Here's a definition of a ring, randomly plucked from
Wikipedia:
In mathematics, more specifically in modern algebra, a ring is a set
equipped with two binary operations – often referred to as addition
and multiplication.
Are you using "superposition" to refer to the addition operation? Or
something else? Are you attempting to talk about what mathematicians
mean by rings?
These are the same operators in use within the polynomial. Because
superposition requires that each of its elements be in the same domain
then any work in polynomials with real coefficients must obey the
superposition operator.
Seems not. Pity. You may be a misunderstood genius, for all I know,
but you will remain thus unless you are prepared to understand what
other people are saying, so you can talk to them in a way that leads
to understanding, not just more confusion.
Brian Chandler
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Understanding the quotient ring nomenclature
- From: Brian Chandler
- Re: Understanding the quotient ring nomenclature
- References:
- Understanding the quotient ring nomenclature
- From: Tim BandTech.com
- Re: Understanding the quotient ring nomenclature
- From: Tim BandTech.com
- Re: Understanding the quotient ring nomenclature
- From: Mariano Suárez-Alvarez
- Re: Understanding the quotient ring nomenclature
- From: Tim BandTech.com
- Re: Understanding the quotient ring nomenclature
- From: Arturo Magidin
- Re: Understanding the quotient ring nomenclature
- From: Tim BandTech.com
- Re: Understanding the quotient ring nomenclature
- From: Leland McInnes
- Re: Understanding the quotient ring nomenclature
- From: Tim BandTech.com
- Re: Understanding the quotient ring nomenclature
- From: Leland McInnes
- Re: Understanding the quotient ring nomenclature
- From: Tim BandTech.com
- Re: Understanding the quotient ring nomenclature
- From: Brian Chandler
- Re: Understanding the quotient ring nomenclature
- From: Tim BandTech.com
- Understanding the quotient ring nomenclature
- Prev by Date: Re: Understanding the quotient ring nomenclature
- Next by Date: Re: Understanding the quotient ring nomenclature
- Previous by thread: Re: Understanding the quotient ring nomenclature
- Next by thread: Re: Understanding the quotient ring nomenclature
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|