Re: Understanding the quotient ring nomenclature

Brian Chandler wrote:
Tim BandTech.com wrote:
On Jun 16, 5:22 am, Brian Chandler <imaginator...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
<snip>
"Criticism" isn't the problem. But you still _haven't_ explained. Do
you understand why saying "the (set of) polynomials form a ring" is
true, and the bits about "polynomials are not rings" is not false, but
just meaningless.
, or are you telling your own story
You still don't appear to intend to tell us. Never mind...

Sorry -- I really messed this up! Just skip the partial sentences, or
read them, as you wish. In any order, too.

I really meant to ask: do you read books at all? I mean, does your
"understanding" of rings come from how mathematicians have defined
rings, or is it entirely out of your own head?

Brian Chandler
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Dead phone
    ... my K800i has gone tits up. ... It rings and I get message alerts but I ... can't hear what anyone's saying when I answer calls. ...
    (uk.rec.motorcycles)
  • Re: air filter saturated with oil
    ... SteveB gurgled happily, sounding much like they ... were saying: ... replacing the rings will reduce the problem. ...
    (uk.rec.cars.maintenance)
  • Re: 11 ring qualify?
    ... I remember in Anthony Gatto's 'Gatto Entertainment 13' he managed 17 ... catches with 11 rings, before saying how brilliant Sergei Ignatov was for ...
    (rec.juggling)
  • Re: OT FREE Tofu Sticks
    ... I can already hear people saying, ... I like the Flash piece. ... It rings just true enough to be scary. ...
    (rec.outdoors.fishing.fly)
  • Re: Comedy on radio 4
    ... such a big fuss about the LibDems making cold calls, yet if you try and report some @rsehole who rings up 27 times a day saying you've won tickets for a cruise, they won't do a bl**dy thing about it. ...
    (uk.rec.sheds)
Quantcast