Re: Question about "polynomial evaluations"
- From: Brian Chandler <imaginatorium@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 21:51:02 -0700 (PDT)
Arturo Magidin wrote:
On Jun 17, 2:16 pm, Brian Chandler <imaginator...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
<snipped>
Yes; what I think you were aiming for is what I mentioned elsewhere:
polynomial functions as opposed to polynomials.
Ah, yes. Thanks -- your explanation made a lot of it clearer.
In fact, one can prove that if R is *any* finite field, then *every*
element of F(R) is a polynomial function; in particular, since F(R) is
finite, the map eval cannot be one-to-one.
Is this proof trivial? It looks as though you can just "construct" a
polynomial for any function, given an unlimited amount of "space" to
play with. Intuitively, it ought to be possible to make a polynomial
(function) that maps p to q, and everything except p to 0, then you
just add them together. [?]
x=0 x=1 "Evaluation"
0 0 0
1 1 1
0 1 S (for 'same')
1 0 D (for 'different')
OK, so I could rewrite these as the polynomial functions 0, 1, x, x+1,
but I'll leave the single character identifiers for ASCIIvenience, and
repeat the multiplication table for these polynomial functions:
* 0 1 S D
0 0 0 0 0
1 0 1 S D
S 0 S S 0
D 0 D 0 D
Is this right? I suppose this reminds me how feeble my grasp is on
what a ring homomorphism is. There's a "shape-preserving" map from
polynomials (which certainly don't have zero divisors) to polynomial
functions (which do?) Hmm, so it means that the "zero-
polynomials" (like x^2+x) are an ideal, which doesn't do much except
remind me how feeble my grasp is on what an ideal is.
Brian Chandler
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Question about "polynomial evaluations"
- From: William Hale
- Re: Question about "polynomial evaluations"
- From: Arturo Magidin
- Re: Question about "polynomial evaluations"
- References:
- Understanding the quotient ring nomenclature
- From: Tim BandTech.com
- Re: Understanding the quotient ring nomenclature
- From: Tim BandTech.com
- Re: Understanding the quotient ring nomenclature
- From: Brian Chandler
- Re: Understanding the quotient ring nomenclature
- From: Tim BandTech.com
- Re: Understanding the quotient ring nomenclature
- From: Brian Chandler
- Re: Understanding the quotient ring nomenclature
- From: Brian Chandler
- Re: Understanding the quotient ring nomenclature
- From: Tim BandTech.com
- Re: Understanding the quotient ring nomenclature
- From: Brian Chandler
- Re: Understanding the quotient ring nomenclature
- From: Tim BandTech.com
- Re: Understanding the quotient ring nomenclature
- From: Brian Chandler
- Question about "polynomial evaluations"
- From: Brian Chandler
- Re: Question about "polynomial evaluations"
- From: Arturo Magidin
- Understanding the quotient ring nomenclature
- Prev by Date: Re: Understanding the quotient ring nomenclature
- Next by Date: Tangent coefficient congruency
- Previous by thread: Re: Question about "polynomial evaluations"
- Next by thread: Re: Question about "polynomial evaluations"
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|