Re: JSH: Psychology of the denial of "core error"

On Jul 5, 12:13 am, Bacle <ba...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Jul 4, 7:56 pm, "Achava Nakhash, the Loving
Snake"
<ach...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
James,

I realize that this is an exercise in futility,
but
I am going to try
to demonstrate to you why the mathematical
community does not take
anything you say seriously.  Many of us do,
however, find you

I've read your reply and it fits more with the
psychological aspects
of this issue.

Readers who are puzzled by his reply need to
understand how
devastating the core error is.

  You mean that you decided to spend 15 years of
your
 life in something without getting any useful
return?.
  I would be devastated too.

Sounds like you think a "useful return" is acceptance
and accolades?

Maybe money? As well?

Other readers, see where I'm going here?

Not really. No one I know has sided with you. But
you will surely use your circular logic to make this
a sign you are right.

There are hundreds of journals to submit to, yet
you don't do it.

Other readers see where I am going?


These people are NOT mathematicians. They want money
and power.


If they did and thought you were right, they would
have stolen your work. Then there are two choices:

i)They don't think you are right, and did not take
and therefore submit your work.

ii)They are power-hungry, and submitted your work as theirs.
But no one has then accepted their (and therefore your)
work as valid once it was submitted.

To them, without those things there is no success!

Here go the exclamation points again:
Top of the Muffin to You!!

He may actually believe he has cogent rebuttals,
but
he also may be
faking in case later he believes he needs to say
his
mind snapped in
his own defense.

Ever heard of crying wolf. I saw some of your old
posts and you have been predicting this for very long.
It is tiresome. And a lot of posts really convince me
that you are not in good mental health: prophecies
of doom, for once, talk about cannibalism, belief
that you are of some superior species, etc.

Seriously, I am not mocking you, get some therapy.

  You, OTOH can just say that you're stupid in your
 own defense. Everyone will believe you.

For someone who makes a living doing mathematics if
later there is a
question about whether or not they were perpetuating
a fraud the
answer can mean their livelihood.

Cry wolf. Submit a paper or stop whining, please.

For you this may be just a game, but for some of
these people it could
mean losing their jobs, and having to start their
careers over
completely, possibly with a fraud conviction hanging
over them.

And it could mean you being a nothing, which you
seem unable to accept.

Certain entities like the US Government do take
academic fraud
seriously. The repercussions could be quite
significant.

Same goes for the threats you have issued to people.

An insanity defense in the face of prosecution might
seem like an
option to some.


Same for your insanity.
marvelously entertaining.  As I remarked
several
times already, you
write very well, and you spin an absorbing, if
silly, science fiction
conspiracy involving mathematicians and, in
particular, number
theorists.  Never before have we been
considered so
powerful.  We
certainly don't feel that way.

I will intersperse my specific comments withing
your text, where
appropriate, to try to show you how
mathematicians
view the
mathematics of what you do.  I and others have
done
this before to
little effect, but I happen to be in the mood.
 Beethoven's fifth is
playing in my speakers, so I guess I just feel
empowered or something.

On Jul 4, 6:41 pm, JSH <jst...@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

Turns out that if you follow rigorous
mathematics
it is trivial to
show a problem with the use of the ring of
algebraic integers with a
quadratic factorization that I've often given
before:

7(175x^2 - 15x + 2) = (5a_1(x) + 7)(5a_2(x)+
7)

where the a's are roots of

a^2 - (7x-1)a + (49x^2 - 14x) = 0.

This appears to be a monic polynomial of degree
2
with coefficients
in Z[x].  As such, its roots would be in some
sort
of integral
extension (this is a technical term you may
look
up) of Z[x] living
within a field that is an extension of degree 2
over Z(x).  It is not
an algebraic integer.  I am unfamiliar with the
factorization

That is false.  Given an algebraic integer x the
roots of

 a^2 - (7x-1)a + (49x^2 - 14x) = 0

are always algebraic integers.

  Convince me. It is not even clear if you intend

It's math. It's not about what you personally
believe!!!

Those who wonder how YEARS can go by with stupid
arguments about basic
math need only look at that request to understand the
Hell these
people have put me through, as they keep asking to be
convinced of
basic mathematics, over and over and over and over
and over and over
and over again.

It is a deliberate frustration strategy in my opinion
as they are con
artists. Remember this guys lust for money and power
revealed in his
notions of success above to which I replied.

To such a person, truth is just a word. Success is
getting something
from people and his demand is for me to convince HIM,
as if
mathematical correctness is just such trash.

For such a person, public opinion is all that matters
as THAT is how
you get money and power.

 7x-1 to be taken as a polynomial, or if it will
 assume numerical values. I think Achava was
assuming

That's not a mathematical statement. Seems to be
something you just
made up.

a^2 - (7x-1)a + (49x^2 - 14x) = 0

IS in the ring of algebraic integers if that is the
declared ring.

The error by the earlier poster in claiming it is not
is not fixed by
your support!!!

People like you seem insistent in a democratic
process against
mathematics.

No, you imbecile, 7x-1 is a _polynomial_ , an
algebraic integer is a complex solution to a poly
with _integer coefficients_. Do you get that?.
Do you not get that 7x-1 is not an integer unless
you specify an assignment to x?.

 the first case. Then he was right. So you should

He was wrong. And you are wrong in reply.

You never bothered with the specific points I have
made.

It doesn't matter how many people like you reply
claiming he was
right. He was wrong.

You never bothered offering a counter.

 specify which one you are working with.
    This shows you lack basic understanding. I am
  not by any means a number theorist and I can see
  how this could be confusing. This shows you are

a^2 - (7x-1)a + (49x^2 - 14x) = 0

If you say ring of algebraic integers there is NO
PROBLEM with that
expression.

And there is NO PROBLEM with the rest either:

Yes, imbecile: 7x-1 IS NOT AN INTEGER!!!!

There I put some extra exclamation points for you!!




7(175x^2 - 15x + 2) = (5a_1(x) + 7)(5a_2(x)+ 7)

where the a's are roots of

a^2 - (7x-1)a + (49x^2 - 14x) = 0.

  not too sharp nor knowledgeable.
<deleted>

That insistence on insults is so telling, and it is
amazing how
solidly people who rely on insults sit on the
sci.math newsgroup.

Right, because you did not repeatedly insult everyone,
right?. You are a self-deluded hypocritical buffoon
loser.


Year after year after year I've refuted people on
basic mathematical
points, and they will just repeat the error year
after year after year
and rely on the group opinion.

But you're doing fake math!!!

You can't handle answering basic questions in
a clear way either.

You're STILL wasting your lives and energy. So what?
You can squeak
out a few years with the world unaware?

You have wasted 15, at least, and want to bring
someone down with you.

YOUR LIFE WAS WASTED ON FAKE WORK regardless.

Your life was wasted on fake work.

15 years (translate: 15 years!!!!)
Your people lie about mathematics. When error is
revealed you simply
repeat the error and gang up against the mathematics
that shows your
error--and then you lie about what you are doing.

Boo hoo, cry me a river, loser.

I think some of you have some weird fantasy that you
can break the
entire human race, get over some hump, and have the
mathematical
errors so entrenched in human belief that NO one can
ever break it
out--and then you think you win?

But you will _never_ win with your self-righteous
hypocrisy and double-standards. Submit or shut the
*** up, you two-bit loser.
By betraying the human race.

Your win is the betrayal of the human race, the human
species.

And you think you don't sound psychotic with statements
like these?

You are anti-people.

You are non-people.

James Harris
.

Quantcast