Re: ( e^(io) + e^ (-io) ) /2 = cos o
- From: rob@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Rob Johnson)
- Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 16:15:59 +0000 (UTC)
In article <2c984d26-87bd-480f-bde9-d15f7e802d10@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Nando <nando.portugal@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 6 Ago, 02:41, "Rob Pratt" <Rob.Pr...@xxxxxxx> wrote:
"Nando" <nando.portu...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:0e89be75-5365-4810-9b6e-b93bb4ef294d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I'm supposed to do a demonstration.
It's stated that e^(io) = cos o + i sin o
And this is the exercise:
( e^(io) + e^ (-io) ) /2 = cos o
And this is what I came up with:
( e^(io) + e^ (-io) ) /2 =
= ( e ^ (io) ) /2 + 1/ ( 2 e ^ (io) ) =
= (cos o + i sin o) /2 + 1/ ( 2 ( cos o + i sin o) =
= ( (cos o + i sen o) ^2 +1) / ( 2 (cos o + i sen o) =
= ( (cos o ^2 + 2 cos o + i.sen 0 - i.sen 0 ^2) +1) / ( 2 ( cos o
+ 2i.sen 0 ) = ...
And now... I don't know where to get from here, and I get this feeling
this is getting much too complicate for the level of math I would
expect in this kind of exercise...
Any thought?
Thanks in advance!
Substitute the definition of e^() and then use two facts:
1. cosine is an even function
2. sine is an odd function
Thanks Marco, Oppt, mike3 and Rob Pratt!!
It took me some time to really understand your help... (although it
was really all very well explained).
Anyway, there was another similar exercise I still can't finish:
(e ^(io) - e ^(-io))/2 = sin o
are you sure this is what the book says? The definition of sin(o)
would be
e^(io) - e^(-io)
sin(o) = ----------------
2i
ok, so with your help:
e ^(-io) = e ^(i. -o) = sin (-o) + i.cos(-o)
If e^(io) = cos(o) + i sin(o), then e^(-io) = cos(-o) + i sin(-o)
= cos(o) - i sin(o). Luckily, you seem to have used the correct
definition below.
and, the complete equation:
( (cos o + i.sin o) - ( cos(-o) + i.sin(-o) ) ) /2 =
=( (cos o + i.sin o) - (cos o - i.sin o) )/2=
=( cos o + i.sin o - cos o + i.sin o )/2 =
=( 2i.sin o ) / 2 =
= i.sin o
Which is not, as the book states, "sin o" .
So, where did I go wrong this time?...
You have gotten the correct answer for (e ^(io) - e ^(-io))/2, but as
I mentioned above, this is not the definition of sin(o); the correct
definition divides by 2i not 2.
Rob Johnson <rob@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
take out the trash before replying
to view any ASCII art, display article in a monospaced font
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: ( e^(io) + e^ (-io) ) /2 = cos o
- From: alainverghote@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: ( e^(io) + e^ (-io) ) /2 = cos o
- References:
- ( e^(io) + e^ (-io) ) /2 = cos o
- From: Nando
- Re: ( e^(io) + e^ (-io) ) /2 = cos o
- From: Rob Pratt
- Re: ( e^(io) + e^ (-io) ) /2 = cos o
- From: Nando
- ( e^(io) + e^ (-io) ) /2 = cos o
- Prev by Date: paypal payment the hottest Chanel Belt ED Hardy belt Gucci Belt Versace Belt on www.salewto.com
- Next by Date: ┡┢┣Free shipping!!! Cheap wholesale Air Force One shoes, Nike Jardon shoes ect with high quality in website ==www.fjrjtrade.com== (paypal payment)
- Previous by thread: Re: ( e^(io) + e^ (-io) ) /2 = cos o
- Next by thread: Re: ( e^(io) + e^ (-io) ) /2 = cos o
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|