Re: A new math usenet group
- From: David R Tribble <david@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 10:11:19 -0700 (PDT)
Herman Jurjus wrote:
My fear is that we'll end up with a junk group and a pedant group (and
basically no other math groups).
Bart Goddard wrote:
Right now, all we have is a junk group. So even if we add a pedant group,
it's an improvement. But I think you have no worry here. The only
way sci.math.moderated will turn sci.math into pure junk, is if it's
successful. And it won't be successful if it's a pedant group.
Sci.math is not a completely junk group. The fact that you and
other math-worthy posters are here is proof of that.
That being said, it is undeniable that sci.math has an unacceptably
large percentage of nonsense, troll postings, and spam.
Most of my enjoyment of sci.math is learning about math
(as I am only an amateur mathematician) by reading the interplay
between those in the know and those not. This includes the
more interesting banter posts provided by the totally clueless
cranks - but only the interesting and polite ones, a minority.
Of late I find absolutely no interest in the likes of James Harris,
Archimedes Plutonium, et al, and most especially Musatov (who
almost single-handedly has prompted this serious attempt at forming
a moderated math newsgroup). It's bad enough that it's just clutter,
but it's real sin is that it's just dull and boring.
So what I'm saying is that while I would certainly not miss
most of the garbage and nonsense currently littering sci.math,
I would in fact miss some of the, um, cream of the nonsense,
for the entertainment value as well as the educational value
(from the reasoned retorts). I worry that a pedant-only newsgroup
would be simply boring by comparison.
-drt
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: A new math usenet group
- From: Bart Goddard
- Re: A new math usenet group
- References:
- Re: A new math usenet group
- From: Jack
- Re: A new math usenet group
- From: adamk
- Re: A new math usenet group
- From: Herman Jurjus
- Re: A new math usenet group
- From: Bart Goddard
- Re: A new math usenet group
- From: Herman Jurjus
- Re: A new math usenet group
- From: Bart Goddard
- Re: A new math usenet group
- Prev by Date: Suggest the notation
- Next by Date: Re: matrices with "repeated eigenvectors"
- Previous by thread: Re: A new math usenet group
- Next by thread: Re: A new math usenet group
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|