Re: A new math usenet group
- From: Phil Carmody <thefatphil_demunged@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 09:35:30 +0300
pubkeybreaker <pubkeybreaker@xxxxxxx> writes:
On Aug 19, 4:26 am, Phil Carmody <thefatphil_demun...@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Bart Goddard <goddar...@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
Herman Jurjus <hjur...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in news:4a8935c9$0$1654$703f8584
@textnews.kpn.nl:
Right. I think it's a fundamental point that we'd reject posts,
not people. Any butthead who follows the guidelines gets
approved.
Imho, not even weird ideas should be rejected.
So far, there's only two and a half things the concensus agrees
to reject: 1. Spam. 2. Venom. 2.5. Overly-repetitive.
Any filter which doesn't remove idiocy simply isn't worth implementing.
I disagree. Those who are interested and willing to learn CAN learn
from seeing a bit of nonsense get debunked.
We should only ban repetitive nonsense.
You appear to have interpreted my statement as saying that anything
which is wrong should not be propagated. I have not said that at all.
Idiocy goes deeper than just being wrong - repetitivity and the
inability to learn are sure signs too.
But I certainly think that nonsense that's "not even wrong" has no
place on a moderated group.
Phil
--
If GML was an infant, SGML is the bright youngster far exceeds
expectations and made its parents too proud, but XML is the
drug-addicted gang member who had committed his first murder
before he had sex, which was rape. -- Erik Naggum (1965-2009)
.
- References:
- A new math usenet group
- From: William Elliot
- Re: A new math usenet group
- From: Cliff B
- Re: A new math usenet group
- From: William Elliot
- Re: A new math usenet group
- From: Cliff B
- Re: A new math usenet group
- From: William Elliot
- Re: A new math usenet group
- From: Penny Hassett
- Re: A new math usenet group
- From: Bart Goddard
- Re: A new math usenet group
- From: Herman Jurjus
- Re: A new math usenet group
- From: Bart Goddard
- Re: A new math usenet group
- From: Phil Carmody
- Re: A new math usenet group
- From: pubkeybreaker
- A new math usenet group
- Prev by Date: Re: What does count this Abel function?
- Next by Date: Re: Lucas Numbers
- Previous by thread: Re: A new math usenet group
- Next by thread: Re: A new math usenet group
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|