Re: What puzzles me, discovery ignored
- From: absence <marty.musatov@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 23:58:29 -0700 (PDT)
On Sep 8, 5:49 pm, Enrico <ungerne...@xxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sep 7, 10:12 pm, Enrico <ungerne...@xxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sep 7, 11:58 am, Mark Murray <w.h.o...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Enrico wrote:
I've got a couple of Excel speadsheets that will let you plug in
numbers and see what happens. You will need to have the Greatest
Common Divisor function GCD(X, Y) working - can't remember if GCD
came with the original Excel package or with one of those mysterious
"Add-Ins"
Yikes! :-) I don't do Excel.
It would be safer to receive a text - only explanation. I can pull
comments off the spreadsheets and organize them a bit to the point
where you should be able to try your own calculations. This will
take a few days - I'll have to remove variable name conflicts between
my stuff and JSH's
I can email the text-only stuff or post it here.
Let me know which one you want.
Text is vastly preferable. Please do both, if that is OK?
If your reply-to: is set, may I email you my real email address?
My intention is to code the work as (probably) C++, and then give
it a hammering (pun intended). C++ means I can then trivially modify
the code if I need to start using bignums by using operator
overloading.
There is another constraint that can be used toAh, useful!
limit the choices for x and y.
The constraint is: (2*x + 1) divides (2*y +1)^2 -1
Does James mention that anywhere?
Also - I'm more interested in the Diophantine solutions than in
factoring. Does James actually have a general solution, or is
your decryption of his work focussing on factorisation?
M
--
Mark Murray
===================================================================
If your reply-to: is set, may I email you my real email address?
I got one from James, so it should be working.
The constraint is: (2*x + 1) divides (2*y +1)^2 -1
Does James mention that anywhere?
No. James' factorization method relates to forms like:
P^2 - D*Q^2 = R^2
where D is an odd number to be factored.
My method involved the dot (scalar) product of a pair of vectors,
each of which contain 3 terms, any one of which can be calculated
from the other two. I found a way to convert them to the Pell - like
form above, but its not too obvious.
Also - I'm more interested in the Diophantine solutions than in
factoring. Does James actually have a general solution, or is
your decryption of his work focussing on factorisation?
I've been assuming that it's general because I can start with a
factorization, generate two equations of the form:
a x2 + b xy + c y2 + dx + ey + f = 0
and see that James' method correctly solves each for (x+y)
There are probably equations that I cannot generate from a
factorization, but have solutions. I haven't looked into this.
James mentions a solution existence check, so I have some reason
to think his solution is general. (I have not proved this!)
I'll write up a procedure to let you generate the pairs of
diophantine equations and see James' solution method work.
I expect to have it ready to post sometime tomorrow.
Enrico- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
============================================================
Mark - Check this with numeric values before you start writing
long C programs. Its mostly cut and paste from a functioning
spead***, but there's always the chance of mistyping during
editing or commenting.
Example: Factorization, 2 variable diophantine equations, Pell
equations
A=7
B=18
C=23
X=15
Y=19
Z=12
R=2*A*C - B^2 = -2
S = A*X + B*Y + C*Z = 723
D = S^2 + R = 723^2 - 2 = 522727 = 463 * 1129
Two Pell - like equations can be written:
r(v)^2 -D*s(v)^2 = t(v)^2
(S*X + C)^2 - D*X^2 = (Y*C + X*B)^2
10868^2 - 522727 * 15^2 = 707^2
GCD(ABS(r(v)+t(v)),ABS(D)) = 463
GCD(ABS(r(v)-t(v)),ABS(D)) = 1129
Take the GDC of these two and divide out
any common factor to get the factors of D
463 * 1129 = 522727 = D
r(v)^2 -D*s(v)^2 = t(v)^2
(S*Z + A)^2 - D*Z^2 = (Y*A + Z*B)^2
8683^2 - 522727 * 12^2 = 349^2
GCD(ABS(r(v)-t(v)),ABS(D)) = 463
GCD(ABS(r(v)+t(v)),ABS(D)) = 1129
Take the GDC of these two and divide out
any common factor to get the factors of D
463 * 1129 = 522727 = D
James goes on about rational solutions to the Pell Equation.
Rational solutions for the Pell Equation with D can be
gotten by dividing out t(v)^2 from r(v)^2 - D*s(v)^2 = t(v)^2
James uses Pell - like equations written as:
r(v)^2 - D*s(v)^2 = t(v)^2
I have attempted to duplicate this below:
The following two transform pairs on (A, B, C) and (X, Y, Z)
use quadratic functions of v and
preserve the values of D, S, 2*X*Z - Y^2, and 2*A*C - B^2
while changing the values in the Pell Equation
Using the example above,
U(0) = (X, Y, Z) = (15,19,12)
T(0) = (A, B, C) = (7,18,23)
let v = -1 (Domain is integers)
First pair:
Z <= Z
Y <= -2*Z*v + Y
X <= 2*Z*v^2 - 2*Y*v + X
C <= 2*A*v^2 + 2*B*v + C
B <= 2*A*v + B
A <= A
U(-1) = (77,43,12)
T(-1) = (7, 4 1)
Second pair:
Z <= 2*X*v^2 - 2*Y*v + Z
Y <= -2*X*v + Y
X <= X
C <= C
B <= 2*C*v + B
A <= 2*C*v^2 + 2*B*v + A
U(-1) = (15, 49, 80)
T(-1) = (17, -28, 23)
Notice that the dot product of U(v) and T(v) remains unchanged
You can take your starting values of U and T and apply one of the
transforms with any integer value of v, then apply the other transform
to the result with a new value of v, then go back to the first
transform
with yet another value of v, etc - alternating transforms and using
any
value of v each time and stopping at the end of any transform.
The factorizations will remain unchanged,
but the Pell - like equations will change.
Part 2 - Using (X, Y, Z) and (A, B, C) to generate equations
of the form c1*x^2 + c2*x*y+ c3*y^2 + c4 + c5*x + c6*y = 0
and showing James' method giving correct solutions as (x + y)
Note: X ,Y, Z, A, B, C are different variables than x, y, z, a, b, c
Problem - Factor D^2 + R = 723 ^ 2 - 2
Surrogate is (A + B) ^ 2 - (B ^ 2 - 2 * A * C) = 25 ^ 2 - 2
(Surrogate is small, has the same form as D^2 + R, namely R =
-2)
You can use the transform pairs to pump it up if you want.
The factors of the surrogate are A and 2*(B + C) + A
A=7
B=18
C=23
X, Y, Z values are unknown and are to be found such that
S = A*X + B*Y + C*Z = 723
X is odd
Y is odd
Z is a multiple of 4
Y ^ 2 - 2 * X * Z = 1
Define new variables x, y, z
x = (X - 1) / 2
y = (Y - 1) /2
z = Z / 4
Use A, B, C, and S to set up a diophantine equation to find x and y
4*A*x^2+4*B*x*y+2*C*y^2+2*(2*A+B-S)*x+2*(B+C)*y+A+B-S = 0
28*x^2 + 72*x*y +46*y^2 - 1382*x + 82*y - 698 = 0
Dividing out the 2's gives
14*x^2 + 36*x*y + 23*y^2 -691*x + 41*y - 349 = 0
c1 = 14
c2 = 36
c3 = 23
c4 = -349
c5 = -691
c6 = 41
James' solution method uses the variable names A, B, C, and S,
so I will assign new values for them:
A = (c2 - 2c1)^2 + 4c1(c2 - c1 - c3)
B = 2(c2 - 2c1)(c6 - c5) + 4c5(c2 - c1 - c3)
C = (c6 - c5)^2 + 4c4(c2 - c1 - c3).
A(x+y)^2 + B(x+y) -S^2 + C = 0
rearrage terms:
A(x+y)^2 + B(x+y) + C = S^2
A = 8
B = 14476
C = 537220
x+y = 16 gives S = 878
by trial and error, find that x = 7 and y = 9 give
X = 2 * x + 1 = 15
Y = 2 * y + 1 = 19
Z = (Y^2 -1) / 2*X = 12
Using the original values for A, B, C = 7, 18, 23 redefine
S:
S = A*X + B*Y + C*Z = 723
and the factorization is done as in the example at the beginning
using
(S*X + C)^2 - D*X^2 = (Y*C + X*B)^2
or
(S*Z + A)^2 - D*Z^2 = (Y*A + Z*B)^2
A second diophantine equation can be set up to find y and z
using the original values:
A=7
B=18
C=23
S = 723
32*C*z^2+16*B*z*y+4*A*y^2+8*(B-S)*z+4*A*y+0 = 0
Divide out the common factor 4:
8*C*z^2+4*B*z*y+A*y^2+2*(B-S)*z+A*y = 0
184*z^2 + 72*z*y + 7*y^2 - 1410*z +7*y = 0
c1 = 184
c2 = 72
c3 = 7
c4 = 0
c5 = -1410
c6 = 7
James' solution method uses the variable names A, B, C, and S,
so I will assign new values for them:
A = (c2 - 2c1)^2 + 4c1(c2 - c1 - c3)
B = 2(c2 - 2c1)(c6 - c5) + 4c5(c2 - c1 - c3)
C = (c6 - c5)^2 + 4c4(c2 - c1 - c3).
A(z+y)^2 + B(z+y) -S^2 + C = 0
rearrage terms:
A(z+y)^2 + B(z+y) + C = S^2
A = 32
B = -167704
C = 2007889
z + y = 12 gives S = 7
by trial and error, find that z = 3 and y = 9 give
Z = 4 * z = 12
Y = 2 * y + 1 = 19
X = (Y^2 - 1) / (2*Z) = 15
Which are the same values of X, Y, and Z found the first time.
One important thing I have not checked is the question of
have many solutions exist for each these diophantine equations.
Enrico
Results 1 - 10 for X = (Y^2 - 1) / (2*Z) = 15. (0.29 seconds)
1.
google search brings up strange characters - Google Chrome Help
26 posts - 11 authors
1. Can you guys type the following into the address bar and send
the results to ..... 000002b0: 50 9e c6 70 61 b0 6f 27 78 e4 32 29 5c
26 8b 82 P..pa.o'x.2)\&. ... 000003b0: 5a b8 de 4a 01 15 02 be 79 1c
57 34 b7 4d 3e 19 Z..J....y.W4. ...
www.google.com/support/forum/p/Chrome/thread?tid...hl=en
2.
Do the planes 3x+6y-z=15 and x+2y-3z=5 intersect? - Yahoo!7
Answers
3x + 6y - 9z = 15. Now subtract that from the first. 8z = 0 z =
0 ... [3,6,-1] X [1,2,-3] = [-16,8,0] ... [x,y,z] = [5,0,0] + u
[-2,1,0]. 2 hours ago ...
au.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090830021105AA2fsom
3.
Google Directory - Games > Video Games
Society > Issues > Violence and Abuse > Media > Video Games
(2) ... TCP and UDP port settings for popular online games for
Windows, PlayStation 2, and Xbox. ...
www.google.com/Top/Games/Video_Games/
4.
X-y-z=1 2x-3y+z=10 x+y-2z=0? - Yahoo! UK & Ireland Answers
|0 0 5| = |15| giving z = 3, y = 1 and x = 5 by back-
substitution. Check using Cramer's rule: D0 = 6 -1 + (-4 - 1) - (2 +
3) = -5 ...
uk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090625194534AAZWUtZ
5.
TEXT ONLY ZOOM - Google Chrome Help
42 posts - 22 authors
Zorro z, Chrome has page zoom functions. You can use Ctrl++ to
increase zoom and ... about full-zoom vs. text-only zoom in FF3 which
also applies to Chrome 2.x. .... 1 of 2 people found this answer
helpful. Did you? Sign in to vote. ... When I'd had it with Firefox I
tried Opera and I gave up on that in 15 minutes ...
www.google.com/support/forum/p/Chrome/thread?tid...hl=en
6.
[PDF]
n n n n 3 x + 5 y + 2 z = 10 9 x + 3 y + 2 z = 14 x -1 1 = y 1
3 ...
File Format: PDF/Adobe Acrobat - View as HTML
3x 2y 7z = 15 . Solution: A vector parallel to the line is v =
3i 2j 7k . So the equation of the line is: x +1. 3. = y 4. 2. = z
3 ...
www.math.sc.edu/~sumner/math250fall2007/.../ProblemSet4Solutions.pdf
7.
MathLinks :: View topic - x^2+y^2+z^2=1
14 posts - 7 authors
Joined: 15 Jun 2008. Posts: 881. Location: Nghe An
province,Vietnam ... Let x;y;z\ge 0 such that x^2+y^2+z^2=1 . Find the
maximum and minimum of ... Let S = \frac {x}{1 + yz} + \frac { S \leq
x + y + z. By Am-GM x^2 + y^2 + z^2 \geq ...
www.mathlinks.ro/viewtopic.php?p=1615973
8.
[PDF]
f (0,0) z = f ( x , y ) g (1, 1, 3) = (2, 5) f ( x , y ) = (2
xy ...
File Format: PDF/Adobe Acrobat - View as HTML
A particle flies off the surface x. 2. + 3x + y. 2 z = 7 at the
point. 1, 1, 3 ... 2.6 # 1, 3(a)(b), 5(a), 7(a), 8, 9, 13(b), 15, 20,
24, 25 ...
www.math.sc.edu/~sumner/math250fall2007/.../Exam2ReviewProblems.pdf
9.
Prove x+y+z <= x^2+y^2+z^2 where? - Yahoo! Answers India
Member since: 15 January 2007; Total points: 114 (Level 1) ... u
is the sum of two numbers x and y such that xy=1/z , that is u^2-4/z
=0. ...in.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20070114224250AAnAqAl
10.
[PDF]
L : x +1 2 = y 2 1 = z +1 3 L : x + 3 6 = y 4 ? = z 7 ? L : x +
3 ...
File Format: PDF/Adobe Acrobat - View as HTML
2. : x + 3. 6. = y 4. 3. = z 7. 9 . 2. Write the equation for
the line. L. 1 .... August 29, 2007. In your text: 1.1 #21, 22. 1.3
#1, 3, 15(d), 19, 25.
www.math.sc.edu/~sumner/math250fall2007/.../ProblemSet3Solutions.pdf
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Martin Musatov
©2009 http://MeAmI.org
.
- References:
- Re: What puzzles me, discovery ignored
- From: Ben Bacarisse
- Re: What puzzles me, discovery ignored
- From: Enrico
- Re: What puzzles me, discovery ignored
- From: Mark Murray
- Re: What puzzles me, discovery ignored
- From: Enrico
- Re: What puzzles me, discovery ignored
- From: Mark Murray
- Re: What puzzles me, discovery ignored
- From: Enrico
- Re: What puzzles me, discovery ignored
- From: Enrico
- Re: What puzzles me, discovery ignored
- Prev by Date: Re: Uniformly continuous question
- Next by Date: Re: define Finite as 10^500 and one little adjustment for Geometry; #86
- Previous by thread: Re: What puzzles me, discovery ignored
- Next by thread: Re: What puzzles me, discovery ignored
- Index(es):
Loading