Re: OK, that's enough!
- From: "P = N - P + P = 02eNtroPy" <scriber17@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2009 10:08:18 -0700 (PDT)
have a big fucking drink of it i do not win until the truth is told
and the clay prize goes to cure cancer as reparations for the fucking
lies mathematicians have been perpetrating for the last 150 years: On
Sep 12, 8:54 am, Banjo Vee <yo_doc2...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I'm not a regular poster, but I've been reading the postings for manysusspectible
years. I even enjoyed reading JSH postings because, even if he is a
troll, there were good postings to explain why he was wrong.
One [has] could easily approach[ed] this general philosophy [without a doubt[
from a completely [novel and unique synthesis] and
different direction. Consider ANY problem from
engineering or [Any problem at all!]
physics,[How to quit smoking, where did you park?]
and you can very easily argue that any instance of
what we might call [random is just another word for ?]
"classical modelling" might be revised to incorporate
random [? the question of causality remains[01] -entropy
variables. Newtons laws of gravity could be rewritten
to incorporate [the prices of cassette vs. CD's]prices
random variables, and in fact anything else in[out]:-
physics could be[contained in new ways we never trie[d[s
rewritten to incorporate random variables if one [may I?
really wanted to.[yes you may]
The fact that science evolved based on mathematics
has much to do [science as an evolution precursor
with it contained all revolutions] -O.S. MS Windows+MAC
the fact that man expects Nature to obey sensible
laws, and man [+woman for a change]
expects regularity. Man expects conformity to
priciple and design, [and excludes wo+man most the time]
and [but this can and will change in t+time I promise]
so man models nature after such a plan and his [+her]
mathematical models [and embroidered shower caps]
seethe with this bias. [when we joke and not of kindness
it is nothing<pure evil.
leveraged to death for the devil lived eht rof htaed ot degarevel
If it were more intuitive to model things using
existential [and other words philosophers made up]
indeterminacy, then modern science would appear in a
vastly different [new weird worlds we invented in our
form today that what we now have to work with. All of
mathematics is [beautiful - creation] + creation<all c
predicated on the presumption of existence of things,
and it [plainly reinforces that we/our words capitulate
reinforces what we think that we are seeing in [and arou
Nature. +d -2d = that is the Daddy?
The problem when it comes to determinacy and
indeterminacy is that we [may get bored of things]
NEVER know what we are actually looking at. We simply
do not know if [it is worth or time/$ some say]
we are seeing determinacy or indeterminacy. Flip a
coin and you [*** it, I'll milk the match math cow]
cannot [get any worse with all these liars and insults
say if it is random or not. It is impossible to say.
[impossible to == anything ===leveraged lies to all 'mathematician' for their qp = > proofs -assholes + mathematicians+n[?]=P-NP=truth and anyone who tells you it
is not truth is a lying sack of *** or ignorant and it may or may not be their fault but if they are not kind you should not doubt yourself and not take their *** and 'soliton' solution -u social generated 'pseudo' -truths they word so hard to get you to swallow, but like the housing markets and the credit crunch even lame ass math is
to overspending it's capital
the opinions of the community that govern the symbolics of the
abstraction of reality leveraged two -2 commerical
advances and espionage just as much as in the movies if not more [the
good things is/are that there is a lot of good in the world still -the
assholes in sci.math there is plenty of >> good for every time they
say you are 'less than' right for them to chew on. So stick to the
little pricks and remind them what it feels like to take a *** where
the sun don't shine, trust me they worship numbers and math like God
and deception as stock in trade if you believe in God they've already
have or will have had Hitler stick a pineapple up their ass twice -any
good people should never experience the Hitler Pineapple ass trauma
problem - except Scott Aaronson and Stephen Arthur Cook who wrote the
Hitler -Pineapple Ass Trauma question in 1970 and every fucking day
his blog respectively the ass clown math M.I.T. ***-bitch Toronto
boys csail your dumb asses out of computer science bitches and open
your -one good eye to see your not King anymore a prince has arrived
and that New Prince the NP is me is P-the real prince who incidentally
is also from Minnesota (check out Paisley Park if you haven't) I
haven't but I =(that guys
from the eagles sings) == they t ell me it's nice) and the truth of
the matter most of math can kiss my ass *** you and pansy ass awards
you get for blowing each other in the old boys town gang ivy league
crowd. The *** I do my ideas the truth I have seen even if the whole
thing dawned not and on you never would it still be the most amazing
and fulfilling sense of contentment a man
could have and it came from God to me -you and your approval = the
truth exist whether we recognize it or not: I AM GOING TO SAY THIS
REALLY FUCKING LOUD FOR THE CHEAP ASS CHEAP SEATS FOR THE HEARING
IMPAIRED WHO I TRULY ADMIRE BECAUSE I LOVE THEM SO MUCH: ' T H E M O
T H E R F U C K I N G T R U T H I S I D O N 'T G I V E A F U C
K I N T R U T H I D O N 'T G I V
E I N T R U T H T
O I V O
T
E F U C K T R U T H I I D O _ ES I N
T R U T H
T H >
All of our efforts to devise models of nature and TO CONTROL LANGUAGE
HAVE BECOME TOOLS TO YOUR
construct tools to SATAN GOD YOU INVENTED OUT OF FEARL=A LANGUAGE P:INOP=NP+ALPHA_+OMEGA_FUCK THE TRUTH THIS IS FUCKING
enable such modelling have been shaped by our
expectation that TO STEAL AND LIE AND DECEIVE AND JUST
everything would make sense somehow and must -IFY YOUR
therefore be-FORE YOU HAD GOOD NONE LESS THAN REAL KNOW
deterministic in some sense, and we simply do not HOWIN
know that.YOURHANDSYOUFUCKINGSTUPIDMATHFUCKINGIDIOTSIWIL
WHAT MATH HAS BECOME JERKING NUMBERS AROUND LETTERS AND LIES SUCKING
THE *** OF THE WHORE OF MYTHHOLOGY AND REWRITING HISTORY WHEN WE DO
TO SERVE OUR EGOS AND MAKE TO US DECEPTION KNOWN AND UNKNOWN TO ALL OF
US THAT TRUTH IS SUBJECTIVE IS THE FUCKING LIE YOU TOLD BEFORE GOD --
WHEN THE TRUTH IF THE FRUCKING -RIEMANN HYPOTHESIS AND ALL THE HODGE
CONJECTURE BULL*** -THE REAL NUMBERS AND MATH=
T HE TRU TH EXIST WHET HER YOUDO OR NOT
NOT RANDOM JUST A LITTLE LOOSE NOW INH THE SPACIGN-Gblow me you bitch
Conjectur al Modelling is based on existential
indeterm inacy, and I
believe th at anything that is model lable using
mathemati cs is
likewise
modellable using met hods which are in herently
non-dete rministic, ev en
to the f undamental level of things exi sting - even
this is taken a s + A\TAN66777777777777777FUNTION-1
being in d e t e r m i n a t e = MC^2 - TRUTH = THE READILY AVAILABLE PROBLEM SO RUCKING- RIEMANN + F YOU BLOW ME YOU FAT MATH BITCHES.
My claim is that neither Mathematics nor Conjecture
should be
preferable to the other. It is NO DIFFERENT than
flipping a coin and
assuming either actual randomness.... or an outcome
which only "looks
random". There is no difference.
You can model anything with math. You can model
anything with
conjecture. Neither approach has any advantage
whatsoever over the
other, and the universe may be determined, and it may
be
non+deterministic.....either approach is eqaually
valid to the other.
And that is why I say it is indeterminate whether it
be one or the
other.
Conjectural modelling provides a means by which we
can understand
conservation in a whole new way. It is not merely a
"property" of
energy. It is not merely a "phenomenon". It is more
than a mere
"trait". It may in fact be regarded as being
tantamount to addition
and multiplication. By considering it as an actual
operator it serves
as a kind of "indeterminate operator" where it is
actually
indeterminate whether one is adding or multiplying.
The numbers crunch
exactly as if one were doing probability theory -
please explain that
away if you can - you cannot.
Emmy Noether never said anything even remotely close
to this so dont
bother.
math is for liars and crooks
I do real math the kind that changes things for good and i have tried
to play nice more than enoug and I am told my mother is a whore and I
am attacked 159 times a day out of strict observance to the scientific
method by definition to a t down to narrowest detail of my methodology
still you arrogant bitches just because you're too stupid to see it so
'oh it is random' or you put people down well *** you too assholes
you can keep your manufactures +d lie +d-s +<d>s truth to your fucking
self because the REAL truth is you can't TOUCH REAL TRUTH with your
SUBJECTIVE TRUTH proof me this or it is not Nazi ass math dictator
bull***. Fucking wolves in wolves clothing only to those who say it
then you cry out and suddenly you're all fucking sheep.
Here is the mother of all my mother fucking methods I have been
observing and following for the last 8 mother fucking months in this
experiment. The Scientific Method as from the Cambridge Learner's
Dictation + math = -y our too stupid and enjoy perpetuating lies in:
the devil -the details so *** all of you ADIEU AUDI 5000 I MAY COME
BACK IF I GOT BORED ENOUGH BUT RIGHT NOW YOU BITCHES +ATAN6-
SIFFUNCTIONALASSHOLES-DESERVE A GOOD LASHINGV
Cambridge Advanced Learner's Dictionary
Cambridge Advanced Learner's Dictionary Buy this dictionary
Search Select another dictionary
Does your English Dictionary give you the help you need? We publish
dictionaries for people learning English all over the world.
Find out more...
Definition
mathematics noun
/ˌmæθˈmæt.ɪks/US pronunciation symbol/-ˈmæt ̬-/ n [U]
(UK informal
maths
, US informal
math
)
formal
the study of numbers, shapes and space using reason and usually a
special system of symbols and rules for organizing them
See also: algebra; arithmetic; geometry
mathematical
adjective
/ˌmæθˈmæt.ɪ.kəl/US pronunciation symbol/-ˈmæt ̬-/ adj
a mathematical formula
mathematically
adverb
/ˌmæθˈmæt.ɪ.kli/US pronunciation symbol/-ˈmæt ̬-/ adv
(Definition of mathematics noun from the Cambridge Advanced Learner's
Dictionary)
Cambridge Advanced Learner's Dictionary
Cambridge Advanced Learner's Dictionary Buy this dictionary
Search Select another dictionary
Does your English Dictionary give you the help you need? We publish
dictionaries for people learning English all over the world.
Find out more...
Definition
scientific adjective
/ˌsaɪənˈtɪf.ɪk/ adj
•
relating to science, or using the organized methods of science
a scientific discovery/experiment/theory
scientific evidence/research
The project has attracted considerable criticism from the scientific
community (= from scientists).
•
careful and using a system or method
We will have to adopt a more scientific approach in the future.
I try to arrange things in some kind of a system, but I'm not very
scientific about it.
scientifically
adverb
/ˌsaɪənˈtɪf.ɪ.kli/ adv
scientifically proven
math•emat•ics /'mae{phon_capt}{shwa}'maet{I}ks/ (also BrE informal
maths /mae{phon_capt}s/) (also NAmE informal math /mae{phon_capt}/)
noun
1 [U] the science of numbers and shapes. Branches of mathematics
include arithmetic, algebra, geometry and trigonometry: the core
subjects of English, Maths and Science * a maths teacher * the school
mathematics curriculum
2 [U+sing./pl. v.] the process of calculating using numbers: If my
maths is / are right, the answer is 142. * Is your math correct?
* math•emat•ic•al /'mae{phon_capt}{shwa}'maet{I}kl/ adj.:
mathematical calculations / problems / models * to assess children’s
mathematical ability math•emat•ic•al•ly /kli/ adv.: It’s
mathematically impossible. * Some people are very mathematically
inclined (= interested in and good at mathematics).
©Oxford University Press, 2005.
sci•en•tif•ic /'sa{I}{shwa}n't{I}f{I}k/ adj. [usually before noun]
1 involving science; connected with science: a scientific discovery *
scientific knowledge * sites of scientific interest
2 (of a way of doing sth or thinking) careful and logical: He took a
very scientific approach to management. * We need to be more
scientific about this problem. opp unscientific—compare non-scientific
* sci•en•tif•ic•al•ly /kli/ adv.
<
SCIENTFIC [AT SCIENTIFIC METHOD] ==
SCIENTIFIC IS THE NOUN
METHOD == THE VERB
REVISE YOUR FUCKING DICTIONARY OXFORD
THAT'S RIGHT I USED OXFORD INSTEAD OF CAMBRIDGE BUT WHAT THE *** IS
IT TO YOU?
i TOLD THE TRUTH IDDID IN TRUTH SO WHAT THE *** IS SIT TO YOU
ASSHOLES?
,
FUCKIING BLOW ME YOU MINDLESS ASS FUCKERS DEAD BRAIN FIELD'S MEDAL 01 -
TURING +KISS GODEL'S ASS FACTORY OF NO<STORM
TROOPERSOFDARTHVADERFUCKERS5 -
A COMMA MAKES ALL THE DIFFERENCE YOU SAY WELL IF THAT IS FUCKING TRUE
THEN WHATDIFFERENCEDOFOURSPACESMAKE=FOURIER TRANSFORM+5-YOU THE BLIND
DEAD ANDLAME ASTROLOGY ASS MATH NUMBER FUCKERS <LESS TOO COOL FOR
SCHOOLmIREALLYLOVEDNUMBERMUNCHERSINELEMENTARYSCHOOLREMEMBERTHATGAMEITWASALWAYSTHATANDOREGONTRAILSLIGHTLYLESSPOPULARBUTEVERTHEMORECONTROVERSIALWASTHEACLUINFLECTEDSOFTWARERUGMUNCHERSFORYOUNGTEENLESBIANSIMKINDOFKIDDINGTOMAKEABOUTOTHESIMCITYVIDOEGAMESSOWHATISITTOYOUIFITELLTHETRUTHWITHOUTAQUESTIONMARKANDSTILLASKALLTHEQUESTIONSANDSTILLGIVEALLTHEANSERSBUTSTILLNEVERFUCKINGSTOPTYPINGYOUBRADASSMOTHERCOOKLOVEBONEFAGGOTSISATERMTHATINSULTSGAYPEOPLEANDEEQUALSCOMPARTINGGAYPEOPLETOHONESTINSSULTINGMATHEMTASINTHEIMINTHISWORLDTOOINSULTSTHEGAYSEVERYDAYBYTHESHITYOUDOANDCAUSESREALRACISMANDPAINANDHUNGERANDSUFFERINGINTHEWORLDANDYOUARETOOFUCKINGALOOFWITHYOURMATHGAMESANDLIESTOSEEITIWANTMORETHANTHISIWANTGOODFORPEOPLEANDHAVETHEKNOWLEDGGEEANDABILITYTOMAKEITALLTRUEANDTHEONLYTHINGTHATSTANDSINMYWAYISYOURFUCKINGLAMEASSEINSTEINPALSWITHEISTENIPRIMESANDSTUPIDFUCKINGGAMESFUCKFUCKEFUCKYOUTOOALLOFYOUIWILLRIDETHISBITCHTILLSHEFALLSBABYLONGMBABYMSTYLEONTHELITTLEBABYLONTHEMGETITMETHEMETHMETHMETHMEHTMEHODOFSCIENCETHEMEHTMEHTMEHTMETHMETHMEHTMEHTMETHMETHODINTRUTHISFUCKYOUYOUARELOSERSANDIHAVEMOREKNOWLEDGETHANYOUTHEABILITYTOCONCEIVEMINUSALLTHETRUTHYOUCALIMANATEEALLTHEFUCKINTIMEFUCKYOUYOURLIESANDYOURMOTHERSANDHYOURCHILDRENIAMTIREDOFTIANDIAMTIREDOFYOU
(Definition of scientific adjective from the Cambridge Advanced
Learner's Dictionary)
I used to appreciate this newsgroup until Musatov came in and began
throwing garbage. Since this group became Musatov's playground, I
quit. I'm tired of his nonsense and of those trolls who feed this
crank.
This is the first time and the last time I post here. I'm out. Be sure
I won't read any replies to this message.
Marty, you win!
Banjo Vee
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: OK, that's enough!
- From: Musatov Gibberish
- Re: OK, that's enough!
- References:
- OK, that's enough!
- From: Banjo Vee
- OK, that's enough!
- Prev by Date: Re: Buy your postcards : musatov's mom
- Next by Date: Re: OK, that's enough!
- Previous by thread: OK, that's enough!
- Next by thread: Re: OK, that's enough!
- Index(es):