Re: Set Theory, Anyone?
- From: Arturo Magidin <magidin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 23:05:14 -0800 (PST)
On Dec 5, 12:22 am, Jack Wellington <jack.wellingt...@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
And I still don't understand how asking for answers to an assignment
that merits nothing towards my grade is characteristic of cheating.
Was the assignment for *you* to do the work, or for you to find
someone to do the work for you?
Would you be presenting the answers as your own, or would you have
presented them as "Someone on Usenet told me the answers were x, y, z,
and w." ?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Set Theory, Anyone?
- From: Jack Wellington
- Re: Set Theory, Anyone?
- References:
- Set Theory, Anyone?
- From: Jack Wellington
- Re: Set Theory, Anyone?
- From: Jack Wellington
- Re: Set Theory, Anyone?
- From: Jack Wellington
- Re: Set Theory, Anyone?
- From: Arturo Magidin
- Re: Set Theory, Anyone?
- From: Jack Wellington
- Re: Set Theory, Anyone?
- From: Arturo Magidin
- Re: Set Theory, Anyone?
- From: Arturo Magidin
- Re: Set Theory, Anyone?
- From: Jack Wellington
- Re: Set Theory, Anyone?
- From: Virgil
- Re: Set Theory, Anyone?
- From: Jack Wellington
- Re: Set Theory, Anyone?
- From: Jack Wellington
- Set Theory, Anyone?
- Prev by Date: 111x19=2109 , 2109 /3=703 BUT 111X 19/3 OR 6.33333=702.963
- Next by Date: Re: Set Theory, Anyone?
- Previous by thread: Re: Set Theory, Anyone?
- Next by thread: Re: Set Theory, Anyone?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|