# sci.math

**Communist Obama Vs Pres: John F.Kennedy:**,*BroilJAB***Thinking about Photon.**,*sadovnik socratus***Re: Thinking about Photon.**,*sadovnik socratus***Re: Thinking about Photon.**,*Josh Meyer***"speed of light to the second power is the rate of growth of the wavefront in diaidans <endquote**,*1treePetrifiedForestLane*

**y^2=x^3+2**,*lionel . dorat***AiG Vacation Bible School RECORD Turn-Out**,*BroilJAB***Why WM is Never Correct!**,*Virgil***"Raul" is in Row 2, Column 2.**,*David Bernier***Hillary SHOCKER: So What if I Killed Worthless Soldiers.**,*BroilJAB***What is the field of mathematics that deal with properties of numerical order and geometry? (if there is such)**,*JT***Notation question**,*Peter Percival***Re: Notation question**,*Robin Chapman*

**A proposed change in definitions of quasi-uniform and quasi-metric spaces**,*Victor Porton***Young Boy RAPED TO DEATH by Pervert Jew**,*BroilJAB***Re: The Sun Referance**,*baclesback***Re: #7 Integral & integration; Textbook 4th ed. : TRUE CALCULUS; without the phony limit concept**,*baclesback***Numbersystem and bases**,*JT***Calculate angles, sides and areas for any regular polygon without using trig functions and Pi**,*JT***Re: Calculate angles, sides and areas for any regular polygon without using trig functions and Pi**,*JT***Re: Calculate angles, sides and areas for any regular polygon without using trig functions and Pi**,*AMiews***Re: Calculate angles, sides and areas for any regular polygon without using trig functions and Pi**,*Ken Pledger***Re: Calculate angles, sides and areas for any regular polygon without using trig functions and Pi**,*Ray Vickson*

**Re: #1 Keeping Stupidity Coming Along: now with geometry with numbers; Textbook 4th ed. : TRUE CALCULUS; without the phony limit concept**,*baclesback***Sum of Squares of Prime Reciprocals**,*ksoileau***Re: Sum of Squares of Prime Reciprocals**,*Josh Meyer*

**Prime Digit Sums**,*fc3a501***Re: Trying to find perimeter of a regular pentagon**,*JT*- <Possible follow-ups>
**Re: Trying to find perimeter of a regular pentagon**,*JT***Re: Trying to find perimeter of a regular pentagon**,*Barry Schwarz***Re: Trying to find perimeter of a regular pentagon**,*JT***Re: Trying to find perimeter of a regular pentagon**,*Ken Pledger***Re: Trying to find perimeter of a regular pentagon**,*JT***Re: Trying to find perimeter of a regular pentagon**,*Ken Pledger***Re: Trying to find perimeter of a regular pentagon**,*David Bernier***Re: Trying to find perimeter of a regular pentagon**,*1treePetrifiedForestLane***Re: Trying to find perimeter of a regular pentagon**,*JT***Re: Trying to find perimeter of a regular pentagon**,*Ray Vickson***Re: Trying to find perimeter of a regular pentagon**,*1treePetrifiedForestLane*

**Re: Trying to find perimeter of a regular pentagon**,*JT***Re: Trying to find perimeter of a regular pentagon**,*JT***Re: Trying to find perimeter of a regular pentagon**,*1treePetrifiedForestLane***Re: Trying to find perimeter of a regular pentagon**,*JT***Re: Trying to find perimeter of a regular pentagon**,*1treePetrifiedForestLane***Re: Trying to find perimeter of a regular pentagon**,*JT***Re: Trying to find perimeter of a regular pentagon**,*Richard Tobin***Re: Trying to find perimeter of a regular pentagon**,*JT***Re: Trying to find perimeter of a regular pentagon**,*Richard Tobin***Re: Trying to find perimeter of a regular pentagon**,*1treePetrifiedForestLane***Re: Trying to find perimeter of a regular pentagon**,*JT***Re: Trying to find perimeter of a regular pentagon**,*1treePetrifiedForestLane*

**Re: Trying to find perimeter of a regular pentagon**,*Graham Cooper***Re: Trying to find perimeter of a regular pentagon**,*Ray Vickson*

**division and non-division algebras in physics**,*Mike***Regular polygons**,*JT***Re: Regular polygons**,*JT***Re: Regular polygons**,*JT***Re: Regular polygons**,*JT***Re: Regular polygons**,*JT***Re: Regular polygons**,*JT***Re: Regular polygons**,*JT***Re: Regular polygons**,*JT***regular polygona**,*1treePetrifiedForestLane*

**Re: ANNOUNCEMENT TO IJAMR ., THE NUMBER ONE OPEN MINDED MATHEMATICS JOURNAL IN THE WORLD**,*Robin Chapman*- <Possible follow-ups>
**Re: ANNOUNCEMENT TO IJAMR ., THE NUMBER ONE OPEN MINDED MATHEMATICS JOURNAL IN THE WORLD**,*Soap Research*

**Re: error correction Re: total number of functions in Calculus**,*baclesback***Re: #2 Borderline between finite and infinity determines Cartesian Coordinate System; Textbook 4th ed. : TRUE CALCULUS; without the phony limit concept**,*baclesback***Method of variation**,*vijayashreevinayak***Iterating f(X) = X^2 - X + 1**,*David Bernier***Re: Iterating f(X) = X^2 - X + 1**,*David Bernier***Re: Iterating f(X) = X^2 - X + 1**,*David Bernier***Re: Iterating f(X) = X^2 - X + 1**,*David Bernier*

**Math problem**,*Kid***Re: Math problem**,*William Elliot***Re: Math problem**,*William Elliot***Re: Math problem**,*Ken Pledger*

**SCIENCE IN A MESS**,*Pentcho Valev***Re: SCIENCE IN A MESS**,*Pentcho Valev***Re: SCIENCE IN A MESS**,*1treePetrifiedForestLane*

**Re: SCIENCE IN A MESS**,*Ed Prochak***science is rebatable**,*1treePetrifiedForestLane*

**Re: THE 12TH SPIRAL OF PRIME NUMBERS , TO BE PUBLISHED TODAY**,*redmond***Re: THE 12TH SPIRAL OF PRIME NUMBERS , TO BE PUBLISHED TODAY**,*Soap Research*

**From the UPI**,*rich burge***Question on Rudin's Principles of Mathematical Analysis 3rd ed -- book needed to help me out.**,*pepstein5***Funcoid**,*William Elliot***Re: Funcoid**,*fom***Re: Funcoid**,*admin*

**the greatest event in the history of mankind**,****tozon***Re: Integral & integration #7 Textbook 3rd ed. : Mathematics for the Mentally Feeble by the Mentally Feeble too Cowardly to Submit Results.**,*baclesback***Re: More Made-Up Garbage that Has never been Tested by Third-Party because plutonium is a COWARD and his whole life is a life of PRETENSE , and a PHONY charade. Go back to Washing Dishes, you Repulsive Twat.**,*baclesback***another kind of multiplicative function (multiplicative number theory)**,*David Bernier***Re: another kind of multiplicative function (multiplicative number theory)**,*William Elliot***Re: another kind of multiplicative function (multiplicative number theory)**,*David Bernier***Re: another kind of multiplicative function (multiplicative number theory)**,*1treePetrifiedForestLane***Re: another kind of multiplicative function (multiplicative number theory)**,*William Elliot***Re: another kind of multiplicative function (multiplicative number theory)**,*David Bernier***Re: another kind of multiplicative function (multiplicative number theory)**,*William Elliot***Re: another kind of multiplicative function (multiplicative number theory)**,*David Bernier*

**ZFC is found to be inconsistent**,****tozon***Flaw in Godels proof- Godel sentence G is outlawed by the very axiom he uses to prove his theorem**,****tozon***Re: the derivative becomes a part of the function itself #5 Textbook 3rd ed. : TRUE CALCULUS; without the phony limit concept**,*baclesback***Re: the true Derivative #4 Textbook 2nd ed. : TRUE FRAUD; without the phony 5 posts per day Limit of HYPOCRIT plutonium**,*baclesback***Re: the true Derivative #4 Textbook 2nd ed. : TRUE CALCULUS; without the phony limit concept**,*baclesback***Re: More baseless Claims Leading Nowhere #14 Textbook -02nd ed. : Living a Life of Fraud and Pretense and Hoping someone Else buys into It.**,*baclesback***Re: More baseless Claims Leading Nowhere #14 Textbook -02nd ed. : Living a Life of Fraud and Pretense and Hoping someone Else buys into It.**,*baclesback***Re: More baseless Claims Leading Nowhere #14 Textbook -02nd ed. : Living a Life of Fraud and Pretense and Hoping someone Else buys into It.**,*baclesback**baclesback*

**in defence of. Archimedes Plutonium**,****tozon**Message not available*

**in defence of plutonium.archimedes**,****tozon***Re: in defence of plutonium.archimedes**,*Peter Percival***Re: in defence of plutonium.archimedes**,****tozon***Re: in defence of plutonium.archimedes**,*Peter Percival***Re: in defence of plutonium.archimedes**,*baclesback***Re: in defence of plutonium.archimedes**,*1treePetrifiedForestLane***Re: in defence of plutonium.archimedes**,*hbertaz***Re: in defence of plutonium.archimedes**,*baclesback***Re: in defence of plutonium.archimedes**,*baclesback***Re: in defence of plutonium.archimedes**,*1treePetrifiedForestLane***in defense of Aristotle Carborundum**,*1treePetrifiedForestLane***Re: in defence of plutonium.archimedes**,*baclesback***Re: in defence of plutonium.archimedes**,*baclesback*

**Re: in defence of plutonium.archimedes**,*Jens Stuckelberger*

**Re: total number of functions and the ability to zoom in on every number point and its surrounding 10^-603 empty space #3 Textbook 3rd ed. : TRUE CALCULUS; without the phony limit concept**,*baclesback***Re: total number of functions and the ability to write an infinite amount of stupidity 10^-603 empty space all over in my brain #3 Textbook Recommended as Prepper Toilet Paper 3rd ed. : CALCULUS; as Phony as my Science Credentials.**,*baclesback***Re: total number of functions and the ability to write an infinite amount of stupidity 10^-603 empty space all over in my brain #3 Textbook Recommended as Prepper Toilet Paper 3rd ed. : CALCULUS; as Phony as my Science Credentials.**,*baclesback***Re: total number of functions and the ability to write an infinite amount of stupidity 10^-603 empty space all over in my brain #3 Textbook Recommended as Prepper Toilet Paper 3rd ed. : CALCULUS; as Phony as my Science Credentials.**,*bacman**baclesback**baclesback**baclesback**baclesback*

**Re: total number of functions and the ability to zoom in on every number point and its surrounding 10^-603 empty space #3 Textbook 3rd ed. : TRUE CALCULUS; without the phony limit concept**,*baclesback***Re: total number of functions and the ability to zoom in on every number point and its surrounding 10^-603 empty space #3 Textbook 3rd ed. : TRUE CALCULUS; without the phony limit concept**,*baclesback*- <Possible follow-ups>
****tozon*

**Re: Why Stop with Phonyness Now, When you have Built your Whole Life Around it? the phony limit concept**,*hbertaz***Basic Question on Bundles.**,*hbertaz***Re: Basic Question on Bundles.**,*baclesback*

**Re: Cartesian Coordinate System, the union of geometry with numbers #0 Textbook 2nd ed. : TRUE CALCULUS; without the phony limit concept**,****tozon***Re: Cartesian Coordinate System, the union of geometry with numbers #0 Textbook 2nd ed. : TRUE CALCULUS; without the phony limit concept**,*hbertaz*- <Possible follow-ups>
**Re: Cartesian Coordinate System, the union of geometry with numbers #0 Textbook 2nd ed. : TRUE CALCULUS; without the phony limit concept**,*hbertaz*

**Re: Borderline between finite and infinity determines Cartesian Coordinate System #1 Textbook 2nd ed. : TRUE CALCULUS; without the phony limit concept**,*baclesback***Egyptian fraction identities**,*David Bernier***Re: Egyptian fraction identities**,*David Bernier***Re: Egyptian fraction identities**,*James Waldby***Re: Egyptian fraction identities**,*David Bernier*

**Re: Maxwell Equations as example of your IDIOCY over all of physics and math #9 Textbook 2nd ed. : TRUE CALCULUS; Something Way above your Head**,*baclesback***Re: Maxwell Equations as example of your IDIOCY over all of physics and math #9 Textbook 2nd ed. : TRUE CALCULUS; Something Way above your Head**,*baclesback***Re: Maxwell Equations as example of your IDIOCY over all of physics and math #9 Textbook 2nd ed. : TRUE CALCULUS; Something Way above your Head**,*baclesback*

**Feedback in Turing Machines**,*apoorv***Feedback in Turing Machines**,*apoorv***Re: Feedback in Turing Machines**,*Graham Cooper*

**Re: Feedback in Turing Machines**,*William Elliot***Re: Feedback in Turing Machines**,*apoorv***Re: Feedback in Turing Machines**,*William Elliot*

**Space Equator Theorem.By Aiya-Oba**,*Aiya-Oba***A question about totally bounded uniform spaces**,*Victor Porton***Re: A question about totally bounded uniform spaces**,*William Elliot***Re: A question about totally bounded uniform spaces**,*dullrich***Re: A question about totally bounded uniform spaces**,*David Bernier***Re: A question about totally bounded uniform spaces**,*David Bernier*

**Re: LIGHT FALLS LIKE ANY MATERIAL BODY: IMPLICATIONS FOR RELATIVITY?**,*Pentcho Valev***Re: An Unheralded Breakthrough: The Rosetta Stone of Mathematics**,****tozon***Re: An Unheralded Breakthrough: The Rosetta Stone of Mathematics**,*1treePetrifiedForestLane*

**Inconsistent equations?**,*Peter***Re: Inconsistent equations?**,*Peter***Re: Inconsistent equations?**,*Peter Percival***Re: Inconsistent equations?**,*Peter***Re: Inconsistent equations?**,*Peter Percival***Re: Inconsistent equations?**,*Peter***Re: Inconsistent equations?**,*Peter Percival***Re: Inconsistent equations?**,*Peter***Re: Inconsistent equations?**,*Peter Percival*

**Re: Inconsistent equations?**,*James Waldby***Re: Inconsistent equations?**,*Virgil***Re: Inconsistent equations?**,*Peter*

**Re: Inconsistent equations?**,*William Elliot*

**All talk about prime number is meaningless as mathematician dont even know what a number is**,****tozon***Re: All talk about prime number is meaningless as mathematician dont even know what a number is**,*1treePetrifiedForestLane***Re: All talk about prime number is meaningless as mathematician dont even know what a number is**,*Virgil***Re: All talk about prime number is meaningless as mathematician dont even know what a number is**,*Jens Stuckelberger*

**Re: Matheology § 269**,*Virgil***Mathematicians cannot define a number without being impredicative-thus maths is meaningless**,****tozon***Soifer Graph**,*bill***Re: Soifer Graph**,*Barry Schwarz***Re: Soifer Graph**,*bill*

**Re: plutonium is superfluous and unfocused/unable to do any Math Textbook 2nd ed that no one will ever read. : #8 TRUE CALCULUS; with the phony limit concept ologist: 2011, 2010, 2009, 2008, 2007, 2006, 2005, 2004, 2003, 2002, 2001, 2000, 1999,**,*baclesback***Re: plutonium is superfluous and unfocused/unable to do any Math Textbook 2nd ed that no one will ever read. : #8 TRUE CALCULUS; with the phony limit concept ologist: 2011, 2010, 2009, 2008, 2007, 2006, 2005, 2004, 2003, 2002, 2001, 2000, 1999,**,*baclesback***Re: plutonium is superfluous and unfocused/unable to do any Math Textbook 2nd ed that no one will ever read. : #8 TRUE CALCULUS; with the phony limit concept ologist: 2011, 2010, 2009, 2008, 2007, 2006, 2005, 2004, 2003, 2002, 2001, 2000, 1999,**,*baclesback**baclesback**baclesback***Re: plutonium is a Butterball and unfocused/unable to do any Math Textbook 2nd ed that no one will ever read. : #2 Psych CALCULUS; with the phony limit concept ologist: 2011, 2010, 2009, 2008, 2007, 2006, 2005, 2004, 2003, 2002, 2001, 2000, 1999,**,*baclesback*

**bebop**,*sanebow***Re: bebop**,*AMiews*

**Re: pretend infinity border is 10 grid and derivative #4 Textbook 2nd ed. : TRUE CALCULUS; without the phony limit concept**,*hbertaz***Re: What Part of " An unmoderated newsgroup on general and advanced mathematics" do you NOT Understand?**,*hbertaz***Re: What Part of " An unmoderated newsgroup on general and advanced mathematics" do you NOT Understand?**,*hbertaz***Re: What Part of " An unmoderated newsgroup on general and advanced mathematics" do you NOT Understand?**,*hbertaz**hbertaz**hbertaz**hbertaz***AP finally makes a little problem set!**,*1treePetrifiedForestLane*

**Re: how plutonium's Stupidity destroys the derivative and integral #6 Textbook that no one Will Ever Read without Laughing 2nd ed. : TRUE CALCULUS; without the phony limit concept**,*hbertaz***Re: pretend I am a Scientist.**,*baclesback***Re: pretend I am a Scientist.**,*baclesback***Re: pretend I am a Scientist.**,*baclesback***Re: pretend I am a Scientist.**,*baclesback*

**Re: pretend infinity border is 10 grid and my Entire Life is just one Big Pretense. A Bet for Baboonio plutonium. that NO ONE will Buy his Shit Textbook**,*baclesback***Finding paths in trees from Random Forests**,*herakleides***Does this imply that lim x --> oo f'(x) = 0?**,*steinerartur***Re: Does this imply that lim x --> oo f'(x) = 0?**,*Robin Chapman***Re: Does this imply that lim x --> oo f'(x) = 0?**,*Bart Goddard***Does this imply that lim x --> oo f'(x) = 0?**,*steinerartur***Re: Does this imply that lim x --> oo f'(x) = 0?**,*William Elliot***Re: Does this imply that lim x --> oo f'(x) = 0?**,*steinerartur*

**Re: Does this imply that lim x --> oo f'(x) = 0?**,*baclesback***Re: Does this imply that lim x --> oo f'(x) = 0?**,*William Elliot***Re: Does this imply that lim x --> oo f'(x) = 0?**,*baclesback***Re: Does this imply that lim x --> oo f'(x) = 0?**,*William Elliot***Re: Does this imply that lim x --> oo f'(x) = 0?**,*Graham Cooper***Re: Does this imply that lim x --> oo f'(x) = 0?**,*Graham Cooper***Re: Does this imply that lim x --> oo f'(x) = 0?**,*steinerartur***Re: Does this imply that lim x --> oo f'(x) = 0?**,*Graham Cooper***Re: Does this imply that lim x --> oo f'(x) = 0?**,*baclesback***Re: Does this imply that lim x --> oo f'(x) = 0?**,*baclesback*

**Re: Does this imply that lim x --> oo f'(x) = 0?**,*William Elliot***Re: Does this imply that lim x --> oo f'(x) = 0?**,*Graham Cooper*

**Re: the derivative #3 Textbook 2nd ed. : TRUE CALCULUS; without the phony limit concept**,*Soap Research***Re: DECALAGE D'EINSTEIN OU DECALAGE DE NEWTON ?**,*Pentcho Valev***Re: DECALAGE D'EINSTEIN OU DECALAGE DE NEWTON ?**,*Pentcho Valev***Re: DECALAGE D'EINSTEIN OU DECALAGE DE NEWTON ?**,*1treePetrifiedForestLane***Re: DECALAGE D'EINSTEIN OU DECALAGE DE NEWTON ?**,*Pentcho Valev*

**Coombination question**,*kuan kuan***Re: Coombination question**,*Barry Schwarz***Re: Coombination question**,*Arturo Magidin*

**Missouri State University Problem Corner**,*Les***Re: how plutonium destroys the truth, and his claims are never examined by 3rd parties. #8 FRAUDULENT CALCULUS; with a phony limit concept to fit my phony life (textbook 1st ed.)**,*hbertaz***Re: Old Math expects you to accept a line as having area #7 Another Made-up Statement by Con-Artist and Imbecile Non-Scientist.**,*hbertaz***391 is special too**,*Dale Shoults***Re: 391 is special too**,*William Elliot***Re: 391 is special too**,*Peter Percival***Re: 391 is special too**,*William Elliot*

**Re: 391 is special too**,*Roland Franzius***Re: 391 is special too**,*Pfsszxt*

**Re: Fundamental Theorem of Calculus is superfluous in New Math #9 TRUE CALCULUS; without the phony limit concept (textbook 1st ed.)**,*Soap Research***Re: Fundamental Theorem of Calculus is superfluous in New Math #9 TRUE CALCULUS; without the phony limit concept (textbook 1st ed.)**,*hbertaz*- <Possible follow-ups>
**Re: Fundamental Theorem of Calculus is superfluous in New Math #9 TRUE CALCULUS; without the phony limit concept (textbook 1st ed.)**,*hbertaz*

**I kinda forgot i learned to write maths...**,*me***Re: I kinda forgot i learned to write maths...**,*Dirk Van de moortel***Re: I kinda forgot i learned to write maths...**,*Narasimham***Re: I kinda forgot i learned to write maths...**,*David Bernier***Re: I kinda forgot i learned to write maths...**,*1treePetrifiedForestLane*

**Grothendieck universe**,*William Elliot***Re: Grothendieck universe**,*fom***Re: Grothendieck universe**,*William Elliot***Re: Grothendieck universe**,*fom***Re: Grothendieck universe**,*William Elliot***Re: Grothendieck universe**,*fom*

**Is my open problem about equality of filters difficult?**,*Victor Porton***Re: Is my open problem about equality of filters difficult?**,*William Elliot***Re: Is my open problem about equality of filters difficult?**,*Victor Porton***Re: Is my open problem about equality of filters difficult?**,*William Elliot***Re: Is my open problem about equality of filters difficult?**,*Victor Porton***Re: Is my open problem about equality of filters difficult?**,*William Elliot***Re: Is my open problem about equality of filters difficult?**,*Victor Porton***Re: Is my open problem about equality of filters difficult?**,*William Elliot***Re: Is my open problem about equality of filters difficult?**,*Victor Porton*

**Numbers, representation, nature and foundational myths.**,*Y***Re: #3 TRUE CALCULUS; without the phony limit concept; Textbook for Middle-School on up (1st edition)**,*hbertaz***Re: #3 TRUE CALCULUS; without the phony limit concept; Textbook for Middle-School on up (1st edition)**,*hbertaz***Re: #3 TRUE CALCULUS; without the phony limit concept; Textbook for Middle-School on up (1st edition)**,*hbertaz**hbertaz**hbertaz*- <Possible follow-ups>
*hbertaz*

**Contractible Image.**,*hbertaz***Re: Contractible Image.**,*W. Dale Hall***Re: Contractible Image.**,*hbertaz***Re: Contractible Image.**,*W. Dale Hall*

**Re: Contractible Image.**,*baclesback*

**Re: #4 TRUE CALCULUS only within my Bubble of Self-delusion; my Whole Life is phony , and Ii have no concept of it; Toilet Paper for Middle-School on up (1-ply and 2-ply)**,*hbertaz***Re: #4 TRUE CALCULUS only within my Bubble of Self-delusion; my Whole Life is phony , and Ii have no concept of it; Toilet Paper for Middle-School on up (1-ply and 2-ply)**,*hbertaz***Re: #4 TRUE CALCULUS only within my Bubble of Self-delusion; my Whole Life is phony , and Ii have no concept of it; Toilet Paper for Middle-School on up (1-ply and 2-ply)**,*hbertaz**hbertaz**hbertaz**hbertaz**hbertaz**hbertaz*

**Re: CONFIRMED :PRIME NUMBERS ARE ARRANGED CENTRI-SPIRAL AROUND A HALF-LINE**,*Robin Chapman*- <Possible follow-ups>
**Re: CONFIRMED :PRIME NUMBERS ARE ARRANGED CENTRI-SPIRAL AROUND A HALF-LINE**,*YBM***Re: CONFIRMED :PRIME NUMBERS ARE ARRANGED CENTRI-SPIRAL AROUND A HALF-LINE**,*redmond*

**Re: #1 TRUE CALCULUS; without the fictional limit concept Textbook for Middle-School on up (1st edition)**,*baclesback***Re: #1 TRUE CALCULUS; without the fictional limit concept Textbook for Middle-School on up (1st edition). MORE FRAUD by self-deluded Baboon A BET**,*baclesback***Re: HYASYS Intellectual Chapt11 the New Periodic Table of Chemical Elements based on Maxwell Equations as Fraud of Physics .Pseudoscience and Lying continues ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed**,*baclesback***Re: HYASYS Intellectual Chapt11 the New Periodic Table of Chemical Elements based on Maxwell Equations as Fraud of Physics .Pseudoscience and Lying continues ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed**,*baclesback***Re: HYASYS Intellectual Chapt11 the New Periodic Table of Chemical Elements based on Maxwell Equations as Fraud of Physics .Pseudoscience and Lying continues ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed**,*baclesback**baclesback**baclesback*

**Re: #2 TRUE CALCULUS 2-Ply; by a Semi-literate Baboon with a phony science concept; Fraudulent Textbook for Middle-School on up (1st edition) by a Fraudulent Wannabee Scientist who Fools No one. The Stupidity Continues**,*baclesback***Re: #2 TRUE CALCULUS 2-Ply; by a Semi-literate Baboon with a phony science concept; Fraudulent Textbook for Middle-School on up (1st edition) by a Fraudulent Wannabee Scientist who Fools No one. The Stupidity Continues**,*baclesback***Re: #2 TRUE CALCULUS 2-Ply; by a Semi-literate Baboon with a phony science concept; Fraudulent Textbook for Middle-School on up (1st edition) by a Fraudulent Wannabee Scientist who Fools No one. The Stupidity Continues**,*baclesback**baclesback**baclesback**baclesback*

**Convention for ascii shorthand for calculus functions**,*rob***Re: Convention for ascii shorthand for calculus functions**,*Dirk Van de moortel***Re: Convention for ascii shorthand for calculus functions**,*William Elliot***Re: Convention for ascii shorthand for calculus functions**,*Dirk Van de moortel***Re: Convention for ascii shorthand for calculus functions**,*rob***Convention for ascii shorthand for calculus functions**,*William Elliot***Re: Convention for ascii shorthand for calculus functions**,*rob***Re: Convention for ascii shorthand for calculus functions**,*Virgil***Re: Convention for ascii shorthand for calculus functions**,*William Elliot***Re: Convention for ascii shorthand for calculus functions**,*fom***Re: Convention for ascii shorthand for calculus functions**,*Aatu Koskensilta***Re: Convention for ascii shorthand for calculus functions**,*William Elliot***Re: Convention for ascii shorthand for calculus functions**,*fom***Re: Convention for ascii shorthand for calculus functions**,*fom*

**Re: Convention for ascii shorthand for calculus functions**,*Dr J R Stockton*

**Did The Lady HOPE Save Dr.Darwin?**,*BroilJAB***Floor of the log equation: s = (floor(log10(x))+1)*x - round((10^(floor(log10(x))+1)-10)/9)**,*nepomucenocarlos68***Re: Floor of the log equation: s = (floor(log10(x))+1)*x - round((10^(floor(log10(x))+1)-10)/9)**,*Carlos Nepomuceno**Message not available**Message not available*

**The field of Computable Reals and Cantor**,*Dick***Space Radiation-Gravitation Equator Discovered. By Aiya-Oba**,*Aiya-Oba***The Scientific Society**,*0*- <Possible follow-ups>
**The Scientific Society**,*0*

**Re: The SUCCESSOR of DOG is NOT a NUMBER!**,*0*- <Possible follow-ups>
**Re: The SUCCESSOR of DOG is NOT a NUMBER!**,*0*

**Re: A logically motivated theory**,*0***Prime Number Definition**,*0***Re: Prime Number Definition**,*emptypost*

**Re: 1-ply,or 2-ply ? Chapt15.62 Driving DiwEqtions #1277 New Physics #1485 =SAME OLD GARBAGE : ATOM BRUTALITY 5th ed More Untested Garbage by Baboon Calling Herself a Scientist. parallel (that is, when there is some real number such that ) we say t**,*baclesback***WORLD'S FIRST EVER ISOMETRIC , CENTRI- SPIRAL PRIME NUMBER SERIES ( Accepted for publication)**,*hope9900***Photon and Matter = Life and Death.**,*sadovnik socratus***Question about Base**,*Jymesion***Re: Question about Base**,*karl***Re: Question about Base**,*Jymesion*

**Question about Base**,*0***Question about Base**,*0***Re: Question about Base**,*Jymesion***Re: Question about Base**,*Bill Taylor***Re: Question about Base**,*Jymesion*

**Re: Question about Base**,*JT***Re: Question about Base**,*Jymesion*

**Re: Question about Base**,*JT***Re: Question about Base**,*JT***Re: Question about Base**,*JT*

**A joke mathematicians tell -- request for source**,*pepstein5***Re: A joke mathematicians tell -- request for source**,*gus gassmann***Re: A joke mathematicians tell -- request for source**,*gus gassmann***Re: A joke mathematicians tell -- request for source**,*pepstein5***Re: A joke mathematicians tell -- request for source**,*Peter Percival***Re: A joke mathematicians tell -- request for source**,*Bart Goddard***Re: A joke mathematicians tell -- request for source**,*Nicolas Bonneel*

**Exponential Equation - How do you solve this one please?**,*JoeCL***Inverse trig**,*John Smith***Re: Inverse trig**,*W. Dale Hall***Re: Inverse trig**,*1treePetrifiedForestLane***Re: Inverse trig**,*John Smith*

**Re: Inverse trig**,*quasi***Re: Inverse trig**,*quasi***Re: Inverse trig**,*John Smith*

**Re: First Proof That Infinitely Many Prime Numbers Come in Pairs**,*Gus Gassmann*- <Possible follow-ups>
**Re: First Proof That Infinitely Many Prime Numbers Come in Pairs**,*joshipura***Re: First Proof That Infinitely Many Prime Numbers Come in Pairs**,*Peter Percival***Re: First Proof That Infinitely Many Prime Numbers Come in Pairs**,*1treePetrifiedForestLane***even numbers not the sum of TPs?**,*1treePetrifiedForestLane***Re: even numbers not the sum of TPs?**,*Robin Chapman***Re: even numbers not the sum of TPs?**,*1treePetrifiedForestLane***Re: even numbers not the sum of TPs?**,*1treePetrifiedForestLane***Re: even numbers not the sum of TPs?**,*Robin Chapman***Re: First Proof That Infinitely Many Prime Numbers Come in Pairs**,*Robin Chapman*

**Re: First Proof That Infinitely Many Prime Numbers Come in Pairs**,*quasi***Re: First Proof That Infinitely Many Prime Numbers Come in Pairs**,*joshipura***Re: First Proof That Infinitely Many Prime Numbers Come in Pairs**,*Graham Cooper***Re: First Proof That Infinitely Many Prime Numbers Come in Pairs**,*quasi***Re: First Proof That Infinitely Many Prime Numbers Come in Pairs**,*Graham Cooper***Re: First Proof That Infinitely Many Prime Numbers Come in Pairs**,*Aatu Koskensilta***Re: First Proof That Infinitely Many Prime Numbers Come in Pairs**,*Graham Cooper***Re: First Proof That Infinitely Many Prime Numbers Come in Pairs**,*David Bernier***Re: First Proof That Infinitely Many Prime Numbers Come in Pairs**,*Graham Cooper***Re: First Proof That Infinitely Many Prime Numbers Come in Pairs**,*Tucsondrew@xxxxxx***Re: First Proof That Infinitely Many Prime Numbers Come in Pairs**,*Graham Cooper***Re: First Proof That Infinitely Many Prime Numbers Come in Pairs**,*David Bernier***Re: First Proof That Infinitely Many Prime Numbers Come in Pairs**,*Graham Cooper***Re: First Proof That Infinitely Many Prime Numbers Come in Pairs**,*Graham Cooper***Re: First Proof That Infinitely Many Prime Numbers Come in Pairs**,*Graham Cooper***Re: First Proof That Infinitely Many Prime Numbers Come in Pairs**,*Tucsondrew@xxxxxx***Re: First Proof That Infinitely Many Prime Numbers Come in Pairs**,*Tucsondrew@xxxxxx***Re: First Proof That Infinitely Many Prime Numbers Come in Pairs**,*Graham Cooper***Re: First Proof That Infinitely Many Prime Numbers Come in Pairs**,*Graham Cooper***Re: First Proof That Infinitely Many Prime Numbers Come in Pairs**,*David Bernier***Re: First Proof That Infinitely Many Prime Numbers Come in Pairs**,*Richard Tobin***Re: First Proof That Infinitely Many Prime Numbers Come in Pairs**,*Graham Cooper***Re: First Proof That Infinitely Many Prime Numbers Come in Pairs**,*Pubkeybreaker*

**Re: First Proof That Infinitely Many Prime Numbers Come in Pairs**,*Zeit Geist***Re: First Proof That Infinitely Many Prime Numbers Come in Pairs**,****tozon***Re: First Proof That Infinitely Many Prime Numbers Come in Pairs**,*1treePetrifiedForestLane*

**Five-vectors in STR**,*richard miller***Re: Five-vectors in STR**,*Dirk Van de moortel***Re: Five-vectors in STR**,*richard miller***Re: Five-vectors in STR**,*1treePetrifiedForestLane*

**a geometircal star formation**,*josephus***Re: a geometircal star formation**,*1treePetrifiedForestLane***Re: a geometircal star formation**,*josephus***Re: a geometircal star formation**,*josephus***Re: a geometircal star formation**,*1treePetrifiedForestLane*

**Solution Manual Applied Calculus for the Managerial, Life, and Social Sciences, 8 E, by Soo T. Tan**,*Robert Carter***Welcome to <sci.math>. These suggestions may help you.**,*Ken Pledger***mathematical philosophy book, _HyperHumanity_ (The God Series book 10) published**,*Hermes Trismegistus***Linear System in Mathematica -- Solve returns only the zero vector (though there are more solutions)**,*Dino***Re: Solution Manual for Structural Analysis**,*liwc1212***The Unsolved Problems web site**,*timro21***Black Hole**,*Mhasan Muaj***Re: Black Hole**,*Ken Pledger***Re: Black Hole**,*jdawe*

**Space Absolute Singularity Matrix. By Aiya-Oba**,*Aiya-Oba***polya, string of beads**,*Dieter von Holten***Re: polya, string of beads**,*konyberg*

**Horologi clocks**,*JT***compact**,*William Elliot***Re: compact**,*Butch Malahide***Re: compact**,*William Elliot***Re: compact**,*Butch Malahide***compact**,*William Elliot***Re: compact**,*dullrich***Re: compact**,*quasi***Re: compact**,*dullrich***Re: compact**,*quasi***Re: compact**,*William Elliot*

**Top Homology of Manifold with Boundary is Zero. True? Why?**,*baclesback***Re: no High Schoolers in sci newsgroups and Niuz.biz malware wrecking computers**,*hbertaz*- <Possible follow-ups>
**Re: no High Schoolers in sci newsgroups and Niuz.biz malware wrecking computers**,*hbertaz*

**Switching research field, me as a researcher, and my writer block**,*Victor Porton***Re: Switching research field, me as a researcher, and my writer block**,*Victor Porton***Re: Switching research field, me as a researcher, and my writer block**,*dullrich***Re: Switching research field, me as a researcher, and my writer block**,*Victor Porton***Re: Switching research field, me as a researcher, and my writer block**,*hbertaz***Re: Switching research field, me as a researcher, and my writer block**,*Victor Porton***Re: Switching research field, me as a researcher, and my writer block**,*Victor Porton***Re: Switching research field, me as a researcher, and my writer block**,*Ed Prochak***Re: Switching research field, me as a researcher, and my writer block**,*Victor Porton*

- <Possible follow-ups>
**Switching research field, me as a researcher, and my writer block**,*Victor Porton*

**Re: photons that orbit atoms rather than electrons Chapt15.63 electrons of Helium seeking to be a photon structure #1362 New Physics #1566 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed**,*hbertaz***Re: More Idiocy**,*hbertaz***Re: More Idiocy**,*hbertaz***Re: More Idiocy**,*hbertaz*

**Series Converges to Function Non-Differentiable at 0.**,*hbertaz***Re: Chapt17 Telescope experiments as distance tool #1574 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed**,*hbertaz***Re: TO PROFESSOR ROBERT ISRAEL OF SCI MATH RESEARCH ,**,*Narasimham***Re: Chapt17 Enrico! . Call someone. PRONTO! My Behind is too Big and I Can't get out of the Tub. Get a Crew to Pull me Out , Enrico.**,*hbertaz***Re: Chapt17 Telescope experiments, and I am a tool TOTALLY 5th ed**,*hbertaz***Can a small degree polynomial exist in this Ideal?**,*eric . fennessey***Re: Can a small degree polynomial exist in this Ideal?**,*Robin Chapman***Re: Can a small degree polynomial exist in this Ideal?**,*eric . fennessey***Re: Can a small degree polynomial exist in this Ideal?**,*Robin Chapman***Re: Can a small degree polynomial exist in this Ideal?**,*eric . fennessey***Re: Can a small degree polynomial exist in this Ideal?**,*Robin Chapman*

**Re: Can a small degree polynomial exist in this Ideal?**,*Timothy Murphy*

**UN: Illegal Election, IRS Terrorism: Obama to RESIGN**,*BroilJAB***What is the intuitive meaning of "non-Archimedean" for a valued field?**,*mike3***Re: What is the intuitive meaning of "non-Archimedean" for a valued field?**,*William Elliot***Re: What is the intuitive meaning of "non-Archimedean" for a valued field?**,*FredJeffries**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available***archmimedean valuation is infinity-adic numbering**,*1treePetrifiedForestLane***Re: archmimedean valuation is infinity-adic numbering**,*1treePetrifiedForestLane*

**The basis of SRT ( by an uneducated Socratus)**,*sadovnik socratus***Re: correct formula is 14C6 --> (14N7+) + e- + v Chapt15.64 revamping all of Radioactivity theory, since antiparticles do not exist #1368 New Physics #1572 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed**,*baclesback***Re: correct formula is not 14C6 --> (14N7+) + Chapt15.64 revamping all of Stupidity theory, since armpitparticles is not exist #1368 New Physics #1572 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed**,*baclesback***Re: Chapt15.64 revamping all of Stupidty theory, since armpitparticles do exist #1381 New Physics #1565 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed**,*baclesback***Solution of two simultaaneous equations.**,*Peter***Re: Solution of two simultaaneous equations.**,*Patrick FitzGerald***Re: Solution of two simultaaneous equations.**,*Peter***Re: Solution of two simultaaneous equations - a typo?**,*JEmebius***Re: Solution of two simultaaneous equations - a typo?**,*Peter***Re: Solution of two simultaaneous equations - a typo?**,*mike3***Re: Solution of two simultaaneous equations - a typo?**,*William Elliot***Re: Solution of two simultaaneous equations - a typo?**,*AMiews*

**Re: Solution of two simultaaneous equations.**,*Peter*

**Re: Matheology § 264 Hilbert's Hotel: checking out.**,*yashvendars***Re: el Medwhere Kn is compact and L1 (E0) = 0. By the previous corollary L1 (u ium Hard Evil ectron Lewis diagram Chapt15.6 Medium Hard Evil 3 electrons of Poor, Huddled Masses seeking to be Free # ANNALITY 1th edWard**,*baclesback***Re: electron Lew74 million inhabitants,[4] down from its 1989 peak of 2.1 million[5] due to suburbanization.[6] The Budapest Commutis diagram Chapt15.63 electrons of Helium seeking to be a photon structure #1365 New Physics #1569 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed**,*baclesback***Re: electron LePowerball Winning Numbers wis diagram Chapt15.Powerball Winning Numbers 63 electrons of Helium seeking to be a photon structure #1365 New Physics #1569 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed**,*baclesback***Re: electron Lewis diagram ChapBanach–Steinhaus theorem is one of the fundamental results in functional analysis. Together with the Hahn–Banach tht15.63 electrons of Helium seeking to be a photon structure #1365 New Physics #1569 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed**,*baclesback***Re: Spiral Galaxy's vs Scan ARE STILL HUNGRY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!**,*baclesback***Re: What Happened?**,*baclesback***Re: Spiral Galaxy's are Turning JAPANESE!**,*baclesback***Re: electrons turned JAPANESE! form plane atoms? Chapt15.63 electrons of Hokkaido seeking to be a photon structure #1164 New Physics #1368 ATOM TOTALITY 1th Edward**,*baclesback***Re: I'm HUNGRYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!**,*baclesback***Re: electrons turned photons form planar ecliptic inside atoms? Chapt15.63 electrons of Helium seeking to be a photon structure #1364 New Physics #1568 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed**,*baclesback***EMS Monograph Award**,*Victor Porton***Numerical ODEs**,*José Carlos Santos***Re: Numerical ODEs**,*Roland Franzius***Re: Numerical ODEs**,*Peter Percival***Re: Numerical ODEs**,*José Carlos Santos***Re: Numerical ODEs**,*Roland Franzius*

**Re: Numerical ODEs**,*dullrich***Re: Numerical ODEs**,*José Carlos Santos*

**Re: Numerical ODEs**,*Niels Diepeveen***Re: Numerical ODEs**,*Bart Goddard***Re: Numerical ODEs**,*José Carlos Santos***Re: Numerical ODEs**,*Bart Goddard*

**Re: An schizophrenic called Musatov wants destroy Sci-math**,*0***Re: ????????????? WHY DID PROPHET MUHAMMAD MARRY AISHA THE YOUNG GIRL**,*hope9900***Space and Time**,*jlosullivan***Name for elementary result in multivariable calculus?**,*pepstein5***Re: High-precision Algorithm**,*0*- <Possible follow-ups>
**Re: High-precision Algorithm**,*KBH***Re: High-precision Algorithm**,*James Waldby*

**irregular primes less than 1000**,*David Bernier***Re: irregular primes less than 1000**,*James Waldby***Re: irregular primes less than 1000**,*David Bernier***Re: irregular primes less than 1000**,*Gottfried Helms***Re: irregular primes less than 1000**,*Pubkeybreaker*

**SRT by an uneducated Socratus.**,*sadovnik socratus***Harvard Business School Case Study Solutions (contact directly at studentshelp(at)hotmail(dot)com )**,*janid . wali***Noone mess with Zohan**,*JT***hard sudoku, "Platinum Blonde"**,*David Bernier***Re: hard sudoku, "Platinum Blonde"**,*Robin Chapman***Re: hard sudoku, "Platinum Blonde"**,*David Bernier***Re: hard sudoku, "Platinum Blonde"**,*JT***Re: hard sudoku, "Platinum Blonde"**,*Robin Chapman***Re: hard sudoku, "Platinum Blonde"**,*JT***JT illiteracy was Re: hard sudoku, "Platinum Blonde"**,*Robin Chapman***Re: JT illiteracy was Re: hard sudoku, "Platinum Blonde"**,*JT***Re: JT illiteracy was Re: hard sudoku, "Platinum Blonde"**,*JT***JT illiteracy continues**,*Robin Chapman***Re: JT illiteracy continues**,*Dirk Van de moortel***Re: JT illiteracy continues**,*JT***Re: hard sudoku, "Platinum Blonde"**,*Robin Chapman***Re: hard sudoku, "Platinum Blonde"**,*Richard Tobin*

**Re: hard sudoku, "Platinum Blonde"**,*Dirk Van de moortel***Re: hard sudoku, "Platinum Blonde"**,*JT***Re: hard sudoku, "Platinum Blonde"**,*A Nony Mouse*

**Is it me or is it Wolfram?**,*JT***Re: Is it me or is it Wolfram?**,*JT***Re: Is it me or is it Wolfram?**,*Ray Vickson***Re: Is it me or is it Wolfram?**,*Julio Di Egidio***Re: Is it me or is it Wolfram?**,*JT***Re: Is it me or is it Wolfram?**,*JT***Re: Is it me or is it Wolfram?**,*JT***it's**,*1treePetrifiedForestLane*

**One logical problem.**,*sadovnik socratus***Call for Papers: World Congress on Education (WCE-2013)!**,*Margaret Smith***What is the correct name?**,*Ciekaw***Re: What is the correct name?**,*James Waldby***Re: What is the correct name?**,*Ciekaw*

**Half cut?**,*JT***Re: Half cut?**,*JT***Re: Half cut?**,*Jens Stuckelberger***Re: Half cut?**,*JT*

**IV ECCOMAS Thematic Conference VipIMAGE 2013: LAST CALL**,*tavares@xxxxxxxx***Re: IT IS ALL OVER FOR CURRENT MATHEMATICS WITH THE PUBLICATION OF PRIME NUMBER SPIRALS, BY THE GRACE OF CHRIST**,*Robin Chapman*- <Possible follow-ups>
**Re: IT IS ALL OVER FOR CURRENT MATHEMATICS WITH THE PUBLICATION OF PRIME NUMBER SPIRALS, BY THE GRACE OF CHRIST**,*hope9900***Re: IT IS ALL OVER FOR CURRENT MATHEMATICS WITH THE PUBLICATION OF PRIME NUMBER SPIRALS, BY THE GRACE OF CHRIST**,*Robin Chapman**Soap Research**Richard Tobin**Soap Research**Robin Chapman*

**~~~~~Test Bank for Introductory Chemistry, 4E Tro is now available for purchase at affordable prices. Contact us at bestsellers.testbanks[at[gmail.com to buy it today.~~~~**,*esolnow***A Guide to Physics Problems Part 1 - Mechanics, Relativity, and Electrodynamics -by Cahn S., Nadgorny B.**,*davis rock***GIVING UP SANITY FOR CONSTANT SPEED OF LIGHT**,*Pentcho Valev***Re: GIVING UP SANITY FOR CONSTANT SPEED OF LIGHT**,*Pentcho Valev***Re: GIVING UP SANITY FOR CONSTANT SPEED OF LIGHT**,*Pentcho Valev**Message not available**Message not available***Re: GIVING UP SANITY FOR CONSTANT SPEED OF LIGHT**,*Ed Prochak*

**Comprehensive test banks and solution manuals for sale**,*esolnow*- <Possible follow-ups>
**Comprehensive test banks and solution manuals for sale**,*esolnow*

**How do i calculate number of possible transmission reciprocations?**,*JT***Re: How do i calculate number of possible transmission reciprocations?**,*JT***Re: How do i calculate number of possible transmission reciprocations?**,*JT***Re: How do i calculate number of possible transmission reciprocations?**,*JT***Re: How do i calculate number of possible transmission reciprocations?**,*JT***Re: How do i calculate number of possible transmission reciprocations?**,*JT***Re: How do i calculate number of possible transmission reciprocations?**,*1treePetrifiedForestLane***Re: How do i calculate number of possible transmission reciprocations?**,*JT*

**Re: constant separation distance versus a variable distance Chapt15.59 electrons-ecliptic-plane #1353 New Physics #1556 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed**,*hbertaz***Re: plutonium is a Liar, Thug and Cheat, not to Mention a ***. No moderated site will have him.**,*hbertaz***Re: FINAL SPECIFIC CALCULUS OF PRIME NUMBER AS SHOWN HERE POSTED WITH CAMBRIDGE JOURNALS AND JOHN HOPKINS MATHEMATICS JOURNALS**,*redmond***Obama LAUGHS About Dead Americans at Bengazi**,*BroilJAB***Riemann inspired Lewis Carroll to write Alice's Adventures in Wonderland and Through the Looking-Glass (?)**,*David Bernier***Re: HEY, ***: THIS IS CALLED SCI.MATH FOR A***ING REASON**,*hbertaz***Re: STOP POSTING YOUR OFF-TOPIC CRAP IN HERE, YOU WORTHLESS, WANNABEE-SCIENTIST #$%^ BABOON**,*hbertaz***Re: ALL of your posts to sci.math are OFF-TOPIC, you hypocrit.**,*hbertaz***Solving N-1 equations in N unknowns with initial state?**,*Don Del Grande***Re: Solving N-1 equations in N unknowns with initial state?**,*Ken Pledger***Re: Solving N-1 equations in N unknowns with initial state?**,*Don Del Grande***Re: Solving N-1 equations in N unknowns with initial state?**,*christian.bau*

**Re: Solving N-1 equations in N unknowns with initial state?**,*William Elliot*

**[OT] fascinating BBC Horizon program on the brain and consciousness with Marcus du Sautoy**,*David Bernier***Collinear**,*William Elliot***Re: Collinear**,*David Bernier***Re: Collinear**,*William Elliot***Re: Collinear**,*David Bernier*

**Re: Collinear**,*Julio Di Egidio*

**Re: Collinear**,*Robin Chapman***Re: Collinear**,*Barry Schwarz***Re: Collinear**,*dullrich*

**Re: Collinear**,*fom***Re: Collinear**,*fom*

**Re:Atom *** I have this of mathematics derived from the Maxwell Shmarts; Universal *** #1348 Ass Axioms Tie me Down and Do me! #0 ATOM TOTALITY 1th edward**,*hbertaz***Re: Atom *** I have this of mathematics derived from the Maxwell Shmarts; Universal *** #1348 Ass Axioms Tie me Down and Do me! #0 ATOM TOTALITY 1th edward**,*hbertaz***Re: Atom *** I have this of mathematics derived from the Maxwell Shmarts; Universal *** #1348 Ass Axioms Tie me Down and Do me! #0 ATOM TOTALITY 1th edward**,*hbertaz***Re: Atom *** I have this of mathematics derived from the Maxwell Shmarts; Universal *** #1348 Ass Axioms Tie me Down and Do me! #0 ATOM TOTALITY 1th edward**,*hbertaz**hbertaz*

**Re: more STUPIDITY on division by zero, and on everything else. Intellectual Chapt11 for me. All of mathematics distorted and brutalized derived from the 4 Maxwell Coffees; Universal Stupidity Area 51 New Garbage #1554 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed**,*hbertaz***Re: more STUPIDITY on division by zero, and on everything else. Intellectual Chapt11 for me. All of mathematics distorted and brutalized derived from the 4 Maxwell Coffees; Universal Stupidity Area 51 New Garbage #1554 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed**,*hbertaz*

**"The Mystery of the Primes", starring Marcus du Sautoy**,*David Bernier***Calculate circumreference and area of circle without Pi is easy**,*JT***Re: Calculate circumreference and area of circle without Pi is easy**,*JT***Re: Calculate circumreference and area of circle without Pi is easy**,*donstockbauer***Re: Calculate circumreference and area of circle without Pi is easy**,*JT***Re: Calculate circumreference and area of circle without Pi is easy**,*JT***Re: Calculate circumreference and area of circle without Pi is easy**,*JT***Re: Calculate circumreference and area of circle without Pi is easy**,*Richard Tobin***Re: Calculate circumreference and area of circle without Pi is easy**,*JT***the surfer's value of the ratio of the diameter to the area of sphere**,*1treePetrifiedForestLane***Re: the surfer's value of the ratio of the diameter to the area of sphere**,*1treePetrifiedForestLane***Re: the surfer's value of the ratio of the diameter to the area of sphere**,*JT***Re: the surfer's value of the ratio of the diameter to the area of sphere**,*JT***Re: the surfer's value of the ratio of the diameter to the area of sphere**,*1treePetrifiedForestLane*

**Does polynomial P need to be an affine mapping**,*steinerartur***Re: Maxwell Equations makes pee-pee*10^fuck you infinity Chapt10.61 All of nonsense derived from my feeble mind; Universal Stupidity #1048 New Garbage #1552 ATOM TOTALITY 1th edward**,*hbertaz***Re: Maxwell Equations makes pee-pee*10^fuck you infinity Chapt10.61 All of nonsense derived from my feeble mind; Universal Stupidity #1048 New Garbage #1552 ATOM TOTALITY 1th edward**,*hbertaz***Re: Maxwell Equations makes pee-pee*10^fuck you infinity Chapt10.61 All of nonsense derived from my feeble mind; Universal Stupidity #1048 New Garbage #1552 ATOM TOTALITY 1th edward**,*hbertaz**hbertaz*

**Conditions fr Existence of Logf; f Complex-Analytic.**,*hbertaz***Re: SOLVE THIS PREDICTIVE SERIES, TO ANY MATHEMATICIAN OF THE WORLD!!, AND CHANGE THE MATHEMATICS WORLD FOR EVER**,*Robin Chapman*- <Possible follow-ups>
**Re: SOLVE THIS PREDICTIVE SERIES, TO ANY MATHEMATICIAN OF THE WORLD!!, AND CHANGE THE MATHEMATICS WORLD FOR EVER**,*hope9900*

**Re: Chapt15.61 All of Stupidity derived from the 4 Maxwell Coffee Cups; Universal Stupidity by Koko the Chimp #1308 New Physics #1531 aTOm SUPIDITALITY2th ed**,*hbertaz***Re: Chapt15.61 All of Stupidity derived from the 4 Maxwell Coffee Cups; Universal Stupidity by Koko the Chimp #1308 New Physics #1531 aTOm SUPIDITALITY2th ed**,*hbertaz***Re: Chapt15.61 All of Stupidity derived from the 4 Maxwell Coffee Cups; Universal Stupidity by Koko the Chimp #1308 New Physics #1531 aTOm SUPIDITALITY2th ed**,*hbertaz**hbertaz**hbertaz*

*hbertaz*

**BINGO THE EINSTEINIANO CONTRE L'ESPRIT RATIONNEL**,*Pentcho Valev***Re: BINGO THE EINSTEINIANO CONTRE L'ESPRIT RATIONNEL**,*Pentcho Valev***Re: BINGO THE EINSTEINIANO CONTRE L'ESPRIT RATIONNEL**,*Pentcho Valev*

**Sylvester line problem and dot conjecture**,*b9704084***Re: Sylvester line problem and dot conjecture**,*William Elliot***Re: Sylvester line problem and dot conjecture**,*b9704084***Re: Sylvester line problem and dot conjecture**,*b9704084***Re: Sylvester line problem and dot conjecture**,*William Elliot*

**Re: Sylvester line problem and dot conjecture**,*b9704084*

**Connection between Sylvester line problem and dot conjecture.**,*b9704084***Prove that LCM(x,y) * GCF(x,y) = xy**,*Algorithm and automation***Re: Prove that LCM(x,y) * GCF(x,y) = xy**,*William Elliot***Re: Prove that LCM(x,y) * GCF(x,y) = xy**,*Bart Goddard*

**I do not understand result from wolfram**,*JT***Re: I do not understand result from wolfram**,*Dan***Re: I do not understand result from wolfram**,*Ray Vickson***Re: I do not understand result from wolfram**,*David Bernier*

**My problem with geometry or infinity 0.5=((n/2)-1)/n**,*JT***Re: My problem with geometry or infinity 0.5=((n/2)-1)/n**,*JT***Re: My problem with geometry**,*William Elliot***Re: My problem with geometry**,*JT***Re: My problem with geometry**,*William Elliot***Re: My problem with geometry**,*JT***Re: My problem with geometry**,*JT*

**Re: My problem with geometry**,*JT***Re: My problem with geometry**,*JT***Re: My problem with geometry**,*William Elliot***Re: My problem with geometry**,*JT***Re: My problem with geometry**,*William Elliot***Re: My problem with geometry**,*JT***Re: My problem with geometry**,*JT*

**redefining pi**,*calvin***Re: redefining pi**,*david petry***Re: redefining pi**,*William Elliot*

**Re: redefining pi**,*JT***Re: redefining pi**,*William Elliot***Re: redefining pi**,*konyberg***Re: redefining pi**,*konyberg*

**Re: redefining pi**,*Timothy Murphy***Re: redefining pi**,*Bill Taylor***Re: redefining pi**,*david petry***Re: redefining pi**,*JT***Re: redefining pi**,*JT***Re: redefining pi**,*JT***Re: redefining pi**,*JT***Re: redefining pi**,*JT***Re: redefining pi**,*1treePetrifiedForestLane*

**Re: redefining pi**,*J.B. Wood***Re: redefining pi**,*Richard Tobin***Re: redefining pi**,*Barry Schwarz***Re: redefining pi**,*Richard Tobin***Re: redefining pi**,*J.B. Wood***Re: redefining pi**,*J.B. Wood***predefining pi; preinventing the wheel**,*1treePetrifiedForestLane***preinventing the wheel**,*1treePetrifiedForestLane*

**OPEN CHALLENGE TO MATHEMATIANS ON THIS PUBLISHED POLARITY AT 10*3 Numbers**,*hope9900***The relation between circumreference and radius of circle**,*JT***Re: The relation between circumreference and radius of circle**,*emptypost***Re: The relation between circumreference and radius of circle**,*Ross A. Finlayson***Re: The relation between circumreference and radius of circle**,*1treePetrifiedForestLane***Re: The relation between circumreference and radius of circle**,*1treePetrifiedForestLane*

**Connected?**,*William Elliot***Re: Connected?**,*fom***Re: Connected?**,*William Elliot***Re: Connected?**,*Leon Aigret***Connected?**,*William Elliot***Re: Connected?**,*Leon Aigret*

**SOLUTIONS MANUAL: The Theory of Interest 3rd ED by Stephen Kellison**,*Robert Carter***Re: VITESSE DE LA LUMIERE ET GRAVITATION**,*Pentcho Valev***residue at z=0 for sinh(z)*cosh(1/z) ?**,*Brad Cooper***Re: residue at z=0 for sinh(z)*cosh(1/z) ?**,*Robin Chapman*

**probability problem**,*nagen79***Re: probability problem**,*Barry Schwarz***Re: probability problem**,*christian.bau*

**Re: LA SCIENCE SE MEURT !**,*Pentcho Valev***Re: LA SCIENCE SE MEURT !**,*Pentcho Valev*

**Re: Chapt16.2: Still embarrassing Himself with Complete Stupidity. Tiffart quack galaxy's peeds #1335 Quackery #1238 ATOM STUPIDITY 5th ed**,*hbertaz***Re: Chapt16.2: Chimp plutonium want BANANA! . More feces-throwing and chest-pumping by baboon Still embarrassing Himself with Complete Stupidity. Tiffart quack galaxy's peeds #1335 Quackery #1238 ATOM STUPIDITY 5th ed**,*hbertaz*

**Re: Matheology § 258**,*Virgil***Re: Matheology § 258**,*Gus Gassmann*

**N^N**,*William Elliot***Re: Help with identity**,*Ray Vickson*- <Possible follow-ups>
**Re: Help with identity**,*Mike Trainor***Re: Help with identity**,*AP***Re: Help with identity**,*Virgil***Re: Help with identity**,*Mike Trainor*

**Re: Tachyons**,*hanson***Re: Matheology § 258**,*Ed Prochak***OT: but important & scary**,*Ed Prochak***Re: THE SPIRAL CODE OF PRIME NUMBERS IS PUBLISHED TODAY INTERNATIONALLY**,*Robin Chapman*- <Possible follow-ups>
**Re: THE SPIRAL CODE OF PRIME NUMBERS IS PUBLISHED TODAY INTERNATIONALLY**,*Soap Research*

**Circled inscribed polygons with n vertices, arc to side ratio?**,*JT***Re: Circled inscribed polygon**,*William Elliot***Re: Circled inscribed polygon**,*1treePetrifiedForestLane*

**Re: Circled inscribed polygons with n vertices, arc to side ratio?**,*Narasimham***Re: Circled inscribed polygons with n vertices, arc to side ratio?**,*1treePetrifiedForestLane*

**Re: Godel Incompleteness Theorem**,*b9704084***Re: GRAVITATIONAL REDSHIFT REFUTES EINSTEIN'S RELATIVITY**,*Pentcho Valev***Obama Blaming FBI for Boston Killings**,*BroilJAB***The formula for the inner angles of a polygon with 99 vertices?**,*JT***Re: The formula for the inner angles of a polygon with 99 vertices?**,*1treePetrifiedForestLane***pi(1 - 2/n)**,*William Elliot***Re: pi(1 - 2/n)**,*Wally W .*

**Re: The formula for the inner angles of a polygon with 99 vertices?**,*Robin Chapman*

**Re: Alternating series question**,*1treePetrifiedForestLane***Re: Alternating series question**,*Robin Chapman*- <Possible follow-ups>
**Re: Alternating series question**,*1treePetrifiedForestLane*

**Inscribed polygons in circle**,*JT***Re: Inscribed polygons in circle**,*JT***Re: Inscribed polygons in circle**,*JT***Re: Inscribed polygons in circle**,*JT***Re: Inscribed polygons in circle**,*JT***Re: Inscribed polygons in circle**,*JT***Re: Inscribed polygons in circle**,*JT***Re: Inscribed polygons in circle**,*JT***Re: Inscribed polygons in circle**,*JT***Re: Inscribed polygons in circle**,*JT***Re: Inscribed polygons in circle**,*JT***Re: Inscribed polygons in circle**,*JT*

**Re: DOPPLER TOPPLES EINSTEIN**,*Pentcho Valev***Re: DOPPLER TOPPLES EINSTEIN**,*Pentcho Valev***Re: DOPPLER TOPPLES EINSTEIN**,*Pentcho Valev*

**How spherical is a surface created from two saddle shaped surfaces?**,*JT***Re: How spherical is a surface created from two saddle shaped surfaces?**,*JT***Re: How spherical is a surface created from two saddle shaped surfaces?**,*JT***Re: How spherical is a surface created from two saddle shaped surfaces?**,*JT***Re: How spherical is a surface created from two saddle shaped surfaces?**,*JT***Re: How spherical is a surface created from two saddle shaped surfaces?**,*JT***Re: How spherical is a surface created from two saddle shaped surfaces?**,*1treePetrifiedForestLane***Re: How spherical is a surface created from two saddle shaped surfaces?**,*1treePetrifiedForestLane***Re: How spherical is a surface created from two saddle shaped surfaces?**,*JT***Re: How spherical is a surface created from two saddle shaped surfaces?**,*1treePetrifiedForestLane*

**Re: How spherical is a surface created from two saddle shaped surfaces?**,*Narasimham*

**Re: constant gauss curvature surfaces**,*Narasimham***Re: constant gauss curvature surfaces**,*1treePetrifiedForestLane*

**Re: the situation is worse than you thought**,*Robin Chapman*- <Possible follow-ups>
**Re: the situation is worse than you thought**,*timro21*

**Re: Question about a paper of Erd‘s and Selfridge**,*0***Von Braun Summons Obama, FBI: Boston Killings**,*BroilJAB***secondroot(phi plus two) = Brun's constant phi mysticism**,*1treePetrifiedForestLane***golden section wiitering**,*Robin Chapman***Re: golden section wiitering**,*1treePetrifiedForestLane***Bullphitting**,*Robin Chapman***Re: Bullphitting**,*1treePetrifiedForestLane***Re: Bullphitting**,*Robin Chapman***Re: Bullphitting**,*dullrich***Re: Bullphitting**,*1treePetrifiedForestLane***Re: Bullphitting**,*1treePetrifiedForestLane***Re: Bullphitting**,*Robin Chapman***Re: Bullphitting**,*1treePetrifiedForestLane***Re: Bullphitting**,*1treePetrifiedForestLane*

**Re: A flaw in modern axiomatic geometry?**,*Julio Di Egidio***Re: A flaw in modern axiomatic geometry?**,*Butch Malahide***Re: A flaw in modern axiomatic geometry?**,*Julio Di Egidio*

**Magic squares as vorticial approximants in highly-granular flow intersection**,*Ross A. Finlayson***N-gonometry**,*Ross A. Finlayson***Re: N-gonometry**,*1treePetrifiedForestLane***Re: N-gonometry**,*Ross A. Finlayson*

**Re: N-gonometry**,*William Elliot***Re: N-gonometry**,*Ross A. Finlayson***Re: N-gonometry**,*1treePetrifiedForestLane***Re: N-gonometry**,*1treePetrifiedForestLane***Re: N-gonometry**,*1treePetrifiedForestLane***Re: N-gonometry**,*Ross A. Finlayson***Re: N-gonometry**,*1treePetrifiedForestLane***Re: N-gonometry**,*1treePetrifiedForestLane*

**Re: N-gonometry**,*JT***Re: N-gonometry**,*Robin Chapman***Re: N-gonometry**,*JT***Re: N-gonometry**,*JT***Re: N-gonometry**,*Richard Tobin***Re: N-gonometry**,*JT***Re: N-gonometry**,*Richard Tobin***Re: N-gonometry**,*JT***Re: N-gonometry**,*Richard Tobin***Re: N-gonometry**,*JT***Re: N-gonometry**,*1treePetrifiedForestLane***Re: N-gonometry**,*Robin Chapman***Re: N-gonometry**,*JT***Re: N-gonometry**,*Robin Chapman***Re: N-gonometry**,*JT*