# sci.math

**2.97 - Virus, Not content with getting my Geogebra account terminated**,*John Gabriel***DINNER'S READY! Please tell the Smithsonian that its goose is cooked**,*Ed Conrad***§ 537 The diagonal argument requires that Cauchy sequences of irrational numbers contain their limit.**,*mueckenh***Re: § 537 The diagonal argument requires that Cauchy sequences of irrational numbers contain their limit.**,*Sam Sung***Re: § 1 - 10000000: Mueckenheim is a mother*****,*Sam Sung***Re: § 537 The diagonal argument requires that Cauchy sequences of irrational numbers contain their limit.**,*"Jürgen R."***Re: § 537 The diagonal argument requires that Cauchy sequences of irrational numbers contain their limit.**,*Virgil*

**Apple announcement in September of the small screen iphone 1 cm by 1 cm, hooray**,*Archimedes Plutonium***LIM (X-->oo) 2^X = ???**,*grahamcooper7***Re: LIM (X-->oo) 2^X = ???**,*Virgil***Re: LIM (X-->oo) 2^X = ???**,*Zeit Geist*

**FINITE BOUND THEORIES ... .**,*grahamcooper7***Collatz 3x+1 problem "long paths to 1" relative to size of initial innteger**,*David Bernier***EINSTEIN'S RELATIVITY : NEVER ENDING FRAUD**,*Pentcho Valev***Re: EINSTEIN'S RELATIVITY : NEVER ENDING FRAUD**,*Pentcho Valev***Re: EINSTEIN'S RELATIVITY : NEVER ENDING FRAUD**,*Pentcho Valev***Re: EINSTEIN'S RELATIVITY : NEVER ENDING FRAUD**,*Pentcho Valev*

**The Delusion of Physics**,*Kevin Barry***Thomas Hales, a menace to mathematics; a dinosaur of mathematics crawling into a dinosaur rat hole**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Least Dense Packing of geometry figures AP-Conjecture, a star like axes figure**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Re: Least Dense Packing of geometry figures AP-Conjecture, a star like axes figure**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Re: Least Dense Packing of geometry figures AP-Conjecture, a star like axes figure**,*Archimedes Plutonium*

**Least Dense Packing of geometry figures AP-Conjecture, a star like axes figure #2006 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Least Dense figure in 2nd D a star axes and a crate in 3rd D #2007 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***starting to well-define the conjecture of Least Dense Object in geometry #2008 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***star shaped axes for 2D is not the Least Dense Object but rather the square without interior #2009 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***hollow interior sphere is a lesser Least Density Packing than hollow cube #2010 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***tentative first attempt of a proof #2011 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***tentative second attempt of a proof #2012 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***proof of Conjecture-- hollow sphere is the least dense regular solid; Kepler Packing a corollary of this proof #2013 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium*

**AP-conjecture: rectangular axes figure is the Least Dense in all Geometry #2005 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Exact Science Is Like Everything Else: It Has It's Place**,*Bret Cahill***CONGRESS, PLEASE SHOW SOME BALLS IN YOUR HALLOWED HALLS**,*Ed Conrad***So please, why cannot Drexel's Math Forum remove a forgery profile?**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Math Education**,*alal65536***Re: Math Education**,*William Elliot***Re: Math Education**,*alal65536*

**Re: Math Education**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Math Education**,*alal65536*

**Re: Math Education**,*Peter Percival***Re: Math Education**,*alal65536***Re: Maths Education**,*Robin Chapman***Re: Maths Education**,*JohnF*

**Drexel's Math Forum encourages fake named "sleeper cells"**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Re: Drexel's Math Forum encourages fake named "sleeper cells"**,*Jamshīb al-Kāshī***Re: Drexel's Math Forum encourages fake named "sleeper cells"**,*Dan Christensen*

**is Google ever serious about "abuse" like forgery of innocent subscribers**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Revisiting the Barber Paradox: Formalizing the Multiple Barber Scenario**,*Dan Christensen***extirminating the Goon Clod posting under the fake name John Gabriel**,*Archimedes Plutonium***WHY EINSTEIN RETAINED THE CONSTANT SPEED OF LIGHT**,*Pentcho Valev***Re: WHY EINSTEIN RETAINED THE CONSTANT SPEED OF LIGHT**,*Pentcho Valev***Re: WHY EINSTEIN RETAINED THE CONSTANT SPEED OF LIGHT**,*Pentcho Valev***Re: WHY EINSTEIN RETAINED THE CONSTANT SPEED OF LIGHT**,*Pentcho Valev***Re: WHY EINSTEIN RETAINED THE CONSTANT SPEED OF LIGHT**,*Pentcho Valev*

**WM's Application of mathematics to set theory**,*mueckenh***Reals between 0,1 and n/d in integers**,*Ross A. Finlayson***Reals between 0,1 and n/d in integers**,*Ross A. Finlayson***Reals between 0,1 and n/d in integers**,*Ross A. Finlayson*

**Re: Reals between 0,1 and n/d in integers**,*William Elliot***Re: Reals between 0,1 and n/d in integers**,*Ross A. Finlayson***Re: Reals between 0,1 and n/d in integers**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Reals between 0,1 and n/d in integers**,*Ross A. Finlayson***Re: Reals between 0,1 and n/d in integers**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Reals between 0,1 and n/d in integers**,*Ross A. Finlayson***Re: Reals between 0,1 and n/d in integers**,*Ross A. Finlayson*

**Please support WM's bid for a lifetime Pigasus award**,*Tommy***2.96 - Geogebra terminates my account because they don't like my content.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.96 - Geogebra terminates my account because they don't like my content.**,*Jamshīb al-Kāshī******* TROLL ALERT ******,*Dan Christensen***Re: 2.96 - Geogebra terminates my account because they don't like my content.**,*John Gabriel*

**EVERY CHILD AT SCHOOL KNEW EINSTEIN WAS RIGHT**,*Pentcho Valev***Re: EVERY CHILD AT SCHOOL KNEW EINSTEIN WAS RIGHT**,*John Gabriel***Re: EVERY CHILD AT SCHOOL KNEW EINSTEIN WAS RIGHT**,*Pentcho Valev***Re: EVERY CHILD AT SCHOOL KNEW EINSTEIN WAS RIGHT**,*Pentcho Valev*

**The Quran - The Final Revelation to Mankind**,*BV***Re: Question about NBG**,*Arturo Magidin***Interesting Article On PROOF THEORY**,*grahamcooper7***Re: Interesting Article On PROOF THEORY**,*YBM***Re: Interesting Article On PROOF THEORY**,*grahamcooper7*

**Request for comments on two proofs and their typesetting**,*trevor . fancher***Re: Request for comments on two proofs and their typesetting**,*William Elliot***Re: Request for comments on two proofs and their typesetting**,*Peter Percival***Re: Request for comments on two proofs and their typesetting**,*trevor . fancher*

**Seeking to understand...what math property is causing my question.**,*Lenny***UC Berkeley math professors endorsing No Perfect Cuboid to arxiv**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Schoredinger's boX**,*Space998***Re: Schoredinger's boX**,*Space998*

**2.95 - Dullrich has no reviews on his dissertation.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.95 - Dullrich has no reviews on his dissertation.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.95 - Dullrich has no reviews on his dissertation.**,*David C. Ullrich***Re: 2.95 - Dullrich has no reviews on his dissertation.**,*Jamshīb al-Kāshī***Re: 2.95 - Dullrich has no reviews on his dissertation.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.95 - Dullrich has no reviews on his dissertation.**,*Freda Parkins***Re: 2.95 - Dullrich has no reviews on his dissertation.**,*Jamshīb al-Kāshī*

**Re: 2.95 - Dullrich has no reviews on his dissertation.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.95 - Dullrich has no reviews on his dissertation.**,*Jamshīb al-Kāshī***about this comment, who gAf**,*Space998***Re: about this comment, who gAf**,*Jamshīb al-Kāshī*

**where Dirac went wrong; 2/137(e) for magnetic monopole #70 all of geology from Maxwell Eq textbook**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Re: where Dirac went wrong; 2/137(e) for magnetic monopole #70 all of geology from Maxwell Eq textbook**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Re: where Dirac went wrong; 2/137(e) for magnetic monopole #70 all of geology from Maxwell Eq textbook**,*Archimedes Plutonium***we see 2/137 in energy ratio and in Olbers paradox #70 all of geology from Maxwell Eq textbook**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Re: we see 2/137 in energy ratio and in Olbers paradox #70 all of geology from Maxwell Eq textbook**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Re: we see 2/137 in energy ratio and in Olbers paradox #70 all of geology from Maxwell Eq textbook**,*Archimedes Plutonium*

**2.95 John Gabriel gives up on New Calculus no real math in it and HUGE mistake he says**,*Jame Kamel***2.95 no confidence vote removes John Gabriel and 32 years of poo**,*Jame Kamel***2.94 - The New Calculus is the first and only rigorous formulation in history.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.94 - The New Calculus is the first and only rigorous formulation in history.**,*dullrich***Re: 2.94 - The New Calculus is the first and only rigorous formulation in history.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.94 - The New Calculus is the first and only rigorous formulation in history.**,*John Gabriel******* TROLL ALERT ******,*Dan Christensen***Re: 2.94 - The New Calculus is the first and only rigorous formulation in history.**,*John Gabriel***we fell all asleep in the ChjatrooM.**,*Space998*

**Please explain infinity to me!**,*John Gabriel***Re: Please explain infinity to me!**,*Why not***Re: Please explain infinity to me!**,*John Gabriel*

**Re: Please explain infinity to me!**,*dullrich***Re: Please explain infinity to me!**,*John Gabriel***Re: Please explain infinity to me!**,*dullrich***Re: Please explain infinity to me!**,*John Gabriel***Re: Please explain infinity to me!**,*David C. Ullrich***Re: Please explain infinity to me!**,*Space998*

**Re: Please explain infinity to me!**,*John Gabriel***Re: Please explain infinity to me!**,*konyberg***Re: Please explain infinity to me!**,*konyberg*

**Re: Please explain infinity to me!**,*Dan Christensen***Re: Please explain infinity to me!**,*Dan Christensen***Re: Please explain infinity to me!**,*Herman Rubin*

**Re: Please explain infinity to me!**,*John Gabriel***Re: Please explain infinity to me!**,*Jamshīb al-Kāshī***Re: Please explain infinity to me!**,*dullrich*

**Re: Please explain infinity to me!**,*John Gabriel***no**,*Space998*

**Re: Please explain infinity to me!**,*John Gabriel***Re: Please explain infinity to me!**,*Jamshīb al-Kāshī***Re: Please explain infinity to me!**,*Space998*

**2.93 - A 'modified form of the usual division algorithm' - Wikipedia ***ica**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.93 - A 'modified form of the usual division algorithm' - Wikipedia ***ica**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.93 - A 'modified form of the usual division algorithm' - Wikipedia ***ica**,*Space998***ibid**,*Space998*

****** TROLL ALERT ******,*Dan Christensen***Re: 2.93 - A 'modified form of the usual division algorithm' - Wikipedia ***ica**,*Jame Kamel***Re: 2.93 - A 'modified form of the usual division algorithm' - Wikipedia ***ica**,*Jame Kamel***Re: 2.93 - A 'modified form of the usual division algorithm' - Wikipedia ***ica**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.93 - A 'modified form of the usual division algorithm' - Wikipedia ***ica**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.93 - A 'modified form of the usual division algorithm' - Wikipedia ***ica**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.93 - A 'modified form of the usual division algorithm' - Wikipedia ***ica**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.93 - A 'modified form of the usual division algorithm' - Wikipedia ***ica**,*John Gabriel*

**Invariaent Group Property**,*William Elliot***LA SCIENCE EINSTEINIENNE : UN SAUT DANS LE NEANT**,*Pentcho Valev***Re: LA SCIENCE EINSTEINIENNE : UN SAUT DANS LE NEANT**,*Pentcho Valev*

**Stirlings approximation for factorial**,*Jamshīb al-Kāshī***Re: Stirlings approximation for factorial**,*Jame Kamel***Re: Stirlings approximation for factorial**,*James Waldby***Re: Stirlings approximation for factorial**,*David Bernier*

**The Barber Paradox Revisited: Non-Paradoxical Multiple Barber Scenarios.**,*Dan Christensen***Tensor Cross Products (3-space)**,*J.B. Wood***2.92 - Non-terminating representation has ZERO support in mathematics.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.92 - Non-terminating representation has ZERO support in mathematics.**,*Jamshīb al-Kāshī***huh?**,*Space998*

**Re: 2.92 - Non-terminating representation has ZERO support in mathematics.**,*John Gabriel******* TROLL ALERT ******,*Dan Christensen***Re: 2.92 - Non-terminating representation has ZERO support in mathematics.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.92 - Non-terminating representation has ZERO support in mathematics.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.92 - Non-terminating representation has ZERO support in mathematics.**,*John Gabriel*

**Unifying the theory of linear recurrence and differential equations**,*Paul***2.91 - What is a path?**,*John Gabriel******* TROLL ALERT ******,*Dan Christensen***Re: 2.91 - What is a path?**,*Jamshīb al-Kāshī***Re: 2.91 - What is a path?**,*John Gabriel*

**eliminating the Goon Clod posting under the fake name John Gabriel**,*Archimedes Plutonium***forger alert**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Re: forger alert**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Re: forger alert**,*Zeit Geist***Re: forger alert**,*Jamshīb al-Kāshī***Re: forger alert**,*Freda al-Parkins***Re: forger alert**,*Jamshīb al-Kāshī***Re: forger alert**,*Freda al-Parkins**Message not available***Re: (No Subject)**,*Freda al-Parkins*

**Re: eliminating the Goon Clod posting under the fake name John Gabriel**,*Jamshīb al-Kāshī*

**Christianity vs Knighthood**,*Kevin Barry***Re: 1.76 - There is no such thing as an infinite series.**,*jlara00***Re: 1.76 - There is no such thing as an infinite series.**,*John Gabriel*- <Possible follow-ups>
**Re: 1.76 - There is no such thing as an infinite series.**,*John Gabriel***three is less than pi**,*Space998*

**SOLUTIONS MANUAL FOR Quantum Physics of Atoms, Molecules, Solids, Nuclei and Particles 2 nd by Eisberg**,*kalvinmanual9***Group Property**,*William Elliot***Re: Group Property**,*Peter Percival***Re: Group Property**,*William Elliot***Re: Group Property**,*dullrich*

**Re: Group Property**,*dullrich*

**2.90 - The derivation of number and arithmetic axioms in one applet!**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.90 - The derivation of number and arithmetic axioms in one applet!**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.90 - The derivation of number and arithmetic axioms in one applet!**,*Jamshīb al-Kāshī***Re: 2.90 - The derivation of number and arithmetic axioms in one applet!**,*Jamshīb al-Kāshī*

****** TROLL ALERT ******,*Dan Christensen***Re: 2.90 - The derivation of number and arithmetic axioms in one applet!**,*John Gabriel*

**HOW DOES THE SPEED OF LIGHT VARY IN GRAVITY, EINSTEINIANS ?**,*Pentcho Valev***------ ------ ------Properties of A Right Triangle**,*Deep***Re: ------ ------ ------Properties of A Right Triangle**,*Peter Percival*

**IS DOPPLER EFFECT FATAL FOR RELATIVITY, EINSTEINIANS ?**,*Pentcho Valev***Re: IS DOPPLER EFFECT FATAL FOR RELATIVITY, EINSTEINIANS ?**,*Pentcho Valev***Re: IS DOPPLER EFFECT FATAL FOR RELATIVITY, EINSTEINIANS ?**,*Pentcho Valev*

**LET'S SOLVE THE TWIN PARADOX, EINSTEINIANS !**,*Pentcho Valev***Re: LET'S SOLVE THE TWIN PARADOX, EINSTEINIANS !**,*Pentcho Valev*

**Union and sum of infinite cardinals**,*Sandy***Re: Union and sum of infinite cardinals**,*FredJeffries***Re: Union and sum of infinite cardinals**,*David Hartley***Re: Union and sum of infinite cardinals**,*Seymour J.*

**Which methods for determination of double tangents?**,*IV***2.89 - If only I had a dollar for every worthless math dissertation ever cranked out...**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.89 - If only I had a dollar for every worthless math dissertation ever cranked out...**,*Jamshīb al-Kāshī***Re: 2.89 - If only I had a dollar for every worthless math dissertation ever cranked out...**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.89 - If only I had a dollar for every worthless math dissertation ever cranked out...**,*Jamshīb al-Kāshī******* TROLL ALERT ******,*Dan Christensen*

**Re: 2.89 - If only I had a dollar for every worthless math dissertation ever cranked out...**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.89 - If only I had a dollar for every worthless math dissertation ever cranked out...**,*John Gabriel*

**2.88 - Attention ignorant and stupid sci.mythers.**,*John Gabriel******* TROLL ALERT ******,*Dan Christensen***Re: 2.88 - Attention ignorant and stupid sci.mythers.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.88 - Attention ignorant and stupid sci.mythers.**,*Jamshīb al-Kāshī***Re: 2.88 - Attention ignorant and stupid sci.mythers.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.88 - Attention ignorant and stupid sci.mythers.**,*Jamshīb al-Kāshī*

**Re: 2.88 - Attention ignorant and stupid sci.mythers.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.88 - Attention ignorant and stupid sci.mythers.**,*Jamshīb al-Kāshī*

**Re: 2.88 - Attention ignorant and stupid sci.mythers.**,*John Gabriel*

**2.87 - A question on instantaneous rates.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.87 - A question on instantaneous rates.**,*John Gabriel***hey, sylli**,*Space998*

****** TROLL ALERT ******,*Dan Christensen***Re: 2.87 - A question on instantaneous rates.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.87 - A question on instantaneous rates.**,*Jamshīb al-Kāshī***still unanswered queries (like, we don't actually "want any comments, do we**,*Space998***Re: still unanswered queries (like, we don't actually "want any comments, do we**,*Jamshīb al-Kāshī***Re: still unanswered queries (like, we don't actually "want any comments, do we**,*Space998***Re: still unanswered queries (like, we don't actually "want any comments, do we**,*Jamshīb al-Kāshī***Re: still unanswered queries (like, we don't actually "want any comments, do we**,*Space998*

**Re: 2.87 - A question on instantaneous rates.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.87 - A question on instantaneous rates.**,*Henrietta Forskineater***Re: 2.87 - A question on instantaneous rates.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.87 - A question on instantaneous rates.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.87 - A question on instantaneous rates.**,*John Gabriel*

**2.86 - Another invitation.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.86 - Another invitation.**,*Jamshīb al-Kāshī***Re: 2.86 - Another invitation.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.86 - Another invitation.**,*Jamshīb al-Kāshī*

****** TROLL ALERT ****.**,*Dan Christensen***Re: 2.86 - Another invitation.**,*John Gabriel******* TROLL ALERT ******,*Dan Christensen*

**2.85 - Geogebra terminates my account because they don't like my content.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.85 - Geogebra terminates my account because they don't like my content.**,*John Gabriel******* TROLL ALERT ******,*Dan Christensen***Re: **** TROLL ALERT ******,*YBM***Re: **** TROLL ALERT ******,*John Gabriel***Re: **** TROLL ALERT ******,*YBM***Re: **** TROLL ALERT ******,*John Gabriel***Re: **** TROLL ALERT ******,*YBM***Re: **** TROLL ALERT ******,*Jamshīb al-Kāshī***Re: **** TROLL ALERT ******,*YBM***Re: **** TROLL ALERT ******,*Jamshīb al-Kāshī*

**Re: 2.85 - Geogebra terminates my account because they don't like my content.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.85 - Geogebra terminates my account because they don't like my content.**,*Henrietta Forskineater***Re: 2.85 - Geogebra terminates my account because they don't like my content.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.85 - Geogebra terminates my account because they don't like my content.**,*Chris M. Thomasson***Re: 2.85 - Geogebra terminates my account because they don't like my content.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.85 - Geogebra terminates my account because they don't like my content.**,*John Gabriel*

**Re: 2.79.1 I win again with the New Calculus**,*Dan Christensen*- <Possible follow-ups>
**Re: 2.79.1 I win again with the New Calculus**,*Eduardo Fuhqtardo*

**2.84 - You can't silence the truth. It always wins over lies and falsehoods.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.84 - You can't silence the truth. It always wins over lies and falsehoods.**,*Antonio J. Forskineater******* TROLL ALERT ******,*Dan Christensen***Re: 2.84 - You can't silence the truth. It always wins over lies and falsehoods.**,*John Gabriel*

**2.83 - What the academic bourgeoisie does not want you to know!**,*John Gabriel******* TROLL ALERT ******,*Dan Christensen***Re: 2.83 - What the academic bourgeoisie does not want you to know!**,*John Gabriel*

**2.82 - Zero is not required at all in mathematics, even though it is very useful.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.82 - Zero is not required at all in mathematics, even though it is very useful.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.82 - Zero is not required at all in mathematics, even though it is very useful.**,*John Gabriel******* TROLL ALERT ******,*Dan Christensen***Re: 2.82 - Zero is not required at all in mathematics, even though it is very useful.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.82 - Zero is not required at all in mathematics, even though it is very useful.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.82 - Zero is not required at all in mathematics, even though it is very useful.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.82 - Zero is not required at all in mathematics, even though it is very useful.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.82 - Zero is not required at all in mathematics, even though it is very useful.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.82 - Zero is not required at all in mathematics, even though it is very useful.**,*John Gabriel***not Roman numeralS (hashmarks**,*Space998*

**Re: 2.82 - Zero is not required at all in mathematics, even though it is very useful.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.82 - Zero is not required at all in mathematics, even though it is very useful.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.82 - Zero is not required at all in mathematics, even though it is very useful.**,*John Gabriel***2.6 - Zero is very useful.**,*Space998*

**Re: 2.82 - Zero is not required at all in mathematics, even though it is very useful.**,*John Gabriel*

**An elementary but important open problem**,*Victor Porton***Re: An elementary but important open problem**,*Victor Porton*

**EINSTEINIANA : COSMIC OR HUMAN CONSPIRACY ?**,*Pentcho Valev***Re: EINSTEINIANA : COSMIC OR HUMAN CONSPIRACY ?**,*Pentcho Valev***Re: EINSTEINIANA : COSMIC OR HUMAN CONSPIRACY ?**,*Pentcho Valev***Re: EINSTEINIANA : COSMIC OR HUMAN CONSPIRACY ?**,*Pentcho Valev***Re: EINSTEINIANA : COSMIC OR HUMAN CONSPIRACY ?**,*Pentcho Valev***Re: EINSTEINIANA : COSMIC OR HUMAN CONSPIRACY ?**,*Pentcho Valev***Re: EINSTEINIANA : COSMIC OR HUMAN CONSPIRACY ?**,*Pentcho Valev***Re: EINSTEINIANA : COSMIC OR HUMAN CONSPIRACY ?**,*Pentcho Valev*

**Univ Michigan professors endorsing Kepler Packing proof & generalization of V-E+F=2 to arxiv**,*Archimedes Plutonium***generalizing Euler formula V-E+F=2+(n*constant-cross-section)/2 #1996 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***The hexahedroN (brought to you by Sesame streeT**,*Space998***Euler like formulas: 360/A = whole number; V-E+F=2+(n*constant-cross-section)/2 #1997 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Conjecture: a right triangular solid is able to be cut out of a tetrahedron #1998 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Conjecture: Parallelepiped has no cross section! #1999 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***working up for a definition of regular-solid involving cross sections**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Re: working up for a definition of regular-solid involving cross sections**,*Archimedes Plutonium***finally a precision definition of Regular Solid; let us see if it works #2000 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***major problem with patch to fix it #2001 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***another patch needed for cylinder Re: major problem with patch to fix it**,*Archimedes Plutonium***after some patches, looks like a definition #2002 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Re: after some patches, looks like a definition #2002 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Re: after some patches, looks like a definition #2002 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Re: after some patches, looks like a definition #2002 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Re: after some patches, looks like a definition #2002 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Re: after some patches, looks like a definition #2002 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Re: after some patches, looks like a definition #2002 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***finally a precise definition #2003 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***research project-- the pattern of n-gons tiling space #2004 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***foorp**,*Space998***AP-conjecture: rectangular axes figure is the Least Dense in all Geometry #2005 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Re: AP-conjecture: rectangular axes figure is the Least Dense in all Geometry #2005 Correcting Math**,*Space998***thankyou**,*Space998***like Euler in, no, so many ways**,*Space998*

**2.88 all John Gabriel files trashed at filesanywhere a text file was written over each one of them**,*dan brinski***2.69 - scum John Gabriel kicked out of GeogebraTube for math lies**,*dan brinski***§ 535 Solution of Berry's Paradox**,*mueckenh***Re: § 535 Solution of Berry's Paradox**,*Virgil***Re: § 535 Solution of Berry's Paradox**,*Virgil***Re: § 535 Solution of Berry's Paradox**,*Zeit Geist***Re: § 535 Solution of Berry's Paradox**,*mueckenh***Re: § 535 Solution of Berry's Paradox**,*Virgil***Re: § 535 Solution of Berry's Paradox**,*Zeit Geist***Re: § 535 Solution of Berry's Paradox**,*Virgil***Re: ï¿½ 535 Solution of Berry's Paradox**,*mueckenh***Re: ï¿½ 535 Solution of Berry's Paradox**,*Virgil***Re: § 535 Solution of Berry's Paradox**,*mueckenh***Re: § 535 Solution of Berry's Paradox**,*"Jürgen R."***Re: § 535 Solution of Berry's Paradox**,*Virgil***Re: § 535 Solution of Berry's Paradox**,*mueckenh***Re: § 535 Solution of Berry's Paradox**,*Ralf Bader***Re: § 535 Solution of Berry's Paradox**,*mueckenh***Re: § 535 Solution of Berry's Paradox**,*Ralf Bader***Re: § 535 Solution of Berry's Paradox**,*mueckenh***Re: § 535 Solution of Berry's Paradox**,*Virgil***Re: ï¿½ 535 Solution of Berry's Paradox**,*mueckenh***Re: ï¿½ 535 Solution of Berry's Paradox**,*Virgil***Re: § 535 Solution of Berry's Paradox**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: § 535 Solution of Berry's Paradox**,*mueckenh***Re: § 535 Solution of Berry's Paradox**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: § 535 Solution of Berry's Paradox**,*mueckenh***Re: § 535 Solution of Berry's Paradox**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: § 535 Solution of Berry's Paradox**,*mueckenh***Re: § 535 Solution of Berry's Paradox**,*Virgil***Re: § 535 Solution of Berry's Paradox**,*Zeit Geist***Re: § 535 Solution of Berry's Paradox**,*mueckenh***Re: § 535 Solution of Berry's Paradox**,*YBM***Re: § 535 Solution of Berry's Paradox**,*Virgil***Re: § 535 Solution of Berry's Paradox**,*mueckenh***Re: § 535 Solution of Berry's Paradox**,*Zeit Geist***Re: § 535 Solution of Berry's Paradox**,*mueckenh***Re: § 535 Solution of Berry's Paradox**,*Virgil***Re: § 535 Solution of Berry's Paradox**,*Zeit Geist***Re: § 535 Solution of Berry's Paradox**,*mueckenh***Re: § 535 Solution of Berry's Paradox**,*Virgil***Re: § 535 Solution of Berry's Paradox**,*Zeit Geist***Re: § 535 Solution of Berry's Paradox**,*mueckenh***Re: § 535 Solution of Berry's Paradox**,*Virgil***Re: § 535 Solution of Berry's Paradox**,*Zeit Geist***Re: § 535 Solution of Berry's Paradox**,*Virgil***Re: ï¿½ 535 Solution of Berry's Paradox**,*mueckenh***Re: ï¿½ 535 Solution of Berry's Paradox**,*Zeit Geist***Re: ï¿½ 535 Solution of Berry's Paradox**,*Virgil***Re: § 535 Solution of Berry's Paradox**,*Zeit Geist***Re: § 535 Solution of Berry's Paradox**,*mueckenh***Re: § 535 Solution of Berry's Paradox**,*Zeit Geist***Re: § 535 Solution of Berry's Paradox**,*Virgil***Re: § 535 Solution of Berry's Paradox**,*mueckenh***Re: § 1 - 10000000: Mueckenheim is a mother*****,*Sam Sung***Re: § 535 Solution of Berry's Paradox**,*Virgil***Re: § 535 Solution of Berry's Paradox**,*Zeit Geist***Re: § 535 Solution of Berry's Paradox**,*mueckenh***Re: § 535 Solution of Berry's Paradox**,*Zeit Geist***Re: § 535 Solution of Berry's Paradox**,*mueckenh***Re: § 535 Solution of Berry's Paradox**,*mueckenh***Re: § 535 Solution of Berry's Paradox**,*mueckenh***Re: § 535 Solution of Berry's Paradox**,*Virgil***it may not be finiite**,*Space998***Re: § 535 Solution of Berry's Paradox**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: ? 535 Solution of Berry's Paradox**,*Virgil***Re: § 535 Solution of Berry's Paradox**,*mueckenh***Re: § 535 Solution of Berry's Paradox**,*YBM***Re: § 535 Solution of Berry's Paradox**,*mueckenh***Re: § 535 Solution of Berry's Paradox**,*Virgil***Re: § 535 Solution of Berry's Paradox**,*Zeit Geist***Re: § 535 Solution of Berry's Paradox**,*mueckenh***Re: § 535 Solution of Berry's Paradox**,*Virgil***Re: § 535 Solution of Berry's Paradox**,*Zeit Geist***Re: § 535 Solution of Berry's Paradox**,*mueckenh***Re: § 535 Solution of Berry's Paradox**,*Virgil***Re: § 535 Solution of Berry's Paradox**,*Zeit Geist***Re: § 535 Solution of Berry's Paradox**,*Virgil***Re: § 535 Solution of Berry's Paradox**,*Ben Bacarisse***zero & infinity are reciprocal**,*Space998***Re: § 535 Solution of Berry's Paradox**,*Virgil***Re: § 535 Solution of Berry's Paradox**,*Virgil***Re: ï¿½ 535 Solution of Berry's Paradox**,*mueckenh***Re: ï¿½ 535 Solution of Berry's Paradox**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: ï¿½ 535 Solution of Berry's Paradox**,*Virgil***Re: § 535 Solution of Berry's Paradox**,*Virgil*

**Re: § 535 Solution of Berry's Paradox**,*Space998*

**2.82 - How the debate with feeble minded Mark Chu Carroll would have ended...**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.82 - How the debate with feeble minded Mark Chu Carroll would have ended...**,*Jamshīb al-Kāshī***Re: 2.82 - How the debate with feeble minded Mark Chu Carroll would have ended...**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.82 - How the debate with feeble minded Mark Chu Carroll would have ended...**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.82 - How the debate with feeble minded Mark Chu Carroll would have ended...**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.82 - How the debate with feeble minded Mark Chu Carroll would have ended...**,*Port563***Re: 2.82 - How the debate with feeble minded Mark Chu Carroll would have ended...**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.82 - How the debate with feeble minded Mark Chu Carroll would have ended...**,*John Gabriel*

**2.81 - The more I publish truth, the more society hates me.**,*John Gabriel******* TROLL ALERT ******,*Dan Christensen***Re: 2.81 - The more I publish truth, the more society hates me.**,*John Gabriel******* TROLL ALERT ******,*Dan Christensen***Re: **** TROLL ALERT ******,*Dan Christensen***Re: **** TROLL ALERT ******,*Dan Christensen*

**Re: 2.81 - The more I publish truth, the more society hates me.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.81 - The more I publish truth, the more society hates me.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.81 - The more I publish truth, the more society hates me.**,*John Gabriel*

**2.80 - You can access ALL the latest Geogebra Applets here: https://www.filesanywhere.com/fs/v.aspx?v=8b6b6b8d615f6db4a2ab**,*John Gabriel***2.79 - You can access ALL the latest Geogebra Applets here: https://www.filesanywhere.com/fs/v.aspx?v=8b6b6b8d615f6db4a2ab**,*John Gabriel***2.78 - You can access ALL the latest Geogebra Applets here: https://www.filesanywhere.com/fs/v.aspx?v=8b6b6b8d615f6db4a2ab**,*John Gabriel***2.77 - You can access ALL the latest Geogebra Applets here: https://www.filesanywhere.com/fs/v.aspx?v=8b6b6b8d615f6db4a2ab**,*John Gabriel***2.76 - You can access ALL the latest Geogebra Applets here: https://www.filesanywhere.com/fs/v.aspx?v=8b6b6b8d615f6db4a2ab**,*John Gabriel*- <Possible follow-ups>
**2.76 - You can access ALL the latest Geogebra Applets here: https://www.filesanywhere.com/fs/v.aspx?v=8b6b6b8d615f6db4a2ab**,*John Gabriel*

**2.75 - You can access ALL the latest Geogebra Applets here: https://www.filesanywhere.com/fs/v.aspx?v=8b6b6b8d615f6db4a2ab**,*John Gabriel***2.74 - You can access ALL the latest Geogebra Applets here: https://www.filesanywhere.com/fs/v.aspx?v=8b6b6b8d615f6db4a2ab**,*John Gabriel***Non-mathematician about matrices - 2**,*joshipura***Re: Non-mathematician about matrices - 2**,*William Elliot***Re: Non-mathematician about matrices - 2**,*joshipura***Re: Non-mathematician about matrices - 2**,*William Elliot***Re: Non-mathematician about matrices - 2**,*joshipura***Re: Non-mathematician about matrices - 2**,*Peter Percival***Re: Non-mathematician about matrices - 2**,*Roland Franzius***Re: Non-mathematician about matrices - 2**,*Seymour J.*

**2.73 - You can access ALL the latest Geogebra Applets here: https://www.filesanywhere.com/fs/v.aspx?v=8b6b6b8d615f6db4a2ab**,*John Gabriel******* TROLL ALERT ******,*Dan Christensen***Re: 2.73 - You can access ALL the latest Geogebra Applets here: https://www.filesanywhere.com/fs/v.aspx?v=8b6b6b8d615f6db4a2ab**,*Dan Christensen***Re: 2.73 - You can access ALL the latest Geogebra Applets here: https://www.filesanywhere.com/fs/v.aspx?v=8b6b6b8d615f6db4a2ab**,*nab irinskd***Re: 2.73 - You can access ALL the latest Geogebra Applets here: https://www.filesanywhere.com/fs/v.aspx?v=8b6b6b8d615f6db4a2ab**,*Phony McNymshifter**John Gabriel**dullrich**John Gabriel*- <Possible follow-ups>
**2.73 - You can access ALL the latest Geogebra Applets here: https://www.filesanywhere.com/fs/v.aspx?v=8b6b6b8d615f6db4a2ab**,*John Gabriel*

**2.72 - You can access ALL the latest Geogebra Applets here: https://www.filesanywhere.com/fs/v.aspx?v=8b6b6b8d615f6db4a2ab**,*John Gabriel***2.71 - You can access ALL the latest Geogebra Applets here: https://www.filesanywhere.com/fs/v.aspx?v=8b6b6b8d615f6db4a2ab**,*John Gabriel***2.70 - You can access ALL the latest Geogebra Applets here: https://www.filesanywhere.com/fs/v.aspx?v=8b6b6b8d615f6db4a2ab**,*John Gabriel***Non-mathematician about matrices - 1**,*joshipura***Re: Non-mathematician about matrices - 1**,*Peter Percival***Re: Non-mathematician about matrices - 1**,*joshipura***Re: Non-mathematician about matrices - 1**,*Peter Percival*

**Re: Non-mathematician about matrices - 1**,*FredJeffries***Re: Non-mathematician about matrices - 1**,*joshipura***Re: Non-mathematician about matrices - 1**,*FredJeffries***Re: Non-mathematician about matrices - 1**,*joshipura*

**Re: Non-mathematician about matrices - 1**,*Martin Vaeth***Re: Non-mathematician about matrices - 1**,*joshipura***Re: Non-mathematician about matrices - 1**,*Martin Vaeth*

**Re: Non-mathematician about matrices - 1**,*Tim Golden BandTech.com*

**Why did Muecke cross the street?**,*"Jürgen R."***Re: Why did Muecke cross the street?**,*"Jürgen R."***Re: Why did Muecke cross the street?**,*Space998*

**WM is wrong, again, as usual!**,*Virgil***------------------------------------------------ POST ALL 'EINSTEIN' POSTS IN SCI.PHYSICS -------------------------------------------**,*grahamcooper7***Quiz - What does an ellipsis mean in infinite series?**,*John Gabriel***Re: Quiz - What does an ellipsis mean in infinite series?**,*John Gabriel***Re: Quiz - What does an ellipsis mean in infinite series?**,*dan brinski***Re: Quiz - What does an ellipsis mean in infinite series?**,*Math Annotations***Re: Quiz - What does an ellipsis mean in infinite series?**,*John Gabriel***it is the surfer's value of pi, aboriginally**,*Space998***Re: it is the surfer's value of pi, aboriginally**,*ban drinski***nu ;the journal of nu-mbertheo-ry**,*Space998***Re: nu ;the journal of nu-mbertheo-ry**,*Space998***Re: nu ;the journal of nu-mbertheo-ry**,*nab irinskd***Re: nu ;the journal of nu-mbertheo-ry**,*John Gabriel***Re: nu ;the journal of nu-mbertheo-ry**,*Jamshīd al-Kāshī*

**Re: Quiz - What does an ellipsis mean in infinite series?**,*Dan Christensen***two dots is inadequate**,*Space998*

**Re: Quiz - What does an ellipsis mean in infinite series?**,*John Gabriel***Re: Quiz - What does an ellipsis mean in infinite series?**,*dullrich***Re: Quiz - What does an ellipsis mean in infinite series?**,*mueckenh***Re: Quiz - What does an ellipsis mean in infinite series?**,*Virgil***Re: Quiz - What does an ellipsis mean in infinite series?**,*Why not***Re: Quiz - What does an ellipsis mean in infinite series?**,*John Gabriel***Re: Quiz - What does an ellipsis mean in infinite series?**,*Space998***Re: Quiz - What does an ellipsis mean in infinite series?**,*mueckenh***Re: Quiz - What does an ellipsis mean in infinite series?**,*Virgil***Re: Quiz - What does an ellipsis mean in infinite series?**,*John Gabriel***Re: Quiz - What does an ellipsis mean in infinite series?**,*Why not***Re: Quiz - What does an ellipsis mean in infinite series?**,*John Gabriel***Re: Quiz - What does an ellipsis mean in infinite series?**,*Why not***thankyou**,*Space998***Re: Quiz - What does an ellipsis mean in infinite series?**,*John Gabriel***Re: Quiz - What does an ellipsis mean in infinite series?**,*Why not***Re: Quiz - What does an ellipsis mean in infinite series?**,*mueckenh***Re: Quiz - What does an ellipsis mean in infinite series?**,*John Gabriel***Re: Quiz - What does an ellipsis mean in infinite series?**,*Why not***Re: Quiz - What does an ellipsis mean in infinite series?**,*mueckenh***Re: Quiz - What does an ellipsis mean in infinite series?**,*Virgil***Re: Quiz - What does an ellipsis mean in infinite series?**,*mueckenh***Re: Quiz - What does an ellipsis mean in infinite series?**,*Virgil***Re: Quiz - What does an ellipsis mean in infinite series?**,*John Gabriel*

**Re: Quiz - What does an ellipsis mean in infinite series?**,*John Gabriel*

**Answer to Quiz.**,*John Gabriel***Re: Answer to Quiz.**,*Why not***Re: Answer to Quiz.**,*John Gabriel***Re: Answer to Quiz.**,*Jamshīb al-Kāshī***Re: Answer to Quiz.**,*Why not***Re: Answer to Quiz.**,*John Gabriel***Re: Answer to Quiz.**,*Jamshīb al-Kāshī*

**Re: Answer to Quiz.**,*Space998***Re: Answer to Quiz.**,*Space998***Re: Answer to Quiz.**,*Jamshīb al-Kāshī*

**THE SILLIEST EINSTEINIANS**,*Pentcho Valev***Re: THE SILLIEST EINSTEINIANS**,*Pentcho Valev***Re: THE SILLIEST EINSTEINIANS**,*Pentcho Valev***Re: THE SILLIEST EINSTEINIANS**,*grahamcooper7***Re: THE SILLIEST EINSTEINIANS**,*Pentcho Valev*

**Corollary to the Theorema Egregium Augsburgiensis**,*"Jürgen R."***2.69 - Why does Newton's 'ultimate ratio' require no rigorisation with respect to the general derivative?**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.69 - Why does Newton's 'ultimate ratio' require no rigorisation with respect to the general derivative?**,*dan brinski***Re: 2.69 - Why does Newton's 'ultimate ratio' require no rigorisation with respect to the general derivative?**,*YBM***Re: 2.69 - Why does Newton's 'ultimate ratio' require no rigorisation with respect to the general derivative?**,*Dan Christensen**John Gabriel*

**2.68 - dullrich puts his foot in his mouth yet again!**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.68 - dullrich puts his foot in his mouth yet again!**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.68 - dullrich puts his foot in his mouth yet again!**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.68 - dullrich puts his foot in his mouth yet again!**,*dullrich***Re: 2.68 - dullrich puts his foot in his mouth yet again!**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.68 - dullrich puts his foot in his mouth yet again!**,*dullrich***Re: 2.68 - dullrich puts his foot in his mouth yet again!**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.68 - dullrich puts his foot in his mouth yet again!**,*Space998***Re: 2.68 - dullrich puts his foot in his mouth yet again!**,*John Gabriel***das foot**,*Space998***Re: 2.68 - dullrich puts his foot in his mouth yet again!**,*dullrich***Re: 2.68 - dullrich puts his foot in his mouth yet again!**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.68 - dullrich puts his foot in his mouth yet again!**,*dullrich***Re: 2.68 - dullrich puts his foot in his mouth yet again!**,*Soap Research***Re: 2.68 - dullrich puts his foot in his mouth yet again!**,*Jamshīb al-Kāshī*

****** TROLL ALERT ******,*Dan Christensen***Re: **** TROLL ALERT ******,*John Gabriel*

**supertriviallities of what's-his-name**,*Space998***Re: supertriviallities of what's-his-name**,*dan brinski***Re: supertriviallities of what's-his-name**,*John Gabriel***Re: supertriviallities of what's-his-name**,*dan brinski***Re: supertriviallities of what's-his-name**,*John Gabriel***Re: supertriviallities of what's-his-name**,*dan brinski***Re: supertriviallities of what's-his-name**,*Freda Parkins***Re: supertriviallities of what's-his-name**,*dan brinski***Re: supertriviallities of what's-his-name**,*Freda Parkins***Re: supertriviallities of what's-his-name**,*dan brinski***Re: supertriviallities of what's-his-name**,*Jamshīd al-Kāshī***superlatives for the supertrivials**,*Space998*

**Re: 2.68 - dullrich puts his foot in his mouth yet again!**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.68 - dullrich puts his foot in his mouth yet again!**,*dan brinski***degenerate loci**,*Space998*

**Re: 2.68 - dullrich puts his foot in his mouth yet again!**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.68 - dullrich puts his foot in his mouth yet again!**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.68 - dullrich puts his foot in his mouth yet again!**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.68 - dullrich puts his foot in his mouth yet again!**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.68 - dullrich puts his foot in his mouth yet again!**,*YBM***Re: 2.68 - dullrich puts his foot in his mouth yet again!**,*dullrich***Re: 2.68 - dullrich puts his foot in his mouth yet again!**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.68 - dullrich puts his foot in his mouth yet again!**,*YBM***Re: 2.68 - dullrich puts his foot in his mouth yet again!**,*dullrich***Re: 2.68 - dullrich puts his foot in his mouth yet again!**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.68 - dullrich puts his foot in his mouth yet again!**,*David C. Ullrich***Re: 2.68 - dullrich puts his foot in his mouth yet again!**,*Jamshīb al-Kāshī*

**Re: 2.68 - dullrich puts his foot in his mouth yet again!**,*dullrich***Re: 2.68 - dullrich puts his foot in his mouth yet again!**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.68 - dullrich puts his foot in his mouth yet again!**,*YBM***Re: 2.68 - dullrich puts his foot in his mouth yet again!**,*dullrich***Re: 2.68 - dullrich puts his foot in his mouth yet again!**,*Jamshīb al-Kāshī***Re: 2.68 - dullrich puts his foot in his mouth yet again!**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.68 - dullrich puts his foot in his mouth yet again!**,*dullrich***Re: 2.68 - dullrich puts his foot in his mouth yet again!**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.68 - dullrich puts his foot in his mouth yet again!**,*Jame Kamel***Re: 2.68 - dullrich puts his foot in his mouth yet again!**,*dullrich***Re: 2.68 - dullrich puts his foot in his mouth yet again!**,*dullrich***Re: 2.68 - dullrich puts his foot in his mouth yet again!**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.68 - dullrich puts his foot in his mouth yet again!**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.68 - dullrich puts his foot in his mouth yet again!**,*Jamshīb al-Kāshī***Re: 2.68 - dullrich puts his foot in his mouth yet again!**,*Paul*

**Re: 2.68 - dullrich puts his foot in his mouth yet again!**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.68 - dullrich puts his foot in his mouth yet again!**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.68 - dullrich puts his foot in his mouth yet again!**,*dullrich***Re: 2.68 - dullrich puts his foot in his mouth yet again!**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.68 - dullrich puts his foot in his mouth yet again!**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.68 - dullrich puts his foot in his mouth yet again!**,*Jamshīb al-Kāshī***Re: 2.68 - dullrich puts his foot in his mouth yet again!**,*dullrich***Re: 2.68 - dullrich puts his foot in his mouth yet again!**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.68 - dullrich puts his foot in his mouth yet again!**,*Jamshīb al-Kāshī*

**FALLING LIGHT REFUTES EINSTEIN**,*Pentcho Valev***Re: FALLING LIGHT REFUTES EINSTEIN**,*Pentcho Valev*

**promotional designer handbags**,*promotionalsworld***Re: promotional designer handbags**,*dan brinski*

**Density of primes**,*Paul***Re: Density of primes**,*Pubkeybreaker***Re: Density of primes**,*pepstein5***Re: Density of primes**,*Pubkeybreaker***Re: Density of primes**,*Pubkeybreaker*

**Re: Density of primes**,*William Elliot*

**OCHO AD AVVOCATO ***FILOMOSESSUALE DANIELE MINOTTI (FACEBOOK)! OLTRE CHE MEGALAVA EURO MAFIOSI, NAZI, ASSASSINO: MANDANTE DI OMICIDI O "SUICIDATE"! STALKER DI EROE CIVILE MICHELE NISTA SU ORDINE DI TIRANNO FASCIO***FILO TANTO QUANTO: SILVIO BERLUSCONI!**,*SERGIO LIV. TRUFFATO DA DANIELE MINOTTI.***2.67 - None of my materials contain any viruses, trojans or malware of ANY kind.**,*John Gabriel***ANALOGY BETWEEN SOUND AND LIGHT REFUTES EINSTEIN**,*Pentcho Valev***Re: ANALOGY BETWEEN SOUND AND LIGHT REFUTES EINSTEIN**,*Pentcho Valev*

**MOVING CLOCKS REFUTE EINSTEIN**,*Pentcho Valev***Re: MOVING CLOCKS REFUTE EINSTEIN**,*Pentcho Valev*

**2.70. do not respond to John Gabriel posts or even his old posts**,*dan brinski***2.66 - Systematic integration in the New Calculus**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.66 - Systematic integration in the New Calculus**,*dan brinski***Re: 2.66 - Systematic integration in the New Calculus**,*Dan Christensen***Re: 2.66 - Systematic integration in the New Calculus**,*Math Annotations***Re: 2.66 - Systematic integration in the New Calculus**,*John Gabriel***integration by integration**,*Space998*

**Re: 2.66 - Systematic integration in the New Calculus**,*John Gabriel*

**2.65 - Does bijection between infinite sets mean they have the same number of elements?**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.65 - Does bijection between infinite sets mean they have the same number of elements?**,*dan brinski***Re: 2.65 - Does bijection between infinite sets mean they have the same number of elements?**,*Zeit Geist***Re: 2.65 - Does bijection between infinite sets mean they have the same number of elements?**,*grahamcooper7***Re: 2.65 - Does bijection between infinite sets mean they have the same number of elements?**,*Dan Christensen***Re: 2.65 - Does bijection between infinite sets mean they have the same number of elements?**,*John Gabriel*

**2.64 - A number is the measure of a magnitude.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.64 - A number is the measure of a magnitude.**,*dan brinski***Re: 2.64 - A number is the measure of a magnitude.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.64 - A number is the measure of a magnitude.**,*Jamshīb al-Kāshī*

**Re: 2.64 - A number is the measure of a magnitude.**,*Dan Christensen***Re: 2.64 - A number is the measure of a magnitude.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.64 - A number is the measure of a magnitude.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.64 - A number is the measure of a magnitude.**,*YBM***Re: 2.64 - A number is the measure of a magnitude.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.64 - A number is the measure of a magnitude.**,*Dan Christensen*

**Re: 2.64 - A number is the measure of a magnitude.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.64 - A number is the measure of a magnitude.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.64 - A number is the measure of a magnitude.**,*Phony McNymshifter*

**Re: 2.64 - A number is the measure of a magnitude.**,*nab irinskd***use pith (just for fun**,*Space998*

**Re: 2.64 - A number is the measure of a magnitude.**,*John Gabriel***t is the canonical scalar variable in quaternions, the "real part**,*Space998***Re: 2.64 - A number is the measure of a magnitude.**,*Jamshīb al-Kāshī*

**2.64 - New beginning, the FJZHUTAWAC (kaffir) function**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.64 - New beginning, the FJZHUTAWAC (kaffir) function**,*Dan Christensen*

**Has anyone formalized the Liar Paradox showing that it is an error?**,*Peter Olcott***Re: Has anyone formalized the Liar Paradox showing that it is an error?**,*Peter Percival***Re: Has anyone formalized the Liar Paradox showing that it is an error?**,*Peter Olcott***Re: Has anyone formalized the Liar Paradox showing that it is an error?**,*Dirk Van de moortel*

**Re: Has anyone formalized the Liar Paradox showing that it is an error?**,*Dan Christensen***Re: Has anyone formalized the Liar Paradox showing that it is an error?**,*Peter Olcott***Re: Has anyone formalized the Liar Paradox showing that it is an error?**,*Dan Christensen***Re: Has anyone formalized the Liar Paradox showing that it is an error?**,*Peter Olcott***Re: Has anyone formalized the Liar Paradox showing that it is an error?**,*Dan Christensen***I really, really, really am some thing**,*Space998***Re: Has anyone formalized the Liar Paradox showing that it is an error?**,*Peter Olcott***Re: Has anyone formalized the Liar Paradox showing that it is an error?**,*Dan Christensen***Re: Has anyone formalized the Liar Paradox showing that it is an error?**,*Peter Olcott***Re: Has anyone formalized the Liar Paradox showing that it is an error?**,*Space998*

**Applications of Wmath**,*"Jürgen R."***Re: Applications of Wmath**,*Tommy***Re: Applications of Wmath**,*grahamcooper7*

**Re: Applications of Wmath**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Applications of Wmath**,*"Jürgen R."***Re: Applications of Wmath**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Applications of Wmath**,*Dan Christensen***Re: Applications of Wmath**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Applications of Wmath**,*"Jürgen R."***Re: Applications of Wmath**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Applications of Wmath**,*Sam Sung***Re: Applications of Wmath**,*FredJeffries***Re: Applications of Wmath**,*"Jürgen R."*

**Re: Applications of Wmath**,*FredJeffries***Re: Applications of Wmath**,*grahamcooper7*

**HOW EINSTEINIANS KILL AND THEN RESURRECT RELATIVITY**,*Pentcho Valev***Re: HOW EINSTEINIANS KILL AND THEN RESURRECT RELATIVITY**,*Pentcho Valev*

**the motivation of the Goon Clod posting under the fake name John Gabriel**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Hermann Weyl, poet of mathematics**,*Christopher J. Henrich***Re: Hermann Weyl, poet of mathematics**,*John Jones***Re: Hermann Weyl, poet of mathematics**,*Peter Percival***Re: Hermann Weyl, poet of mathematics**,*Christopher J. Henrich***Re: Hermann Weyl, poet of mathematics**,*John Jones*

**Re: Hermann Weyl, poet of mathematics**,*FredJeffries*

**Re: FAA Cancels Certification of Belfort Instrument Company DigiWx AWOS thanks to Mark W. Decker**,*digiwx***Our son is an idiot! He should shut up.**,*Charles & Betty Gabriel***Re: Our son is an idiot! He should shut up.**,*dan brinski*

**Relation between Fourier transform and jump discontinuties**,*Rajesh D***Is Science Math? Is Math Science?**,*Bret Cahill***Re: Is Science Math? Is Math Science?**,*richard miller***Re: Is Science Math? Is Math Science?**,*Bret Cahill***Re: Is Science Math? Is Math Science?**,*richard miller***Re: Is Science Math? Is Math Science?**,*Bret Cahill*

**Re: Is Science Math? Is Math Science?**,*FredJeffries***Re: Is Science Math? Is Math Science?**,*Ken Pledger***Re: Is Science Math? Is Math Science?**,*FredJeffries***Re: Is Science Math? Is Math Science?**,*Virgil***Re: Is Science Math? Is Math Science?**,*Ken Pledger***Re: Is Science Math? Is Math Science?**,*Christopher J. Henrich*

**Re: Is Science Math? Is Math Science?**,*Bret Cahill***Re: Is Science Math? Is Math Science?**,*Virgil***Re: Is Science Math? Is Math Science?**,*Bret Cahill***Re: Is Science Math? Is Math Science?**,*Space998***Einstein'd merely diagrammatical proof**,*Space998*

**2.63.5 John Gabriel arrested convicted GUNS**,*pani***Re: 2.63.5 John Gabriel arrested convicted GUNS**,*dan brinski*

**2.63 - 0.999... is not equal to 1 or anything else, but itself, whatever it is.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.63 - 0.999... is not equal to 1 or anything else, but itself, whatever it is.**,*Dan Christensen***Re: 2.63 - 0.999... is not equal to 1 or anything else, but itself, whatever it is.**,*Mike Hunt***Re: 2.63 - 0.999... is not equal to 1 or anything else, but itself, whatever it is.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.63 - 0.999... is not equal to 1 or anything else, but itself, whatever it is.**,*Space998***Re: 2.63 - 0.999... is not equal to 1 or anything else, but itself, whatever it is.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.63 - 0.999... is not equal to 1 or anything else, but itself, whatever it is.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.63 - 0.999... is not equal to 1 or anything else, but itself, whatever it is.**,*John Gabriel***it is not the same as one <period, but it has the same archimedean valuation**,*Space998***Re: 2.63 - 0.999... is not equal to 1 or anything else, but itself, whatever it is.**,*nab irinskd***Re: 2.63 - 0.999... is not equal to 1 or anything else, but itself, whatever it is.**,*Space998***Re: 2.63 - 0.999... is not equal to 1 or anything else, but itself, whatever it is.**,*Jamshīd al-Kāshī***Re: 2.63 - 0.999... is not equal to 1 or anything else, but itself, whatever it is.**,*John Gabriel***archimeean valuation (absolute value [common arithmetic {first-order predicate calculus <logic -- the first "R**,*Space998***Re: 2.63 - 0.999... is not equal to 1 or anything else, but itself, whatever it is.**,*Jamshīb al-Kāshī*

**Re: 2.63 - 0.999... is not equal to 1 or anything else, but itself, whatever it is.**,*John Gabriel***again, congratulation -- again**,*Space998***your welcome again -- again**,*Space998*

**Re: 2.63 - 0.999... is not equal to 1 or anything else, but itself, whatever it is.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.63 - 0.999... is not equal to 1 or anything else, but itself, whatever it is.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.63 - 0.999... is not equal to 1 or anything else, but itself, whatever it is.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.63 - 0.999... is not equal to 1 or anything else, but itself, whatever it is.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.63 - 0.999... is not equal to 1 or anything else, but itself, whatever it is.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.63 - 0.999... is not equal to 1 or anything else, but itself, whatever it is.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.63 - 0.999... is not equal to 1 or anything else, but itself, whatever it is.**,*John Gabriel***0.999... is not equal to 1.000....**,*Space998***31.4 ****-mouthing Stevin**,*Space998*

**Re: 2.63 - 0.999... is not equal to 1 or anything else, but itself, whatever it is.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.63 - 0.999... is not equal to 1 or anything else, but itself, whatever it is.**,*John Gabriel*

**THE WORDS "ONLY APPARENTLY" IN EINSTEIN'S 1905 PAPER**,*Pentcho Valev***Re: THE WORDS "ONLY APPARENTLY" IN EINSTEIN'S 1905 PAPER**,*John Gabriel*

**2.66.16 Nutcase loose in harlum boinky**,*pani***2.62 - The Gabriel Limit theorem for Cauchy's flawed calculus.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.62 - The Gabriel Limit theorem for Cauchy's flawed calculus.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.62 - The Gabriel Limit theorem for Cauchy's flawed calculus.**,*Dan Christensen***Re: 2.62 - The Gabriel Limit theorem for Cauchy's flawed calculus.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.62 - The Gabriel Limit theorem for Cauchy's flawed calculus.**,*Mike Hunt***Re: 2.62 - The Gabriel Limit theorem for Cauchy's flawed calculus.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.62 - The Gabriel Limit theorem for Cauchy's flawed calculus.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.62 - The Gabriel Limit theorem for Cauchy's flawed calculus.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.62 - The Gabriel Limit theorem for Cauchy's flawed calculus.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.62 - The Gabriel Limit theorem for Cauchy's flawed calculus.**,*Dan Christensen***Re: 2.62 - The Gabriel Limit theorem for Cauchy's flawed calculus.**,*dullrich**Message not available***Re: 2.62 - The Gabriel Limit theorem for Cauchy's flawed calculus.**,*Jamshīb al-Kāshī*

**Re: 2.62 - The Gabriel Limit theorem for Cauchy's flawed calculus.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.62 - The Gabriel Limit theorem for Cauchy's flawed calculus.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.62 - The Gabriel Limit theorem for Cauchy's flawed calculus.**,*Jamshīb al-Kāshī*

**Re: 2.62 - The Gabriel Limit theorem for Cauchy's flawed calculus.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.62 - The Gabriel Limit theorem for Cauchy's flawed calculus.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.62 - The Gabriel Limit theorem for Cauchy's flawed calculus.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.62 - The Gabriel Limit theorem for Cauchy's flawed calculus.**,*Jamshīb al-Kāshī*

**Re: 2.62 - The Gabriel Limit theorem for Cauchy's flawed calculus.**,*John Gabriel*

**2.61 - Neither D. Cuts not Cauchy Sequences provide valid construction for real numbers.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.61 - Neither D. Cuts not Cauchy Sequences provide valid construction for real numbers.**,*Dan Christensen***Re: 2.61 - Neither D. Cuts not Cauchy Sequences provide valid construction for real numbers.**,*konyberg***Re: 2.61 - Neither D. Cuts not Cauchy Sequences provide valid construction for real numbers.**,*pani panagrahi***Re: 2.61 - Neither D. Cuts not Cauchy Sequences provide valid construction for real numbers.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.61 - Neither D. Cuts not Cauchy Sequences provide valid construction for real numbers.**,*Mike Hunt***Re: 2.61 - Neither D. Cuts not Cauchy Sequences provide valid construction for real numbers.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.61 - Neither D. Cuts not Cauchy Sequences provide valid construction for real numbers.**,*John Gabriel*

**contract killing of Gabriel simpler ?**,*Nomen Nescio***2.68.4 John Gabriel hates Jews but not the Jewish People 2013 post by Jew Hater John Gabriel Jewish lawyers are especially prone to a devastating side-effect of this disease called MPD induced filth syndrome**,*Amber***2.66.1 John Gabriel infested other groups as mean troll 2013 Default Re Is 0.9999999999999999999999999999 equal to one?**,*Amber***2.63 - The new definition of "definition"**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.63 - The new definition of "definition"**,*Dan Christensen***Re: 2.63 - The new definition of "definition"**,*Dan Christensen*

**2.63 John Gabriel 2013 narssistic TROLL**,*Amber***As to John Gabriel's narccisism and abusiveness 2013.**,*Amber***Chebyshev polynomials derivative**,*Cristiano***Re: Chebyshev polynomials derivative**,*Roland Franzius*

**A Practical Infinite 1-time-pad Cypher Messaging System!**,*grahamcooper7***Z+ Notaton**,*William Elliot***Re: Z+ Notaton**,*Freda Gabriel***Re: Z+ Notaton**,*Timothy Murphy*

**Re: Z+ Notaton**,*dullrich***Re: Z+ Notaton**,*Ross A. Finlayson***Re: Z+ Notaton**,*William Elliot***Re: Z+ Notaton**,*Jussi Piitulainen***Re: Z+ Notaton**,*Seymour J.*

**Baire Example**,*William Elliot***Re: Baire Example**,*quasi***Re: Baire Example**,*William Elliot***Re: Baire Example**,*quasi***Re: Baire Example**,*William Elliot***Re: Baire Example**,*quasi***Re: Baire Example**,*William Elliot*

**Harvard professors endorse proof of Fundamental Theorem of Algebra to arxiv**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Re: Harvard professors endorse proof of Fundamental Theorem of Algebra to arxiv**,*Space998***Re: Harvard professors endorse proof of Fundamental Theorem of Algebra to arxiv**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Re: Harvard professors endorse proof of Fundamental Theorem of Algebra to arxiv**,*Dan Christensen***Re: Harvard professors endorse proof of Fundamental Theorem of Algebra to arxiv**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Re: Harvard professors endorse proof of Fundamental Theorem of Algebra to arxiv**,*Archimedes Plutonium*

**Re: Harvard professors endorse proof of Fundamental Theorem of Algebra to arxiv**,*Dan Christensen*

**Re: Plagiarising Walsh (Like MLK & BHO) departure leaves America hating Democrats to scramble**,*Freda Gabriel***2.61 - Cohomology to be made Illegal**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.61 - Cohomology to be made Illegal**,*Freda Gabriel***Re: 2.61 - Cohomology to be made Illegal**,*John Gabriel*

**2.60 - I am back on GeogebraTube.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.60 - I am back on GeogebraTube.**,*snoben***Re: 2.60 - I am back on GeogebraTube.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.60 - I am back on GeogebraTube.**,*snoben***Re: 2.60 - I am back on GeogebraTube.**,*Freda Snoden*

**Re: 2.60 - I am back on GeogebraTube.**,*Dan Christensen***Re: 2.60 - I am back on GeogebraTube.**,*Zhumley***Re: 2.60 - I am back on GeogebraTube.**,*munchbutter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx***Re: 2.60 - I am back on GeogebraTube.**,*Dan Christensen***Re: 2.60 - I am back on GeogebraTube.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.60 - I am back on GeogebraTube.**,*John Gabriel*

**Re: John Gabriel is mentally sound.**,*snoben***Re: John Gabriel is mentally sound.**,*John Gabriel*

**HOW EINSTEINIANS LEAVE THE SINKING SHIP**,*Pentcho Valev***Re: HOW EINSTEINIANS LEAVE THE SINKING SHIP**,*Pentcho Valev*

**Re: roots of x^12 = 2^x**,*gyrus1***Re: roots of x^12 = 2^x**,*Peter Percival*- <Possible follow-ups>
**Re: roots of x^12 = 2^x**,*gyrus1***Re: roots of x^12 = 2^x**,*gyrus1***Re: roots of x^12 = 2^x**,*gyrus1*

**Mueckenheim's Theorema Egregium**,*"Jürgen R."***Re: Mueckenheim's Theorema Egregium**,*mueckenh***Re: Mueckenheim's Theorema Egregium**,*Sam Sung***Re: Mueckenheim's Theorema Egregium**,*"Jürgen R."***Re: Mueckenheim's Theorema Egregium**,*Sam Sung***Re: Mueckenheim's Theorema Egregium**,*mueckenh***Re: Mueckenheim's Theorema Egregium**,*"Jürgen R."***Re: Mueckenheim's Theorema Egregium**,*mueckenh***Re: Mueckenheim's Theorema Egregium**,*YBM***Re: Mueckenheim's Theorema Egregium**,*mueckenh***Re: Mueckenheim's Theorema Egregium**,*YBM***Re: Mueckenheim's Theorema Egregium**,*mueckenh***Re: Mueckenheim's Theorema Egregium**,*Virgil***Re: Mueckenheim's Theorema Egregium**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Mueckenheim's Theorema Egregium**,*Virgil***Re: Mueckenheim's Theorema Egregium**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Mueckenheim's Theorema Egregium**,*Michael Klemm***Re: Mueckenheim's Theorema Egregium**,*Sam Sung***Re: Mueckenheim's Theorema Egregium**,*Sam Sung***Re: Mueckenheim's Theorema Egregium**,*mueckenh***Re: Mueckenheim's Theorema Egregium**,*Sam Sung***Re: Mueckenheim's Theorema Egregium**,*mueckenh***Re: Mueckenheim's Theorema Egregium**,*Sam Sung***Re: Mueckenheim's Theorema Egregium**,*Virgil***Re: Mueckenheim's Theorema Egregium**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Mueckenheim's Theorema Egregium**,*mueckenh***Re: Mueckenheim's Theorema Egregium**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Mueckenheim's Theorema Egregium**,*mueckenh***Re: Mueckenheim's Theorema Egregium**,*Virgil***Re: Mueckenheim's Theorema Egregium**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Mueckenheim's Theorema Egregium**,*mueckenh***Re: Mueckenheim's Theorema Egregium**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Mueckenheim's Theorema Egregium**,*Virgil***Re: Mueckenheim's Theorema Egregium**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Mueckenheim's Theorema Egregium**,*mueckenh***Re: Mueckenheim's Theorema Egregium**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Mueckenheim's Theorema Egregium**,*Virgil***Re: Mueckenheim's Theorema Egregium**,*Virgil***Re: Mueckenheim's Theorema Egregium**,*Virgil***Re: Mueckenheim's Theorema Egregium**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Mueckenheim's Theorema Egregium**,*"Jürgen R."***Re: Mueckenheim's Theorema Egregium**,*mueckenh***Re: Mueckenheim's Theorema Egregium**,*"Jürgen R."***Re: Mueckenheim's Theorema Egregium**,*mueckenh***Re: Mueckenheim's Theorema Egregium**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Mueckenheim's Theorema Egregium**,*mueckenh***Re: Mueckenheim's Theorema Egregium**,*Virgil***Re: Mueckenheim's Theorema Egregium**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Mueckenheim's Theorema Egregium**,*mueckenh***Re: Mueckenheim's Theorema Egregium**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Mueckenheim's Theorema Egregium**,*Virgil***Re: Mueckenheim's Theorema Egregium**,*Virgil***Re: Mueckenheim's Theorema Egregium**,*FredJeffries***Re: Mueckenheim's Theorema Egregium**,*mueckenh***Re: Mueckenheim's Theorema Egregium**,*Michael Klemm***Re: Mueckenheim's Theorema Egregium**,*mueckenh***Re: Mueckenheim's Theorema Egregium**,*Virgil***Re: Mueckenheim's Theorema Egregium**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Mueckenheim's Theorema Egregium**,*Virgil***Re: Mueckenheim's Theorema Egregium**,*Virgil***Re: Mueckenheim's Theorema Egregium**,*Virgil***Re: Mueckenheim's Theorema Egregium**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Mueckenheim's Theorema Egregium**,*mueckenh***Re: Mueckenheim's Theorema Egregium**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Mueckenheim's Theorema Egregium**,*mueckenh***Re: Mueckenheim's Theorema Egregium**,*Virgil***Re: Mueckenheim's Theorema Egregium**,*Virgil***Re: Mueckenheim's Theorema Egregium**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Mueckenheim's Theorema Egregium**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Mueckenheim's Theorema Egregium**,*Virgil***Re: Mueckenheim's Theorema Egregium**,*mueckenh***Re: Mueckenheim's Theorema Egregium**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Mueckenheim's Theorema Egregium**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Mueckenheim's Theorema Egregium**,*Virgil***Re: Mueckenheim's Theorema Egregium**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Mueckenheim's Theorema Egregium**,*Sam Sung***Re: Mueckenheim's Theorema Egregium**,*mueckenh***Re: Mueckenheim's Theorema Egregium**,*Virgil***Re: Mueckenheim's Theorema Egregium**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Mueckenheim's Theorema Egregium**,*mueckenh***Re: Mueckenheim's Theorema Egregium**,*Virgil***Re: Mueckenheim's Theorema Egregium**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Mueckenheim's Theorema Egregium**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Mueckenheim's Theorema Egregium**,*Virgil***Re: Mueckenheim's Theorema Egregium**,*mueckenh***Re: Mueckenheim's Theorema Egregium**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Mueckenheim's Theorema Egregium**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Mueckenheim's Theorema Egregium**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Mueckenheim's Theorema Egregium**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Mueckenheim's Theorema Egregium**,*Virgil***Re: Mueckenheim's Theorema Egregium**,*Virgil***Re: Mueckenheim's Theorema Egregium**,*"Jürgen R."***Re: Mueckenheim's Theorema Egregium**,*mueckenh***Re: Mueckenheim's Theorema Egregium**,*"Jürgen R."***Re: Mueckenheim's Theorema Egregium**,*mueckenh***Re: Mueckenheim's Theorema Egregium**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Mueckenheim's Theorema Egregium**,*YBM***Re: Mueckenheim's Theorema Egregium**,*Virgil***Re: Mueckenheim's Theorema Egregium**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Mueckenheim's Theorema Egregium**,*Virgil***Re: Mueckenheim's Theorema Egregium**,*FredJeffries***Re: Mueckenheim's Theorema Egregium**,*mueckenh***Re: Mueckenheim's Theorema Egregium**,*Virgil***Re: Mueckenheim's Theorema Egregium**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Mueckenheim's Theorema Egregium**,*mueckenh***Re: Mueckenheim's Theorema Egregium**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Mueckenheim's Theorema Egregium**,*mueckenh***Re: Mueckenheim's Theorema Egregium**,*Virgil***Re: Mueckenheim's Theorema Egregium**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Mueckenheim's Theorema Egregium**,*Virgil***Re: Mueckenheim's Theorema Egregium**,*Sam Sung***Re: Mueckenheim's Theorema Egregium**,*Virgil***Re: Mueckenheim's Theorema Egregium**,*Sam Sung***Re: Mueckenheim's Theorema Egregium**,*Virgil*

**Re: Mueckenheim's Theorema Egregium**,*YBM***Re: Mueckenheim's Theorema Egregium**,*Virgil*

**Re: Mueckenheim's Theorema Egregium**,*munchbutter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx*

**Re: 2.997xx John Gabriel Mental Analysis**,*snoben***professors of MIT endorse proof to arxiv that Maxwell Equations derive Peano Axioms**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Re: professors of MIT endorse proof to arxiv that Maxwell Equations derive Peano Axioms**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Re: professors of MIT endorse proof to arxiv that Maxwell Equations derive Peano Axioms**,*Archimedes Plutonium*

**long total stopping times in Collatz iterations**,*David Bernier***professors of Yale endorse 5 Color Mapping proof and valid Jordan Curve proof to arxiv**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Re: professors of Yale endorse 5 Color Mapping proof and valid Jordan Curve proof to arxiv**,*Archimedes Plutonium*- <Possible follow-ups>
**professors of Yale endorse 5 Color Mapping proof and valid Jordan Curve proof to arxiv**,*Archimedes Plutonium*

**Returning to Oort**,*Kevin Barry***EINSTEIN'S MOST BLATANT LIE**,*Pentcho Valev***Re: EINSTEIN'S MOST BLATANT LIE**,*Pentcho Valev***Re: EINSTEIN'S MOST BLATANT LIE**,*Pentcho Valev***Re: EINSTEIN'S MOST BLATANT LIE**,*Pentcho Valev*

**Only for mathematicians!**,*mueckenh***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Sam Sung***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*"Jürgen R."***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*mueckenh***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Sam Sung***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*"Jürgen R."***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*mueckenh***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*"Jürgen R."***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Virgil***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Sam Sung***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*mueckenh***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Virgil***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Virgil***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Virgil***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Ben Bacarisse*

**Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*mueckenh***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*mueckenh***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Virgil***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*mueckenh***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Sam Sung***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Sam Sung***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Sam Sung***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*mueckenh***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Sam Sung***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*mueckenh***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*mueckenh***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Virgil***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Virgil***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*mueckenh***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Virgil***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*FredJeffries***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*mueckenh***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Virgil***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*FredJeffries***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Virgil***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*mueckenh***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*mueckenh***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Virgil***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*FredJeffries***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Virgil***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*mueckenh***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*FredJeffries***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*mueckenh***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*FredJeffries***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Virgil***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*FredJeffries***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*mueckenh***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Virgil***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*FredJeffries***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*mueckenh***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Virgil***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Virgil***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*mueckenh***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Virgil***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*FredJeffries***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*mueckenh***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Virgil***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*mueckenh***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*mueckenh***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*YBM***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*mueckenh***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*YBM***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*"Jürgen R."***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*mueckenh***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*"Jürgen R."***Re: Only for mathematicians! Not for WM!**,*Virgil***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*mueckenh***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Virgil***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*"Jürgen R."***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*mueckenh***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*"Jürgen R."***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Martin Shobe***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*mueckenh***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*mueckenh***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Virgil***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Ralf Bader***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Virgil***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Virgil***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*mueckenh***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Virgil***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Virgil***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Ralf Bader***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*mueckenh***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Virgil***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Virgil***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*mueckenh***Re: Only for mathematicians! WM need not apply!**,*Virgil***Re: Only for mathematicians! WM need not apply!**,*mueckenh***Re: Only for mathematicians! WM need not apply!**,*Virgil***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Virgil***Re: Only for mathematicians! NOt for WM**,*Virgil***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*mueckenh***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Virgil***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*mueckenh***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Virgil***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*mueckenh***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Virgil***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*mueckenh***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Virgil***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Virgil***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*mueckenh***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Virgil***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Virgil***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*mueckenh***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Virgil***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Virgil***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*mueckenh***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Virgil***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*mueckenh***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Virgil***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*mueckenh***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Virgil***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Virgil***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*mueckenh***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Sam Sung***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Virgil***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*"Jürgen R."***Re: Only for mathematicians! WM not welcome!**,*Virgil***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*mueckenh***Re: Only for mathematicians, WM need not alpy!**,*Virgil***Re: Only for mathematicians, WM need not alpy!**,*mueckenh***Re: Only for mathematicians, WM need not alpy!**,*Virgil***Re: Only for mathematicians, WM need not alpy!**,*YBM***Re: Only for mathematicians, WM need not alpy!**,*Virgil***Re: Only for mathematicians, WM need not apply!**,*Virgil***Re: Only for mathematicians, WM need not apply!**,*mueckenh***Re: Only for mathematicians, WM need not apply!**,*Virgil***Re: Only for mathematicians, WM need not apply!**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Only for mathematicians, WM need not apply!**,*mueckenh***Re: Only for mathematicians, WM need not apply!**,*Virgil***Re: Only for mathematicians, WM need not apply!**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Only for mathematicians, WM is wrong again!**,*Virgil***Re: Only for mathematicians, WM need not apply!**,*mueckenh***Re: Only for mathematicians, WM need not apply!**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Only for mathematicians, WM need not apply!**,*Virgil***Re: WM Wrong Again!!**,*Virgil***Re: Only for mathematicians, WM need not apply!**,*mueckenh***Re: Only for mathematicians, WM need not apply!**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Only for mathematicians, WM need not apply!**,*Virgil***Re: Only for mathematicians, WM need not apply!**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Only for mathematicians, WM need not apply!**,*Virgil***Re: Only for mathematicians, WM need not apply!**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Only for mathematicians, WM need not apply!**,*Virgil***Re: Only for mathematicians, WM need not apply!**,*mueckenh***Re: Only for proper mathematicians, WM need not apply!**,*Virgil***Re: Only for mathematicians, WM need not apply!**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Only for mathematicians, WM need not apply!**,*mueckenh***Re: Only for mathematicians, WM need not apply!**,*Virgil***Re: Only for mathematicians, WM need not apply!**,*mueckenh***Re: Only for mathematicians, WM need not apply!**,*Virgil***Re: Only for mathematicians, WM need not apply!**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Only for mathematicians, WM need not apply!**,*mueckenh***Re: § 1 - 10000000: Mueckenheim is a mother*****,*Sam Sung***Re: Only for mathematicians, WM need not apply!**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Only for mathematicians, WM need not apply!**,*mueckenh***Re: WM is an arrogant fool!**,*Virgil***Re: Only for mathematicians, WM need not apply!**,*Virgil***Re: Only for mathematicians, WM need not apply!**,*Virgil***Re: Only for mathematicians, WM need not alpy!**,*mueckenh***Re: Only for mathematicians, WM need not apply!**,*Virgil***Re: Only for mathematicians, WM need not alpy!**,*mueckenh***Re: Only for mathematicians, WM need not alpy!**,*YBM***Re: Only for mathematicians, WM need not alpy!**,*mueckenh***Re: Only for mathematicians, WM need not apply!**,*Virgil***Re: Only for mathematicians, WM not eligible!**,*Virgil***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*mueckenh***Re: Only for mathematicians, not wmytheologists!**,*Virgil***Re: Only for mathematicians, not wmytheologists!**,*mueckenh***Re: Only for mathematicians, not wmytheologists!**,*Virgil***Re: Only for mathematicians, not wmytheologists!**,*FredJeffries***Re: Only for mathematicians, not WMytheologists!**,*Virgil***Re: Only for mathematicians, not wmytheologists!**,*mueckenh***Re: Only for mathematicians, not wmytheologists!**,*Virgil***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Virgil***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*mueckenh***Re: Only for mathematicians! WM not welcome!**,*Virgil***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Virgil***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*mueckenh***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Sam Sung***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Virgil***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*mueckenh***Re: Only for proper anti-WMytheological mathematicians!**,*Virgil***Re: Only for proper anti-WMytheological mathematicians!**,*mueckenh***Re: Only for proper anti-WMytheological mathematicians!**,*Virgil***Re: Only for proper anti-WMytheological mathematicians!**,*mueckenh***Re: Only for proper anti-WMytheological mathematicians!**,*Virgil***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*mueckenh***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Virgil***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*mueckenh***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Virgil***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Virgil***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*mueckenh***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*mueckenh***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Virgil***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*mueckenh***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Virgil***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*mueckenh***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Virgil***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Virgil***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Virgil***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Virgil***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Virgil***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*mueckenh***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*mueckenh***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Virgil***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*mueckenh***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*mueckenh***Re: Only for non-WMytheologists !**,*Virgil***Re: Only for non-WMytheologists !**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Only for non-WMytheologists !**,*Virgil***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Virgil***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Sam Sung***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*mueckenh***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Virgil***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*mueckenh***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Virgil***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Virgil***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Virgil***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Sam Sung***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*mueckenh***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Virgil***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*mueckenh***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Virgil***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*YBM***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*mueckenh***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*YBM***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*mueckenh***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Virgil***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Virgil***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Virgil***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*mueckenh***Re: § 1 - 10000000: Mueckenheim is a mother*****,*Sam Sung***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Sam Sung***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*mueckenh***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Virgil***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Virgil***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Virgil***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Virgil***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Virgil***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Virgil*

**Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*JohnF***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Ben Bacarisse*

**Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Ross A. Finlayson***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*FredJeffries*

**Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Pirx42***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*mueckenh***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Pirx42***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Virgil***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Pirx42***Re: Only for mathematicians! WM not welcomee!**,*Virgil*

**Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*YBM***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*mueckenh***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Virgil*

**Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*mueckenh***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Ralf Bader***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*mueckenh***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Sam Sung***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Sam Sung***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Sam Sung***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*mueckenh***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Ross A. Finlayson***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*mueckenh***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*YBM***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Sam Sung***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*mueckenh***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Virgil***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*YBM***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*mueckenh***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Virgil***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*mueckenh***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Virgil***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Virgil***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Virgil***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Ralf Bader***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*mueckenh***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Virgil***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*mueckenh***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*mueckenh***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*mueckenh***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*mueckenh***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Virgil***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*mueckenh***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Virgil***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*mueckenh***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Virgil***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*mueckenh***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Virgil***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*mueckenh***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Virgil***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Virgil***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*mueckenh***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*mueckenh***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Virgil***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Virgil***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Virgil***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*"Jürgen R."***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Virgil***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Virgil***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Virgil***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*mueckenh***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Virgil***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Virgil*

**Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Tommy*

**Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Virgil***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*munchbutter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Sam Sung*

**Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*John Gabriel***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Mike Hunt*

**Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Ryan Lafferty***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*gorgol***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Virgil***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*mueckenh***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Virgil***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*mueckenh***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Virgil***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Virgil***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*mueckenh***Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Virgil*

**Novice question - "Polygonal prime" numbers**,*joshipura***FAQ? - "factorial'th root"**,*joshipura***Re: FAQ? - "factorial'th root"**,*John Jones***Re: FAQ? - "factorial'th root"**,*Bart Goddard***Re: FAQ? - "factorial'th root"**,*David Bernier***Re: FAQ? - "factorial'th root"**,*Space998***Re: FAQ? - "factorial'th root"**,*Bart Goddard*

**Re: FAQ? - "factorial'th root"**,*Ray Vickson*

**sci.math**,*Ross A. Finlayson***Re: sci.math**,*snoben*

**From "Advice for amateur mathematicians on writing and publishing papers"**,*Dan Christensen***Probable paper accompanying one of the ICM 2014 Plenary lectures**,*David Bernier***§10000**,*Sam Sung***Re: §10000**,*Virgil*

**Invasion of the newsgroup snatchers**,*George Cornelius***Re: Invasion of the newsgroup snatchers**,*snoben***Re: Invasion of the newsgroup snatchers**,*Jan***Re: Invasion of the newsgroup snatchers**,*Tommy***Re: Invasion of the newsgroup snatchers**,*snoben***Re: Invasion of the newsgroup snatchers**,*David Bernier*

**Re: Invasion of the newsgroup snatchers**,*John Jones***Re: Invasion of the newsgroup snatchers**,*David Bernier*

**EINSTEIN'S RELATIVITY INCOMPATIBLE WITH DOPPLER EFFECT**,*Pentcho Valev***Re: EINSTEIN'S RELATIVITY INCOMPATIBLE WITH DOPPLER EFFECT**,*Pentcho Valev***Re: EINSTEIN'S RELATIVITY INCOMPATIBLE WITH DOPPLER EFFECT**,*Pentcho Valev*

**2.60 John Gabriel infested with Extreme Narcissism**,*snoben***Re: 2.60 John Gabriel infested with Extreme Narcissism**,*John Gabriel*

**EINSTEIN'S RELATIVITY INCOMPATIBLE WITH GRAVITATIONAL REDSHIFT**,*Pentcho Valev***2.6.1 John Gabriel tests positive for Extreme Narcissism**,*snoben***Difference of consecutive powers**,*Bart Goddard***Re: Difference of consecutive powers**,*quasi***Re: Difference of consecutive powers**,*quasi***Re: Difference of consecutive powers**,*Herman Rubin***Re: Difference of consecutive powers**,*quasi***Re: Difference of consecutive powers**,*Pubkeybreaker***Re: Difference of consecutive powers**,*robersi730*

**Re: Difference of consecutive powers**,*quasi***Re: Difference of consecutive powers**,*Gottfried Helms***Re: Difference of consecutive powers**,*robersi730***Re: Difference of consecutive powers**,*robersi730***Re: Difference of consecutive powers**,*robersi730*

**Proposal for Forum Set Architectures that Facilitate Casual Journals**,*David Elkins***John Gabriel**,*Freda Parkins***Re: John Gabriel**,*snoben***Re: John Gabriel**,*Freda Parkins*

**Re: John Gabriel**,*Dan Christensen***Re: John Gabriel**,*snoben***Re: John Gabriel**,*Dan Christensen*

**Re: John Gabriel**,*Freda Parkins***Re: John Gabriel**,*snoben***Re: John Gabriel**,*Freda Parkins***Re: John Gabriel**,*snoben***Re: John Gabriel**,*Freda Parkins***Re: John Gabriel**,*snoben***Re: John Gabriel**,*snoben*

**2.59.9 - The mean value theorem**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.59.9 - The mean value theorem**,*Dan Christensen*

**2.59.8 - Area as a product of natural averages.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.59.8 - Area as a product of natural averages.**,*Dan Christensen***Re: 2.59.8 - Area as a product of natural averages.**,*Dan Christensen***Re: 2.59.8 - Area as a product of natural averages.**,*John Gabriel*

**2.59.7 - What is a natural average?**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.59.7 - What is a natural average?**,*Dan Christensen***Re: 2.59.7 - What is a natural average?**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.59.7 - What is a natural average?**,*Space998***Re: 2.59.7 - What is a natural average?**,*snoben***Re: 2.59.7 - What is a natural average?**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.59.7 - What is a natural average?**,*snoben***Re: 2.59.7 - What is a natural average?**,*Space998*

**Re: 2.59.7 - What is a natural average?**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.59.7 - What is a natural average?**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.59.7 - What is a natural average?**,*Space998***Re: 2.59.7 - What is a natural average?**,*Freda Gabriel*

**Re: 2.59.7 - What is a natural average?**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.59.7 - What is a natural average?**,*Dan Christensen***sleepy time**,*Space998*

**Re: 2.59.7 - What is a natural average?**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.59.7 - What is a natural average?**,*Space998***Re: 2.59.7 - What is a natural average?**,*dan brinski*

**Re: 2.59.7 - What is a natural average?**,*Tard Spotter***Re: 2.59.7 - What is a natural average?**,*John Gabriel*

**2.59.6 - The derivative: finding the slope of a tangent line.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.59.6 - The derivative: finding the slope of a tangent line.**,*Dan Christensen***Re: 2.59.6 - The derivative: finding the slope of a tangent line.**,*The Voice of Reason***Re: 2.59.6 - The derivative: finding the slope of a tangent line.**,*Dan Christensen***Re: 2.59.6 - The derivative: finding the slope of a tangent line.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.59.6 - The derivative: finding the slope of a tangent line.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.59.6 - The derivative: finding the slope of a tangent line.**,*John Gabriel***the slope is slidey**,*Space998*

**Re: 2.59.6 - The derivative: finding the slope of a tangent line.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.59.6 - The derivative: finding the slope of a tangent line.**,*Dan Christensen***porportionality is not allowed**,*Space998*

**Re: 2.59.6 - The derivative: finding the slope of a tangent line.**,*John Gabriel*

**2.59.5 - Secant and tangent lines**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.59.5 - Secant and tangent lines**,*Dan Christensen***Re: 2.59.5 - Secant and tangent lines**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.59.5 - Secant and tangent lines**,*Space998***Re: 2.59.5 - Secant and tangent lines**,*Space998***Re: 2.59.5 - Secant and tangent lines**,*snoben*

**Re: 2.59.5 - Secant and tangent lines**,*snoben***Re: 2.59.5 - Secant and tangent lines**,*Buffalo Buffalo Buffalo*

**Re: 2.59.5 - Secant and tangent lines**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.59.5 - Secant and tangent lines**,*John Gabriel***you may have your plum pudding, stupido**,*Space998*

**Re: 2.59.5 - Secant and tangent lines**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.59.5 - Secant and tangent lines**,*Dan Christensen***exactly by construtction, whether or not the slope is irrational**,*Space998*

**Re: 2.59.5 - Secant and tangent lines**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.59.5 - Secant and tangent lines**,*John Gabriel*

**2.59.4 - What is a secant line and how do we find its slope?**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.59.4 - What is a secant line and how do we find its slope?**,*Buck Futter***Re: 2.59.4 - What is a secant line and how do we find its slope?**,*Dan Christensen***Re: 2.59.4 - What is a secant line and how do we find its slope?**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.59.4 - What is a secant line and how do we find its slope?**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.59.4 - What is a secant line and how do we find its slope?**,*John Gabriel*

**2.59.3 - What is a tangent line?**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.59.3 - What is a tangent line?**,*snoben***Re: 2.59.3 - What is a tangent line?**,*Actangent The Infallible***Re: 2.59.3 - What is a tangent line?**,*Dan Christensen***Re: 2.59.3 - What is a tangent line?**,*Dan Christensen***Re: 2.59.3 - What is a tangent line?**,*John Gabriel*

**2.59.2 - There is no change in x or y.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.59.2 - There is no change in x or y.**,*Dan Christensen***Re: 2.59.2 - There is no change in x or y.**,*John Gabriel*

**2.59.1 - All straight lines have slope.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.59.1 - All straight lines have slope.**,*snoben***Re: 2.59.1 - All straight lines have slope.**,*Space998***Re: 2.59.1 - All straight lines have slope.**,*John Gabriel*

**2.58 - The Mean Value Theorem**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.58 - The Mean Value Theorem**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.58 - The Mean Value Theorem**,*snoben***Re: 2.58 - The Mean Value Theorem**,*Dan Christensen***Re: 2.58 - The Mean Value Theorem**,*Space998*

**Re: 2.58 - The Mean Value Theorem**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.58 - The Mean Value Theorem**,*John Gabriel*

**Efficiently finding long Collatz sequences.**,*Paul***Re: Efficiently finding long Collatz sequences.**,*Pubkeybreaker***Re: Efficiently finding long Collatz sequences.**,*James Waldby***Re: Efficiently finding long Collatz sequences.**,*David Bernier*

**Re: Efficiently finding long Collatz sequences.**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Efficiently finding long Collatz sequences.**,*David Bernier***Re: Efficiently finding long Collatz sequences.**,*David Bernier***Re: Efficiently finding long Collatz sequences.**,*David Bernier***Re: Efficiently finding long Collatz sequences.**,*David Bernier***Re: Efficiently finding long Collatz sequences.**,*David Bernier*

**Re: Which regular polyhedra have parallel sides?**,*shop***Re: 2.34 - The New Calculus is simple, elegant and powerful. It is the first rigorous formulation in human history.**,*FredJeffries***Re: 2.34 - The New Calculus is simple, elegant and powerful. It is the first rigorous formulation in human history.**,*dullrich*- <Possible follow-ups>
**Re: 2.34 - The New Calculus is simple, elegant and powerful. It is the first rigorous formulation in human history.**,*John Gabriel**John Gabriel**John Gabriel**John Gabriel**John Gabriel**John Gabriel**John Gabriel**John Gabriel*

**Triangular Billiards Conjecture**,*David Bernier***Re: Triangular Billiards Conjecture**,*David Bernier***Re: Triangular Billiards Conjecture**,*FredJeffries***Re: Triangular Billiards Conjecture**,*Space998***Re: Triangular Billiards Conjecture**,*David Bernier***Re: Triangular Billiards Conjecture**,*David Bernier*

**THE TWIN ABSURDITY IN EINSTEIN'S RELATIVITY**,*Pentcho Valev***Re: THE TWIN ABSURDITY IN EINSTEIN'S RELATIVITY**,*Pentcho Valev***Re: THE TWIN ABSURDITY IN EINSTEIN'S RELATIVITY**,*Pentcho Valev***Re: THE TWIN ABSURDITY IN EINSTEIN'S RELATIVITY**,*Pentcho Valev***Re: THE TWIN ABSURDITY IN EINSTEIN'S RELATIVITY**,*Pentcho Valev*

**The use of citation of "authorities"**,*Pirx42***Re: The use of citation of "authorities"**,*William Elliot***Re: The use of citation of "authorities"**,*Peter Percival***Re: The use of citation of "authorities"**,*Pirx42***Re: The use of citation of "authorities"**,*Jim Burns***Re: The use of citation of "authorities"**,*Pirx42***Re: The use of citation of "authorities"**,*Peter Percival***Re: The use of citation of "authorities"**,*Jim Burns***Re: The use of citation of "authorities"**,*Peter Percival*

**Re: The use of citation of "authorities"**,*Jim Burns***Re: The use of citation of "authorities"**,*Pirx42***Re: The use of citation of "authorities"**,*Peter Percival*

**Re: The use of citation of "authorities"**,*George Cornelius***Re: The use of citation of "authorities"**,*Bood Blodkin***Re: The use of citation of "authorities"**,*Dan Christensen*

**DISCRETE PUBLIC KEY (Cryptography)**,*grahamcooper7***2.58 John Gabriel chooses Aggressive Lobotomy**,*Dr Fromage***Flattery vs Satisfaction**,*Kevin Barry***LA CONCEPTION D'EINSTEIN : PAS FORCEMENT LA BONNE MAIS...**,*Pentcho Valev***2.57 - There is no such thing as an instantaneous rate.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.57 - There is no such thing as an instantaneous rate.**,*Freda Parkins***Re: 2.57 - There is no such thing as an instantaneous rate.**,*Dr Fromage***Re: 2.57 - There is no such thing as an instantaneous rate.**,*Vic***Re: 2.57 - There is no such thing as an instantaneous rate.**,*Freda Parkins***Re: 2.57 - There is no such thing as an instantaneous rate.**,*Vic***Re: 2.57 - There is no such thing as an instantaneous rate.**,*Freda Parkins***Re: 2.57 - There is no such thing as an instantaneous rate.**,*Vic***Re: 2.57 - There is no such thing as an instantaneous rate.**,*Freda Parkins***Re: 2.57 - There is no such thing as an instantaneous rate.**,*snoben***Re: 2.57 - There is no such thing as an instantaneous rate.**,*Freda Parkins*

**Re: 2.57 - There is no such thing as an instantaneous rate.**,*Dan Christensen***Re: 2.57 - There is no such thing as an instantaneous rate.**,*Space998***Re: 2.57 - There is no such thing as an instantaneous rate.**,*Mutt Buncher***Re: 2.57 - There is no such thing as an instantaneous rate.**,*Dan Christensen***Re: 2.57 - There is no such thing as an instantaneous rate.**,*Dan Christensen***Re: 2.57 - There is no such thing as an instantaneous rate.**,*Dan Christensen*

**Re: 2.57 - There is no such thing as an instantaneous rate.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.57 - There is no such thing as an instantaneous rate.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.57 - There is no such thing as an instantaneous rate.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.57 - There is no such thing as an instantaneous rate.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.57 - There is no such thing as an instantaneous rate.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.57 - There is no such thing as an instantaneous rate.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.57 - There is no such thing as an instantaneous rate.**,*pani panagrahi*

**Re: 2.57 - There is no such thing as an instantaneous rate.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.57 - There is no such thing as an instantaneous rate.**,*John Gabriel*

**2.56 - The definite integral is a product of two averages.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.56 - The definite integral is a product of two averages.**,*Dan Christensen***Re: 2.56 - The definite integral is a product of two averages.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.56 - The definite integral is a product of two averages.**,*Dan Christensen***isn';t that cool**,*Space998*

**Re: 2.56 - The definite integral is a product of two averages.**,*Freda Parkins***Re: 2.56 - The definite integral is a product of two averages.**,*dullrich***Re: 2.56 - The definite integral is a product of two averages.**,*Space998***Re: 2.56 - The definite integral is a product of two averages.**,*Dr Fromage***Re: 2.56 - The definite integral is a product of two averages.**,*John Gabriel*

**HOW MANY PARAMETERS DOES THE HALT( _ , _ , _ , _ , ...... , _ ) FUNCTION NEED?**,*grahamcooper7***Set coverage, dancing links, DLX performance**,*Dieter von Holten***Re: Set coverage, dancing links, DLX performance**,*James Waldby*

**KILLING RATIONALITY IN EINSTEIN'S WORLD**,*Pentcho Valev***Re: KILLING RATIONALITY IN EINSTEIN'S WORLD**,*Pentcho Valev***Re: KILLING RATIONALITY IN EINSTEIN'S WORLD**,*Pentcho Valev***Re: KILLING RATIONALITY IN EINSTEIN'S WORLD**,*Pentcho Valev*

**Einsteins MERITS!**,*grahamcooper7***Re: Einsteins MERITS!**,*David Bernier***Re: Einsteins MERITS!**,*David Bernier*

**Re: Uniqueness of a theory with no axioms**,*Tony Orlow***2.58 - The Rimming Tangent-derivative Curve**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.58 - The Rimming Tangent-derivative Curve**,*Buck Futter***Re: 2.58 - The Rimming Tangent-derivative Curve**,*Dr Cheese***Re: 2.58 - The Rimming Tangent-derivative Curve**,*grahamcooper7*

**Re: TEMPS, EINSTEINISME, DOUBLEPENSEE**,*Pentcho Valev***2.67 Wrong on the Internet: John Gabriel**,*Dr Cheese***Re: 2.67 Wrong on the Internet: John Gabriel**,*John Gabriel*

**2.56 - Why John Gabriel is Right**,*Dr Cheese***Re: 2.56 - Why John Gabriel is Right**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.56 - Why John Gabriel is Right**,*snoben***Re: 2.56 - Why John Gabriel is Right again**,*Freda Gabriel*

**2.60 Jack Huizenga PhD refutes John Gabriel's Math as Trollware**,*Dr Cheese***Re: 2.60 Jack Huizenga PhD refutes John Gabriel's Math as Trollware**,*Vic***Re: 2.60 Jack Huizenga PhD refutes John Gabriel's Math as Trollware**,*Freda***Re: 2.60 Jack Huizenga PhD refutes John Gabriel's Math as Trollware**,*Freda***Re: 2.60 Jack Huizenga PhD refutes John Gabriel's Math as Trollware**,*snoben***Re: 2.60 Jack Huizenga PhD refutes John Gabriel's Math as Trollware**,*snoben***Re: 2.60 Jack Huizenga PhD refutes John Gabriel's Math as Trollware**,*Amber*

**Re: 1.82 - Troll Dan Christensen**,*John Gabriel***Re: 1.82 - Troll John Gabriel**,*Dan Christensen*- <Possible follow-ups>
**Re: 1.82 - Troll Dan Christensen**,*John Gabriel***Re: 1.82 - Troll and Idiot John Gabriel (WARNING to sci.math NEWCOMERS)**,*Port563***Re: 1.82 - Troll Dan Christensen**,*Dan Christensen*

**Re: 1.82 - Troll Dan Christensen**,*John Gabriel***Re: 1.82 - Troll Dan Christensen**,*John Gabriel*

**Re: 1.82 - Troll Dan Christensen**,*John Gabriel***Re: 1.82 - Troll Dan Christensen**,*Buffalo Buffalo Buffalo*

**Re: 1.82 - Troll Dan Christensen**,*John Gabriel***Re: 1.82 - Troll Dan Christensen**,*John Gabriel***Re: 1.82 - Troll Dan Christensen**,*John Gabriel***Re: 1.82 - Troll Dan Christensen**,*Dan Christensen***Re: 1.82 - Troll Dan Christensen**,*grahamcooper7***Re: 1.82 - Troll Dan Christensen**,*Dan Christensen*

**Re: 1.82 - Troll Dan Christensen**,*John Gabriel***Re: 1.82 - Troll Dan Christensen**,*Dan Christensen*

**Re: 1.82 - Troll Dan Christensen**,*John Gabriel***Re: 1.82 - Troll Dan Christensen**,*John Gabriel***Re: 1.82 - Troll Dan Christensen**,*John Gabriel*

**Re: Dear Students of WM: Why your professor's 'proof' is worthless.**,*PotatoSauce***2.55 - My refutation of Harvard alumnus Jack Huizenga.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.55 - My refutation of Harvard alumnus Jack Huizenga.**,*Dan Christensen***Re: 2.55 - My refutation of Harvard alumnus Jack Huizenga.**,*Shuttah Piddiette***Re: 2.55 - My refutation of Harvard alumnus Jack Huizenga.**,*Dr Cheese***Re: 2.55 - My refutation of Harvard alumnus Jack Huizenga.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.55 - My refutation of Harvard alumnus Jack Huizenga.**,*Dan Christensen*

**Re: 2.55 - My refutation of Harvard alumnus Jack Huizenga.**,*konyberg***Re: 2.55 - My refutation of Harvard alumnus Jack Huizenga.**,*dullrich***Re: 2.55 - My refutation of Harvard alumnus Jack Huizenga.**,*dullrich***Re: 2.55 - My refutation of Harvard alumnus Jack Huizenga.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.55 - My refutation of Harvard alumnus Jack Huizenga.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.55 - My refutation of Harvard alumnus Jack Huizenga.**,*Dan Christensen*

**Re: 2.55 - My refutation of Harvard alumnus Jack Huizenga.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.55 - My refutation of Harvard alumnus Jack Huizenga.**,*John Gabriel*

**EINSTEIN'S SCHIZOPHRENIC WORLD**,*Pentcho Valev***Re: EINSTEIN'S SCHIZOPHRENIC WORLD**,*John Gabriel***Re: EINSTEIN'S SCHIZOPHRENIC WORLD**,*John Gabriel***Re: EINSTEIN'S SCHIZOPHRENIC WORLD**,*Shuttah Piddiette*

**Re: EINSTEIN'S SCHIZOPHRENIC WORLD**,*Pentcho Valev***Re: EINSTEIN'S SCHIZOPHRENIC WORLD**,*Pentcho Valev***Re: EINSTEIN'S SCHIZOPHRENIC WORLD**,*Pentcho Valev*

**2.54 - Exactly what does Leibniz notation mean?**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.54 - Exactly what does Leibniz notation mean?**,*Dan Christensen***Re: 2.54 - Exactly what does Leibniz notation mean?**,*Dr Cheese***Re: 2.54 - Exactly what does Leibniz notation mean?**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.54 - Exactly what does Leibniz notation mean?**,*Dan Christensen***Re: 2.54 - Exactly what does Leibniz notation mean?**,*Dr Cheese*

**Re: 2.54 - Exactly what does Leibniz notation mean?**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.54 - Exactly what does Leibniz notation mean?**,*Dan Christensen***Re: 2.54 - Exactly what does Leibniz notation mean?**,*Dr Cheese*

**Re: 2.54 - Exactly what does Leibniz notation mean?**,*Jan***Re: 2.54 - Exactly what does Leibniz notation mean?**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.54 - Exactly what does Leibniz notation mean?**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.54 - Exactly what does Leibniz notation mean?**,*John Gabriel*

**2.53 - The meaning of differentials and the difference ratio.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.53 - The meaning of differentials and the difference ratio.**,*Dan Christensen***Re: 2.53 - The meaning of differentials and the difference ratio.**,*Dr Cheese***Re: 2.53 - The meaning of differentials and the difference ratio.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.53 - The meaning of differentials and the difference ratio.**,*Dan Christensen*

**Re: 2.53 - The meaning of differentials and the difference ratio.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.53 - The meaning of differentials and the difference ratio.**,*John Gabriel*

**2.53 Why John Gaberial is better than all of us**,*John***Idle playing around....: An "inverse" of the Taylor-series (?)**,*Gottfried Helms***Re: Idle playing around....: An "inverse" of the Taylor-series (?)**,*John Gabriel*- <Possible follow-ups>
**Idle playing around....: An "inverse" of the Taylor-series (?)**,*Gottfried Helms***Re: Idle playing around....: An "inverse" of the Taylor-series (?)**,*William Elliot***Re: Idle playing around....: An "inverse" of the Taylor-series (?)**,*Gottfried Helms***Re: Idle playing around....: An "inverse" of the Taylor-series (?)**,*William Elliot*

**Re: Idle playing around....: An "inverse" of the Taylor-series (?)**,*Leon Aigret*

**THE SPEED OF LIGHT CANNOT BE CONSTANT**,*Pentcho Valev***Re: THE SPEED OF LIGHT CANNOT BE CONSTANT**,*Pentcho Valev*

**Dad teaching math - and got confused about placing people in a circle and (-1)!**,*joshipura***placing people in a circle and (-1)!**,*William Elliot***Re: placing people in a circle and (-1)!**,*Peter Percival***Re: placing people in a circle and (-1)!**,*William Elliot***Re: placing people in a circle and (-1)!**,*Seymour J.***Re: placing people in a circle and (-1)!**,*Space998*

**Re: Dad teaching math - and got confused about placing people in a circle and (-1)!**,*Ray Vickson***Re: Dad teaching math - and got confused about placing people in a circle and (-1)!**,*Barry Schwarz*

**2.52 - What dy and dx really mean.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.52 - What dy and dx really mean.**,*Hoofington P. McSnort***Re: 2.52 - What dy and dx really mean.**,*dullrich***Re: 2.52 - What dy and dx really mean.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.52 - What dy and dx really mean.**,*Space998***Re: 2.52 - What dy and dx really mean.**,*Seymour J.*

**Re: 2.52 - What dy and dx really mean.**,*John***Re: 2.52 - What dy and dx really mean.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.52 - What dy and dx really mean.**,*Dr Cheese*

**Re: 2.52 - What dy and dx really mean.**,*Dan Christensen***Re: 2.52 - What dy and dx really mean.**,*Dan Christensen*

**Re: 2.52 - What dy and dx really mean.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.52 - What dy and dx really mean.**,*Dr Cheese*

**Re: 2.52 - What dy and dx really mean.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.52 - What dy and dx really mean.**,*Dr Cheese*

**Re: 2.52 - What dy and dx really mean.**,*Dr Cheese***Re: 2.52 - What dy and dx really mean.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.52 - What dy and dx really mean.**,*Dan Christensen*

**Re: 2.52 - What dy and dx really mean.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.52 - What dy and dx really mean.**,*Dan Christensen***Re: 2.52 - What dy and dx really mean.**,*Dr Cheese*

**Re: 2.52 - What dy and dx really mean.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.52 - What dy and dx really mean.**,*Space998***Re: 2.52 - What dy and dx really mean.**,*Dr Fromage*

**Re: 2.52 - What dy and dx really mean.**,*John Gabriel*

**easiest proof of Jordan Curve Theorem as a corollary of Moebius theorem #1982 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Re: easiest proof of Jordan Curve Theorem as a corollary of Moebius theorem #1982 Correcting Math**,*Space998***proof of Jordan Curve Theorem as a corollary of Moebius theorem #1983 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Re: proof of Jordan Curve Theorem as a corollary of Moebius theorem #1983 Correcting Math**,*Space998***I probably have the first NON flawed proof of the Jordan Curve Theorem #1984 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Re: I probably have the first NON flawed proof of the Jordan Curve Theorem #1984 Correcting Math**,*Space998***proof of Jordan Curve Theorem from Moebius theorem #1985 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***fight in math over Jordan vs. Veblen and why case studies is never a proof #1986 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium*

**EINSTEIN : VARIABLE SPEED OF LIGHT IN GRAVITY**,*Pentcho Valev***Re: EINSTEIN : VARIABLE SPEED OF LIGHT IN GRAVITY**,*Pentcho Valev***Re: EINSTEIN : VARIABLE SPEED OF LIGHT IN GRAVITY**,*Pentcho Valev***Re: EINSTEIN : VARIABLE SPEED OF LIGHT IN GRAVITY**,*Pentcho Valev*

**SPEED OF LIGHT AND THE END OF PHYSICS**,*Pentcho Valev***Re: SPEED OF LIGHT AND THE END OF PHYSICS**,*Pentcho Valev*

**Cool Math Shortcuts**,*Mind Math***Re: Cool Math Shortcuts**,*Mind Math*

**2.56 - Godel is a baboon next to me in terms of intelligence**,*John Gabriel***Re: professors of MIT endorse proof to arxiv-- Maxwell Equations derive Peano Axioms**,*Dan Christensen*- <Possible follow-ups>
**Re: professors of MIT endorse proof to arxiv-- Maxwell Equations derive Peano Axioms**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Re: professors of MIT endorse proof to arxiv-- Maxwell Equations derive Peano Axioms**,*Dan Christensen*

**Batman vs The Joker**,*Kevin Barry***WAS EINSTEIN A CHEAT ?**,*Pentcho Valev***Re: WAS EINSTEIN A CHEAT ?**,*Pentcho Valev***Re: WAS EINSTEIN A CHEAT ?**,*Pentcho Valev*

**2.53 - It's not the tangent, it's the derivative object, idiot!**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.53 - It's not the tangent, it's the derivative object, idiot!**,*Dan Christensen***Re: 2.53 - It's not the tangent, it's the derivative object, idiot!**,*Gerald Walders***Re: 2.53 - It's not the tangent, it's the derivative object, idiot!**,*Dan Christensen*- <Possible follow-ups>
**2.53 - It's not the tangent, it's the derivative object, idiot!**,*John Gabriel*

**EINSTEIN'S RELATIVITY : TRAVELLING TWIN BOTH YOUNGER AND OLDER**,*Pentcho Valev***2.51 - Uncountable real number set and completeness of real numbers?**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.51 - Uncountable real number set and completeness of real numbers?**,*Zeit Geist***Re: 2.51 - Uncountable real number set and completeness of real numbers?**,*Dan Christensen***Re: 2.51 - Uncountable real number set and completeness of real numbers?**,*Leah Powers***Re: 2.51 - Uncountable real number set and completeness of real numbers?**,*John***Re: 2.51 - Uncountable real number set and completeness of real numbers?**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.51 - Uncountable real number set and completeness of real numbers?**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.51 - Uncountable real number set and completeness of real numbers?**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.51 - Uncountable real number set and completeness of real numbers?**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.51 - Uncountable real number set and completeness of real numbers?**,*John Gabriel***death to the tetragon**,*Space998*

**Re: 2.51 - Uncountable real number set and completeness of real numbers?**,*John Gabriel***the main thing is completeness, not finity**,*Space998***infinity is mod -1 in any even base**,*Space998*

**Re: 2.51 - Uncountable real number set and completeness of real numbers?**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.51 - Uncountable real number set and completeness of real numbers?**,*John Gabriel*

**Two Plus Two**,*William Elliot***Re: Two Plus Two**,*Dan Christensen***Re: Two Plus Two**,*William Elliot*

**math professors of Cornell University to endorse infinity-borderline proof to arxiv.org**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Re: math professors of Cornell University to endorse infinity-borderline proof to arxiv.org**,*Space998***Re: math professors of Cornell University to endorse infinity-borderline proof to arxiv.org**,*Dan Christensen***the laughing professors**,*Space998*

**Re: math professors of Cornell University to endorse infinity-borderline proof to arxiv.org**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Re: math professors of Cornell University to endorse infinity-borderline proof to arxiv.org**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Re: math professors of Cornell University to endorse infinity-borderline proof to arxiv.org #1987 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Re: math professors of Cornell University to endorse infinity-borderline proof to arxiv.org #1988 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***perhaps the first alternative proof of 10^603 infinity border that does not use pi #1989 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Re: perhaps the first alternative proof of 10^603 infinity border that does not use pi #1990 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Re: perhaps the first alternative proof of 10^603 infinity border that does not use pi #1990 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Re: perhaps the first alternative proof of 10^603 infinity border that does not use pi #1990 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium**Archimedes Plutonium**Archimedes Plutonium***happentance, infinitely often (...000..., ...123..., ...666..., ...999...**,*Space998*

**Re: math professors of Cornell University to endorse infinity-borderline proof to arxiv.org**,*Space998*

**Re: math professors of Cornell University to endorse infinity-borderline proof to arxiv.org**,*Archimedes Plutonium*

**Re: 2.37 - The contradictions of the flawed calculus.**,*Space998***Re: John gabrieL says that he "knows Euclid, and yet**,*Space998***Re: John gabrieL says that he "knows Euclid, and yet**,*Space998***coolsville**,*Space998***Re: coolsville**,*Space998*

**prove Avacado's numbeR has a basis in some thing**,*Space998***------- ------ ----- triangles**,*Deep***Re: Princeton Univ math professors endorsing Beal & FLT proofs to arxiv**,*Archimedes Plutonium***sfoorp**,*Space998***Re: Princeton Univ math professors endorsing Beal & FLT proofs to arxiv**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Re: Princeton Univ math professors endorsing Beal & FLT proofs to arxiv**,*Space998***Re: Princeton Univ math professors endorsing Beal & FLT proofs to arxiv**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Re: Princeton Univ math professors endorsing Beal & FLT proofs to arxiv**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Re: Princeton Univ math professors endorsing Beal & FLT proofs to arxiv**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Re: Princeton Univ math professors endorsing Beal & FLT proofs to arxiv**,*Archimedes Plutonium***and, you do not do that**,*Space998*

- <Possible follow-ups>
**Re: Princeton Univ math professors endorsing Beal & FLT proofs to arxiv**,*Dan Christensen*

**2.54 - The Greatest Ever Invention of Mathematics**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.54 - The Greatest Ever Invention of Mathematics**,*Dan Christensen***Re: 2.54 - The Greatest Ever Invention of Mathematics**,*John***Re: 2.54 - The Greatest Ever Invention of Mathematics**,*Kook Spotters*

**Re: EINSTEIN'S RELATIVITY : THE MADNESS OF 20th CENTURY SCIENCE**,*Pentcho Valev***"I abolished 'if and only if' definitions because they are stupid!" -- John Gabriel**,*Dan Christensen***Help please?**,*Peter Fairbrother***Re: Help please?**,*Port563***Re: Help please?**,*Peter Fairbrother***Re: Help please?**,*Leon Aigret***Re: Help please?**,*Leon Aigret*

**Re: Help please?**,*John Gabriel*

**Re: Help please?**,*John***Re: Help please?**,*Peter Fairbrother*

**Re: Help please?**,*Pfsszxt*

**Re: Topological Property**,*Martin Vaeth***professors of Stanford endorsing proof of Goldbach to arxiv**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Re: professors of Stanford endorsing proof of Goldbach to arxiv**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Re: professors of Stanford endorsing proof of Goldbach to arxiv**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Re: professors of Stanford endorsing proof of Goldbach to arxiv**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Re: professors of Stanford endorsing proof of Goldbach to arxiv**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Re: professors of Stanford endorsing proof of Goldbach to arxiv**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Re: professors of Stanford endorsing proof of Goldbach to arxiv**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Re: professors of Stanford endorsing proof of Goldbach to arxiv**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Re: professors of Stanford endorsing proof of Goldbach to arxiv**,*Archimedes Plutonium***you tdo trivial better than any thing**,*Space998*

**Re: professors of Stanford endorsing proof of Goldbach to arxiv**,*Dan Christensen*

**Re: professors of UC Berkeley endorsing No Perfect Cuboid to arxiv**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Re: professors of UC Berkeley endorsing No Perfect Cuboid to arxiv**,*Space998***Re: professors of UC Berkeley endorsing No Perfect Cuboid to arxiv**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Re: professors of UC Berkeley endorsing No Perfect Cuboid to arxiv**,*Space998***Re: professors of UC Berkeley endorsing No Perfect Cuboid to arxiv**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Re: professors of UC Berkeley endorsing No Perfect Cuboid to arxiv**,*Space998***Re: professors of UC Berkeley endorsing No Perfect Cuboid to arxiv**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Re: professors of UC Berkeley endorsing No Perfect Cuboid to arxiv**,*Space998***Re: professors of UC Berkeley endorsing No Perfect Cuboid to arxiv**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Re: professors of UC Berkeley endorsing No Perfect Cuboid to arxiv**,*Space998*

**attention**,*lissencephalic***Re: attention**,*John***Re: attention**,*lissencephalic***Re: attention**,*John*

**Re: attention**,*Kook Spotters***Re: attention**,*lissencephalic*

**Re: Borel Compact, corrected**,*William Elliot***Re: Borel Compact, corrected**,*Niels Diepeveen*- <Possible follow-ups>
**Re: Borel Compact, corrected**,*Niels Diepeveen***Borel Compact, cocclusion**,*William Elliot***Re: Borel Compact, cocclusion**,*Niels Diepeveen*

**Re: 2.781 John Gabriel in Mental Ward**,*bit188*- <Possible follow-ups>
**Re: 2.781 John Gabriel in Mental Ward**,*snoben*

**2.52 John Gaberial Manafestoe in Russian**,*John***2.49 John Gabriel Manufesto Translation**,*John***LE CAUCHEMAR DES EINSTEINIENS**,*Pentcho Valev***Re: LE CAUCHEMAR DES EINSTEINIENS**,*YBM***Re: LE CAUCHEMAR DES EINSTEINIENS**,*Pentcho Valev***Re: LE CAUCHEMAR DES EINSTEINIENS**,*Pentcho Valev*

**Here is another illegitimate factoring, using ECM, according to Pubkeybreaker.**,*djoyce099***Re: Here is another illegitimate factoring, using ECM, according to Pubkeybreaker.**,*The Wormmaker***Re: Here is another illegitimate factoring, using ECM, according to Pubkeybreaker.**,*djoyce099***Re: Here is another illegitimate factoring, using ECM, according to Pubkeybreaker.**,*djoyce099***Re: Here is another illegitimate factoring, using ECM, according to Pubkeybreaker.**,*The Wormmaker***Re: Here is another illegitimate factoring, using ECM, according to Pubkeybreaker.**,*djoyce099***Re: Here is another illegitimate factoring, using ECM, according to Pubkeybreaker.**,*Gerald Walders***Re: Here is another illegitimate factoring, using ECM, according to Pubkeybreaker.**,*djoyce099*

**UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS REFUTES EINSTEIN'S RELATIVITY**,*Pentcho Valev***Re: UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS REFUTES EINSTEIN'S RELATIVITY**,*Pentcho Valev***Re: UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS REFUTES EINSTEIN'S RELATIVITY**,*Pentcho Valev***Re: UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS REFUTES EINSTEIN'S RELATIVITY**,*Pentcho Valev*

**Re: math professors of Cornell Univ endorse Infinity borderline proof to arxiv**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Re: professors of Yale endorse proof of 5 Color Mapping to arxiv**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Re: professors of Yale endorse proof of 5 Color Mapping to arxiv**,*Space998***Far easier proof of the Jordan Curve Theorem as a corollary of Moebius theorem #1981 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***just do it**,*Space998*

**Re: professors of Yale endorse proof of 5 Color Mapping to arxiv**,*Archimedes Plutonium*

**solutions manual and test bank at cheap, discount price, contact directly at discountsmtb(at)hotmail(dot)com**,*smtbhelp*- <Possible follow-ups>
**solutions manual and test bank at cheap, discount price, contact directly at discountsmtb(at)hotmail(dot)com**,*smtbhelp***solutions manual and test bank at cheap, discount price, contact directly at discountsmtb(at)hotmail(dot)com**,*smtbhelp**smtbhelp**smtbhelp**smtbhelp**smtbhelp*

**NO OPERATING SYSTEM CAN CONTAIN ALL APPS!**,*grahamcooper7***(V)ous - a useful 3rd Logic Quantifier**,*grahamcooper7***Simple Lie algebra question**,*fc3a501***Re: INCREDIBLY SILLY EINSTEINIANS**,*Pentcho Valev***§ 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: § 534 Finis**,*John Gabriel***Re: § 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: § 534 Finis**,*John Gabriel***Re: § 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Zeit Geist***Re: § 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Sam Sung***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Zeit Geist***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: § 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Sam Sung***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Zeit Geist***Re: § 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Zeit Geist***Re: § 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: ï¿½ 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: ï¿½ 534 Finis**,*Zeit Geist***Re: ï¿½ 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: ï¿½ 534 Finis**,*Sam Sung***Re: i?? 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: ï¿½ 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: ï¿½ 534 Finis**,*Zeit Geist***Re: ï¿½ 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: ï¿½ 534 Finis**,*Zeit Geist***Re: ï¿½ 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: ï¿½ 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: ? 534 Finis**,*YBM***Re: ? 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: ? 534 Finis**,*YBM***Re: ï¿½ 534 Finis**,*Zeit Geist***Re: ï¿½ 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: ï¿½ 534 Finis**,*Zeit Geist***Re: ï¿½ 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: ï¿½ 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: § 534 Finis**,*John Gabriel***Re: § 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: § 534 Finis**,*John Gabriel***Re: § 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: § 534 Finis**,*John Gabriel***Re: § 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: § 534 Finis**,*John Gabriel***Re: § 534 Finis**,*John***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Zeit Geist***Re: § 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Zeit Geist***Re: § 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: ï¿½ 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: § 534 Finis**,*John***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Virgil*

**Re: § 534 Finis**,*Dan Christensen***Re: § 534 Finis**,*John Gabriel***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Dan Christensen*

**Re: § 534 Finis**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: § 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: § 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Zeit Geist***Re: § 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Zeit Geist***Re: § 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: § 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Sam Sung***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: § 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Sam Sung***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: § 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Sam Sung***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: § 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: § 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: § 534 Finis**,*YBM***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: § 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Zeit Geist***Re: § 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Zeit Geist***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: § 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: ï¿½ 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: ï¿½ 534 Finis**,*Zeit Geist***Re: ï¿½ 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Zeit Geist***Re: § 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Zeit Geist***Re: § 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Zeit Geist***Re: § 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Zeit Geist***Re: § 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Zeit Geist***Re: § 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Zeit Geist***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: § 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: § 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: ï¿½ 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: ? 534 Finis**,*Pirx42***Re: ? 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: ? 534 Finis**,*Zeit Geist***Re: ? 534 Finis**,*Pirx42***Re: ? 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: ? 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: ? 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: ï¿½ 534 Finis**,*Zeit Geist***Re: ï¿½ 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Zeit Geist***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Virgil*

**Re: § 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Sam Sung***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Michael Klemm***Re: § 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Sam Sung***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Zeit Geist***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Michael Klemm***Re: § 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Michael Klemm***Re: § 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***parity is undefined for odd-base representations of infinity**,*Space998***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Michael Klemm***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Sam Sung***Re: § 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Zeit Geist***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: § 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Sam Sung***Re: ? 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: ? 534 Finis**,*Sam Sung***Re: ? 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Zeit Geist***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: ï¿½ 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: ï¿½ 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: ï¿½ 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: ï¿½ 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: ï¿½ 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: ï¿½ 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Virgil*

**Re: § 534 Finis**,*Mind Math***Re: § 534 Finis**,*david petry***Re: § 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Pirx42***Re: § 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Pirx42***Re: § 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Pirx42***Re: Â§ 534 Finis**,*Virgil*

**Re: § 534 Finis**,*Tommy***Re: § 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Tommy***Re: § 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: § 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Sam Sung***Re: § 534 Finis**,*YBM***Re: § 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Zeit Geist***Re: § 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Zeit Geist***Re: § 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Zeit Geist***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: ï¿½ 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: ? 534 Finis**,*YBM***Re: ? 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: ? 534 Finis**,*YBM***Re: ? 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: ? 534 Finis**,*YBM***Re: ? 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: ? 534 Finis**,*YBM***Re: ? 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: ? 534 Finis**,*YBM***Re: ? 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: ? 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: ? 534 Finis**,*Zeit Geist***Re: ? 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: ? 534 Finis**,*Zeit Geist***Re: ? 534 Finis**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: ? 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: ? 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: ? 534 Finis**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: ? 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: ? 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: ? 534 Finis**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: ? 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: ? 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: ? 534 Finis**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: ? 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: ? 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: ? 534 Finis**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: ? 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: ? 534 Finis**,*Zeit Geist***Re: ? 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: ? 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: ? 534 Finis**,*Zeit Geist***Re: ? 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: ? 534 Finis**,*Zeit Geist***Re: ? 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: ? 534 Finis**,*YBM***Re: ? 534 Finis**,*Vergil***Re: ? 534 Finis**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: ? 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: ? 534 Finis**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: ? 534 Finis**,*Zeit Geist***Re: ? 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: ? 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: ? 534 Finis**,*Sam Sung***Re: ? 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: ? 534 Finis**,*Zeit Geist***Re: ? 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: ? 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: ? 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: ï¿½ 534 Finis**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Ã¯Â¿âˆ 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Sam Sung***Re: § 534 Finis**,*YBM***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Sam Sung***Re: § 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Ralf Bader***Re: § 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Zeit Geist***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Ralf Bader***Re: § 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Ralf Bader***Re: § 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Ralf Bader***Re: § 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Ralf Bader***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Sam Sung***Re: § 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Ralf Bader***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Zeit Geist***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: § 534 Finis**,*YBM***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Sam Sung***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Sam Sung***Re: § 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: § 534 Finis**,*YBM***Re: § 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Zeit Geist***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: § 534 Finis**,*YBM***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: § 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Zeit Geist***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Tommy***Re: § 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: § 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Zeit Geist***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Tommy***Re: § 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: § 534 Finis**,*FredJeffries***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Martin Shobe***Re: § 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Sam Sung***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Sam Sung***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Zeit Geist***Re: § 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Sam Sung***Re: § 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Sam Sung***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Sam Sung***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Zeit Geist***Re: § 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Martin Shobe***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: § 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Martin Shobe***Re: § 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Martin Shobe***Re: § 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Martin Shobe***Re: § 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Martin Shobe***Re: § 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Ralf Bader***Re: Â§ 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: § 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Zeit Geist***Re: § 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: § 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Zeit Geist***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: § 534 Finis**,*YBM***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Martin Shobe***Re: § 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Zeit Geist***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Martin Shobe***Re: § 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Martin Shobe***Re: § 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Martin Shobe***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: § 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: § 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: § 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: § 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: § 534 Finis**,*YBM***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Martin Shobe***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Martin Shobe***Re: § 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Martin Shobe***Re: § 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Martin Shobe***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: ï¿½ 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: ï¿½ 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: ï¿½ 534 Finis**,*Zeit Geist***Re: ï¿½ 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: ï¿½ 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: ï¿½ 534 Finis**,*Zeit Geist***Re: ï¿½ 534 Finis**,*Zeit Geist***Re: ï¿½ 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: ï¿½ 534 Finis**,*Zeit Geist***Re: ï¿½ 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: ï¿½ 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: ï¿½ 534 Finis**,*Sam Sung***Re: ï¿½ 534 Finis**,*Zeit Geist***Re: ï¿½ 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: ï¿½ 534 Finis**,*Zeit Geist***Re: ï¿½ 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: ï¿½ 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: ï¿½ 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: § 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Martin Shobe***Re: § 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Martin Shobe**Message not available***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Sam Sung**Message not available***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Martin Shobe***Re: § 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Martin Shobe***Re: § 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Zeit Geist***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Martin Shobe***Re: § 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Sam Sung***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Zeit Geist***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Martin Shobe***Re: § 534 Finis to WM's WMytheology**,*Virgil***Re: § 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: § 534 Finis for WM**,*Virgil***Re: § 534 Finis**,*bobg0***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: § 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Martin Shobe***Re: § 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Sam Sung***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Martin Shobe***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Virgil**Message not available***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Zeit Geist***Re: § 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Zeit Geist***Re: § 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Zeit Geist***Re: § 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Zeit Geist***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Zeit Geist***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: § 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Zeit Geist***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: § 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Zeit Geist***Re: § 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: ï¿½ 534 Finis**,*Zeit Geist***Re: ï¿½ 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: ï¿½ 534 Finis**,*Zeit Geist***Re: ï¿½ 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: ï¿½ 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: ï¿½ 534 Finis**,*Zeit Geist***Re: ï¿½ 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: ï¿½ 534 Finis**,*Zeit Geist***Re: ï¿½ 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: ï¿½ 534 Finis**,*Zeit Geist***Re: ï¿½ 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: ï¿½ 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: ï¿½ 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: � 534 Finis**,*Martin Shobe***Re: ï¿½ 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: ï¿½ 534 Finis**,*Zeit Geist***Re: ï¿½ 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Zeit Geist***Re: § 534 Finis**,*YBM***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Zeit Geist***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: ï¿½ 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: ï¿½ 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: ï¿½ 534 Finis**,*Zeit Geist***Re: ï¿½ 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: ï¿½ 534 Finis**,*Zeit Geist***Re: ï¿½ 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: ï¿½ 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: ï¿½ 534 Finis**,*Zeit Geist***Re: ï¿½ 534 Finis. WM fails to prove his case, again!**,*Virgil***Re: ï¿½ 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: § 534 Finis**,*YBM***Re: Â§ 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: Â§ 534 Finis**,*Sam Sung***Re: Â§ 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: Â§ 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Martin Shobe***Re: § 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Sam Sung***Re: § 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Sam Sung***Re: Â§ 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Zeit Geist***Re: § 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: Â§ 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Martin Shobe***Re: Â§ 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: § 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Martin Shobe***Re: § 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Martin Shobe***Re: § 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Martin Shobe***Re: § 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Martin Shobe***Re: § 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Zeit Geist***Re: § 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: § 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Sam Sung***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Sam Sung***Re: ? 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: ? 534 Finis**,*Sam Sung***Re: ? 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: ? 534 Finis**,*Sam Sung***Re: ? 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: ? 534 Finis**,*Sam Sung***Re: ? 534 Finis**,*Sam Sung***Re: § 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: § 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: § 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Sam Sung***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Sam Sung***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Sam Sung***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Sam Sung***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Sam Sung***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: § 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: § 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Zeit Geist***Re: § 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Sam Sung***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Sam Sung***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Sam Sung***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Zeit Geist***Re: § 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Sam Sung***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Sam Sung***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Sam Sung***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Sam Sung***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: § 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: § 534 Finis**,*PotatoSauce***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Zeit Geist***Re: § 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: ï¿½ 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: ï¿½ 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Martin Shobe***Re: § 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Martin Shobe***Re: § 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Zeit Geist***Re: § 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Zeit Geist***Re: § 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Zeit Geist***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: § 534 Finis**,*YBM***Re: § 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Sam Sung***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Sam Sung***Re: § 534 Finis**,*YBM***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Sam Sung***Re: § 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: § 534 Finis**,*YBM***Re: § 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: § 534 Finis**,*YBM***Re: § 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Zeit Geist***Re: § 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Martin Shobe***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Sam Sung***Re: § 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: § 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: § 534 Finis**,*FredJeffries***Re: § 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: § 534 Finis**,*FredJeffries***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: § 534 Finis**,*FredJeffries***Re: § 534 Finis**,*YBM***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: § 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Michael Klemm***Re: § 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Zeit Geist***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Martin Shobe***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: § 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Zeit Geist***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: § 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Zeit Geist***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: § 534 Finis**,*YBM***Re: § 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: § 534 Finis**,*YBM***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: ? 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: ï¿½ 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: ï¿½ 534 Finis**,*Zeit Geist***Re: ï¿½ 534 Finis**,*Zeit Geist***Re: ï¿½ 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: ï¿½ 534 Finis**,*Zeit Geist***Re: ? 534 Finis**,*YBM***Re: ï¿½ 534 Finis**,*Zeit Geist***Re: ï¿½ 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: ï¿½ 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: § 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Zeit Geist***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Michael Klemm***Re: § 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Ralf Bader***Re: § 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Zeit Geist***Re: § 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Zeit Geist***Re: § 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: § 534 Finis**,*FredJeffries***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: § 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Sam Sung***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Zeit Geist***Re: § 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: § 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: § 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Â§ 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: Â§ 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: § 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: § 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: § 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: § 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: § 534 Finis**,*YBM***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Sam Sung***Re: § 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Uergil***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Sam Sung***Re: § 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: § 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: § 534 Finis**,*FredJeffries***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: § 534 Finis**,*"Jürgen R."***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Sam Sung***Re: § 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: § 534 Finis**,*"Jürgen R."***Re: § 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: § 534 Finis**,*"Jürgen R."***Re: § 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: Â§ 534 Finis**,*Marc Olschok***Re: Â§ 534 Finis**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: § 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Zeit Geist***Re: § 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: § 534 Finis**,*YBM***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Sam Sung***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Sam Sung***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Zeit Geist***Re: § 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Zeit Geist***Re: § 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Sam Sung***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Zeit Geist***Re: § 534 Finis**,*FredJeffries***Re: § 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: § 534 Finis**,*FredJeffries***Re: § 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: § 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Zeit Geist***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Zeit Geist*

**Re: § 534 Finis**,*Dan Christensen***Re: § 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Dan Christensen***Re: § 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Virgil***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Zeit Geist***Re: § 534 Finis**,*mueckenh***Re: § 534 Finis**,*Virgil*

**Re: Unity Root Matrix Theory (URMT)**,*J.B. Wood***Re: Unity Root Matrix Theory (URMT)**,*richard miller***Re: Unity Root Matrix Theory (URMT)**,*J.B. Wood*

**FALSE CONFIRMATIONS OF EINSTEIN'S RELATIVITY**,*Pentcho Valev***Re: FALSE CONFIRMATIONS OF EINSTEIN'S RELATIVITY**,*Pentcho Valev***Re: FALSE CONFIRMATIONS OF EINSTEIN'S RELATIVITY**,*Pentcho Valev***Re: FALSE CONFIRMATIONS OF EINSTEIN'S RELATIVITY**,*Pentcho Valev***Re: FALSE CONFIRMATIONS OF EINSTEIN'S RELATIVITY**,*Pentcho Valev*

**Newsflash! I have been kicked off Feces Book.**,*John Gabriel***Re: Newsflash! I have been kicked off Feces Book.**,*YBM***Re: Newsflash! I have been kicked off Feces Book.**,*John Gabriel*

**Re: Newsflash! I have been kicked off Feces Book.**,*Dan Christensen***Re: Newsflash! I have been kicked off Feces Book.**,*John Gabriel***Re: Newsflash! I have been kicked off Feces Book.**,*Dan Christensen***Re: Newsflash! I have been kicked off Feces Book.**,*Space998*

**Re: Newsflash! I have been kicked off Feces Book.**,*John*

**PROOF THAT DAEMONS EXIST ON THE WEB <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<**,*grahamcooper7***Re: Math professors Univ. Michigan endorse Kepler Packing proof to arxiv**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Re: Math professors Univ. Michigan endorse Kepler Packing proof to arxiv**,*Space998***Hsiang fakery and Hales fakery of Kepler Packing Re: Math professors Univ. Michigan endorse Kepler Packing proof to arxiv**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Re: Hsiang fakery and Hales fakery of Kepler Packing Re: Math professors Univ. Michigan endorse Kepler Packing proof to arxiv**,*Space998***Re: Hsiang fakery and Hales fakery of Kepler Packing Re: Math professors Univ. Michigan endorse Kepler Packing proof to arxiv**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Re: Hsiang fakery and Hales fakery of Kepler Packing Re: Math professors Univ. Michigan endorse Kepler Packing proof to arxiv**,*Space998**Archimedes Plutonium***Euler type formula for tiling 3D with pipes Re: Math professors Univ. Michigan endorse Kepler Packing proof to arxiv**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Re: Euler type formula for tiling 3D with pipes Re: Math professors Univ. Michigan endorse Kepler Packing proof to arxiv**,*Space998***Re: Euler type formula for tiling 3D with pipes Re: Math professors Univ. Michigan endorse Kepler Packing proof to arxiv**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Re: Euler type formula for tiling 3D with pipes Re: Math professors Univ. Michigan endorse Kepler Packing proof to arxiv**,*Space998***Euler type formula for tiling 3D with pipes #1991 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***360/A for Euler type formula of tiling 100% in 3rd Dimension #1992 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***generalizing the Euler formula to include right triangles and rectangles #1993 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***generalizing the Euler formula #1994 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***why do you do THAT**,*Space998***Re: generalizing the Euler formula #1995 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Re: generalizing the Euler formula #1995 Correcting Math**,*Space998*

**Eucl geom = ellipt + hyperbolic Re: Maxwell Equations derive Peano Axioms #1978 Correcting Math #1646 New Physics #2054 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed**,*Archimedes Plutonium***I believe I found the clue on why these huge semi-primes factor so fast with the E.C.M.**,*djoyce099***Re: I believe I found the clue on why these huge semi-primes factor so fast with the E.C.M.**,*bert***Re: I believe I found the clue on why these huge semi-primes factor so fast with the E.C.M.**,*djoyce099***Re: I believe I found the clue on why these huge semi-primes factor so fast with the E.C.M.**,*Pubkeybreaker***Re: I believe I found the clue on why these huge semi-primes factor so fast with the E.C.M.**,*djoyce099***Re: I believe I found the clue on why these huge semi-primes factor so fast with the E.C.M.**,*djoyce099***Re: I believe I found the clue on why these huge semi-primes factor so fast with the E.C.M.**,*djoyce099***Re: I believe I found the clue on why these huge semi-primes factor so fast with the E.C.M.**,*Pubkeybreaker***Re: I believe I found the clue on why these huge semi-primes factor so fast with the E.C.M.**,*djoyce099***Re: I believe I found the clue on why these huge semi-primes factor so fast with the E.C.M.**,*djoyce099***Re: I believe I found the clue on why these huge semi-primes factor so fast with the E.C.M.**,*The Wormmaker***Re: I believe I found the clue on why these huge semi-primes factor so fast with the E.C.M.**,*Pubkeybreaker***Re: I believe I found the clue on why these huge semi-primes factor so fast with the E.C.M.**,*djoyce099***Re: I believe I found the clue on why these huge semi-primes factor so fast with the E.C.M.**,*Michael Ascher***Re: I believe I found the clue on why these huge semi-primes factor so fast with the E.C.M.**,*Pubkeybreaker***Re: I believe I found the clue on why these huge semi-primes factor so fast with the E.C.M.**,*djoyce099***Re: I believe I found the clue on why these huge semi-primes factor so fast with the E.C.M.**,*Pubkeybreaker***Re: I believe I found the clue on why these huge semi-primes factor so fast with the E.C.M.**,*djoyce099***Re: I believe I found the clue on why these huge semi-primes factor so fast with the E.C.M.**,*Pubkeybreaker***Re: I believe I found the clue on why these huge semi-primes factor so fast with the E.C.M.**,*djoyce099***Re: I believe I found the clue on why these huge semi-primes factor so fast with the E.C.M.**,*Leah Powers***Re: I believe I found the clue on why these huge semi-primes factor so fast with the E.C.M.**,*djoyce099***Re: I believe I found the clue on why these huge semi-primes factor so fast with the E.C.M.**,*Eduardo Dorknado***Re: I believe I found the clue on why these huge semi-primes factor so fast with the E.C.M.**,*djoyce099***Re: I believe I found the clue on why these huge semi-primes factor so fast with the E.C.M.**,*Eduardo Dorknado***Re: I believe I found the clue on why these huge semi-primes factor so fast with the E.C.M.**,*djoyce099***Re: I believe I found the clue on why these huge semi-primes factor so fast with the E.C.M.**,*djoyce099***Re: I believe I found the clue on why these huge semi-primes factor so fast with the E.C.M.**,*djoyce099*

**Re: I believe I found the clue on why these huge semi-primes factor so fast with the E.C.M.**,*The Wormmaker***Re: I believe I found the clue on why these huge semi-primes factor so fast with the E.C.M.**,*James Waldby***Re: I believe I found the clue on why these huge semi-primes factor so fast with the E.C.M.**,*David Bernier***Re: I believe I found the clue on why these huge semi-primes factor so fast with the E.C.M.**,*djoyce099***Re: I believe I found the clue on why these huge semi-primes factor so fast with the E.C.M.**,*David Bernier***Re: I believe I found the clue on why these huge semi-primes factor so fast with the E.C.M.**,*djoyce099*

**Re: I believe I found the clue on why these huge semi-primes factor so fast with the E.C.M.**,*djoyce099*

**2.51 Translated 9 applet New Lame Poo Calculus Courapse**,*Jon Bif***Heads up !**,*Jon Bif***2.50 - About the 9-applet New Calculus course.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.50 - About the 9-applet New Calculus course.**,*Dan Christensen***Re: 2.50 - About the 9-applet New Calculus course.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.50 - About the 9-applet New Calculus course.**,*Dan Christensen*

**Re: 2.50 - About the 9-applet New Calculus course.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.50 - About the 9-applet New Calculus course.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.50 - About the 9-applet New Calculus course.**,*Dan Christensen***Re: 2.50 - About the 9-applet New Calculus course.**,*Freda*

**Re: 2.50 - About the 9-applet New Calculus course.**,*John Gabriel*

**Re: Gabriel to meet same fate as FLT troll (murdered)?**,*Dave U . Random***Re: Gabriel to meet same fate as FLT troll (murdered)?**,*John Gabriel*

**ALBERT EINSTEIN INSTITUTE REFUTES RELATIVITY**,*Pentcho Valev***Re: ALBERT EINSTEIN INSTITUTE REFUTES RELATIVITY**,*Pentcho Valev*

**Re: many math theorems involve stacking Re: math professors Princeton Univ. endorsing Beal & FLT proofs to arxiv**,*Space998***Re: professors of Cambridge Univ endorse proof of No Odd Perfect to arxiv**,*Space998*- <Possible follow-ups>
**Re: professors of Cambridge Univ endorse proof of No Odd Perfect to arxiv**,*Archimedes Plutonium***more clear summary Re: professors of Cambridge Univ endorse proof of No Odd Perfect to arxiv**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Re: more clear summary Re: professors of Cambridge Univ endorse proof of No Odd Perfect to arxiv**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Re: more clear summary Re: professors of Cambridge Univ endorse proof of No Odd Perfect to arxiv**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Re: professors of Cambridge Univ endorse proof of No Odd Perfect to arxiv**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Re: professors of Cambridge Univ endorse proof of No Odd Perfect to arxiv**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Re: professors of Cambridge Univ endorse proof of No Odd Perfect to arxiv**,*Archimedes Plutonium*

**Re: professors of Cambridge Univ endorse proof of No Odd Perfect to arxiv**,*gorgol*

**Professors of Harvard endorse proof of Fundamental Theorem of Algebra to arxiv**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Re: Professors of Harvard endorse proof of Fundamental Theorem of Algebra to arxiv**,*Archimedes Plutonium***a Hahvahd professoR didn't say THIS**,*Space998***complex numbers (and irrationals) are really just vectors Re: Professors of Harvard endorse proof of Fundamental Theorem of Algebra to arxiv**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Re: complex numbers (and irrationals) are really just vectors Re: Professors of Harvard endorse proof of Fundamental Theorem of Algebra to arxiv**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Re: complex numbers (and irrationals) are really just vectors Re: Professors of Harvard endorse proof of Fundamental Theorem of Algebra to arxiv**,*YBM***Re: complex numbers (and irrationals) are really just vectors Re: Professors of Harvard endorse proof of Fundamental Theorem of Algebra to arxiv**,*Space998**Archimedes Plutonium**Archimedes Plutonium*

**Re: 2.14 - Why is Gabriel's New Limit Theorem for mainstream mythmatics the first coherent theorem about limits?**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.14 - Why is Gabriel's New Limit Theorem for mainstream mythmatics the first coherent theorem about limits?**,*Space998*- <Possible follow-ups>
**Re: 2.14 - Why is Gabriel's New Limit Theorem for mainstream mythmatics the first coherent theorem about limits?**,*John Gabriel**John Gabriel**John Gabriel**John Gabriel**John Gabriel**Dr Cheese**Dr Cheese**John Gabriel*

**Re: 2.50 - Jacobeans in Clifford Algebras**,*Jan***Re: Welcome all mathematicians and teachers, do you believe in my concept of semi-prime super cycles?**,*djoyce099*- <Possible follow-ups>
**Re: Welcome all mathematicians and teachers, do you believe in my concept of semi-prime super cycles?**,*Fritz Luger***Re: Welcome all mathematicians and teachers, do you believe in my concept of semi-prime super cycles?**,*Kook Spotters**Leah Powers*

**Re: Attention: Please read this if you are new to sci.math.**,*Dr. Thelmat*- <Possible follow-ups>
**Re: Attention: Please read this if you are new to sci.math.**,*John Gabriel***Re: Attention: Please read this if you are new to sci.math.**,*John Gabriel***Re: Attention: Please read this if you are new to sci.math.**,*John Gabriel***Re: Attention: Please read this if you are new to sci.math.**,*Kook Spotters*

**Re: Attention: Please read this if you are new to sci.math.**,*John Gabriel***Re: Attention: Please read this if you are new to sci.math.**,*John Gabriel***Re: Attention: Please read this if you are new to sci.math.**,*John Gabriel***Re: Attention: Please read this if you are new to sci.math.**,*John Gabriel***Re: Attention: Please read this if you are new to sci.math.**,*Dan Christensen***Re: Attention: Please read this if you are new to sci.math.**,*Buffalo Buffalo Buffalo*

**Re: Attention: Please read this if you are new to sci.math.**,*John Gabriel***Re: Attention: Please read this if you are new to sci.math.**,*Dan Christensen*

**Re: Attention: Please read this if you are new to sci.math.**,*John Gabriel***Re: Attention: Please read this if you are new to sci.math.**,*pani panagrahi*

**Re: Attention: Please read this if you are new to sci.math.**,*John Gabriel***Re: Attention: Please read this if you are new to sci.math.**,*John Gabriel***Re: Attention: Please read this if you are new to sci.math.**,*John Gabriel***Re: Attention: Please read this if you are new to sci.math.**,*John Gabriel***Re: Attention: Please read this if you are new to sci.math.**,*John Gabriel***Re: Attention: Please read this if you are new to sci.math.**,*John Gabriel******* TROLL ALERT ******,*Dan Christensen*

**Re: Attention: Please read this if you are new to sci.math.**,*John Gabriel*

**Re: 1.23 - Gabriel's List - A Survey among sci.math visitors.**,*Dr. Thelmat*- <Possible follow-ups>
**Re: 1.23 - Gabriel's List - A Survey among sci.math visitors.**,*Jon Bif***Re: 1.23 - Gabriel's List - A Survey among sci.math visitors.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 1.23 - Gabriel's List - A Survey among sci.math visitors.**,*Space998***Re: 1.23 - Gabriel's List - A Survey among sci.math visitors.**,*Jon Bif***Re: 1.23 - Gabriel's List - A Survey among sci.math visitors.**,*David C. Ullrich***Re: 1.23 - Gabriel's List - A Survey among sci.math visitors.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 1.23 - Gabriel's List - A Survey among sci.math visitors.**,*David C. Ullrich***Re: 1.23 - Gabriel's List - A Survey among sci.math visitors.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 1.23 - Gabriel's List - A Survey among sci.math visitors.**,*dullrich***Re: 1.23 - Gabriel's List - A Survey among sci.math visitors.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 1.23 - Gabriel's List - A Survey among sci.math visitors.**,*John***Re: 1.23 - Gabriel's List - A Survey among sci.math visitors.**,*David C. Ullrich***Re: 1.23 - Gabriel's List - A Survey among sci.math visitors.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 1.23 - Gabriel's List - A Survey among sci.math visitors.**,*dullrich***reifying THIS**,*Space998***Re: 1.23 - Gabriel's List - A Survey among sci.math visitors.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 1.23 - Gabriel's List - A Survey among sci.math visitors.**,*Dr Cheese*

**Re: 1.23 - Gabriel's List - A Survey among sci.math visitors.**,*David C. Ullrich***Re: 1.23 - Gabriel's List - A Survey among sci.math visitors.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 1.23 - Gabriel's List - A Survey among sci.math visitors.**,*David C. Ullrich***Re: 1.23 - Gabriel's List - A Survey among sci.math visitors.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 1.23 - Gabriel's List - A Survey among sci.math visitors.**,*Dan Christensen***Re: 1.23 - Gabriel's List - A Survey among sci.math visitors.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 1.23 - Gabriel's List - A Survey among sci.math visitors.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 1.23 - Gabriel's List - A Survey among sci.math visitors.**,*Dan Christensen***Re: 1.23 - Gabriel's List - A Survey among sci.math visitors.**,*Dan Christensen***Re: 1.23 - Gabriel's List - A Survey among sci.math visitors.**,*Dan Christensen***Re: 1.23 - Gabriel's List - A Survey among sci.math visitors.**,*Dan Christensen***Re: 1.23 - Gabriel's List - A Survey among sci.math visitors.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 1.23 - Gabriel's List - A Survey among sci.math visitors.**,*Dan Christensen***Re: 1.23 - Gabriel's List - A Survey among sci.math visitors.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 1.23 - Gabriel's List - A Survey among sci.math visitors.**,*Dan Christensen***Re: 1.23 - Gabriel's List - A Survey among sci.math visitors.**,*John***Re: 1.23 - Gabriel's List - A Survey among sci.math visitors.**,*Dan Christensen***Re: 1.23 - Gabriel's List - A Survey among sci.math visitors.**,*Dan Christensen***Re: 1.23 - Gabriel's List - A Survey among sci.math visitors.**,*dullrich***Re: 1.23 - Gabriel's List - A Survey among sci.math visitors.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 1.23 - Gabriel's List - A Survey among sci.math visitors.**,*David C. Ullrich***Re: 1.23 - Gabriel's List - A Survey among sci.math visitors.**,*John***Re: 1.23 - Gabriel's List - A Survey among sci.math visitors.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 1.23 - Gabriel's List - A Survey among sci.math visitors.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 1.23 - Gabriel's List - A Survey among sci.math visitors.**,*Dan Christensen*

**Re: 1.23 - Gabriel's List - A Survey among sci.math visitors.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 1.23 - Gabriel's List - A Survey among sci.math visitors.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 1.23 - Gabriel's List - A Survey among sci.math visitors.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 1.23 - Gabriel's List - A Survey among sci.math visitors.**,*John Gabriel***zeez, What**,*Space998*

**Re: 1.23 - Gabriel's List - A Survey among sci.math visitors.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 1.23 - Gabriel's List - A Survey among sci.math visitors.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 1.23 - Gabriel's List - A Survey among sci.math visitors.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 1.23 - Gabriel's List - A Survey among sci.math visitors.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 1.23 - Gabriel's List - A Survey among sci.math visitors.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 1.23 - Gabriel's List - A Survey among sci.math visitors.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 1.23 - Gabriel's List - A Survey among sci.math visitors.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 1.23 - Gabriel's List - A Survey among sci.math visitors.**,*Math Annotations***Re: 1.23 - Gabriel's List - A Survey among sci.math visitors.**,*dan brinski*

**Re: 1.23 - Gabriel's List - A Survey among sci.math visitors.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 1.23 - Gabriel's List - A Survey among sci.math visitors.**,*John Gabriel******* TROLL ALERT ******,*Dan Christensen*

**Re: 1.23 - Gabriel's List - A Survey among sci.math visitors.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 1.23 - Gabriel's List - A Survey among sci.math visitors.**,*Jamshīb al-Kāshī*

**Re: 1.23 - Gabriel's List - A Survey among sci.math visitors.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 1.23 - Gabriel's List - A Survey among sci.math visitors.**,*Jamshīb al-Kāshī*

**Re: 1.23 - Gabriel's List - A Survey among sci.math visitors.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 1.23 - Gabriel's List - A Survey among sci.math visitors.**,*Jamshīb al-Kāshī*

**Re: 1.23 - Gabriel's List - A Survey among sci.math visitors.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 1.23 - Gabriel's List - A Survey among sci.math visitors.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 1.23 - Gabriel's List - A Survey among sci.math visitors.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 1.23 - Gabriel's List - A Survey among sci.math visitors.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 1.23 - Gabriel's List - A Survey among sci.math visitors.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 1.23 - Gabriel's List - A Survey among sci.math visitors.**,*Jamshīb al-Kāshī*

**Re: 2.46 - Why you should ask questions and post comments at my FaceBook link.**,*Dr. Thelmat***Re: RICHARD FEYNMAN DISHONEST**,*Pentcho Valev***Re: 2.42 - If you want detailed answers...**,*Dr. Thelmat*- <Possible follow-ups>
**Re: 2.42 - If you want detailed answers...**,*dullrich***Re: 2.42 - If you want detailed answers...**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.42 - If you want detailed answers...**,*dullrich***Re: 2.42 - If you want detailed answers...**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.42 - If you want detailed answers...**,*dullrich***Re: 2.42 - If you want detailed answers...**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.42 - If you want detailed answers...**,*John***Re: 2.42 - If you want detailed answers...**,*John***Re: 2.42 - If you want detailed answers...**,*Space998*

**Re: 1.89 - Does an instantaneous rate exist really?**,*Dr. Thelmat*- <Possible follow-ups>
**Re: 1.89 - Does an instantaneous rate exist really?**,*Space998***Re: 1.89 - Does an instantaneous rate exist really?**,*John Gabriel***Re: 1.89 - Does an instantaneous rate exist really?**,*John Gabriel***Re: 1.89 - Does an instantaneous rate exist really?**,*John Gabriel***Re: 1.89 - Does an instantaneous rate exist really?**,*John Gabriel***Re: 1.89 - Does an instantaneous rate exist really?**,*John Gabriel***Re: 1.89 - Does an instantaneous rate exist really?**,*John Gabriel***Re: 1.89 - Does an instantaneous rate exist really?**,*John Gabriel*

**Re: 2.47 - What is the speed of an object at t=1 if the position function is s(t)=(t-1)^(1/3)+1 ?**,*Dr. Thelmat*- <Possible follow-ups>
**Re: 2.47 - What is the speed of an object at t=1 if the position function is s(t)=(t-1)^(1/3)+1 ?**,*Dr. Thelmat***Re: 2.47 - What is the speed of an object at t=1 if the position function is s(t)=(t-1)^(1/3)+1 ?**,*Dr. Thelmat***Re: 2.47 - What is the speed of an object at t=1 if the position function is s(t)=(t-1)^(1/3)+1 ?**,*Dan Christensen***Re: 2.47 - What is the speed of an object at t=1 if the position function is s(t)=(t-1)^(1/3)+1 ?**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.47 - What is the speed of an object at t=1 if the position function is s(t)=(t-1)^(1/3)+1 ?**,*Dan Christensen***Re: 2.47 - What is the speed of an object at t=1 if the position function is s(t)=(t-1)^(1/3)+1 ?**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.47 - What is the speed of an object at t=1 if the position function is s(t)=(t-1)^(1/3)+1 ?**,*Dan Christensen***Re: 2.47 - What is the speed of an object at t=1 if the position function is s(t)=(t-1)^(1/3)+1 ?**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.47 - What is the speed of an object at t=1 if the position function is s(t)=(t-1)^(1/3)+1 ?**,*Dan Christensen***Re: 2.47 - What is the speed of an object at t=1 if the position function is s(t)=(t-1)^(1/3)+1 ?**,*Dan Christensen***Re: 2.47 - What is the speed of an object at t=1 if the position function is s(t)=(t-1)^(1/3)+1 ?**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.47 - What is the speed of an object at t=1 if the position function is s(t)=(t-1)^(1/3)+1 ?**,*Dan Christensen*

**Re: 2.47 - What is the speed of an object at t=1 if the position function is s(t)=(t-1)^(1/3)+1 ?**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.47 - What is the speed of an object at t=1 if the position function is s(t)=(t-1)^(1/3)+1 ?**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.47 - What is the speed of an object at t=1 if the position function is s(t)=(t-1)^(1/3)+1 ?**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.47 - What is the speed of an object at t=1 if the position function is s(t)=(t-1)^(1/3)+1 ?**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.47 - What is the speed of an object at t=1 if the position function is s(t)=(t-1)^(1/3)+1 ?**,*Dan Christensen***Re: 2.47 - What is the speed of an object at t=1 if the position function is s(t)=(t-1)^(1/3)+1 ?**,*Jon Bif***Re: 2.47 - What is the speed of an object at t=1 if the position function is s(t)=(t-1)^(1/3)+1 ?**,*The Wormmaker*

**Re: 2.24 - The idiots that run Wikipedia - debunking what it means for a function to be differentiable.**,*Dr. Thelmat***Re: you don't know WHAT you don't know**,*Dr. Thelmat***Re: 2.48 - It's not the derivative, it's the tangent object, stupid!**,*Dr. Thelmat**Message not available*- <Possible follow-ups>
**Re: 2.48 - It's not the derivative, it's the tangent object, stupid!**,*Dr. Thelmat***Re: 2.48 - It's not the derivative, it's the tangent object, stupid!**,*Dan Christensen***Re: 2.48 - It's not the derivative, it's the tangent object, stupid!**,*Dan Christensen*

**Re: 2.48 - It's not the derivative, it's the tangent object, stupid!**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.48 - It's not the derivative, it's the tangent object, stupid!**,*Dan Christensen*

**Re: 2.48 - It's not the derivative, it's the tangent object, stupid!**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.48 - It's not the derivative, it's the tangent object, stupid!**,*Dan Christensen*

**Re: 2.48 - It's not the derivative, it's the tangent object, stupid!**,*Fritz Luger***Re: 2.48 - It's not the derivative, it's the tangent object, stupid!**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.48 - It's not the derivative, it's the tangent object, stupid!**,*Dan Christensen*

**Re: 2.48 - It's not the derivative, it's the tangent object, stupid!**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.48 - It's not the derivative, it's the tangent object, stupid!**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.48 - It's not the derivative, it's the tangent object, stupid!**,*John Gabriel*

**Re: pigeonhole principle is physics not maths ?**,*RedAcer***Re: pigeonhole principle is physics not maths ?**,*grabber*- <Possible follow-ups>
**Re: pigeonhole principle is physics not maths ?**,*FredJeffries*

**Re: Twisted honeycombs, Coxeter**,*Michael Klemm***Re: Twisted honeycombs, Coxeter**,*Christopher J. Henrich*

**Re: 2.45 - What some PhDs said about differentials.**,*YBM**Message not available***Re: 2.45 - What some PhDs said about differentials.**,*Dr. Thelmat*

- <Possible follow-ups>
**Re: 2.45 - What some PhDs said about differentials.**,*Dr. Thelmat***Re: 2.45 - What some PhDs said about differentials.**,*Dr. Thelmat***Re: 2.45 - What some PhDs said about differentials.**,*Dr. Thelmat***Re: 2.45 - What some PhDs said about differentials.**,*Dr. Thelmat***Re: 2.45 - What some PhDs said about differentials.**,*David C. Ullrich***Re: 2.45 - What some PhDs said about differentials.**,*David C. Ullrich***Re: 2.45 - What some PhDs said about differentials.**,*John Gabriel*

**Re: 2.45 - What some PhDs said about differentials.**,*Dan Christensen***Re: 2.45 - What some PhDs said about differentials.**,*Dan Christensen***Re: 2.45 - What some PhDs said about differentials.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.45 - What some PhDs said about differentials.**,*David C. Ullrich***Re: 2.45 - What some PhDs said about differentials.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.45 - What some PhDs said about differentials.**,*dullrich***Re: 2.45 - What some PhDs said about differentials.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.45 - What some PhDs said about differentials.**,*Soap Research***Re: 2.45 - What some PhDs said about differentials.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.45 - What some PhDs said about differentials.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.45 - What some PhDs said about differentials.**,*YBM***Re: 2.45 - What some PhDs said about differentials.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.45 - What some PhDs said about differentials.**,*Dr Cheese***Re: 2.45 - What some PhDs said about differentials.**,*Soap Research***Re: 2.45 - What some PhDs said about differentials.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.45 - What some PhDs said about differentials.**,*John***Re: 2.45 - What some PhDs said about differentials.**,*David C. Ullrich***Re: 2.45 - What some PhDs said about differentials.**,*David C. Ullrich***Re: 2.45 - What some PhDs said about differentials.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.45 - What some PhDs said about differentials.**,*dullrich***Re: 2.45 - What some PhDs said about differentials.**,*John Gabriel***it is time to say hello/goodbye**,*Space998***Re: 2.45 - What some PhDs said about differentials.**,*John*

**Re: 2.45 - What some PhDs said about differentials.**,*Dan Christensen***Re: 2.45 - What some PhDs said about differentials.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.45 - What some PhDs said about differentials.**,*Soap Research***Re: 2.45 - What some PhDs said about differentials.**,*Soap Research***Re: 2.45 - What some PhDs said about differentials.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.45 - What some PhDs said about differentials.**,*Soap Research***Re: 2.45 - What some PhDs said about differentials.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.45 - What some PhDs said about differentials.**,*Soap Research***Re: 2.45 - What some PhDs said about differentials.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.45 - What some PhDs said about differentials.**,*John***Re: 2.45 - What some PhDs said about differentials.**,*Dan Christensen***Re: 2.45 - What some PhDs said about differentials.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.45 - What some PhDs said about differentials.**,*Dan Christensen***Re: 2.45 - What some PhDs said about differentials.**,*John***Re: 2.45 - What some PhDs said about differentials.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.45 - What some PhDs said about differentials.**,*John***Re: 2.45 - What some PhDs said about differentials.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.45 - What some PhDs said about differentials.**,*Dan Christensen***Re: 2.45 - What some PhDs said about differentials.**,*Dan Christensen***Re: 2.45 - What some PhDs said about differentials.**,*John*

**Re: 2.45 - What some PhDs said about differentials.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.45 - What some PhDs said about differentials.**,*Dan Christensen*

**Re: 2.45 - What some PhDs said about differentials.**,*dullrich***Re: 2.45 - What some PhDs said about differentials.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.45 - What some PhDs said about differentials.**,*David C. Ullrich***Re: 2.45 - What some PhDs said about differentials.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.45 - What some PhDs said about differentials.**,*John***Re: 2.45 - What some PhDs said about differentials.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.45 - What some PhDs said about differentials.**,*John***Re: 2.45 - What some PhDs said about differentials.**,*dullrich*

**Re: 2.45 - What some PhDs said about differentials.**,*Jan***Re: 2.45 - What some PhDs said about differentials.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.45 - What some PhDs said about differentials.**,*John***Re: 2.45 - What some PhDs said about differentials.**,*dullrich***Re: 2.45 - What some PhDs said about differentials.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.45 - What some PhDs said about differentials.**,*John***Re: 2.45 - What some PhDs said about differentials.**,*dullrich***Re: 2.45 - What some PhDs said about differentials.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.45 - What some PhDs said about differentials.**,*Dr Cheese***Re: 2.45 - What some PhDs said about differentials.**,*dullrich*

**Re: 2.45 - What some PhDs said about differentials.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.45 - What some PhDs said about differentials.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.45 - What some PhDs said about differentials.**,*FredJeffries***Re: 2.45 - What some PhDs said about differentials.**,*John Gabriel*

**sorry -- you cannot use that**,*Space998*

**Re: 2.45 - What some PhDs said about differentials.**,*FredJeffries***Re: 2.45 - What some PhDs said about differentials.**,*Ross A. Finlayson***Re: 2.45 - What some PhDs said about differentials.**,*FredJeffries***Re: 2.45 - What some PhDs said about differentials.**,*Ross A. Finlayson*

**Re: 2.45 - What some PhDs said about differentials.**,*John Gabriel*

**Re: 2.45 - What some PhDs said about differentials.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.45 - What some PhDs said about differentials.**,*dullrich***Re: 2.45 - What some PhDs said about differentials.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.45 - What some PhDs said about differentials.**,*Shuttah Piddiette*

**Re: 2.45 - What some PhDs said about differentials.**,*John Gabriel***editen subjectum**,*Space998*

**Re: 2.45 - What some PhDs said about differentials.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.45 - What some PhDs said about differentials.**,*Dan Christensen*

**Re: 2.45 - What some PhDs said about differentials.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.45 - What some PhDs said about differentials.**,*Dan Christensen***Re: 2.45 - What some PhDs said about differentials.**,*Dr Cheese*

**Re: 2.45 - What some PhDs said about differentials.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.45 - What some PhDs said about differentials.**,*Dan Christensen*

**Re: 2.45 - What some PhDs said about differentials.**,*John Gabriel*

**Re: ? 533 Proof**,*Ben Bacarisse*- <Possible follow-ups>
**Re: ? 533 Proof**,*Martin Shobe**Message not available***Re: ? 533 Proof**,*Sam Sung*

*Message not available***Re: ? 533 Proof**,*Martin Shobe***Re: ? 533 Proof**,*Virgil***Re: ? 533 Proof**,*mueckenh***Re: ? 533 Proof**,*Sam Sung***Re: ? 533 Proof**,*Virgil***Re: ? 533 Proof**,*Virgil***Re: ? 533 Proof**,*mueckenh***Re: ? 533 Proof**,*Sam Sung***Re: ? 533 Proof**,*Virgil***Re: ? 533 Proof**,*Virgil***Re: ? 533 Proof**,*mueckenh***Re: ? 533 Proof**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: ? 533 Proof**,*Virgil***Re: ? 533 Proof**,*mueckenh***Re: ? 533 Proof**,*Virgil***Re: ? 533 Proof**,*Sam Sung*

*Message not available*

**Re: ? 533 Proof**,*Virgil***Re: ? 533 Proof**,*Virgil**Message not available***Re: ? 533 Proof**,*Sam Sung*

*Message not available***Re: ? 533 Proof**,*Virgil*

**Re: ? 533 Proof**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: ? 533 Proof**,*mueckenh***Re: ? 533 Proof**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: ? 533 Proof**,*Virgil***Re: ? 533 Proof**,*mueckenh***Re: ? 533 Proof**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: ? 533 Proof**,*Virgil***Re: ? 533 Proof**,*Virgil***Re: ? 533 Proof**,*mueckenh***Re: ? 533 Proof**,*Virgil*

**Re: ? 533 Proof**,*Space998*

**Welcome to <sci.math>. These suggestions may help you.**,*Ken Pledger**Message not available***Re: Welcome to <sci.math>. These suggestions may help you.**,*Ken Pledger***Re: Welcome to <sci.math>. These suggestions may help you.**,*Niels Diepeveen***Re: Welcome to <sci.math>. These suggestions may help you.**,*Ken Pledger*

- <Possible follow-ups>
**Welcome to <sci.math>. These suggestions may help you.**,*Ken Pledger*