# sci.math

**Eagle and Flath on Euclid's IP proof #13 the 4th ed. Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Tne empty set and the disproof of the axiom of infinity**,*gert . treiber***solutions manual, test bank for Business Driven Information Systems 3rd Canadian Edition 3e Paige Baltzan Brian Detlor Cameron**,*smtbhelp***puzzle on sqrt mod 2^k**,*Rosario193***Re: puzzle on sqrt mod 2^k**,*Rosario193***Re: puzzle on sqrt mod 2^k**,*Herman Rubin***Re: puzzle on sqrt mod 2^k**,*Arturo Magidin*

**TINV functions**,*londo londos***why chose Ore for Prime Simplicity in Mathematical Intelligencer? #12 the 4th ed. Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***why chose Ore in Prime Simplicity of Mathematical Intelligencer? #12 the 4th ed. Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Aleph?**,*William Elliot***Re: Aleph?**,*Arturo Magidin***Re: Aleph?**,*samiso***Re: Aleph? Correction**,*William Elliot***Re: Aleph? Correction**,*dullrich***Re: Aleph? Correction**,*Peter Percival*

**Re: Aleph? Correction**,*Herman Rubin*

**require 2 courses of Logic; Dunham on Euclid IP #11 the 4th ed. Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***..... ..... ..... Unique solutions**,*Deep***My survey 84% fail; MI survey ??; Davis & Hersh and Dickson on Euclid IP #10 the 4th ed. Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***solutions manual, test bank for Anatomy & Physiology An Integrative Approach 1e Michael McKinley Valerie O'Loughlin Theresa Bidle**,*piecutie056***Geometric Algebra at the start of learning higher math**,*rpjherman***Re: Geometric Algebra at the start of learning higher math**,*Robin Chapman***Re: Geometric Algebra at the start of learning higher math**,*Dan Christensen***Re: Geometric Algebra at the start of learning higher math**,*FredJeffries***Re: Geometric Algebra at the start of learning higher math**,*richard miller***Re: Geometric Algebra at the start of learning higher math**,*samiso*

**Area of an n-gon inscribing a circle (parallel to Heron's formula)?**,*joshipura***Re: Area of an n-gon inscribing a circle (parallel to Heron's formula)?**,*Richard Tobin***Re: Area of an n-gon inscribing a circle (parallel to Heron's formula)?**,*quasi***Re: Area of an n-gon inscribing a circle (parallel to Heron's formula)?**,*quasi***Re: Area of an n-gon inscribing a circle (parallel to Heron's formula)?**,*Richard Tobin***Re: Area of an n-gon inscribing a circle (parallel to Heron's formula)?**,*Richard Tobin***Re: Area of an n-gon inscribing a circle (parallel to Heron's formula)?**,*quasi***Re: Area of an n-gon inscribing a circle (parallel to Heron's formula)?**,*quasi***Re: Area of an n-gon inscribing a circle (parallel to Heron's formula)?**,*Richard Tobin*

**Re: Area of an n-gon inscribing a circle (parallel to Heron's formula)?**,*joshipura*

*Message not available***Re: Area of an n-gon inscribing a circle (parallel to Heron's formula)?**,*William Elliot*

**Generating Function for Reciprocals of Fibonacci Numbers**,*eric . fennessey***Re: Generating Function for Reciprocals of Fibonacci Numbers**,*Jussi Piitulainen***Re: Generating Function for Reciprocals of Fibonacci Numbers**,*konyberg***Re: Generating Function for Reciprocals of Fibonacci Numbers**,*Robin Chapman*

**outliers by grubb's test**,*geomodelers***Re: outliers by grubb's test**,*Ken Pledger*

**Iowa State Univ. math professors ask-endorse: True Representation of the Irrational Number to arxiv #2131 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***if math students were required formal logic; Heckman & Davidson attempt of IP proof #9 the 4th ed. Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Re: What Is A Planet?**,*Earle Jones27***A three-dimensional counterpart to the Koch curve**,*erkdemon***Re: A three-dimensional counterpart to the Koch curve**,*Chris M. Thomasson***Re: A three-dimensional counterpart to the Koch curve**,*erkdemon***Re: A three-dimensional counterpart to the Koch curve**,*Chris M. Thomasson*

**Re: A three-dimensional counterpart to the Koch curve**,*Peter Percival*

**Re: A three-dimensional counterpart to the Koch curve**,*Chris M. Thomasson***Re: A three-dimensional counterpart to the Koch curve**,*Chris M. Thomasson*

**puzzle**,*RichD***Re: puzzle**,*Virgil***Re: puzzle**,*William Elliot***Re: puzzle**,*quasi*

**Re: puzzle**,*Rosario193***Re: puzzle**,*Rosario193***Re: puzzle**,*Rosario193*

**Re: puzzle**,*quasi***Re: puzzle**,*quasi***Re: puzzle**,*quasi***Re: puzzle**,*Rosario193*

**Re: puzzle**,*Timothy Murphy***Re: puzzle**,*quasi***Re: puzzle**,*quasi***Re: puzzle**,*Timothy Murphy*

**Re: puzzle**,*Rosario193***Re: puzzle**,*quasi***Re: puzzle**,*Rosario193*

**Re: puzzle**,*David Hartley***Re: puzzle**,*David Hartley***Re: puzzle**,*quasi***Re: puzzle**,*PotatoSauce*

**Re: puzzle**,*Rosario193*

**Re: puzzle**,*Bart Goddard***Re: puzzle**,*David Hartley***Re: puzzle**,*quasi***Re: puzzle**,*Bart Goddard***Re: puzzle**,*Bart Goddard***Re: puzzle**,*quasi*

**Re: puzzle**,*PotatoSauce*

**AXIOM OF SUBSET**,*grahamcooper7**Message not available***Re: AXIOM OF SUBSET**,*grahamcooper7*

**Cops Acting Like Cops Caught On Camera**,*Kevin Barry***The Logic of Jesus**,*Kevin Barry***Simplified Formulas!**,*Khaled Alwasel***Re: Simplified Formulas!**,*Barry Schwarz***Re: Simplified Formulas!**,*bert***Simplified Formulas!**,*drhuang57*

**New 'Bash' software bug may pose bigger threat than 'Heartbleed'**,*Mok-Kong Shen***English terms: 'composed/component/constituent function'?**,*IV***Cardinal Trichotomy**,*William Elliot***Re: Cardinal Trichotomy**,*Arturo Magidin***Re: Cardinal Trichotomy**,*William Elliot***Re: Cardinal Trichotomy**,*Herman Rubin***Re: Cardinal Trichotomy**,*Arturo Magidin*

**Re: Cardinal Trichotomy**,*Seymour J.***Re: Cardinal Trichotomy**,*William Elliot*

**Polignac and; Courant & Robbins #6 the 4th ed. Correcting Math 2014**,*Archimedes Plutonium***infinite Tower of primes and Polignac #7 the 4th ed. Correcting Math 2014**,*Archimedes Plutonium*

**Axiom Of Induction! ( = )**,*grahamcooper7***DEFINITION OF =**,*grahamcooper7***Re: DEFINITION OF =**,*grahamcooper7***Re: DEFINITION OF =**,*grahamcooper7*

**PhD studentship: Social evolution theory at the University of St Andrews, UK**,*drandygardner***correcting infinitude of primes proof; Heuer, Boyer & Merzbach, Conway & Guy #5 the 4th ed. Correcting Math 2014**,*Archimedes Plutonium***solutions manual for International Financial Reporting and Analysis 5e David Alexander Anne Britton Ann Jorissen**,*smtbhelp*- <Possible follow-ups>
**solutions manual for International Financial Reporting and Analysis 5e David Alexander Anne Britton Ann Jorissen**,*smtbhelp*

**solutions manual for CyberLaw Text and Cases 3e Gerald Ferrera Margo Reder Stephen Lichtenstein Robert Darrow Jeffrey Klosek**,*smtbhelp***Christianity vs Homosexuality**,*Kevin Barry***Re: Christianity vs Homosexuality**,*Pirx42***Re: Christianity vs Homosexuality**,*samiso***Re: Christianity vs Homosexuality**,*mathedman*

**modular sqrt and sqrt(g,p^2)**,*Rosario193***Re: modular sqrt and sqrt(g,p^2)**,*Robin Chapman***Re: modular sqrt and sqrt(g,p^2)**,*Rosario193***Re: modular sqrt and sqrt(g,p^2)**,*Rosario193***Re: modular sqrt and sqrt(g,p^2)**,*Rosario193***Re: modular sqrt and sqrt(g,p^2)**,*Rosario193***Re: modular sqrt and sqrt(g,p^2)**,*Rosario193***Re: modular sqrt and sqrt(g,p^2)**,*Rosario193*

**Re: modular sqrt and sqrt(g,p^2)**,*Rosario193***Re: modular sqrt and sqrt(g,p^2)**,*Rosario193*

**Re: modular sqrt and sqrt(g,p^2)**,*Rosario193***Re: modular sqrt and sqrt(g,p^2)**,*bert***Re: modular sqrt and sqrt(g,p^2)**,*Rosario193***Re: modular sqrt and sqrt(g,p^2)**,*bert*

**SPACETIME WRONG, THE LIGHT POSTULATE TRUE ?**,*Pentcho Valev***Univ. Cincinnati math professors ask-endorse: True Material Conditional of Logic to arxiv #2130 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Proof of Infinitude of Twin Primes #3 the 4th ed. Correcting Math 2014**,*Archimedes Plutonium***foorp fo ... gniht emos**,*Space998***Re: foorp fo ... gniht emos**,*Space998***Re: foorp fo ... gniht emos**,*Space998*

**Connected Derived Set**,*William Elliot***Re: Connected Derived Set**,*Sam Sung***Re: Connected Derived Set**,*William Elliot***Re: Connected Derived Set**,*quasi***Re: Connected Derived Set**,*William Elliot*

**Complexity lower bounds for n integers**,*nworm00***EINSTEINIANS TEACH DOPPLER EFFECT**,*Pentcho Valev***Re: EINSTEINIANS TEACH DOPPLER EFFECT**,*Pentcho Valev*

**asking endorsement Utah State Univ. math professors: True Prime Number Theorem to arxiv #2129 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Re: asking endorsement Utah State Univ. math professors: True Prime Number Theorem to arxiv #2129 Correcting Math**,*Dan Christensen***Need to revise concept of Convergent; Revised Prime Number Theorem #2132 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Compiled-Curve definition and precision definition of Convergency #2133 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium*

**Succesive primes in X^2 + X + A**,*Ludovicus***Re: Succesive primes in X^2 + X + A**,*Pubkeybreaker*

**Re: What came first, Fire or Water?**,*Dan Christensen***The power set of |N is uncountable -- A formal proof (DC Proof 2.0 format)**,*Dan Christensen***My Negros Are Demon Possessed**,*Kevin Barry***Nowhere dense Reciprocals**,*William Elliot***Re: Nowhere dense Reciprocals**,*Col. Edmund Burke***Re: Nowhere dense Reciprocals**,*samiso*

**Re: Nowhere dense Reciprocals**,*quasi***Re: Nowhere dense Reciprocals**,*David Hartley***Re: Nowhere dense Reciprocals**,*William Elliot***Re: Nowhere dense Reciprocals**,*William Elliot*

**ABSURD BEHAVIOUR OF LIGHT IN GRAVITY**,*Pentcho Valev***Seeking help understanding r'_2(n) - finding the number of "double squares"**,*lebbeous***Re: Seeking help understanding r'_2(n) - finding the number of "double squares"**,*konyberg***Re: Seeking help understanding r'_2(n) - finding the number of "double squares"**,*lebbeous***Re: Seeking help understanding r'_2(n) - finding the number of "double squares"**,*konyberg***Re: Seeking help understanding r'_2(n) - finding the number of "double squares"**,*konyberg***Re: Seeking help understanding r'_2(n) - finding the number of "double squares"**,*konyberg***Re: Seeking help understanding r'_2(n) - finding the number of "double squares"**,*lebbeous***Re: Seeking help understanding r'_2(n) - finding the number of "double squares"**,*konyberg*

**Re: Seeking help understanding r'_2(n) - finding the number of "double squares"**,*Leon Aigret*

**Utah State Univ. math professors endorse a true Prime Number Theorem to arxiv #2125 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***back to the drawing board #2126 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***use Li(x) as tool Re: back to the drawing board #2127 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***sqrt10 the base for the largest spot on direct hit of a number #2128 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium*

**Is there a proof that a prime exists : n < p < 2n**,*grahamcooper7***Re: Is there a proof that a prime exists : n < p < 2n**,*konyberg***Re: Is there a proof that a prime exists : n < p < 2n**,*grahamcooper7***Re: Is there a proof that a prime exists : n < p < 2n**,*grahamcooper7***Re: Is there a proof that a prime exists : n < p < 2n**,*konyberg***Re: Is there a proof that a prime exists : n < p < 2n**,*grahamcooper7***Re: Is there a proof that a prime exists : n < p < 2n**,*konyberg***Re: Is there a proof that a prime exists : n < p < 2n**,*konyberg***Re: Is there a proof that a prime exists : n < p < 2n**,*grahamcooper7***Re: Is there a proof that a prime exists : n < p < 2n**,*konyberg***Re: Is there a proof that a prime exists : n < p < 2n**,*grahamcooper7***Re: Is there a proof that a prime exists : n < p < 2n**,*konyberg*

**Re: Is there a proof that a prime exists : n < p < 2n**,*David Bernier***Re: Is there a proof that a prime exists : n < p < 2n**,*Timothy Murphy***Re: Is there a proof that a prime exists : n < p < 2n**,*bert*

**Have we seen the last of the lunatic?**,*Port563***Re: Have we seen the last of the lunatic?**,*samiso***Re: Have we seen the last of the lunatic?**,*Christopher J. Henrich***Re: Have we seen the last of the lunatic?**,*wpihughes***Re: Have we seen the last of the lunatic?**,*Space998***Re: Have we seen the last of the lunatic?**,*samiso***Re: Have we seen the last of the lunatic?**,*wpihughes***Re: Have we seen the last of the lunatic?**,*samiso***Re: Have we seen the last of the lunatic?**,*Space998***Re: Have we seen the last of the lunatic?**,*Space998*

**half way circling a square**,*robin479***Re: half way circling a square**,*William Elliot***Re: half way circling a square**,*robin479***Re: half way circling a square / whetstone sharing**,*James Waldby*

**instructor manual, test bank for Core Macroeconomics & Course Tutor 2e Gerald Stone**,*smtbhelp***instructor manual, test bank for Marketing, International Edition 15e William Pride Ferrell**,*smtbhelp***HIDDEN ABSURDITY IN EINSTEIN'S 1905 PAPER**,*Pentcho Valev***Re: HIDDEN ABSURDITY IN EINSTEIN'S 1905 PAPER**,*samiso**Message not available***Re: HIDDEN ABSURDITY IN EINSTEIN'S PAPER OF 1905**,*Pentcho Valev*

**Thomas' Calculus Early Transcendentals, Single Variable (13th Edition) by Thomas, Weir & Hass**,*kalvinmanual11***WAY TO GET NEXT PRIME NUMBER**,*enggintel***Re: WAY TO GET NEXT PRIME NUMBER**,*Col. Edmund Burke***Re: WAY TO GET NEXT PRIME NUMBER**,*rossum***Re: WAY TO GET NEXT PRIME NUMBER**,*grahamcooper7*

- <Possible follow-ups>
**WAY TO GET NEXT PRIME NUMBER**,*enggintel***WAY TO GET NEXT PRIME NUMBER**,*rajaniyer@xxxxxxxxxxx***WAY TO GET NEXT PRIME NUMBER**,*rajaniyer@xxxxxxxxxxx*

**Productive Sets and Cantor's Diagonalization Procedure**,*Dick***Professor Mueckenheim blows his chance**,*FredJeffries***Re: Professor Mueckenheim blows his chance**,*"Jürgen R."*

**A WAY TO GET THE PRIME NUMBER**,*rajaniyer@xxxxxxxxxxx***Re: A WAY TO GET THE PRIME NUMBER**,*krischa123***Re: A WAY TO GET THE PRIME NUMBER**,*bert*

**A SIMPLE WAY GETTING ALL PRIME NUMBERS**,*rajaniyer@xxxxxxxxxxx***Re: A SIMPLE WAY GETTING ALL PRIME NUMBERS**,*Pubkeybreaker***Re: A SIMPLE WAY GETTING ALL PRIME NUMBERS**,*krischa123*

**EINSTEIN'S RELATIVITY : THE SCIENCE OF SMUG CONDESCENSION**,*Pentcho Valev***GMAT Training in Hyderabad**,*vaasuisc*- <Possible follow-ups>
**GMAT Training in Hyderabad**,*jogiramo*

**Looped Line**,*William Elliot***Re: Looped Line**,*quasi***Re: Looped Line**,*quasi***Re: Looped Line**,*David Hartley***Re: Looped Line**,*quasi***Re: Looped Line**,*quasi***Re: Looped Line**,*David Hartley***Re: Looped Line**,*William Elliot*

**A variant of the Collatz "3x + 1" problem that uses a real-valued parameter, in place of the "3" in "3x"**,*David Bernier***Re: A variant of the Collatz "3x + 1" problem that uses a real-valued parameter, in place of the "3" in "3x"**,*djoyce099***Re: A variant of the Collatz "3x + 1" problem that uses a real-valued parameter, in place of the "3" in "3x"**,*David Bernier*

**#1 the 4th edition Correcting Math 2014; Chapter 1: Logic in Math-- those that have it are mathematicians, otherwise calculators**,*Archimedes Plutonium***math professors Utah State Univ. endorse Revised Prime Number Theorem with new formula to arxiv #2112 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***either retract or downsize this work on Prime Number Theorem #2114 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***either retract or downsize this work on Prime Number Theorem #2114 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***amend my Prime Number Theorem for it looks superior to logarithmic integral #2115 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***mending my formula for it looks superior to logarithmic integral #2116 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***how my formula is superior #2117 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Re: how my formula is superior #2117 Correcting Math**,*Sam Sung***My new formula does far better than any before on the Prime Number Theorem #2118 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***best Prime Number Theorem formula available sqrt10^exp = x in the formula x/exp #2119 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***worked out 10^12 Re: best Prime Number Theorem formula available sqrt10^exp = x in the formula x/exp #2120 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***making MY formula x/exp more accurate than even Li(x) #2121 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Re: making MY formula x/exp more accurate than even Li(x) #2122 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***the add-on to x/exp to make it more accurate than Li(x) #2123 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***formula x/exp outbests Li(x) for predicting 10^6 #2124 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium*

**Re: math professors Utah State Univ. endorse Revised Prime Number Theorem with new formula to arxiv #2112 Correcting Math**,*Dan Christensen***G. Denham & J.L. Bell of Univ. Western Ontario, does anyone ever do math there, or only ad hominem?**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Re: G. Denham & J.L. Bell of Univ. Western Ontario, does anyone ever do math there, or only ad hominem?**,*Dan Christensen***Franz, Dhillon, Boivin, Williams of Univ. Western Ontario, your Christensen, J.D. does not know what "endorse" means, yet attacks, attacks attacks**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Re: Franz, Dhillon, Boivin, Williams of Univ. Western Ontario, your Christensen, J.D. does not know what "endorse" means, yet attacks, attacks attacks**,*Dan Christensen*

**Leica Microsystems Peter Reimer is a***ING JERK**,*Fritz Wuehler***Generating Functions for Quotients of Terms**,*eric . fennessey***Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*"Jürgen R."***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Tommy***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*FredJeffries***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Martin Shobe***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Brian M . Scott***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Brian M . Scott***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Brian M . Scott***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***irrational numbers are perfectly proportional per Eudoxus**,*Space998***Re: irrational numbers are perfectly proportional per Eudoxus**,*mueckenh***Re: irrational numbers are perfectly proportional per Eudoxus**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*krischa123***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*krischa123***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*"Jürgen R."***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Michael Klemm***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Michael Klemm***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational WM has no representation as a mathemtatician.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational WM has no representation as a mathemtatician.**,*mueckenh***Re: WM claims SUM_(k in |N) 9/10^k = 1-10^-n for some n in |N.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*krischa123***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*krischa123***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation in WMytheology**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*krischa123***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*krischa123***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*wpihughes***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*wpihughes***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*wpihughes***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*wpihughes***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*wpihughes***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*wpihughes***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*wpihughes***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*wpihughes***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*wpihughes***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*wpihughes***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*wpihughes***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*wpihughes***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers are "infinite" decimals.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*wpihughes***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*wpihughes***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have representation as decimals.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have representation as decimals.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have representation as decimals.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have representation as decimals.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have representation as decimals.**,*FredJeffries***Re: Irrational numbers have representation as decimals.**,*FredJeffries***Re: Irrational numbers have representation as decimals.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have representation as decimals.**,*FredJeffries***Re: Irrational numbers have representation as decimals.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have representation as decimals.**,*FredJeffries***Re: Irrational numbers have representation as decimals.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have representation as decimals.**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Irrational numbers have representation as decimals.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have representation as decimals.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*wpihughes***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*wpihughes***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*wpihughes***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*wpihughes***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*wpihughes***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*wpihughes***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*wpihughes***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*wpihughes***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Space998***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*K_h***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*FredJeffries***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*K_h***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*FredJeffries***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*FredJeffries***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*wpihughes***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*wpihughes***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*FredJeffries***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*FredJeffries***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*FredJeffries***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*FredJeffries***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*FredJeffries***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*FredJeffries***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*FredJeffries***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*FredJeffries***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*FredJeffries***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*FredJeffries***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*FredJeffries***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*krischa123***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*krischa123***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation in WMytheology**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*krischa123***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*FredJeffries***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*FredJeffries***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*FredJeffries***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*FredJeffries***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*FredJeffries***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*FredJeffries***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Irrational numbers have a representation as infinite decimals strings.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as ratinal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: WM says numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: WM says numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: WM says numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: A Geometric series proves WM wrong!.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*"Jürgen R."***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Martin Shobe***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Martin Shobe***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*krischa123***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*krischa123***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation in WMytheology**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Martin Shobe***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers all have representations as decimals**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Ralf Bader***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Ralf Bader***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*FredJeffries***Re: Irrational numbers have representation as decimals**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*FredJeffries***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*FredJeffries***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*FredJeffries***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*FredJeffries***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Martin Shobe***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have representation as decimals**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have representation as decimals**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Martin Shobe***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have representation as endless decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Martin Shobe***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Pirx42***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil*

**Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*FredJeffries***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Dan Christensen*

**Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Ben Bacarisse*

**Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*krischa123***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*krischa123***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*krischa123***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: WM has no representation a decimal fraction.**,*Virgil***Re: WM has no representation a decimal fraction.**,*mueckenh***Re: WM has no representation a decimal fraction.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*YBM***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*YBM***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*YBM***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*YBM***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation in WMytheology**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil*

**Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*krischa123***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Space998***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*krischa123***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*krischa123***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*krischa123***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*krischa123***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*krischa123***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*krischa123***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Irrational WM has no representation as a mathematician.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational WM has no representation as a mathematician.**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Irrational WM has no representation as a mathematician.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational WM has no representation as a mathematician.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational WM has no representation as a mathematician.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*krischa123***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*krischa123***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*krischa123***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*krischa123***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*krischa123***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*krischa123***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*krischa123***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*krischa123***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*krischa123***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*krischa123***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil*

**Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Tommy Davis***usign pythagorean theoerm**,*Space998***Re: usign pythagorean theoerm**,*mueckenh***Re: usign pythagorean theoerm**,*Virgil***Re: usign pythagorean theoerm**,*Space998*

**Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh*

**The Muecke Museum**,*"Jürgen R."***Re: The Muecke Museum**,*Zeit Geist***Re: The Muecke Museum**,*"Jürgen R."***Re: The Muecke Museum**,*"Jürgen R."***Re: The Muecke Museum**,*"Jürgen R."***Re: The Muecke Museum**,*"Jürgen R."***Re: The Muecke Museum**,*Sam Sung***Re: The Muecke Museum**,*"Jürgen R."***Re: The Muecke Museum**,*"Jürgen R."***Re: The Muecke Museum**,*"Jürgen R."***Re: The Muecke Museum**,*"Jürgen R."***Re: The Muecke Museum**,*"Jürgen R."***Re: The Muecke Museum**,*FredJeffries***Re: The Muecke Museum**,*YBM***Re: The Muecke Museum**,*Sam Sung***Re: The Muecke Museum**,*Michael Klemm***Re: The Muecke Museum**,*FredJeffries***Re: The Muecke Museum**,*Virgil*

**WHO IS ENTITLED TO ATTACK EINSTEIN ?**,*Pentcho Valev***Re: WHO IS ENTITLED TO ATTACK EINSTEIN ?**,*Pentcho Valev***Re: WHO IS ENTITLED TO ATTACK EINSTEIN ?**,*Pentcho Valev*

**Re: OT: Emma Watson's recent address to the UN**,*Zeit Geist***Re: OT: Emma Watson's recent address to the UN**,*David Dalton*

**Re: what exactly is the mind?**,*samiso*- <Possible follow-ups>
**Re: what exactly is the mind?**,*Zeit Geist*

**Question on Infinity**,*F Graci***Re: Question on Infinity**,*Brian M . Scott***Re: Question on Infinity**,*F Graci***Re: Question on Infinity**,*Sam Sung***Re: Question on Infinity**,*Brian M . Scott***Re: Question on Infinity**,*Virgil***Re: Question on Infinity**,*Pirx42***Re: Question on Infinity**,*A Nony Mouse***Re: Question on Infinity**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Question on Infinity**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Question on Infinity**,*K_h***Re: Question on Infinity**,*K_h*

**Re: Question on Infinity**,*Sam Sung***Re: Question on Infinity**,*Seymour J.***Re: Question on Infinity**,*FredJeffries***Re: Question on Infinity**,*Space998*

**Re: Question on Infinity**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Question on Infinity**,*dullrich***Re: Question on Infinity**,*F Graci***Re: Question on Infinity**,*FredJeffries***Re: Question on Infinity**,*Ross A. Finlayson*

**Re: Question on Infinity**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Question on Infinity**,*Seymour J.***Re: Question on Infinity**,*krischa123***Re: Question on Infinity**,*dullrich***Re: Question on Infinity**,*F Graci*

**Re: Question on Infinity**,*krischa123*

**Utah State Univ. math professors endorse Revised Prime Number Theorem with new formula to arxiv #2111 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Virgil please**,*Sam Sung***Re: Virgil please**,*Virgil***Re: Virgil please**,*Sam Sung*

**This is for Virgil**,*Sam Sung***Re: This is for Virgil**,*Sam Sung*

**Muecke's Second Proof of the Countability of the Reals**,*"Jürgen R."***Continued multiplication (in line with continued fractions)?**,*joshipura***Reply to an argument of Ben Bacarisse**,*mueckenh***Re: Reply to an argument of Ben Bacarisse**,*Sam Sung***Re: Reply to an argument of Ben Bacarisse**,*Sam Sung***Re: Reply to an argument of Ben Bacarisse**,*"Jürgen R."***Re: Reply to an argument of Ben Bacarisse**,*mueckenh***Re: Reply to an argument of Ben Bacarisse**,*mueckenh***Re: Reply to an argument of Ben Bacarisse**,*"Jürgen R."***Re: Reply to an argument of Ben Bacarisse**,*mueckenh***Re: Reply to an argument of Ben Bacarisse**,*Sam Sung***Re: Reply to an argument of Ben Bacarisse**,*"Jürgen R."***Re: Reply to an argument of Ben Bacarisse**,*Sam Sung***Re: Reply to an argument of Ben Bacarisse**,*Sam Sung***Re: Reply to an argument of Ben Bacarisse**,*mueckenh***Re: Reply to an argument of Ben Bacarisse**,*Virgil***Re: Reply to an argument of Ben Bacarisse**,*Virgil***Re: Reply to an argument of Ben Bacarisse**,*Virgil***Re: Reply to an argument of Ben Bacarisse**,*Sam Sung***Re: Reply to an argument of Ben Bacarisse**,*Sam Sung*

**Questions for Prof Mueckenheim (was: Reply to an argument of Ben Bacarisse)**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Questions for Prof Mueckenheim (was: Reply to an argument of Ben Bacarisse)**,*mueckenh***Re: Questions for Prof Mueckenheim (was: Reply to an argument of Ben Bacarisse)**,*Virgil***Re: Questions for Prof Mueckenheim**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Questions for Prof Mueckenheim**,*mueckenh***Re: Questions for Prof Mueckenheim**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Questions for Prof Mueckenheim**,*Virgil*

**Re: Reply to an argument of Ben Bacarisse**,*Virgil***Re: Reply to an argument of Ben Bacarisse**,*Zeit Geist*

**examples in mathHandbook**,*drhuang57***Ultra Regular**,*William Elliot***Re: Ultra Regular**,*Martin Shobe***Re: Ultra Regular**,*William Elliot*

**Nihilism in Science**,*Kevin Barry***EINSTEIN'S RELATIVITY : A NEVER-ENDING FEAST**,*Pentcho Valev***Re: EINSTEIN'S RELATIVITY : A NEVER-ENDING FEAST**,*Pentcho Valev***Re: EINSTEIN'S RELATIVITY : A NEVER-ENDING FEAST**,*Pentcho Valev***Re: EINSTEIN'S RELATIVITY : A NEVER-ENDING FEAST**,*Pentcho Valev*

**Martin-Lof Proofs as Programs is False and Undemonstrated. Theorems are Programs**,*Charlie-Boo***GLORIOUS CONFIRMATION OF TIME DILATION ?**,*Pentcho Valev***Re: GLORIOUS CONFIRMATION OF TIME DILATION ?**,*Pentcho Valev*

**Topological Property**,*Paul***Re: Topological Property**,*Brian M . Scott***Re: Topological Property**,*William Elliot***Re: Topological Property**,*pepstein5***Re: Topological Property**,*William Elliot*

**Summing powers by Monte Carlo**,*Paul***Re: Summing powers by Monte Carlo**,*danheyman@xxxxxxxxx***Re: Summing powers by Monte Carlo**,*danheyman@xxxxxxxxx*

**solutions manual, test bank for Cengage Advantage Books Law for Business 16e John Ashcroft Janet Ashcroft**,*smtbhelp***solutions manual, test bank for Cornerstones of Managerial Accounting 5e Maryanne Mowen Don Hansen Dan Heitger**,*smtbhelp***new true formula for Prime Number Theorem, x/Ln(x) + (average)b^(n+1)/b^n #2102 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***showing how the formula works Re: x/Ln(x) + (average)b^(n+1)/b^n #2103 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Revised Prime Number Theorem: showing how the formula works x/Ln(x) + (average)b^(n+1)/b^n #2104 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***example base 3 Re: Revised Prime Number Theorem: showing how the formula works (average) x/Ln(x) + b^(n+1)/b^n #2105 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***let me have a more precise formula (Average) (x/Ln(x)of b^(n+1)) + (x/Ln(x) of b^n) #2106 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***((x/Ln(x)of b^(n+1)) + b*(x/Ln(x) of b^n))/2 = predicted primes of number b^(n+1) #2107 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***((x/Ln(x)of b^(n+1) + (b*(x/Ln(x) of b^n))/2 = predicted primes of number b^(n+1) #2108 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Re: ((x/Ln(x)of b^(n+1) + (b*(x/Ln(x) of b^n))/2 = predicted primes of number b^(n+1) #2110 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Re: example base 3 Re: Revised Prime Number Theorem: showing how the formula works (average) x/Ln(x) + b^(n+1)/b^n #2109 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium*

**Re: new true formula for Prime Number Theorem, x/Ln(x) + (average)b^(n+1)/b^n #2102 Correcting Math**,*redmond***Re: new true formula for Prime Number Theorem, x/Ln(x) + (average)b^(n+1)/b^n #2102 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***I stand corrected on Prime Number Theorem**,*Archimedes Plutonium*

**polynomial for 2cos(2pi*k/17)**,*Jan Kr Haugland***Re: polynomial for 2cos(2pi*k/17)**,*Christopher J. Henrich***Re: polynomial for 2cos(2pi*k/17)**,*Christopher J. Henrich*

**Re: polynomial for 2cos(2pi*k/17)**,*Robin Chapman***Re: polynomial for 2cos(2pi*k/17)**,*David Bernier***Re: polynomial for 2cos(2pi*k/17)**,*Robin Chapman*

**Re: polynomial for 2cos(2pi*k/17)**,*quasi*

**Re: polynomial for 2cos(2pi*k/17)**,*Jan Kr Haugland*

**Usrprung der Zeitkoordinate**,*Sam Sung***Re: Usrprung der Zeitkoordinate**,*Sam Sung*

**Some Publications by Prof. Dr. WM**,*Sam Sung***Some Publications of Professor Dr. WM**,*Sam Sung***Regards**,*Sam Sung***Professor Dr. WM**,*Sam Sung***When derivative of a function without inverse - symbolically?**,*IV***SAVING EINSTEIN FROM DOPPLER**,*Pentcho Valev***PLEASE THE WEEKEND IS HERE SO EVERYBODY STOP POSTING STOP REPLYING TO POSTS SO I CAN UPDATE THE SERVERS PLEASE GOT IT ? THIS IS REALLY NECESSARY NOW SERVER IS FULL OF POSTS THAT ARE NO GOOD AND HAVE TO BE CLEANED OUT THEY ARE GETTING STINKY ROTTING IN THE SERVER**,*Hown Jcrboz***IT'S TOUGH FINDING BALLS IN OUR HALLOWED HALLS**,*Ed Conrad***Re: 3.19 New Calculus used to recalculate US Debt**,*Hown Jcrboz*- <Possible follow-ups>
**Re: 3.19 New Calculus used to recalculate US Debt**,*David Sukov*

**CRIMESTOP IN EINSTEIN'S WORLD**,*Pentcho Valev***Re: CRIMESTOP IN EINSTEIN'S WORLD**,*Pentcho Valev***Re: CRIMESTOP IN EINSTEIN'S WORLD**,*Pentcho Valev*

**Bottom Element?**,*William Elliot***Re: Bottom Element?**,*Steffen Schuler***Re: Bottom Element?**,*William Elliot***Re: Bottom Element?**,*Brian M . Scott*

**Re: 3.19 New Calculus wins Schoolbook approval**,*Hown Jcrboz***The Indomitable Will**,*Kevin Barry***Re: The Indomitable Will**,*Hown Jcrboz*

**Re: Atheists Smarter than Religious Believers**,*Zeit Geist*- <Possible follow-ups>
**Re: Atheists Smarter than Religious Believers**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Atheists Smarter than Religious Believers**,*Bart Goddard*

**Re: 0 as a natural number**,*Dan Christensen***Re: 0 as a natural number**,*Space998***Re: 0 as a natural number**,*Space998*

**Re: OT: double-move chess**,*Paul***Mueckenheim proves that the reals are countable (part 3)**,*"Jürgen R."***Re: Mueckenheim proves that the reals are countable (part 3)**,*mueckenh***Re: Mueckenheim proves that the reals are countable (part 3)**,*Virgil***Mueckenheim is a stinking mother*****,*Sam Sung***Re: Mueckenheim proves that the reals are countable (part 3)**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Mueckenheim proves that the reals are countable (part 3)**,*mueckenh***Re: Mueckenheim proves that the reals are countable (part 3)**,*FredJeffries***Re: Mueckenheim proves that the reals are countable (part 3)**,*mueckenh***Re: Mueckenheim proves that the reals are countable (part 3)**,*FredJeffries***Re: Mueckenheim proves that the reals are countable (part 3)**,*mueckenh***Re: Mueckenheim proves that the reals are countable (part 3)**,*Virgil***Re: Mueckenheim proves that the reals are countable (part 3)**,*FredJeffries***Re: Mueckenheim "proves" that the reals are countable (part 3)**,*Virgil***Re: Mueckenheim proves that the reals are countable (part 3)**,*mueckenh***Re: Mueckenheim proves that the reals are countable (part 3)**,*"Jürgen R."***Re: Mueckenheim proves that the reals are countable (part 3)**,*mueckenh***Re: Mueckenheim proves that the reals are countable (part 3)**,*Virgil***Re: Mueckenheim proves that the reals are countable (part 3)**,*Sam Sung***Re: Mueckenheim proves that the reals are uncountable (part 3)**,*Virgil***Re: Mueckenheim proves that the reals are countable (part 3)**,*Virgil*

**Re: Mueckenheim proves that the reals are countable (part 3)**,*Ralf Bader***Re: Mueckenheim proves that the reals are countable (part 3)**,*mueckenh***Re: Mueckenheim proves that the reals are countable (part 3)**,*Virgil***Re: Mueckenheim proves that the reals are countable (part 3)**,*Ralf Bader***Re: Mueckenheim proves that the reals are countable (part 3)**,*Virgil***Re: Mueckenheim proves that the reals are countable (part 3)**,*mueckenh***Re: Mueckenheim disproves that the reals are countable**,*Virgil***Re: Mueckenheim disproves that the reals are countable**,*mueckenh***Re: Mueckenheim disproves that the reals are countable**,*Virgil***Re: Mueckenheim proves that the reals are countable (part 3)**,*mueckenh***Re: Mueckenheim proves that the reals are uncountable (part 3)**,*Virgil***Re: Mueckenheim proves that the reals are uncountable (part 3)**,*mueckenh***Re: Mueckenheim proves that the reals are uncountable (part 3)**,*Virgil***Re: Mueckenheim proves that the reals are uncountable (part 3)**,*mueckenh***Re: Mueckenheim proves that the reals are uncountable (part 3)**,*Virgil***Re: Mueckenheim proves that the reals are countable (part 3)**,*YBM***Re: Mueckenheim proves that the reals are countable (part 3)**,*mueckenh***Re: Mueckenheim proves that the reals are countable (part 3)**,*Virgil***Re: Mueckenheim proves that the reals are countable (part 3)**,*mueckenh***Re: Mueckenheim proves that the reals are countable (part 3)**,*Virgil***Re: Mueckenheim proves that the reals are countable (part 3)**,*mueckenh***Re: Mueckenheim falsely claims that the reals are countable (part 3)**,*Virgil***Re: Mueckenheim falsely claims that the reals are countable (part 3)**,*mueckenh***Re: Mueckenheim falsely claims that the reals are countable (part 3)**,*Virgil***Re: Mueckenheim falsely claims that the reals are countable (part 3)**,*mueckenh***Re: Mueckenheim falsely claims that the reals are countable (part 3)**,*Virgil***Re: Mueckenheim falsely claims that the reals are countable (part 3)**,*mueckenh***Re: Mueckenheim falsely claims that the reals are countable (part 3)**,*Virgil***Re: Mueckenheim falsely claims that the reals are countable (part 3)**,*mueckenh***Re: Mueckenheim falsely claims that the reals are countable (part 3)**,*Virgil***Re: Mueckenheim falsely claims that the reals are countable (part 3)**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Mueckenheim falsely claims that the reals are countable (part 3)**,*mueckenh***Re: Mueckenheim falsely claims that the reals are countable (part 3)**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Mueckenheim falsely claims that the reals are countable (part 3)**,*mueckenh***Re: Mueckenheim falsely claims that the reals are countable (part 3)**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Mueckenheim falsely claims that the reals are countable (part 3)**,*Sam Sung***Re: Mueckenheim falsely claims that the reals are countable (part 3)**,*mueckenh***Re: Mueckenheim falsely claims that the reals are countable (part 3)**,*Virgil***Re: Mueckenheim falsely claims that the reals are countable (part 3)**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Mueckenheim falsely claims that the reals are countable (part 3)**,*mueckenh***Re: Mueckenheim falsely claims that the reals are countable (part 3)**,*Virgil***Re: Mueckenheim falsely claims that the reals are countable (part 3)**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Mueckenheim falsely claims that the reals are countable (part 3)**,*Virgil***Re: Mueckenheim falsely claims that the reals are countable (part 3)**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Mueckenheim falsely claims that the reals are countable (part 3)**,*mueckenh***Re: Mueckenheim falsely claims that the reals are countable (part 3)**,*Virgil***Re: Mueckenheim falsely claims that the reals are countable (part 3)**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Mueckenheim falsely claims that the reals are countable (part 3)**,*mueckenh***Re: Mueckenheim falsely claims that the reals are countable (part 3)**,*Virgil***Re: Mueckenheim falsely claims that the reals are countable (part 3)**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Mueckenheim falsely claims that the reals are countable (part 3)**,*Virgil***Re: Mueckenheim falsely claims that the reals are countable (part 3)**,*Virgil***Re: Mueckenheim falsely claims that the reals are countable (part 3)**,*Virgil***Re: Mueckenheim proves that the reals are countable (part 3)**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Mueckenheim proves that the reals are countable (part 3)**,*mueckenh***Re: Mueckenheim proves that the reals are countable (part 3)**,*Virgil***Re: Mueckenheim proves that the reals are countable (part 3)**,*mueckenh***Re: Mueckenheim proves that the reals are countable (part 3)**,*Virgil*

**crypto asymétrique**,*remy***3.20 - Since I did away with Points of Inflexion, we need Bullet Secan**,*John Gabriel***Re: 3.20 - Since I did away with Points of Inflexion, we need Bullet Secan**,*ChumChan***Re: 3.20 - Since I did away with Points of Inflexion, we need Bullet S**,*John Gabriel***Re: 3.20 - Since I did away with Points of Inflexion, we need Bullet S**,*vapidz cronduks***Re: 3.20 - Since I did away with Points of Inflexion, we need Bullet S**,*Dale***Re: 3.20 - Since I did away with Points of Inflexion, we need Bullet S**,*sam iso***Re: 3.20 - Since I did away with Points of Inflexion, we need Bullet S**,*David Sukov*

**Re: 3.20 - Since I did away with Points of Inflexion, we need Bullet Secan**,*Hown Jcrboz*

**LA CEINTURE PROTECTRICE DU FAUX POSTULAT D'EINSTEIN**,*Pentcho Valev***Re: LA CEINTURE PROTECTRICE DU FAUX POSTULAT D'EINSTEIN**,*Pentcho Valev*

**EINSTEIN'S LIGHT POSTULATE : THE MOST UNAMBIGUOUS TEST ?**,*Pentcho Valev***Re: EINSTEIN'S LIGHT POSTULATE : THE MOST UNAMBIGUOUS TEST ?**,*Pentcho Valev*

**Mueckenheim proves that the reals are countable cont'd (2)**,*"Jürgen R."***How Mueckenheim proves that the Reals are Countable**,*"Jürgen R."***Re: How Mueckenheim proves that the Reals are Countable**,*Dan Christensen***Re: How Mueckenheim proves that the Reals are Countable**,*Ben Bacarisse*

**Re: How Mueckenheim proves that the Reals are Countable**,*Dan Christensen***Re: How Mueckenheim proves that the Reals are Countable**,*"Jürgen R."*

**proving Conjecture-- 100 is the largest N for exact prime hits #2084 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Re: proving Conjecture-- 100 is the largest N for exact prime hits #2084 Correcting Math**,*redmond***Re: proving Conjecture-- 100 is the largest N for exact prime hits #2084 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Re: proving Conjecture-- 100 is the largest N for exact prime hits #2084 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***third column is where we divide next actual by previous actual & next missed by previous missed#2085 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***is the true formula for Prime Number Theorem 10^(n+1)/10^n = 10 #2086 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***true formula for Prime Number Theorem 10^(n+1)/10^n -> 10 #2087 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***still keep x/Ln(x) Re: true formula for Prime Number Theorem 10^(n+1)/10^n -> 10 #2088 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***the True--Prime Number Theorem formula b^(n+1)/b^n -> b #2089 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***error Re: the True--Prime Number Theorem formula b^(n+1)/b^n -> b #2090 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***more errors Re: the True--Prime Number Theorem formula b^(n+1)/b^n -> b #2091 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***errors Re: the True--Prime Number Theorem formula b^(n+1)/b^n -> b #2092 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***base 3 appears to hold Re: the True--Prime Number Theorem formula b^(n+1)/b^n -> b #2093 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Re: base 3 appears to hold Re: the True--Prime Number Theorem formula b^(n+1)/b^n -> b #2093 Correcting Math**,*Space998***Principle as to why this formula works--Prime Number Theorem formula b^(n+1)/b^n -> b #2094 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***example of convergence in base 2; b^(n+1)/b^n -> b #2095 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***what actually causes the convergency, the driving mechanism? #2096 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Re: what actually causes the convergency, the driving mechanism? #20967 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***true formula of Prime Number Theorem x/Ln(x) + (average)b^(n+1)/b^n #2098 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Re: true formula of Prime Number Theorem x/Ln(x) + (average)b^(n+1)/b^n #2099 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***predicting 1000 to have 168 primes Re: true formula of Prime Number Theorem x/Ln(x) + (average)b^(n+1)/b^n #2100 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Riemann Hypothesis was a fake because Prime Number Theorem x/Ln(x) + (average)b^(n+1)/b^n #2101 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Avacado's numbeR (10^603?... three zeroes in pi -- who gAf**,*Space998***Re: Principle as to why this formula works--Prime Number Theorem formula b^(n+1)/b^n -> b #2094 Correcting Math**,*Space998***the emperor ... something about his wardrobe, but I can't find it**,*Space998*

**Barak Obama and Nihilism**,*Kevin Barry***HELLO, HALLS OF CONGRESS . . . IS ANYONE THERE?**,*Ed Conrad***Mexicans Are So Cool!!**,*Kevin Barry***Expression without inverse of sinc(x)?**,*IV***instructor manual, test bank for Competing for Advantage 3e Robert Hoskisson Michael Hitt Duane Ireland Jeffrey Harrison**,*smtbhelp***The Untold Story of Men and Math**,*ChumChan***Re: The Untold Story of Men and Math**,*David Sukov***Re: The Untold Story of Men and Math**,*Hown Jcrboz*

**PARADOXE DE JEAN EISENSTAEDT**,*Pentcho Valev***Re: PARADOXE DE JEAN EISENSTAEDT**,*Pentcho Valev*

**EINSTEIN'S ORIGINAL LIE**,*Pentcho Valev***Re: EINSTEIN'S ORIGINAL LIE**,*Pentcho Valev***Re: EINSTEIN'S ORIGINAL LIE**,*Pentcho Valev*

**GRAVITATIONAL TIME DILATION : IDIOCY PAR EXCELLENCE**,*Pentcho Valev***Re: GRAVITATIONAL TIME DILATION : IDIOCY PAR EXCELLENCE**,*Pentcho Valev*

**Best way to find random number within a range?**,*Dexter***find unknown angle**,*humbled survivor***Re: find unknown angle**,*William Elliot***Re: find unknown angle**,*Sam Sung*

**instructor manual, test bank for Cengage Advantage Books Law for Business 18e The Honorable John Ashcroft Janet Ashcroft**,*smtbhelp***any thing nu**,*Space998***Re: any thing nu**,*Space998***Re: any thing nu**,*samiso***Re: any thing nu**,*samiso***Re: any thing nu**,*Space998***Re: any thing nu**,*samiso*

**Two sets connected by bijection (terminology question)**,*Victor Porton***Re: Two sets connected by bijection (terminology question)**,*Peter Percival***Re: Two sets connected by bijection (terminology question)**,*Victor Porton*

****** TROLL ALERT ******,*Dan Christensen*- <Possible follow-ups>
****** TROLL ALERT ******,*Dan Christensen*

**3.18 - The Enema Function and Suppository Lemna.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 3.18 - The Enema Function and Suppository Lemna.**,*Uranus Deposit***Re: 3.18 - The Enema Function and Suppository Lemna.**,*ChumChan***Re: 3.18 - The Enema Function and Suppository Lemna.**,*ChumChan***Re: 3.18 - The Enema Function and Suppository Lemna.**,*ChumChan***Re: 3.18 - The Enema Function and Suppository Lemna.**,*ChumChan***Re: 3.18 - The Enema Function and Suppository Lemna.**,*ChumChan***Re: 3.18 - The Enema Function and Suppository Lemna.**,*ChumChan***Re: 3.18 - The Enema Function and Suppository Lemna.**,*ChumChan***Re: 3.18 - The Enema Function and Suppository Lemna.**,*ChumChan***Re: 3.18 - The Enema Function and Suppository Lemna.**,*ChumChan***Re: 3.18 - The Enema Function and Suppository Lemna.**,*Uranus Deposit***Re: 3.18 - The Enema Function and Suppository Lemna.**,*ChumChan*

**THE PROTECTIVE BELT OF EINSTEIN'S FALSE LIGHT POSTULATE**,*Pentcho Valev***Re: THE PROTECTIVE BELT OF EINSTEIN'S FALSE LIGHT POSTULATE**,*Pentcho Valev***Re: THE PROTECTIVE BELT OF EINSTEIN'S FALSE LIGHT POSTULATE**,*Pentcho Valev*

**Welcome to <sci.math>. These suggestions may help you.**,*Ken Pledger***a^n = a^(n-1) + a^(n-2) + ... + a^1 + a^0 ; for real a**,*joshipura***All answers and one question for Ben Bacarisse**,*mueckenh***Re: All answers and one question for Ben Bacarisse**,*Michael Klemm***Re: All answers and one question for Ben Bacarisse**,*mueckenh***Re: All answers and one question for Ben Bacarisse**,*Virgil***Re: All answers and one question for Ben Bacarisse**,*Michael Klemm***Re: All answers and one question for Ben Bacarisse**,*Virgil***Re: All answers and one question for Ben Bacarisse**,*Michael Klemm***Re: All answers and one question for Ben Bacarisse**,*Virgil***Re: All answers and one question for Ben Bacarisse**,*mueckenh***Re: All answers and one question for Ben Bacarisse**,*Virgil*

**Re: All answers and one question for Ben Bacarisse**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: WM's "list of everything" isn't a list of everything**,*Virgil***Re: WM's "list of everything" isn't a list of everything**,*mueckenh***Re: WM's "list of everything" isn't a list of everything**,*Virgil***Re: WM's "list of everything" isn't a list of everything**,*mueckenh***Re: WM's "list of everything" isn't a list of everything**,*Virgil***Re: WM's "list of everything" isn't a list of everything**,*Zeit Geist*

**Re: All answers and one question for Ben Bacarisse**,*mueckenh***Re: All answers and one question for Ben Bacarisse**,*Virgil***Re: All answers and one question for Ben Bacarisse**,*mueckenh***Re: All answers and one question for Ben Bacarisse**,*Virgil***Re: All answers and one question for Ben Bacarisse**,*Virgil***Re: All answers and one question for Ben Bacarisse**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: WM's claimed "List of everything" isn't one!**,*Virgil***Re: All answers and one question for Ben Bacarisse**,*mueckenh***Re: All answers and one question for Ben Bacarisse**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: All answers and one question for Ben Bacarisse**,*Sam Sung***Re: All answers and one question for Ben Bacarisse**,*Sam Sung***Re: All answers and one question for Ben Bacarisse**,*Sam Sung***Re: All answers and one question for Ben Bacarisse**,*mueckenh***Re: All answers and one question for Ben Bacarisse**,*Sam Sung***Re: All answers and one question for Ben Bacarisse**,*Sam Sung***Re: All answers and one question for Ben Bacarisse**,*Ralf Bader***Re: All answers and one question for Ben Bacarisse**,*mueckenh***Re: All answers and one question for Ben Bacarisse**,*Virgil***Re: All answers and one question for Ben Bacarisse**,*mueckenh***Re: All answers and one question for Ben Bacarisse**,*Virgil***Re: All answers and one question for Ben Bacarisse**,*Ralf Bader***Re: All answers and one question for Ben Bacarisse**,*Virgil***Re: All answers and one question for Ben Bacarisse**,*mueckenh***Re: All answers and one question for Ben Bacarisse**,*Virgil***Re: All answers and one question for Ben Bacarisse**,*mueckenh***Re: All answers and one question for Ben Bacarisse**,*Virgil***Re: All answers and one question for Ben Bacarisse**,*Ralf Bader***Re: All answers and one question for Ben Bacarisse**,*mueckenh***Re: All answers and one question for Ben Bacarisse**,*Ralf Bader***Re: All answers and one question for Ben Bacarisse**,*mueckenh***Re: All answers and one question for Ben Bacarisse**,*Virgil***Re: All answers and one question for Ben Bacarisse**,*Zeit Geist***Re: All answers and one question for Ben Bacarisse**,*Virgil***Re: All answers and one question for Ben Bacarisse**,*mueckenh***Re: All answers and one question for Ben Bacarisse**,*Zeit Geist***Re: All answers and one question for Ben Bacarisse**,*Virgil***Re: All answers and one question for Ben Bacarisse**,*Zeit Geist***Re: All answers and one question for Ben Bacarisse**,*Virgil***Re: All answers and one question for Ben Bacarisse**,*Virgil***Re: All answers and one question for Ben Bacarisse**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: All answers and one question for Ben Bacarisse**,*Virgil***Re: All answers and one question for Ben Bacarisse**,*Zeit Geist***Re: All answers and one question for Ben Bacarisse**,*mueckenh***Re: All answers and one question for Ben Bacarisse**,*Virgil***Re: All answers and one question for Ben Bacarisse**,*mueckenh***Re: All answers and one question for Ben Bacarisse**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: All answers and one question for Ben Bacarisse**,*Virgil***Re: All answers and one question for Ben Bacarisse**,*Zeit Geist***Re: All answers and one question for Ben Bacarisse**,*mueckenh***Re: All answers and one question for Ben Bacarisse**,*Virgil***Re: All answers and one question for Ben Bacarisse**,*Zeit Geist***Re: All answers and one question for Ben Bacarisse**,*mueckenh***Re: All answers and one question for Ben Bacarisse**,*Virgil***Re: All answers and one question for Ben Bacarisse**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Some answers and one question for Ben Bacarisse**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Some answers and one question for Ben Bacarisse**,*Virgil***Re: Some answers and one question for Ben Bacarisse**,*mueckenh***Re: Some answers and one question for Ben Bacarisse**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Some answers and one question for Ben Bacarisse**,*mueckenh***Re: Some answers and one question for Ben Bacarisse**,*Virgil***Re: Some answers and some questions for Prof. Mueckenheim**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Some answers and some questions for Prof. Mueckenheim**,*"Jürgen R."***Re: Some answers and some questions for Prof. Mueckenheim**,*Virgil***Re: Some answers and some questions for Prof. Mueckenheim**,*Jim Burns***Re: Some answers and some questions for Prof. Mueckenheim**,*mueckenh***Re: Some answers and some questions for Prof. Mueckenheim**,*Virgil***Re: Some answers and some questions for Prof. Mueckenheim**,*Jim Burns***Re: Some answers and some questions for Prof. Mueckenheim**,*mueckenh***Re: Some answers and some questions for Prof. Mueckenheim**,*Jim Burns***Re: Some answers and some questions for Prof. Mueckenheim**,*mueckenh***Re: Some answers and some questions for Prof. Mueckenheim**,*Virgil***Re: Some answers and some questions for Prof. Mueckenheim**,*Jim Burns***Re: Some answers and some questions for Prof. Mueckenheim**,*mueckenh***Re: Some answers and some questions for Prof. Mueckenheim**,*Virgil***Re: Some answers and some questions for Prof. Mueckenheim**,*Jim Burns***Re: Some answers and some questions for Prof. Mueckenheim**,*mueckenh***Re: Some answers and some questions for Prof. Mueckenheim**,*Jim Burns***Re: Some answers and some questions for Prof. Mueckenheim**,*mueckenh***Re: Some answers and some questions for Prof. Mueckenheim**,*Jim Burns***Re: Some answers and some questions for Prof. Mueckenheim**,*mueckenh***Re: Some answers and some questions for Prof. Mueckenheim**,*Virgil***Re: Some answers and some questions for Prof. Mueckenheim**,*Jim Burns***Re: Some answers and some questions for Prof. Mueckenheim**,*mueckenh***Re: Some answers and some questions for Prof. Mueckenheim**,*Virgil***Re: Some answers and some questions for Prof. Mueckenheim**,*mueckenh***Re: Some answers and some questions for Prof. Mueckenheim**,*Virgil***Re: Some answers and some questions for Prof. Mueckenheim**,*Jim Burns***Re: Some answers and some questions for Prof. Mueckenheim**,*Virgil***Re: Some answers and some questions for Prof. Mueckenheim**,*Virgil***Re: Some answers and some questions for Prof. Mueckenheim**,*Virgil***Re: Some answers and some questions for Prof. Mueckenheim**,*Virgil***Re: Some answers and some questions for Prof. Mueckenheim**,*mueckenh***Re: Some answers and some questions for Prof. Mueckenheim**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Some answers and some questions for Prof. Mueckenheim**,*Virgil***Re: Some answers and some questions for Prof. Mueckenheim**,*mueckenh***Re: Some answers and some questions for Prof. Mueckenheim**,*Virgil***Re: Some answers and some questions for Prof. Mueckenheim**,*mueckenh***Re: Some answers and some questions for Prof. Mueckenheim**,*Virgil***Re: Some answers and some questions for Prof. Mueckenheim**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Some answers and some questions for Prof. Mueckenheim**,*mueckenh***Re: Some answers and some questions for Prof. Mueckenheim**,*Virgil***Re: Some answers and some questions for Prof. Mueckenheim**,*mueckenh***Re: Some answers and some questions for Prof. Mueckenheim**,*Virgil***Re: Some answers and some questions for Prof. Mueckenheim**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Some answers and some questions for Prof. Mueckenheim**,*mueckenh***Re: Some answers and some questions for Poof. Mueckenheim**,*Virgil***Re: Some answers and some questions for Prof. Mueckenheim**,*Virgil***Re: Some answers and some questions for Prof. Mueckenheim**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Some answers and some questions for Prof. Mueckenheim**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Some answers and some questions for Prof. Mueckenheim**,*mueckenh***Re: Some answers and some questions for Prof. Mueckenheim**,*Virgil***Re: Some answers and some questions for Prof. Mueckenheim**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Some answers and some questions for Prof. Mueckenheim**,*Port563***Re: Some answers and some questions for Prof. Mueckenheim**,*mueckenh***Re: Some answers and some questions for Prof. Mueckenheim**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Some answers and some questions for Prof. Mueckenheim**,*mueckenh***Re: Some answers and some questions for Prof. Mueckenheim**,*Virgil***Re: Some answers and some questions for Prof. Mueckenheim**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Some answers and some questions for Prof. Mueckenheim**,*Virgil***Re: Some answers and some questions for Prof. Mueckenheim**,*mueckenh***Re: Some answers and some questions for Prof. Mueckenheim**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Some answers and some questions for Prof. Mueckenheim**,*Virgil***Re: Some answers and some questions for Prof. Mueckenheim**,*mueckenh***Re: Some answers and some questions for Prof. Mueckenheim**,*Virgil***Re: Some answers and some questions for Prof. Mueckenheim**,*Virgil***Re: Some answers and some questions for Prof. Mueckenheim**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Some answers and some questions for Prof. Mueckenheim**,*mueckenh***Re: Some answers and some questions for Prof. Mueckenheim**,*Virgil***Re: Some answers and some questions for Prof. Mueckenheim**,*mueckenh***Re: Some answers and some questions for Prof. Mueckenheim**,*Virgil***Re: Some answers and some questions for Prof. Mueckenheim**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Some answers and some questions for Prof. Mueckenheim**,*mueckenh***Re: Some answers and some questions for Prof. Mueckenheim**,*Virgil***Re: Some answers and some questions for Prof. Mueckenheim**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Some answers and some questions for Prof. Mueckenheim**,*mueckenh***Re: Some answers and some questions for Prof. Mueckenheim**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Some answers and some questions for Prof. Mueckenheim**,*mueckenh***Re: Some answers and some questions for Prof. Mueckenheim**,*Virgil***Re: Some answers and some questions for Prof. Mueckenheim**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Some answers and some questions for Prof. Mueckenheim**,*mueckenh***Re: Some answers and some questions for Prof. Mueckenheim**,*Virgil***Re: Some answers and some questions for Prof. Mueckenheim**,*Virgil***Re: Some answers and some questions for Prof. Mueckenheim**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Some answers and some questions for Prof. Mueckenheim**,*mueckenh***Re: Some answers and some questions for Prof. Mueckenheim**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Some answers and some questions for Prof. Mueckenheim**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Some answers and some questions for Prof. Mueckenheim**,*mueckenh***Re: Some answers and some questions for Prof. Mueckenheim**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Some answers and some questions for Prof. Mueckenheim**,*Virgil***Re: Some answers and some questions for Prof. Mueckenheim**,*Virgil***Re: Some answers and some questions for Prof. Mueckenheim**,*Virgil***Re: Some answers and some questions for Prof. Mueckenheim**,*"Jürgen R."***Re: Some answers and some questions for Prof. Mueckenheim**,*mueckenh***Re: Some answers and some questions for Prof. Mueckenheim**,*Virgil***Re: Some answers and some questions for Prof. Mueckenheim**,*mueckenh***Re: Some answers and some questions for Prof. Mueckenheim**,*Virgil***Re: Some answers and some questions for Prof. Mueckenheim**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Some answers and some questions for Prof. Mueckenheim**,*mueckenh***Re: Some answers and some questions for Prof. Mueckenheim**,*"Jürgen R."***Re: Some answers and some questions for Prof. Mueckenheim**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Some answers and some questions for Prof. Mueckenheim**,*Sam Sung***Re: Some answers and some questions for Prof. Mueckenheim**,*mueckenh***Re: Some answers and some questions for Prof. Mueckenheim**,*"Jürgen R."***Re: Some answers and some questions for Prof. Mueckenheim**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Some answers and some questions for Prof. Mueckenheim**,*mueckenh***Re: Some answers and some questions for Prof. Mueckenheim**,*"Jürgen R."***Re: Some answers and some questions for Prof. Mueckenheim**,*mueckenh***Re: Some answers and some questions for Prof. Mueckenheim**,*"Jürgen R."***Re: Some answers and some questions for Prof. Mueckenheim**,*Sam Sung***Re: Some answers and some questions for Prof. Mueckenheim**,*Brian M . Scott***Re: Some answers and some questions for Prof. Mueckenheim**,*mueckenh***Re: Some answers and some questions for Prof. Mueckenheim**,*Brian M . Scott***Re: Some answers and some questions for Prof. Mueckenheim**,*mueckenh***Re: Some answers and some questions for Prof. Mueckenheim**,*Brian M . Scott***Re: Some answers and some questions for Prof. Mueckenheim**,*mueckenh***Re: Some answers and some questions for Prof. Mueckenheim**,*Virgil***Re: Some answers and some questions for Prof. Mueckenheim**,*mueckenh***Re: Some answers and some questions for Prof. Mueckenheim**,*Virgil***Re: Some answers and some questions for Prof. Mueckenheim**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Some answers and some questions for Prof. Mueckenheim**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Some answers and some questions for Prof. Mueckenheim**,*mueckenh***Re: Some answers and some questions for Prof. Mueckenheim**,*Virgil***Re: Some answers and some questions for Prof. Mueckenheim**,*Sam Sung***Re: Some answers and some questions for Prof. Mueckenheim**,*Virgil***Re: Some answers and some questions for Prof. Mueckenheim**,*Space998***Re: Some answers and some questions for Prof. Mueckenheim**,*Space998***Re: Some answers and some questions for Prof. Mueckenheim**,*Virgil***Re: Some answers and some questions for Prof. Mueckenheim**,*mueckenh***Re: Some answers and some questions for Prof. Mueckenheim**,*Virgil***Re: Some answers and some questions for Prof. Mueckenheim**,*mueckenh***Re: Some answers and some questions for Prof. Mueckenheim**,*Virgil***Re: Some answers and some questions for Prof. Mueckenheim**,*Virgil***Re: Some answers and some questions for Prof. Mueckenheim**,*Virgil***Re: Some answers and some questions for Prof. Mueckenheim**,*Virgil***Re: Some answers and some questions for Prof. Mueckenheim**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Some answers and some questions for Prof. Mueckenheim**,*mueckenh***Re: Some answers and some questions for Prof. Mueckenheim**,*Virgil***Re: Some answers and some questions for Prof. Mueckenheim**,*mueckenh***Re: Some answers and some questions for Prof. Mueckenheim**,*Virgil***Re: Some answers and some questions for Prof. Mueckenheim**,*mueckenh***Re: Some answers and some questions for Prof. Mueckenheim**,*Virgil***Re: Some answers and some questions for Prof. Mueckenheim**,*Virgil***yes, all of them, now**,*Space998***Re: Some answers and some questions for Prof. Mueckenheim**,*mueckenh***Re: Some answers and some questions for Prof. Mueckenheim**,*Virgil***Re: Some answers and some questions for Prof. Mueckenheim**,*mueckenh***Re: Some answers and some questions for Prof. Mueckenheim**,*Virgil***Re: Some answers and some questions for Prof. Mueckenheim**,*mueckenh***Re: Some answers and some questions for Prof. Mueckenheim**,*Virgil***Re: Some answers and some questions for Prof. Mueckenheim**,*Virgil***Re: Some answers and some questions for Prof. Mueckenheim**,*mueckenh***Re: Some answers and some questions for Prof. Mueckenheim**,*Virgil***Re: Some answers and some questions for Prof. Mueckenheim**,*mueckenh***Re: Some answers and some questions for Prof. Mueckenheim**,*Virgil***Re: Some answers and some questions for Prof. Mueckenheim**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Some answers and some questions for Prof. Mueckenheim**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Some answers and some questions for Prof. Mueckenheim**,*mueckenh***Re: Some answers and some questions for Prof. Mueckenheim**,*Virgil***Re: Some answers and some questions for Prof. Mueckenheim**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Some answers and some questions for Prof. Mueckenheim**,*mueckenh***Re: Some answers and some questions for Prof. Mueckenheim**,*Virgil***Re: Some answers and some questions for Prof. Mueckenheim**,*Virgil***Re: Some answers and some questions for Prof. Mueckenheim**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Some answers and one question for Ben Bacarisse**,*Virgil*

**Re: All answers and one question for Ben Bacarisse**,*Virgil***Re: All answers and one question for Ben Bacarisse**,*wpihughes*

**Combinatorics on pairs...**,*Dieter von Holten***Re: Combinatorics on pairs...**,*Timothy Murphy***Re: Combinatorics on pairs...**,*Dieter von Holten***Re: Combinatorics on pairs...**,*Wasell***Re: Combinatorics on pairs...**,*Wasell*

**Re: Combinatorics on pairs...**,*Tommy***Re: Combinatorics on pairs...**,*Timothy Murphy*

**ABSURD TIME DILATION IN EINSTEIN'S RELATIVITY**,*Pentcho Valev***Re: ABSURD TIME DILATION IN EINSTEIN'S RELATIVITY**,*Pentcho Valev***Re: ABSURD TIME DILATION IN EINSTEIN'S RELATIVITY**,*Pentcho Valev*

**what is math**,*Rosario193***Re: what is math**,*Freda Norml*

**Re: Harvard professors endorse proof of Fundamental Theorem of Algebra to arxiv**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Re: Harvard professors endorse proof of Fundamental Theorem of Algebra to arxiv**,*Archimedes Plutonium*

**Re: How to find a if there is a zero or root between two points quickly**,*guenter . nowak***Re: math professors of Cornell University to endorse infinity-borderline proof to arxiv.org**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Re: math professors of Cornell University to endorse infinity-borderline proof to arxiv.org**,*Dan Christensen***Re: math professors of Cornell University to endorse infinity-borderline proof to arxiv.org**,*Space998***Re: math professors of Cornell University to endorse infinity-borderline proof to arxiv.org**,*Archimedes Plutonium*

**Re: UC Berkeley math professors endorsing No Perfect Cuboid to arxiv**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Re: UC Berkeley math professors endorsing No Perfect Cuboid to arxiv**,*Space998***Re: UC Berkeley math professors endorsing No Perfect Cuboid to arxiv**,*Archimedes Plutonium*- <Possible follow-ups>
**Re: UC Berkeley math professors endorsing No Perfect Cuboid to arxiv**,*Dan Christensen***President Amit Chakma of Univ Western Ontario-- is Dan Christensen in your math dept?**,*Archimedes Plutonium***André Boivin boivin@uwo.ca Department Chair is this Dan Christensen in your math dept?**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Re: André Boivin boi...@uwo.ca Department Chair is this Dan Christensen in your math dept?**,*Space998***Re: André Boivin boi...@uwo.ca Department Chair is this Dan Christensen in your math dept?**,*Dan Christensen***Can a Univ of Western Ontario faculty member talk to Dan about his bad behavior**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Re: Can a Univ of Western Ontario faculty member talk to Dan about his bad behavior**,*Dan Christensen***Janet Williams of Univ Western Ontario, are professors tied to a code of conduct??**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Re: Janet Williams of Univ Western Ontario, are professors tied to a code of conduct??**,*Dan Christensen***abnormal people never know who is attacking and who is victim**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Re: abnormal people never know who is attacking and who is victim**,*Dan Christensen***Re: abnormal people never know who is attacking and who is victim**,*Space998***Re: President Amit Chakma of Univ Western Ontario-- is Dan Christensen in your math dept?**,*Dan Christensen***he's really intimidating, eh**,*Space998*

**Re: UC Berkeley math professors endorsing No Perfect Cuboid to arxiv**,*Dan Christensen*

**INSTRUCTOR'S SOLUTIONS MANUAL FOR Engineering Mechanics Dynamics 13th Ed. by Hibbeler**,*kalvinmanual13***03::21**,*Sam Sung***Nazis-0 Jews-1**,*Kevin Barry***3.16 - Weierstrass was a drunk, but much worse than that, is he was a dunce.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 3.16 - Weierstrass was a drunk, but much worse than that, is he was a dunce.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 3.16 - Weierstrass was a drunk, but much worse than that, is he was a dunce.**,*dullrich******* TROLL ALERT ******,*Dan Christensen***Re: **** TROLL ALERT ******,*John Gabriel***Re: **** TROLL ALERT ******,*Freda Norml***Re: **** TROLL ALERT ******,*Dan Christensen***Re: **** TROLL ALERT ******,*Freda Norml***Re: **** TROLL ALERT ******,*ChumChan**Message not available***Re: **** TROLL ALERT ******,*Dan Christensen*

**Re: 3.16 - Weierstrass was a drunk, but much worse than that, is he was a dunce.**,*Bob Hutchins*

**3.15 - The question that no one can answer of even try to answer because it's plainly absurd.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 3.15 - The question that no one can answer of even try to answer because it's plainly absurd.**,*Why not***Re: 3.15 - The question that no one can answer of even try to answer because it's plainly absurd.**,*dullrich***Re: 3.15 - The question that no one can answer of even try to answer because it's plainly absurd.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 3.15 - The question that no one can answer of even try to answer because it's plainly absurd.**,*norman***Re: 3.15 - The question that no one can answer of even try to answer because it's plainly absurd.**,*Freda Norml***the question you don't ask ,foo**,*Space998***Re: 3.15 - The question that no one can answer of even try to answer because it's plainly absurd.**,*dullrich*

**Re: 3.15 - The question that no one can answer of even try to answer because it's plainly absurd.**,*Dan Christensen******* TROLL ALERT ******,*Dan Christensen***Re: **** TROLL ALERT ******,*Space998***Re: **** TROLL ALERT ******,*Space998***Re: **** TROLL ALERT ******,*Space998***Re: **** TROLL ALERT ******,*Space998*

**test that every modern day math professor would fail in his/her classroom 1= .999.... #2065 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***introducing SubFractions into math with infinity borderlines #2066 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Subfractions versus regular fractions #2069 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***what subfractions do to Continued Fractions #2071 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Re: what subfractions do to Continued Fractions #2071 Correcting Math**,*Space998***can we freely interchange fractions with decimals? #2075 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Subfraction looks to be the answer and solution #2076 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Re: Subfraction looks to be the answer and solution #2076 Correcting Math**,*Uranus Deposit***how zeroes play a role in telling what numbers are finite & infinite #2079 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***why .9999.... is an infinite number, not a finite #2083 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium****** CRANK ALERT *****,*Dan Christensen***Re: why .9999.... is an infinite number, not a finite #2083 Correcting Math**,*Space998***"problem does not arise in base_one accounting (neither do "decimals per se**,*Space998*

***** CRANK ALERT *****,*Dan Christensen***Re: *** CRANK ALERT *****,*Dan Christensen*

**Re: test that every modern day math professor would fail in his/her classroom 1= .999.... #2065 Correcting Math**,*Freda Norml*

**WM's nonsense!**,*Virgil***Re: WM's nonsense!**,*John Gabriel***Re: WM's nonsense!**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Re: WM's nonsense!**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: WM's nonsense!**,*"Jürgen R."***Re: WM's nonsense!**,*YBM***Re: WM's nonsense!**,*mueckenh***Re: WM's nonsense!**,*Virgil***Re: WM's nonsense!**,*YBM***Re: WM's nonsense!**,*Virgil***Re: WM's nonsense!**,*Sam Sung***Re: WM's nonsense!**,*Sam Sung***Re: WM's nonsense!**,*Sam Sung***Re: WM's nonsense!**,*Sam Sung*

**Re: WM's nonsense!**,*John Gabriel***Re: WM's nonsense!**,*mueckenh*

**Re: WM's nonsense!**,*mueckenh***Re: WM's nonsense!**,*Virgil***The nonsense of set theory**,*mueckenh***Re: The nonsense of WM's version of set theory**,*Virgil***Re: Prof. W Mueckenheim's nonsense!**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Prof. W Mueckenheim's nonsense!**,*mueckenh***WM is a mother*****,*Sam Sung***Re: Prof. W Mueckenheim's nonsense!**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Prof. W Mueckenheim's nonsense!**,*"Jürgen R."***Re: Prof. W Mueckenheim's nonsense!**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Prof. W Mueckenheim's nonsense!**,*mueckenh***Re: Prof. W Mueckenheim's nonsense!**,*Virgil***Re: Prof. W Mueckenheim's nonsense!**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Prof. W Mueckenheim's nonsense!**,*Virgil***Re: Prof. W Mueckenheim's nonsense!**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Prof. W Mueckenheim's nonsense!**,*Rosario193***Re: Prof. W Mueckenheim's nonsense!**,*Virgil***Re: Prof. W Mueckenheim's nonsense!**,*Rosario193***Re: Prof. W Mueckenheim's nonsense!**,*Rosario193*

**IQR convert to Mean and (SD)**,*iMikkel***Re: IQR convert to Mean and (SD)**,*Ben Bacarisse*

**GREATEST CONSPIRACY IN THE HISTORY OF HISTORY**,*Ed Conrad***Proposition vs corollary?**,*Victor Porton***Re: Proposition vs corollary?**,*scattered*

**Updated version of my formal proof of Cantor-Bernstein-Schroeder Theorem (DC Proof format)**,*Dan Christensen***QUANTUM ENTANGLEMENT = *piffle***,*grahamcooper7***Re: QUANTUM ENTANGLEMENT = *piffle***,*David Bernier***Re: QUANTUM ENTANGLEMENT = *piffle***,*grahamcooper7***Re: QUANTUM ENTANGLEMENT = *piffle***,*David Bernier***Re: QUANTUM ENTANGLEMENT = *piffle***,*David Bernier***Re: QUANTUM ENTANGLEMENT = *piffle***,*David Bernier*

**Re: QUANTUM ENTANGLEMENT = *piffle***,*grahamcooper7*

**Re: QUANTUM ENTANGLEMENT = *piffle***,*Peter Percival*

**Expansive Well Ordering**,*William Elliot***Re: Expansive Well Ordering**,*quasi***Re: Expansive Well Ordering**,*William Elliot***Re: Expansive Well Ordering**,*William Elliot***Re: Expansive Well Ordering**,*David Hartley***Re: Expansive Well Ordering**,*Timothy Murphy***Re: Expansive Well Ordering**,*David Hartley***Re: Expansive Well Ordering**,*Timothy Murphy***Re: Expansive Well Ordering**,*Brian M . Scott***Re: Expansive Well Ordering**,*Timothy Murphy***Expansive Well Ordering**,*William Elliot***Re: Expansive Well Ordering**,*David Hartley***Re: Expansive Well Ordering**,*William Elliot***Re: Expansive Well Ordering**,*Brian M . Scott***Re: Expansive Well Ordering**,*William Elliot***Re: Expansive Well Ordering**,*Brian M . Scott***Re: Expansive Well Ordering**,*Timothy Murphy***Re: Expansive Well Ordering**,*Brian M . Scott***Re: Expansive Well Ordering**,*Brian M . Scott***Re: Expansive Well Ordering**,*Brian M . Scott***Re: Expansive Well Ordering**,*David Bernier***Re: Expansive Well Ordering**,*Brian M . Scott***Re: Expansive Well Ordering**,*Timothy Murphy***Re: Expansive Well Ordering**,*David Bernier*

**Re: Expansive Well Ordering**,*David Hartley***Re: Expansive Well Ordering**,*Virgil***Re: Expansive Well Ordering**,*William Elliot*

**Re: Expansive Well Ordering**,*William Elliot*

**Announcement....**,*David Bernier***mathHandbook.com updated**,*drhuang57***Re: mathHandbook.com updated**,*John Gabriel***Re: mathHandbook.com updated**,*John Gabriel***Re: mathHandbook.com updated**,*norman*

**Re: mathHandbook.com updated**,*norman***Re: mathHandbook.com updated**,*drhuang57***Re: mathHandbook.com updated**,*drhuang57*

**is *disproof* of the Prime Number Theorem #2058 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***formula for perfect squares versus primes Re: is *disproof* of the Prime Number Theorem #2059 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***tentative first formula for a True Prime Number theorem #2060 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***closer to formula for a True Prime Number theorem #2061 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium*

**Re: is *disproof* of the Prime Number Theorem #2058 Correcting Math**,*bert***Re: is *disproof* of the Prime Number Theorem #2058 Correcting Math**,*Port563***circular functions**,*Space998***counterbalancing x/Ln(x) by 19/7 & 22/7 as "e" substitutes Re: is *disproof* of the Prime Number Theorem #2063 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Re: counterbalancing x/Ln(x) by 19/7 & 22/7 as "e" substitutes Re: is *disproof* of the Prime Number Theorem #2063 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***example of what a true Prime Number theorem would be, using 3 replacement of "e" #2064 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Re: example of what a true Prime Number theorem would be, using 3 replacement of "e" #2064 Correcting Math**,*Peter Percival***getting exact hits by using sqrt8, 3, sqrt10 in Prime Number Theorem #2067 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***upper & lower bounds to give exact prime accounting in Prime Number theorem #2068 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***pi as fraction at 603 digits rightward #2070 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Re: pi as fraction at 603 digits rightward #2070 Correcting Math**,*Space998***Re: pi as fraction at 603 digits rightward #2070 Correcting Math**,*Space998***Is the next exact hit of prime accounting 100/4 that of 10^602? #2072 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***exact count of primes at 10^602 (a true Prime Number Theorem) #2073 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Re: exact count of primes at 10^602 (a true Prime Number Theorem) #2074 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***exact count of primes at 10^602 (a true Prime Number Theorem) #2077 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***example of upper and lower bound for true Prime Number Theorem #2078 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Re: example of upper and lower bound for true Prime Number Theorem #2078 Correcting Math**,*Space998***Conjecture: 100 the largest single N for exact prime accounting #2080 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Re: Conjecture: 100 the largest single N for exact prime accounting #2081 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***straightforward proof that 100 is the largest N exact hit of primes #2082 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium*

**Other bullshit by WM in arxive**,*Sam Sung***WM kindergarden**,*Sam Sung***Re: WM kindergarden**,*norman*

**Virgil**,*Sam Sung***What Do Nazis Believe?**,*Kevin Barry***equation involving sums of powers**,*duncan smith***Re: equation involving sums of powers**,*William Elliot***Re: equation involving sums of powers**,*Roland Franzius***Re: equation involving sums of powers**,*Leon Aigret***Re: equation involving sums of powers**,*duncan smith***Re: equation involving sums of powers**,*Hown Jcrboz***Re: equation involving sums of powers**,*duncan smith***Re: equation involving sums of powers**,*duncan smith***Re: equation involving sums of powers**,*samiso***Re: equation involving sums of powers**,*Leon Aigret***Re: equation involving sums of powers**,*duncan smith*

**solutions manual, test bank for Economics Private and Public Choice 15e James Gwartney Richard Stroup Russell Sobel David Macpherson**,*piecutie056***3.16 - Factorizing is almost like Raping, so here is its replacement.**,*John Gabriel***MueckeMath Quotes "The Meaning of Infinity"**,*"Jürgen R."***base_infinity (TM**,*Space998***Re: MueckeMath Quotes "The Meaning of Infinity"**,*FredJeffries***Re: MueckeMath Quotes "The Meaning of Infinity"**,*Tommy***Re: MueckeMath Quotes "The Meaning of Infinity"**,*Michael Klemm***Re: MueckeMath Quotes "The Meaning of Infinity"**,*John Gabriel***Re: MueckeMath Quotes "The Meaning of Infinity"**,*Michael Klemm***Re: MueckeMath Quotes "The Meaning of Infinity"**,*John Gabriel*

**Re: MueckeMath Quotes "The Meaning of Infinity"**,*John Gabriel*

**3.14 - Calculus was not rigorous until John Gabriel's New Calculus.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 3.14 - Calculus was not rigorous until John Gabriel's New Calculus.**,*John Gabriel******* TROLL ALERT ******,*Dan Christensen***Re: **** TROLL ALERT ******,*John Gabriel*

**Re: 3.14 - Calculus was not rigorous until John Gabriel's New Calculus.**,*dullrich***Re: 3.14 - Calculus was not rigorous until John Gabriel's New Calculus.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 3.14 - Calculus was not rigorous until John Gabriel's New Calculus.**,*dullrich***Re: 3.14 - Calculus was not rigorous until John Gabriel's New Calculus.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 3.14 - Calculus was not rigorous until John Gabriel's New Calculus.**,*David C. Ullrich***Re: 3.14 - Calculus was not rigorous until John Gabriel's New Calculus.**,*Soap Research***Re: 3.14 - Calculus was not rigorous until John Gabriel's New Calculus.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 3.14 - Calculus was not rigorous until John Gabriel's New Calculus.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 3.14 - Calculus was not rigorous until John Gabriel's New Calculus.**,*David C. Ullrich***Re: 3.14 - Calculus was not rigorous until John Gabriel's New Calculus.**,*norman***Re: 3.14 - Calculus was not rigorous until John Gabriel's New Calculus.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 3.14 - Calculus was not rigorous until John Gabriel's New Calculus.**,*norman***Re: 3.14 - Calculus was not rigorous until John Gabriel's New Calculus.**,*dullrich***Re: 3.14 - Calculus was not rigorous until John Gabriel's New Calculus.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 3.14 - Calculus was not rigorous until John Gabriel's New Calculus.**,*Freda Parkins***simple duality of infinity**,*Space998***Re: 3.14 - Calculus was not rigorous until John Gabriel's New Calculus.**,*norman***Re: 3.14 - Calculus was not rigorous until John Gabriel's New Calculus.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 3.14 - Calculus was not rigorous until John Gabriel's New Calculus.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 3.14 - Calculus was not rigorous until John Gabriel's New Calculus.**,*norman***Re: 3.14 - Calculus was not rigorous until John Gabriel's New Calculus.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 3.14 - Calculus was not rigorous until John Gabriel's New Calculus.**,*Freda Norml***Re: 3.14 - Calculus was not rigorous until John Gabriel's New Calculus.**,*dullrich***Re: 3.14 - Calculus was not rigorous until John Gabriel's New Calculus.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 3.14 - Calculus was not rigorous until John Gabriel's New Calculus.**,*Wasell*

**Re: 3.14 - Calculus was not rigorous until John Gabriel's New Calculus.**,*John Gabriel******* TROLL ALERT ******,*Dan Christensen***Re: 3.14 - Calculus was not rigorous until John Gabriel's New Calculus.**,*dullrich***Re: 3.14 - Calculus was not rigorous until John Gabriel's New Calculus.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 3.14 - Calculus was not rigorous until John Gabriel's New Calculus.**,*norman***Re: 3.14 - Calculus was not rigorous until John Gabriel's New Calculus.**,*Freda Parkins*

**Re: 3.14 - Calculus was not rigorous until John Gabriel's New Calculus.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 3.14 - Calculus was not rigorous until John Gabriel's New Calculus.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 3.14 - Calculus was not rigorous until John Gabriel's New Calculus.**,*Wipe A Rat***Re: 3.14 - Calculus was not rigorous until John Gabriel's New Calculus.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 3.14 - Calculus was not rigorous until John Gabriel's New Calculus.**,*Jan***Re: 3.14 - Calculus was not rigorous until John Gabriel's New Calculus.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 3.14 - Calculus was not rigorous until John Gabriel's New Calculus.**,*Derp***Re: 3.14 - Calculus was not rigorous until John Gabriel's New Calculus.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 3.14 - Calculus was not rigorous until John Gabriel's New Calculus.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 3.14 - Calculus was not rigorous until John Gabriel's New Calculus.**,*Sonny Greer******* TROLL ALERT ******,*Dan Christensen*

**Harvard - don't send your kid to an IVY league university.**,*John Gabriel***LES EINSTEINIENS QUI PLEURENT**,*Pentcho Valev***Re: LES EINSTEINIENS QUI PLEURENT**,*Pentcho Valev***Re: LES EINSTEINIENS QUI PLEURENT**,*Pentcho Valev***Re: LES EINSTEINIENS QUI PLEURENT**,*Pentcho Valev*

**A Theorem of MueckeMath**,*"Jürgen R."***Quotes from MueckeMath**,*"Jürgen R."***Re: Quotes from MueckeMath**,*"Jürgen R."***Re: Quotes from MueckeMath**,*Port563***Re: Quotes from MueckeMath**,*John Gabriel***Re: Quotes from MueckeMath**,*norman*

**Re: Quotes from MueckeMath**,*John Gabriel***Re: Quotes from MueckeMath**,*norman*

**Re: Quotes from MueckeMath**,*"Jürgen R."***Re: Quotes from MueckeMath**,*John Gabriel***Re: Quotes from MueckeMath**,*"Jürgen R."***Re: Quotes from MueckeMath**,*"Jürgen R."***Re: Quotes from MueckeMath**,*"Jürgen R."*

**Re: Quotes from MueckeMath**,*Virgil***Re: Quotes from MueckeMath**,*John Gabriel*

**Re: Quotes from MueckeMath**,*Zeit Geist*

**Re: Dante Alghieri knew Calculus**,*David Bernier***Re: Dante Alghieri knew Calculus**,*Space998*

**Checkout free image program at nih**,*norman***Re: Scott AAronson interviews chatbot ...**,*David Bernier***An idea to solve the Syracuse conjecture**,*zebulon***Re: An idea to solve the Syracuse conjecture**,*Sam Sung***Re: An idea to solve the Syracuse conjecture**,*Guillaume***Re: An idea to solve the Syracuse conjecture**,*Guillaume***Re: An idea to solve the Syracuse conjecture**,*Guillaume***Re: An idea to solve the Syracuse conjecture**,*Guillaume***Re: An idea to solve the Syracuse conjecture**,*Guillaume***Re: An idea to solve the Syracuse conjecture**,*Sam Sung***Re: An idea to solve the Syracuse conjecture**,*David Bernier*

**Re: An idea to solve the Syracuse conjecture**,*Derp*

**PPT**,*bill***Space, Quasi, Bert, WM, Virgil, Fruitcake, on how Old Math believes 0.999.... =1**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Re: Space, Quasi, Bert, WM, Virgil, Fruitcake, on how Old Math believes 0.999.... =1**,*Dan Christensen***Re: Space, Quasi, Bert, WM, Virgil, Fruitcake, on how Old Math believes 0.999.... =1**,*norman***Re: Space, Quasi, Bert, WM, Virgil, Fruitcake, on how Old Math believes 0.999.... =1**,*Virgil***Re: Space, Quasi, Bert, WM, Virgil, Fruitcake, on how Old Math believes 0.999.... =1**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Re: Space, Quasi, Bert, WM, Virgil, Fruitcake, on how Old Math believes 0.999.... =1**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Re: Space, Quasi, Bert, WM, Virgil, Fruitcake, on how Old Math believes 0.999.... =1**,*Soap Research*

**Re: Space, Quasi, Bert, WM, Virgil, Fruitcake, on how Old Math believes 0.999.... =1**,*Richard Tobin***why Oresme series is fakery and 1=0.999.... a fakery #2057 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***thus spake SteviN**,*Space998***Re: thus spake SteviN**,*Space998***this idiot does not know how 0 is related to infinity; #2062 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***krektin *mathematica (four subjects, not including arithmetic, which is what "we are arguing about**,*Space998*

**A proposal for a proof of the Syracuse conjecture**,*zebulon***Jewish Satisfaction**,*Kevin Barry***Re: ordinality of sets**,*FredJeffries***Re: ordinality of sets**,*Sam Sung*- <Possible follow-ups>
**Re: ordinality of sets**,*FredJeffries*

**DOPPLER EFFECT WIPES OUT EINSTEIN'S RELATIVITY**,*Pentcho Valev***Re: DOPPLER EFFECT WIPES OUT EINSTEIN'S RELATIVITY**,*Pentcho Valev***Re: DOPPLER EFFECT WIPES OUT EINSTEIN'S RELATIVITY**,*Pentcho Valev***Re: DOPPLER EFFECT WIPES OUT EINSTEIN'S RELATIVITY**,*Pentcho Valev*

**why would quasi, Space, bert, bonehead, believe in Old Math convergence and Prime Number Theorem??**,*Archimedes Plutonium***solutions manual, test bank for Essentials of Economics 7e Gregory Mankiw**,*piecutie056*- <Possible follow-ups>
**solutions manual, test bank for Essentials of Economics 7e Gregory Mankiw**,*smtbhelp*

**solutions manual, test bank for Financial Accounting The Impact on Decision Makers 9e Gary Porter Curtis Norton**,*piecutie056***solutions manual, test bank for Entrepreneurial Finance 5e Chris Leach Ronald Melicher**,*smtbhelp***solutions manual, test bank for Financial Reporting Financial Statement Analysis and Valuation 8e James Wahlen Stephen Baginski Mark Bradshaw**,*smtbhelp***Some solutions to sigma(n) = 2n + 18, for odd n**,*David Bernier***Re: Some solutions to sigma(n) = 2n + 18, for odd n**,*Space998***Re: Some solutions to sigma(n) = 2n + 18, for odd n**,*David Bernier***Re: Some solutions to sigma(n) = 2n + 18, for odd n**,*Space998***Re: Some solutions to sigma(n) = 2n + 18, for odd n**,*David Bernier*

**3.13 - Simple concepts that the academic bourgeoisie can't get right in over 2000 years.**,*John Gabriel******* TROLL ALERT ******,*Dan Christensen***Re: 3.13 - Simple concepts that the academic bourgeoisie can't get right in over 2000 years.**,*John Gabriel*

**PATHOLOGICAL LYING IN EINSTEIN'S WORLD**,*Pentcho Valev***Re: PATHOLOGICAL LYING IN EINSTEIN'S WORLD**,*John Gabriel***Re: PATHOLOGICAL LYING IN EINSTEIN'S WORLD**,*Pentcho Valev*

**Sequences and Limits**,*mueckenh***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*John Gabriel***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*"Jürgen R."***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*John Gabriel***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*John Gabriel***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*Sam Sung***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*Sam Sung***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*John Gabriel***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*Sam Sung***Sam Dung's boyfriend switches from ***to mouth and vice-versa.**,*John Gabriel***Re: Sam Dung's boyfriend switches from ***to mouth and vice-versa.**,*Sam Sung***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*Sam Sung***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*John Gabriel***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*Sam Sung***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*John Gabriel***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*Sam Sung***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*Sam Sung***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*Sam Sung***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*Sam Sung***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*Sam Sung***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*John Dawkins***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*John Gabriel***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*John Dawkins***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*John Gabriel***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*John Gabriel***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*John Dawkins***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*John Gabriel***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*John Dawkins***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*Seymour J.***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*mueckenh***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*Virgil***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*mueckenh***WM is a mother*****,*Sam Sung***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*Virgil***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*Virgil***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*K_h***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*mueckenh***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*Virgil***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*K_h***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*Jan***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*FredJeffries***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*John Gabriel***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*John Gabriel***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*Jan***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*mueckenh***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*John Gabriel***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*John Gabriel***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*Jan***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*John Gabriel***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*mueckenh***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*Jan***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*mueckenh***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*Virgil***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*FredJeffries***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*David Bernier***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*mueckenh***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*Sam Sung***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*John Gabriel***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*Virgil***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*John Gabriel***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*Seymour J.***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*mueckenh***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*Virgil***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*John Gabriel***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*Virgil***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*Virgil*

**Re: Sequences and Limits**,*mueckenh***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*Sam Sung***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*Sam Sung***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*Virgil*

**Re: Sequences and Limits**,*Sam Sung***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*Sam Sung***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*Sam Sung*

**Re: Sequences and Limits**,*mueckenh***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*Virgil***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*mueckenh***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*Virgil***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*mueckenh***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*Virgil*

**Re: Sequences and Limits**,*mueckenh***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*John Gabriel***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*Sam Sung***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*Sam Sung***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*mueckenh***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*Virgil***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*mueckenh***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*Virgil***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*mueckenh***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*John Gabriel***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*Virgil***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*mueckenh***WM is a mother*****,*Sam Sung***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*Virgil***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*mueckenh***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*Virgil***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*mueckenh***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*mueckenh***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*mueckenh***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*Virgil***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*Virgil***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*Virgil***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*K_h***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*mueckenh***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*Virgil***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*mueckenh***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*Virgil***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*Sam Sung***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*K_h***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*Virgil***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*K_h***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*mueckenh***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*Virgil***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*mueckenh***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*Virgil***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*Seymour J.***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*mueckenh***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*Virgil***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*mueckenh***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*Virgil***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*K_h***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*Seymour J.***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*mueckenh***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*Sam Sung***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*Virgil***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*Virgil***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*Virgil*

**Re: Sequences and Limits**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*Sam Sung***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*Sam Sung***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*Sam Sung*

**Re: Sequences and Limits**,*Seymour J.***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*John Gabriel***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*mueckenh***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*John Gabriel***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*Virgil*

**Re: Sequences and Limits**,*mueckenh***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*mueckenh***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*Sam Sung***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*Zeit Geist***Sequences and Limits**,*mueckenh***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*mueckenh***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*Virgil***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*Virgil***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*John Gabriel***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*Virgil***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*Sam Sung***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*mueckenh***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*mueckenh***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*Virgil***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*Virgil***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*Virgil*

**Re: Sequences and Limits**,*John Gabriel***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*Sam Sung*

**Re: Sequences and Limits**,*Virgil***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*mueckenh***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*Virgil*

**Re: Sequences and Limits**,*John Gabriel***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*mueckenh***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*Virgil***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*mueckenh***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*Virgil***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*mueckenh***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*Virgil***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*mueckenh***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*YBM***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*mueckenh***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*K_h***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*Virgil***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*Seymour J.***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*mueckenh***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*Sam Sung***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*Sam Sung***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*Virgil***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*YBM***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*mueckenh***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*Virgil***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*YBM***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*mueckenh***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*Virgil***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*YBM***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*mueckenh***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*Virgil***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*YBM***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*mueckenh***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*YBM***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*Sam Sung***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*mueckenh***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*Virgil***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*Virgil***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*mueckenh***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*Brian M . Scott***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*Virgil***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*mueckenh***Re:In WM versus Cantor, Cantor always wins!**,*Virgil***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*mueckenh***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*mueckenh***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*Virgil***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*mueckenh***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*Virgil***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*mueckenh***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*Virgil***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*mueckenh***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*Virgil***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*mueckenh***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*Virgil***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*Virgil***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*"Jürgen R."***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*mueckenh***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*mueckenh***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*Sam Sung***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*mueckenh***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*Sam Sung***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*Virgil***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*mueckenh***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*FredJeffries***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*Virgil***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*Virgil***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*Virgil***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*FredJeffries***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*Sam Sung***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*Martin Shobe***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*mueckenh***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*Virgil***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*mueckenh***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*Virgil***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*mueckenh***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*mueckenh***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*Brian M . Scott***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*mueckenh***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*mueckenh***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*Virgil***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*mueckenh***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*Sam Sung***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*Virgil***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*Brian M . Scott***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*mueckenh***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*Virgil***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*mueckenh***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*Virgil***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*Virgil***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*mueckenh***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*Virgil***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*mueckenh***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*Virgil***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*mueckenh***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*Sam Sung***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*Virgil***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*Virgil***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*YBM***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*Sam Sung***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*Virgil***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*mueckenh***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*Virgil***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*mueckenh***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*Virgil***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*FredJeffries***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*Virgil***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*Virgil***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*JohnF***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*Virgil***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*"Jürgen R."***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*JohnF***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*JohnF***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*JohnF***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*JohnF***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*JohnF***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*Seymour J.***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*JohnF***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*Seymour J.***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*mueckenh***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*Virgil***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*mueckenh***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*Virgil***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*mueckenh***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*Virgil***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*mueckenh***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*Virgil***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*Virgil***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*JohnF***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*Virgil***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*mueckenh***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*Virgil***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*Sam Sung***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*mueckenh***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*Virgil***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*Seymour J.***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*Virgil***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*Virgil***Re: Sequences and Limits**,*Zeit Geist*

**Conjecture: AP-prime formula is the most simple of all formulas that lists the primes in order #2048 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***I maybe wrong in that the sieve maybe the most efficient #2051 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***can square roots of odd numbers tell us if prime or composite? #2052 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Re: can square roots of odd numbers tell us if prime or composite? #2053 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***dividing cube root by square root to see if it distinguishes primes #2054 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***glimmer of a pattern emerging that distinguishes primes #2055 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Re: glimmer of a pattern emerging that distinguishes primes #2056 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium*

**Re: Conjecture: AP-prime formula is the most simple of all formulas that lists the primes in order #2048 Correcting Math**,*emptypost***Re: Conjecture: AP-prime formula is the most simple of all formulas that lists the primes in order #2048 Correcting Math**,*emptypost***Re: Conjecture: AP-prime formula is the most simple of all formulas that lists the primes in order #2048 Correcting Math**,*emptypost***square and cube roots leave traces of whether prime or composite #2056 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium*

**Less General Pythagorean Theorem that uses Euclid formula #2047 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Adolph Hitler and The Final Solution**,*Kevin Barry***Really**,*Sam Sung***Another conjecture about filters and cartesian products**,*Victor Porton***Re: Another conjecture about filters and cartesian products**,*Victor Porton*

**minimum of Gamma function on (0, oo)**,*David Bernier***Re: minimum of Gamma function on (0, oo)**,*David Bernier***Re: minimum of Gamma function on (0, oo)**,*David Bernier*

**3.12 - John Gabriel attempts to educate a Viking (Konyberg)**,*John Gabriel***Re: 3.12 - John Gabriel attempts to educate a Viking (Konyberg)**,*norman******* TROLL ALERT ******,*Dan Christensen***Re: 3.12 - John Gabriel attempts to educate a Viking (Konyberg)**,*John Gabriel***Re: 3.12 - John Gabriel attempts to educate a Viking (Konyberg)**,*konyberg***he can't take the "numbertheory**,*Space998*

**EINSTEIN'S 1905 HOAX**,*Pentcho Valev***Re: EINSTEIN'S 1905 HOAX**,*Pentcho Valev***Re: EINSTEIN'S 1905 HOAX**,*Pentcho Valev***Re: EINSTEIN'S 1905 HOAX**,*Pentcho Valev*

**Re: EINSTEIN'S 1905 HOAX**,*John Gabriel***Re: EINSTEIN'S 1905 HOAX**,*norman*

**fwiw, a simple method for computing factorials...**,*Chris M. Thomasson***Re: fwiw, a simple method for computing factorials...**,*William Elliot***Re: fwiw, a simple method for computing factorials...**,*Chris M. Thomasson***Re: fwiw, a simple method for computing factorials...**,*William Elliot*

**Re: fwiw, a simple method for computing factorials...**,*Peter Percival*

**Re: fwiw, a simple method for computing factorials...**,*bert***Re: fwiw, a simple method for computing factorials...**,*Jussi Piitulainen***Re: fwiw, a simple method for computing factorials...**,*Timothy Murphy***Re: fwiw, a simple method for computing factorials...**,*David Bernier*

**Re: fwiw, a simple method for computing factorials...**,*Chris M. Thomasson*

**Re: no**,*Space998***SOLUTIONS MANUAL: CALCULUS EARLY TRANSCENDENTAL FUNCTIONS 6TH ED BY Ron Larson, Bruce Edwards**,*kalvinmanual***fwiw, generating perfect squares without multiplication...**,*Chris M. Thomasson***Re: fwiw, generating perfect squares without multiplication...**,*William Elliot***Re: fwiw, generating perfect squares without multiplication...**,*Chris M. Thomasson***Re: fwiw, generating perfect squares without multiplication...**,*William Elliot*

**Re: fwiw, generating perfect squares without multiplication...**,*robersi730***Re: fwiw, generating perfect squares without multiplication...**,*John Gabriel***Re: fwiw, generating perfect squares without multiplication...**,*Chris M. Thomasson*

**Re: fwiw, generating perfect squares without multiplication...**,*Ken Pledger*

**Re: Union and sum of infinite cardinals**,*Sandy***Re: Union and sum of infinite cardinals**,*FredJeffries***Re: Union and sum of infinite cardinals**,*David Hartley***Re: Union and sum of infinite cardinals**,*Sandy***Re: Union and sum of infinite cardinals**,*Zeit Geist*

**Re: Union and sum of infinite cardinals**,*Seymour J.*

**Re: 1.82 - Troll Dan Christensen**,*John Gabriel******* TROLL ALLERT ******,*Dan Christensen*- <Possible follow-ups>
**Re: 1.82 - Troll Dan Christensen**,*John Gabriel***Re: 1.82 - Troll Dan Christensen**,*John Gabriel Sr.***Re: 1.82 - Retrospective abortion**,*Port563***Re: 1.82 - Retrospective abortion**,*John Gabriel*

**Re: 1.82 - Troll Dan Christensen**,*John Gabriel*

**Try to keep quotes of John Gabriel to a minimum**,*Dan Christensen***Re: Try to keep quotes of John Gabriel to a minimum**,*Dan Christensen***Re: Try to keep quotes of John Gabriel to a minimum**,*John Gabriel***Re: Try to keep quotes of John Gabriel to a minimum**,*Space998*

**Missouri Stste University Problem Corner**,*Les***Re: Solution Manuals Available now in PDF!**,*caray42***Police Pigs vs Our Valiant Military**,*Kevin Barry***3.11 - The URL http://thenewcalculus.weebly.com is now banned on the Wikipedia ***ica!**,*John Gabriel***Re: 3.11 - The URL http://thenewcalculus.weebly.com is now banned on the Wikipedia ***ica!**,*dullrich***Re: 3.11 - The URL http://thenewcalculus.weebly.com is now banned on the Wikipedia ***ica!**,*John Gabriel***Re: 3.11 - The URL http://thenewcalculus.weebly.com is now banned on the Wikipedia ***ica!**,*John Gabriel*

**How to nail a pudding to the wall**,*"Jürgen R."***Continuity of Relations**,*William Elliot***Re: Continuity of Relations**,*Mike Terry***Re: Continuity of Relations**,*Seymour J.*

**Debunking Cantor's Diagonal Argument and other delusions in mythmatics.**,*John Gabriel***Re: Debunking Cantor's Diagonal Argument and other delusions in mythmatics.**,*dullrich******* TROLL ALERT ******,*Dan Christensen***Re: Debunking Cantor's Diagonal Argument and other delusions in mythmatics.**,*John Gabriel***Re: Debunking Cantor's Diagonal Argument and other delusions in mythmatics.**,*John Gabriel***Re: Debunking Cantor's Diagonal Argument and other delusions in mythmatics.**,*John Gabriel*

**IS EINSTEIN'S LIGHT POSTULATE EXPERIMENTALLY CONFIRMED ?**,*Pentcho Valev***Re: IS EINSTEIN'S LIGHT POSTULATE EXPERIMENTALLY CONFIRMED ?**,*Pentcho Valev*

**Re: Stirlings approximation for factorial**,*luirotorres***Re: Stirlings approximation for factorial**,*Ross A. Finlayson***Re: Stirlings approximation for factorial**,*Herman Rubin*

**Historic new proof of the Pythagorean Theorem that reveals far more than older proofs #2033 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Re: Historic new proof of the Pythagorean Theorem that reveals far more than older proofs #2033 Correcting Math**,*Chris M. Thomasson***the most clear Pythagorean theorem proof possible #2034 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Re: the most clear Pythagorean theorem proof possible #2034 Correcting Math**,*Zeit Geist***smallest PPT #2035 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***a proof nearly in hand, so quickly when I promised slow #2036 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Euclid's formula helps the proof #2037 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***gain a less general proof but lose the Formula for primes #2038 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***new attempt of a formula for ordering all the primes in succession #2039 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***using PPT can we strengthen x/Ln(x) #2040 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***statistics table to improve x/Ln(x) #2041 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***A new technique that perhaps is a formula to tell if a random odd number is prime #2042 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Formula that lists all the primes in orderly sequence #2043 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***no counterexamples as of yet Re: Formula that lists all the primes in orderly sequence #2044 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Re: no counterexamples as of yet Re: Formula that lists all the primes in orderly sequence #2044 Correcting Math**,*bert***the infallible Prime test and is the only Formula incorruptable for Primes #2045 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***finally, the Formula that yields all the primes in orderly succession #2046 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Re: finally, the Formula that yields all the primes in orderly succession #2046 Correcting Math**,*bert***why the Goldwasser Killian test is but a morphed version of Square Root test #2047 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Square Root test superior to the Goldwasser Kilian test #2048 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Re: Square Root test superior to the Goldwasser Kilian test #2048 Correcting Math**,*bert***Re: Square Root test superior to the Goldwasser Kilian test #2048 Correcting Math**,*Space998*

**Re: Historic new proof of the Pythagorean Theorem that reveals far more than older proofs #2033 Correcting Math**,*bert***Re: Historic new proof of the Pythagorean Theorem that reveals far more than older proofs #2033 Correcting Math**,*bill**Space998***A^2 = (C+B)(C-B) questioned**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Re: A^2 = (C+B)(C-B) questioned**,*Space998*

**Modern Day Proof of Pythagorean Theorem that is far better than any previous proof #2032 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***104797092792063 takes 1115 iterations (Collatz) to reach 1**,*David Bernier***Re: 104797092792063 takes 1115 iterations (Collatz) to reach 1**,*David Bernier***Re: 104797092792063 takes 1115 iterations (Collatz) to reach 1**,*David Bernier***Re: 104797092792063 takes 1115 iterations (Collatz) to reach 1**,*David Bernier***Re: 104797092792063 takes 1115 iterations (Collatz) to reach 1**,*David Bernier*

**Question on Prime Ordinals**,*Dick***Question on Prime Ordinals**,*Ross A. Finlayson***Re: Question on Prime Ordinals**,*Space998*

**Re: Question on Prime Ordinals**,*FredJeffries*

**Re: I need "Classical Mechanics Solutions Manual (Goldstein)"**,*maria . ancy228***Port563 is a ***! That's rhetorical hyperbole.**,*John Gabriel***Re: Port563 is a ***! That's rhetorical hyperbole.**,*Classic Bob***Re: Port563 is a ***! That's rhetorical hyperbole.**,*Freda Pinkey***Re: Port563 is a ***! That's rhetorical hyperbole.**,*Chris M. Thomasson***Re: Port563 is a ***! That's rhetorical hyperbole.**,*John Gabriel*

**Re: Port563 is a ***! That's rhetorical hyperbole.**,*John Gabriel*

**hlo........help me plz**,*newking9088***Re: hlo........help me plz**,*Freda Pinkey*

**Compact Element**,*William Elliot***Re: Compact Element**,*dullrich***Re: Compact Element**,*William Elliot*

**3.10 - The scum that is Judge Richard Posner, Georg Cantor and the Dilworth Lawsuit.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 3.10 - The scum that is Judge Richard Posner, Georg Cantor and the Dilworth Lawsuit.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 3.10 - The scum that is Judge Richard Posner, Georg Cantor and the Dilworth Lawsuit.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 3.10 - The scum that is Judge Richard Posner, Georg Cantor and the Dilworth Lawsuit.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 3.10 - The scum that is Judge Richard Posner, Georg Cantor and the Dilworth Lawsuit.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 3.10 - The scum that is Judge Richard Posner, Georg Cantor and the Dilworth Lawsuit.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 3.10 - The scum that is Judge Richard Posner, Georg Cantor and the Dilworth Lawsuit.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 3.10 - The scum that is Judge Richard Posner, Georg Cantor and the Dilworth Lawsuit.**,*Freda Pinkey***Re: 3.10 - The scum that is Judge Richard Posner, Georg Cantor and the Dilworth Lawsuit.**,*dullrich***Re: 3.10 - The scum that is Judge Richard Posner, Georg Cantor and the Dilworth Lawsuit.**,*dullrich***Re: 3.10 - The scum that is Judge Richard Posner, Georg Cantor and the Dilworth Lawsuit.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 3.10 - The scum that is Judge Richard Posner, Georg Cantor and the Dilworth Lawsuit.**,*dullrich***Re: 3.10 - The scum that is Judge Richard Posner, Georg Cantor and the Dilworth Lawsuit.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 3.10 - The scum that is Judge Richard Posner, Georg Cantor and the Dilworth Lawsuit.**,*Space998***Re: 3.10 - The scum that is Judge Richard Posner, Georg Cantor and the Dilworth Lawsuit.**,*Space998*

**Re: 3.10 - The scum that is Judge Richard Posner, Georg Cantor and the Dilworth Lawsuit.**,*John Gabriel*

**Re: solutions manual computer systems design and architecture**,*dvkits***"We made from water every living thing"...**,*BV***Solve f(x) = f(x+dx) for x and dx**,*IV***Re: Solve f(x) = f(x+dx) for x and dx**,*stiefelwhitney***Re: Solve f(x) = f(x+dx) for x and dx**,*Why not***Solve f(x) = f(x+dx) for x and dx**,*drhuang57***Re: Solve f(x) = f(x+dx) for x and dx**,*IV***Re: Solve f(x) = f(x+dx) for x and dx**,*John Gabriel***Re: Solve f(x) = f(x+dx) for x and dx**,*John Gabriel***Re: Solve f(x) = f(x+dx) for x and dx**,*Freda Pinkey***Re: Solve f(x) = f(x+dx) for x and dx**,*IV***Re: Solve f(x) = f(x+dx) for x and dx**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Solve f(x) = f(x+dx) for x and dx**,*John Gabriel*

**Re: Solve f(x) = f(x+dx) for x and dx**,*Freda Pinkey*

**Re: DigiWx MILF Jennifer L. Racey Decker**,*digiwx***30 Mod Prime Algorithm (8 Prime Spirals) fastest prime generator says PyPrimes**,*drprincetonu***DECELERATION OF FALLING LIGHT IN RELATIVITY ?**,*Pentcho Valev***Re: DECELERATION OF FALLING LIGHT IN RELATIVITY ?**,*Pentcho Valev***Re: DECELERATION OF FALLING LIGHT IN RELATIVITY ?**,*Pentcho Valev*

**The Delusional Hindu**,*Kevin Barry***Tarski's AxC**,*William Elliot***Re: Tarski's AxC**,*K-theory***Re: Tarski's AxC**,*Peter Percival***Re: Tarski's AxC**,*Peter Percival***Re: Tarski's AxC**,*Herman Rubin***Re: Tarski's AxC**,*William Elliot***Re: Tarski's AxC**,*richard miller*

**Re: Tarski's AxC**,*K-theory***Re: Tarski's AxC**,*William Elliot***Re: Tarski's AxC**,*William Elliot***Re: Tarski's AxC**,*quasi***Re: Tarski's AxC**,*William Elliot***Re: Tarski's AxC**,*JohnF***Re: Tarski's AxC**,*quasi*

**Formula for producing all the primes in succession #2025 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***first math formula that produces all the primes in orderly succession #2026 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Re: first math formula that produces all the primes in orderly succession #2026 Correcting Math**,*Space998***Re: first math formula that produces all the primes in orderly succession #2026 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***producing Primitive Pythagorean Triples from knowing a prime #2028 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***producing perfect squares Re: producing Primitive Pythagorean Triples from knowing a prime #2029 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***does my new formula pose a security threat to economics and government? #2030 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***some conjectures of Primitive Pythagorean Triples #2031 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Re: producing Primitive Pythagorean Triples from knowing a prime #2028 Correcting Math**,*Chris M. Thomasson***can you do a proof?**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Re: can you do a proof?**,*Chris M. Thomasson***Re: can you do a proof?**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: can you do a proof?**,*Chris M. Thomasson***Re: can you do a proof?**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: can you do a proof?**,*Chris M. Thomasson***Re: can you do a proof?**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: can you do a proof?**,*Chris M. Thomasson***Re: can you do a proof?**,*Chris M. Thomasson***Re: can you do a proof?**,*Chris M. Thomasson***Re: can you do a proof?**,*Chris M. Thomasson***Re: producing Primitive Pythagorean Triples from knowing a prime #2028 Correcting Math**,*Chris M. Thomasson***Re: producing Primitive Pythagorean Triples from knowing a prime #2028 Correcting Math**,*Chris M. Thomasson***Re: producing Primitive Pythagorean Triples from knowing a prime #2028 Correcting Math**,*quasi***can Quasi perform the proof? Is consecutive equal to successive? Re: producing Primitive Pythagorean Triples from knowing a prime**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Modern Day Proof of Pythagorean Theorem that is far better than any previous proof #2032 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Re: Modern Day Proof of Pythagorean Theorem that is far better than any previous proof #2032 Correcting Math**,*Space998***not a formula yet**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Re: not a formula yet**,*bert***New try at the formula for rendering all Primes in succession**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Re: New try at the formula for rendering all Primes in succession**,*Space998***Re: Modern Day Proof of Pythagorean Theorem that is far better than any previous proof #2032 Correcting Math**,*Space998***Re: producing Primitive Pythagorean Triples from knowing a prime #2028 Correcting Math**,*Chris M. Thomasson***Re: producing Primitive Pythagorean Triples from knowing a prime #2028 Correcting Math**,*quasi***Re: producing Primitive Pythagorean Triples from knowing a prime #2028 Correcting Math**,*Chris M. Thomasson*

**Stanford Univ math professors endorse proof of Goldbach to arxiv**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Re: Stanford Univ math professors endorse proof of Goldbach to arxiv**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Re: Stanford Univ math professors endorse proof of Goldbach to arxiv**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Re: Stanford Univ math professors endorse proof of Goldbach to arxiv**,*Archimedes Plutonium*

**Re: Stanford Univ math professors endorse proof of Goldbach to arxiv**,*Dan Christensen*

**EINSTEIN'S MAD SECOND POSTULATE**,*Pentcho Valev***Re: EINSTEIN'S MAD SECOND POSTULATE**,*Pentcho Valev***Re: EINSTEIN'S MAD SECOND POSTULATE**,*Pentcho Valev***Re: EINSTEIN'S MAD SECOND POSTULATE**,*Pentcho Valev*

**Re: Non-mathematician about matrices - 1**,*Bill***Re: 2.94 - The New Calculus is the first and only rigorous formulation in history.**,*Freda Pinkey*- <Possible follow-ups>
**Re: 2.94 - The New Calculus is the first and only rigorous formulation in history.**,*Freda Pinkey***Re: 2.94 - The New Calculus is the first and only rigorous formulation in history.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.94 - The New Calculus is the first and only rigorous formulation in history.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.94 - The New Calculus is the first and only rigorous formulation in history.**,*John Gabriel*

**Englisch terms ''composited, composed, component function''?**,*IV***Re: Englisch terms ''composited, composed, component function''?**,*William Elliot***Re: Englisch terms ''composited, composed, component function''?**,*Pirx42***Re: Englisch terms ''composited, composed, component function''?**,*John Gabriel***Re: Englisch terms ''composited, composed, component function''?**,*IV***Re: Englisch terms ''composited, composed, component function''?**,*IV***Re: Englisch terms ''composited, composed, component function''?**,*Pirx42***Re: Englisch terms ''composited, composed, component function''?**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Englisch terms ''composited, composed, component function''?**,*Pirx42***Re: Englisch terms ''composited, composed, component function''?**,*IV***Re: Englisch terms ''composited, composed, component function''?**,*Pirx42*

**Re: Englisch terms ''composited, composed, component function''?**,*Arturo Magidin*

**A sci.math True/False quiz on harmonic functions**,*Paul***Re: A sci.math True/False quiz on harmonic functions**,*John Dawkins***Re: A sci.math True/False quiz on harmonic functions**,*David C. Ullrich***Re: A sci.math True/False quiz on harmonic functions**,*John Dawkins***Re: A sci.math True/False quiz on harmonic functions**,*dullrich***Re: A sci.math True/False quiz on harmonic functions**,*John Dawkins***Re: A sci.math True/False quiz on harmonic functions**,*dullrich***Re: A sci.math True/False quiz on harmonic functions**,*Paul***Re: A sci.math True/False quiz on harmonic functions**,*Peter Percival***Re: A sci.math True/False quiz on harmonic functions**,*Paul***Re: A sci.math True/False quiz on harmonic functions**,*dullrich***Re: A sci.math True/False quiz on harmonic functions**,*Paul***Re: A sci.math True/False quiz on harmonic functions**,*David C. Ullrich***Re: A sci.math True/False quiz on harmonic functions**,*Paul***Re: A sci.math True/False quiz on harmonic functions**,*Peter Percival*

**3.09 - Weights and measures.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 3.09 - Weights and measures.**,*Freda Pinkey******* TROLL ALERT ******,*Dan Christensen***Re: 3.09 - Weights and measures.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 3.09 - Weights and measures.**,*Freda Pinkey*

**3.08 - We have completed the first three lessons on Euclid!**,*John Gabriel***Re: 3.08 - We have completed the first three lessons on Euclid!**,*Freda Pinkey******* TROLL ALERT ******,*Dan Christensen***Re: 3.08 - We have completed the first three lessons on Euclid!**,*John Gabriel***Re: 3.08 - We have completed the first three lessons on Euclid!**,*John Gabriel***Re: 3.08 - We have completed the first three lessons on Euclid!**,*Helen Yeller***Re: 3.08 - We have completed the first three lessons on Euclid!**,*John Gabriel***Re: 3.08 - We have completed the first three lessons on Euclid!**,*John Gabriel*

**3.07 - Whatever I imagine is real, because whatever I imagine is well defined.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 3.07 - Whatever I imagine is real, because whatever I imagine is well defined.**,*Freda Pinkey***Re: 3.07 - Whatever I imagine is real, because whatever I imagine is well defined.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 3.07 - Whatever I imagine is real, because whatever I imagine is well defined.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 3.07 - Whatever I imagine is real, because whatever I imagine is well defined.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 3.07 - Whatever I imagine is real, because whatever I imagine is well defined.**,*John Gabriel*

**3.08 - Asymptotes are a *** idea.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 3.08 - Asymptotes are a *** idea.**,*Helen Yeller***Re: 3.08 - Asymptotes are a *** idea.**,*Freda Pinkey*

**WHAT DID MICHELSON AND MORLEY REFUTE ?**,*Pentcho Valev***Re: WHAT DID MICHELSON AND MORLEY REFUTE ?**,*Pentcho Valev***Re: WHAT DID MICHELSON AND MORLEY REFUTE ?**,*Pentcho Valev*

**3.06 - Part 1 - Let's learn about magnitudes.**,*John Gabriel***any q from .6 to 1.6**,*freymudd***Re: 3.06 - Part 1 - Let's learn about magnitudes.**,*Freda Pinkey******* TROLL ALERT ****.**,*Dan Christensen***Re: 3.06 - Part 1 - Let's learn about magnitudes.**,*Helen Yeller***Re: 3.06 - Part 1 - Let's learn about magnitudes.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 3.06 - Part 1 - Let's learn about magnitudes.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 3.06 - Part 1 - Let's learn about magnitudes.**,*norman***let's play euclidean potentate**,*Space998***Re: let's play euclidean potentate**,*Space998***Re: let's play euclidean potentate**,*John Gabriel***let's play stupid, you**,*Space998*

**Who discussed in RL with idiots like WM?**,*K-theory***Re: Who discussed in RL with idiots like WM?**,*stiefelwhitney***Re: Who discussed in RL with idiots like WM?**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Who discussed in RL with idiots like WM?**,*stiefelwhitney***Re: Who discussed in RL with idiots like WM?**,*Zeit Geist*

**Re: Please explain infinity to me!**,*John Gabriel***3.05 - I am teaching Euclid at Space Time and The Universe.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 3.05 - I am teaching Euclid at Space Time and The Universe.**,*Jamshib al-Kashi******* TROLL ALERT ******,*Dan Christensen***Re: 3.05 - I am teaching Euclid at Space Time and The Universe.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 3.05 - I am teaching Euclid at Space Time and The Universe.**,*Jamshib al-Kashi*

**Re: 3.05 - I am teaching Euclid at Space Time and The Universe.**,*Freda Pinkey***Re: 3.05 - I am teaching Euclid at Space Time and The Universe.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 3.05 - I am teaching Euclid at Space Time and The Universe.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 3.05 - I am teaching Euclid at Space Time and The Universe.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 3.05 - I am teaching Euclid at Space Time and The Universe.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 3.05 - I am teaching Euclid at Space Time and The Universe.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 3.05 - I am teaching Euclid at Space Time and The Universe.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 3.05 - I am teaching Euclid at Space Time and The Universe.**,*John Gabriel*

**non homework question- to see who in sci math is up to snuff**,*Jamshib al-Kashi***new Conjecture Primes the sum or subtraction of two perfect squares Re: professors of Stanford endorsing proof of Goldbach to arxiv**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Re: new Conjecture Primes the sum or subtraction of two perfect squares #2019 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Re: new Conjecture Primes the sum or subtraction of two perfect squares #2020 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Re: new Conjecture Primes the sum or subtraction of two perfect squares**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Re: new Conjecture Primes the sum or subtraction of two perfect squares**,*Archimedes Plutonium***439 and does it have perfect squares? Re: new Conjecture Primes the sum or subtraction of two perfect squares**,*Archimedes Plutonium***conjecture still holding up Re: new Conjecture Primes the sum or subtraction of two perfect squares**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Starting to piece together of proof of this Conjecture-- add or subtract two perfect squares yields all the primes**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Proof of the Conjecture-- subtract two perfect squares yields all the primes beyond 3 #2020 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Proof of the Conjecture-- subtract two perfect squares yields all the primes 3 and beyond #2021 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Re: Proof of the Conjecture-- subtract two perfect squares yields all the primes 3 and beyond #2022 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Formula for Primes when interpolating add with subtract #2023 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***the glimmer of a Formula for producing all the primes in succession #2024 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Re: the glimmer of a Formula for producing all the primes in succession #2024 Correcting Math**,*Helen Yeller***Re: new Conjecture Primes the sum or subtraction of two perfect squares**,*Archimedes Plutonium*

**Solutions needed**,*Jamshib al-Kashi***a Mathematical Induction in geometry-- Grid system induction #2018 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Re: 3.03 - Cauchy proves Riemann wrong**,*Jamshib al-Kashi***Surpring fact about the digits of square root of two**,*Vincent Granville***Re: digits of square root of two**,*William Elliot***Re: Surpring fact about the digits of square root of two**,*John Jones*

**Re: Attention: Please read this if you are new to sci.math.**,*John Gabriel*- <Possible follow-ups>
**Re: Attention: Please read this if you are new to sci.math.**,*John Gabriel***Re: Attention: Please read this if you are new to sci.math.**,*John Gabriel*

**Re: Princeton Univ math professors endorsing Beal & FLT proofs to arxiv**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Re: Princeton Univ math professors endorsing Beal & FLT proofs to arxiv**,*Space998*- <Possible follow-ups>
**Re: Princeton Univ math professors endorsing Beal & FLT proofs to arxiv**,*Space998***Re: Princeton Univ math professors endorsing Beal & FLT proofs to arxiv**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Re: Princeton Univ math professors endorsing Beal & FLT proofs to arxiv**,*Archimedes Plutonium*

**Re: professors of MIT endorse proof to arxiv that Maxwell Equations derive Peano Axioms**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Re: professors of MIT endorse proof to arxiv that Maxwell Equations derive Peano Axioms**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Re: professors of MIT endorse proof to arxiv that Maxwell Equations derive Peano Axioms**,*Archimedes Plutonium*

- <Possible follow-ups>
**Re: professors of MIT endorse proof to arxiv that Maxwell Equations derive Peano Axioms**,*Dan Christensen***T. Barron & Janet Williams of University of Western Ontario note about Dan Christensen**,*Archimedes Plutonium*

**Re: professors of MIT endorse proof to arxiv that Maxwell Equations derive Peano Axioms**,*Charlie-Boo*

**3.04 - What is Archimedes' property or axiom?**,*John Gabriel******* TROLL ALERT ******,*Dan Christensen***Re: 3.04 - What is Archimedes' property or axiom?**,*John Gabriel***Re: 3.04 - What is Archimedes' property or axiom?**,*John Gabriel***Re: 3.04 - What is Archimedes' property or axiom?**,*Jamshib al-Kashi*

**Re: 3.04 - What is Archimedes' property or axiom?**,*John Gabriel***Re: 3.04 - What is Archimedes' property or axiom?**,*John Gabriel***Re: 3.04 - What is Archimedes' property or axiom?**,*Freda Pinkey*

**Re: 3.04 - What is Archimedes' property or axiom?**,*John Gabriel***Re: 3.04 - What is Archimedes' property or axiom?**,*John Gabriel***Re: 3.04 - What is Archimedes' property or axiom?**,*John Gabriel***Re: 3.04 - What is Archimedes' property or axiom?**,*John Gabriel***Re: 3.04 - What is Archimedes' property or axiom?**,*John Gabriel***Re: 3.04 - What is Archimedes' property or axiom?**,*Space998***Re: 3.04 - What is Archimedes' property or axiom?**,*John Gabriel***no**,*Space998***Re: no**,*John Gabriel***Re: no**,*Space998*

**Hartogs Number**,*William Elliot***Re: Hartogs Number**,*David Hartley***Re: Hartogs Number**,*William Elliot***Re: Hartogs Number**,*David Hartley***Re: Hartogs Number**,*Herman Rubin*

**Well Ordered**,*William Elliot***Re: Well Ordered**,*dullrich***Re: Well Ordered**,*William Elliot*

**Re: Well Ordered**,*Seymour J.***Re: Well Ordered**,*William Elliot***Re: Well Ordered**,*Seymour J.*

**3.03 - ALL my Geogebra applets can be accessed easily.**,*John Gabriel******* TROLL ALERT ******,*Dan Christensen***Re: 3.03 - ALL my Geogebra applets can be accessed easily.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 3.03 - ALL my Geogebra applets can be accessed easily.**,*Jamshib al-Kashi*

**Re: 3.03 - ALL my Geogebra applets can be accessed easily.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 3.03 - ALL my Geogebra applets can be accessed easily.**,*Jamshib al-Kashi*

**Re: 3.03 - ALL my Geogebra applets can be accessed easily.**,*Eduardo Dorknado***Re: 3.03 - ALL my Geogebra applets can be accessed easily.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 3.03 - ALL my Geogebra applets can be accessed easily.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 3.03 - ALL my Geogebra applets can be accessed easily.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 3.03 - ALL my Geogebra applets can be accessed easily.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 3.03 - ALL my Geogebra applets can be accessed easily.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 3.03 - ALL my Geogebra applets can be accessed easily.**,*John Gabriel*

**DIVINE EINSTEIN IMPOSES LAWS ON NATURE**,*Pentcho Valev***Re: DIVINE EINSTEIN IMPOSES LAWS ON NATURE**,*Pentcho Valev***Re: DIVINE EINSTEIN IMPOSES LAWS ON NATURE**,*Pentcho Valev*

**Re: professors of Yale endorse 5 Color Mapping proof and valid Jordan Curve proof to arxiv**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Re: professors of Yale endorse 5 Color Mapping proof and valid Jordan Curve proof to arxiv**,*Space998*- <Possible follow-ups>
**Re: professors of Yale endorse 5 Color Mapping proof and valid Jordan Curve proof to arxiv**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Re: professors of Yale endorse 5 Color Mapping proof and valid Jordan Curve proof to arxiv**,*Dan Christensen*

**Excellent Free math book The Origins of Cauchy's Rigorous Calculus by Judith V. Grabiner**,*Jamshīb al-Kāshī***Cambridge Univ endorse proof of No Odd Perfect to arxiv**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Re: Cambridge Univ endorse proof of No Odd Perfect to arxiv**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Re: Cambridge Univ endorse proof of No Odd Perfect to arxiv**,*Dan Christensen***University of Western Ontario, J. Adamus, A. Boivin questions on No Odd Perfect**,*Archimedes Plutonium*

**math professors Univ Michigan endorse Kepler Packing Proof to arxiv**,*Archimedes Plutonium***arxiv THIS**,*Space998***Re: arxiv THIS**,*Space998*

**Re: math professors Univ Michigan endorse Kepler Packing Proof to arxiv**,*Archimedes Plutonium***literacy, in other word**,*Space998***adieu**,*Space998*

**3.02 - The Great Plagiarists: Dedekind, Riemann and Cauchy**,*John Gabriel***Re: 3.02 - The Great Plagiarists: Dedekind, Riemann and Cauchy**,*Jamshīb al-Kāshī***Re: 3.02 - The Great Plagiarists: Dedekind, Riemann and Cauchy**,*Wipe A Rat******* TROLL ALERT ******,*Dan Christensen***commetn alert**,*Space998*

**Re: 3.02 - The Great Plagiarists: Dedekind, Riemann and Cauchy**,*John Gabriel***Re: 3.02 - The Great Plagiarists: Dedekind, Riemann and Cauchy**,*Jamshib al-Kashi*

**Re: 3.02 - The Great Plagiarists: Dedekind, Riemann and Cauchy**,*John Gabriel***Re: 3.02 - The Great Plagiarists: Dedekind, Riemann and Cauchy**,*Jamshib al-Kashi***Re: 3.02 - The Great Plagiarists: Dedekind, Riemann and Cauchy**,*Jamshib al-Kashi*

**Re: 3.02 - The Great Plagiarists: Dedekind, Riemann and Cauchy**,*John Gabriel***Re: 3.02 - The Great Plagiarists: Dedekind, Riemann and Cauchy**,*John Gabriel***Re: 3.02 - The Great Plagiarists: Dedekind, Riemann and Cauchy**,*John Gabriel***3.14, ye olde skriptkitty**,*Space998***Re: 3.14, ye olde skriptkitty**,*John Gabriel***Re: 3.14, ye olde skriptkitty**,*Wipe A Rat***Re: 3.14, ye olde skriptkitty**,*Space998*

**Re: 3.02 - The Great Plagiarists: Dedekind, Riemann and Cauchy**,*John Gabriel*

**2.9999999 John Gabriel presents "Chuckle Calculus" for the mentally impaired**,*Jamshīb al-Kāshī***3.01 - Which comments carry the most weight and influence?**,*John Gabriel******* TROLL ALERT ******,*Dan Christensen***Re: 3.01 - Which comments carry the most weight and influence?**,*Jamshīb al-Kāshī***Re: 3.01 - Which comments carry the most weight and influence?**,*John Gabriel***Re: 3.01 - Which comments carry the most weight and influence?**,*John Gabriel***Re: 3.01 - Which comments carry the most weight and influence?**,*John Gabriel*

**********************************************************************************************************************.**,*grahamcooper7*********************************************** NEW FOUNDATIONS ***********************************************,*grahamcooper7*************************************************************************************************************************,*grahamcooper7***Re: What exactly is Truth? (somewhat formalized)**,*Tim Golden BandTech.com*- <Possible follow-ups>
**Re: What exactly is Truth? (somewhat formalized)**,*John Gabriel***Re: What exactly is Truth? (somewhat formalized)**,*Tim Golden BandTech.com*

**3.00 - What are infinitesimals...**,*John Gabriel******* TROLL ALERT ******,*Dan Christensen***Re: 3.00 - What are infinitesimals...**,*John Gabriel***Re: 3.00 - What are infinitesimals...**,*Space998*

**Re: 3.00 - What are infinitesimals...**,*John Gabriel***Re: 3.00 - What are infinitesimals...**,*John Gabriel***Re: 3.00 - What are infinitesimals...**,*freymudd***Re: 3.00 - What are infinitesimals...**,*Freda Pinkey*

**Re: 3.00 - What are infinitesimals...**,*John Gabriel***Re: 3.00 - What are infinitesimals...**,*Freda Pinkey*

**Re: 3.00 - What are infinitesimals...**,*John Gabriel***Re: 3.00 - What are infinitesimals...**,*Freda Pinkey*

**Re: 3.00 - What are infinitesimals...**,*John Gabriel***zero isn't a number, any more than infinity**,*Space998***Re: 3.00 - What are infinitesimals...**,*Freda Pinkey*

**Re: 3.00 - What are infinitesimals...**,*John Gabriel***Re: 3.00 - What are infinitesimals...**,*Space998*

**Maclaurin Solution for Angle Subtending Arc and Chord**,*humbled survivor***Re: Maclaurin Solution for Angle Subtending Arc and Chord**,*Roland Franzius***Re: Maclaurin Solution for Angle Subtending Arc and Chord**,*humbled survivor*

**2.99 - Judith Grabiner and her junk on Cauchy's non-rigorous calculus**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.99 - Judith Grabiner and her junk on Cauchy's non-rigorous calculus**,*Jamshīb al-Kāshī******* TROLL ALERT ******,*Dan Christensen***Re: 2.99 - Judith Grabiner and her junk on Cauchy's non-rigorous calculus**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.99 - Judith Grabiner and her junk on Cauchy's non-rigorous calculus**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.99 - Judith Grabiner and her junk on Cauchy's non-rigorous calculus**,*Wipe A Rat***Re: 2.99 - Judith Grabiner and her junk on Cauchy's non-rigorous calculus**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.99 - Judith Grabiner and her junk on Cauchy's non-rigorous calculus**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.99 - Judith Grabiner and her junk on Cauchy's non-rigorous calculus**,*John Gabriel*

**THE EINSTEIN THREAD -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------**,*grahamcooper7***Re: 2.82 - How the debate with feeble minded Mark Chu Carroll would have ended...**,*John Gabriel*- <Possible follow-ups>
**Re: 2.82 - How the debate with feeble minded Mark Chu Carroll would have ended...**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.82 - How the debate with feeble minded Mark Chu Carroll would have ended...**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.82 - How the debate with feeble minded Mark Chu Carroll would have ended...**,*John Gabriel*

**Re: 2.96 - Geogebra terminates my account because they don't like my content.**,*John Gabriel*- <Possible follow-ups>
**Re: 2.96 - Geogebra terminates my account because they don't like my content.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.96 - Geogebra terminates my account because they don't like my content.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.96 - Geogebra terminates my account because they don't like my content.**,*John Gabriel*

**2.98 - Love or hate John Gabriel, you better start learning the New Calculus.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.98 - Love or hate John Gabriel, you better start learning the New Calculus.**,*Jamshīb al-Kāshī******* TROLL ALERT ******,*Dan Christensen***Re: 2.98 - Love or hate John Gabriel, you better start learning the New Calculus.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.98 - Love or hate John Gabriel, you better start learning the New Calculus.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.98 - Love or hate John Gabriel, you better start learning the New Calculus.**,*Wipe A Rat***Re: 2.98 - Love or hate John Gabriel, you better start learning the New Calculus.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.98 - Love or hate John Gabriel, you better start learning the New Calculus.**,*John Gabriel*

**2.97 - If it's not geometry, it's not mathematics.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.97 - If it's not geometry, it's not mathematics.**,*Jamshīb al-Kāshī***Re: 2.97 - If it's not geometry, it's not mathematics.**,*Space998***Re: 2.97 - If it's not geometry, it's not mathematics.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.97 - If it's not geometry, it's not mathematics.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.97 - If it's not geometry, it's not mathematics.**,*Helen Yeller***Re: 2.97 - If it's not geometry, it's not mathematics.**,*John Gabriel***if it's not proven, is it *mathematica**,*Space998*

**Re: 2.97 - If it's not geometry, it's not mathematics.**,*John Gabriel*

**Re: 2.14 - Why is Gabriel's New Limit Theorem for mainstream mythmatics the first coherent theorem about limits?**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.14 - Why is Gabriel's New Limit Theorem for mainstream mythmatics the first coherent theorem about limits?**,*dullrich*- <Possible follow-ups>
**Re: 2.14 - Why is Gabriel's New Limit Theorem for mainstream mythmatics the first coherent theorem about limits?**,*John Gabriel**John Gabriel**John Gabriel**John Gabriel**John Gabriel**John Gabriel**John Gabriel**John Gabriel**John Gabriel*

**Re: 1.23 - Gabriel's List - A Survey among sci.math visitors.**,*John Gabriel*- <Possible follow-ups>
**Re: 1.23 - Gabriel's List - A Survey among sci.math visitors.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 1.23 - Gabriel's List - A Survey among sci.math visitors.**,*John Gabriel******* TROLL ALERT ******,*Dan Christensen***Re: 1.23 - Gabriel's List - A Survey among sci.math visitors.**,*John Gabriel******* TROLL ALERT ******,*Dan Christensen***Re: 1.23 - Gabriel's List - A Survey among sci.math visitors.**,*Freda Pinkey*

**Re: 1.23 - Gabriel's List - A Survey among sci.math visitors.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 1.23 - Gabriel's List - A Survey among sci.math visitors.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 1.23 - Gabriel's List - A Survey among sci.math visitors.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 1.23 - Gabriel's List - A Survey among sci.math visitors.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 1.23 - Gabriel's List - A Survey among sci.math visitors.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 1.23 - Gabriel's List - A Survey among sci.math visitors.**,*John Gabriel******* TROLL ALERT ******,*Dan Christensen*

**Re: 1.23 - Gabriel's List - A Survey among sci.math visitors.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 1.23 - Gabriel's List - A Survey among sci.math visitors.**,*John Gabriel*

**Re: 2.68 - dullrich puts his foot in his mouth yet again!**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.82 - Zero is not required at all in mathematics, even though it is very useful.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.63 - 0.999... is not equal to 1 or anything else, but itself, whatever it is.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.95 - Dullrich has no reviews on his dissertation.**,*John Gabriel***Eternal September is still in Season on sci.math**,*David Bernier***Re: Eternal September is still in Season on sci.math**,*Phil Carmody***Re: Eternal September is still in Season on sci.math**,*John Jones***Re: Eternal September is still in Season on sci.math**,*David Bernier*

**JSH: the hammer is coming Tweeter connection**,*Jamshīb al-Kāshī***solutions manual and test bank at cheap, discount price, contact directly at discountsmtb(at)hotmail(dot)com**,*smtbhelp*- <Possible follow-ups>
**solutions manual and test bank at cheap, discount price, contact directly at discountsmtb(at)hotmail(dot)com**,*smtbhelp*

**Quaternions and Angular Dynamics Notes - free PDF**,*richard miller***Re: I believe I found the clue on why these huge semi-primes factor so fast with the E.C.M.**,*djoyce099***simplex cycling at optimum possible?**,*Jaakov***Re: simplex cycling at optimum possible?**,*mixed nuts***Re: simplex cycling at optimum possible?**,*Jaakov***Re: simplex cycling at optimum possible?**,*mixed nuts***Re: simplex cycling at optimum possible?**,*danheyman@xxxxxxxxx***Re: simplex cycling at optimum possible?**,*mixed nuts***Re: simplex cycling at optimum possible?**,*danheyman@xxxxxxxxx***Re: simplex cycling at optimum possible?**,*Ray Vickson***Re: simplex cycling at optimum possible?**,*mixed nuts***Re: simplex cycling at optimum possible?**,*Ray Vickson***Re: simplex cycling at optimum possible?**,*mixed nuts***Re: simplex cycling at optimum possible?**,*Ray Vickson*

**Re: simplex cycling at optimum possible?**,*danheyman@xxxxxxxxx*

**Is the***ing cunt John Gabriel still alive?**,*Dave U . Random***Re: Is the***ing cunt John Gabriel still alive?**,*Jamshīb al-Kāshī***Re: Is the***ing cunt John Gabriel still alive?**,*Jamshīb al-Kāshī***Re: Is the***ing cunt John Gabriel still alive?**,*Jamshīb al-Kāshī***Re: Is the***ing cunt John Gabriel still alive?**,*John Gabriel***Re: Is the***ing cunt John Gabriel still alive?**,*Jamshīb al-Kāshī***Re: Is the***ing cunt John Gabriel still alive?**,*John Gabriel*

**Re: 2.97 - Virus, Not content with getting my Geogebra account terminated**,*Henrietta Forskineater***Re: LA SCIENCE EINSTEINIENNE : UN SAUT DANS LE NEANT**,*Pentcho Valev***Re: LA SCIENCE EINSTEINIENNE : UN SAUT DANS LE NEANT**,*Pentcho Valev***Re: LA SCIENCE EINSTEINIENNE : UN SAUT DANS LE NEANT**,*Pentcho Valev***Re: LA SCIENCE EINSTEINIENNE : UN SAUT DANS LE NEANT**,*Pentcho Valev*

**Re: § WM falsely claims that the diagonal argument requires that Cauchy sequences of irrational numbers contain their limit.**,*Virgil***EINSTEINIANS ASK QUESTIONS TO THEMSELVES**,*Pentcho Valev***Re: EINSTEINIANS ASK QUESTIONS TO THEMSELVES**,*Pentcho Valev***Re: EINSTEINIANS ASK QUESTIONS TO THEMSELVES**,*Pentcho Valev***Re: EINSTEINIANS ASK QUESTIONS TO THEMSELVES**,*Pentcho Valev*

**Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Virgil*- <Possible follow-ups>
**Re: Only for mathematicians!**,*Ross A. Finlayson*

**Re: Only for mathematicians, WM Wrong Again, As Usual!!!**,*Virgil***is Apple a company that enjoys people having Eye strain-- never a font setting that is easy**,*Archimedes Plutonium***what is so difficult about engineering a zoom in enlargement of FONT**,*Archimedes Plutonium*

**logic as to why Least Dense theorem would cause Kepler Packing to be a corollary thereof #2014 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Re: logic as to why Least Dense theorem would cause Kepler Packing to be a corollary thereof #2014 Correcting Math**,*Space998***proving Least Dense Conjecture #2015 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Proof of Least Dense Conjecture and Kepler Packing #2016 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Does Surface Density derive the lattice density numbers? 74%, 78% 83%, 90%, 94%, 100% #2017 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium*

**Re: § 535 Solution of Berry's Paradox**,*Virgil*- <Possible follow-ups>
**Re: § 535 Solution of Berry's Paradox**,*Virgil***Re: § 535 Solution of Berry's Paradox**,*Virgil***Re: § 535 Solution of Berry's Paradox**,*Virgil***Re: § 535 Solution of Berry's Paradox**,*Virgil*

**Re: ï¿½ 537 The diagonal argument requires that Cauchy sequences of irrational numbers contain their limit.**,*Virgil***Re: ï¿½ 537 The diagonal argument requires that Cauchy sequences of irrational numbers contain their limit.**,*mueckenh***Re: ï¿½ 537 The diagonal argument requires that Cauchy sequences of irrational numbers contain their limit.**,*Virgil**Ben Bacarisse**mueckenh**Ben Bacarisse**mueckenh**Ben Bacarisse**mueckenh***Re: ï¿½ 537 The diagonal argument requires that Cauchy sequences have a limit.**,*Virgil**Ben Bacarisse**mueckenh***Re:The diagonal argument proves WM wrong!!**,*Virgil***Re: The diagonal argument proves WM wrong!!**,*mueckenh**Ben Bacarisse***Re: i?? 537 The diagonal argument requires that Cauchy sequences of irrational numbers contain their limit.**,*Virgil**Virgil*

*Zeit Geist**mueckenh**Zeit Geist**mueckenh**Virgil**mueckenh***Re: WM falsely claims the diagonal argument requires that Cauchy sequences of irrational numbers contain their limit.**,*Virgil**Virgil**mueckenh***Re: The diagonal argument requires that Cauchy sequences have a limit.**,*Virgil*

**Re: 2.92 - Non-terminating representation has ZERO support in mathematics.**,*Space998*- <Possible follow-ups>
**Re: 2.92 - Non-terminating representation has ZERO support in mathematics.**,*John Gabriel*

**Re: 2.93 - A 'modified form of the usual division algorithm' - Wikipedia ***ica**,*Space998*- <Possible follow-ups>
**Re: 2.93 - A 'modified form of the usual division algorithm' - Wikipedia ***ica**,*emptypost***Re: 2.93 - A 'modified form of the usual division algorithm' - Wikipedia ***ica**,*Space998***Re: 2.93 - A 'modified form of the usual division algorithm' - Wikipedia ***ica**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.93 - A 'modified form of the usual division algorithm' - Wikipedia ***ica**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.93 - A 'modified form of the usual division algorithm' - Wikipedia ***ica**,*emptypost***Re: 2.93 - A 'modified form of the usual division algorithm' - Wikipedia ***ica**,*emptypost***Re: 2.93 - A 'modified form of the usual division algorithm' - Wikipedia ***ica**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.93 - A 'modified form of the usual division algorithm' - Wikipedia ***ica**,*Freda Parkins***Re: 2.93 - A 'modified form of the usual division algorithm' - Wikipedia ***ica**,*Jamshīb al-Kāshī***Re: 2.93 - A 'modified form of the usual division algorithm' - Wikipedia ***ica**,*Freda Parkins***Re: 2.93 - A 'modified form of the usual division algorithm' - Wikipedia ***ica**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.93 - A 'modified form of the usual division algorithm' - Wikipedia ***ica**,*emptypost*

**Re: 2.93 - A 'modified form of the usual division algorithm' - Wikipedia ***ica**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.93 - A 'modified form of the usual division algorithm' - Wikipedia ***ica**,*Space998***Re: 2.93 - A 'modified form of the usual division algorithm' - Wikipedia ***ica**,*konyberg***Re: 2.93 - A 'modified form of the usual division algorithm' - Wikipedia ***ica**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.93 - A 'modified form of the usual division algorithm' - Wikipedia ***ica**,*konyberg***Re: 2.93 - A 'modified form of the usual division algorithm' - Wikipedia ***ica**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.93 - A 'modified form of the usual division algorithm' - Wikipedia ***ica**,*konyberg***Re: 2.93 - A 'modified form of the usual division algorithm' - Wikipedia ***ica**,*konyberg***Re: 2.93 - A 'modified form of the usual division algorithm' - Wikipedia ***ica**,*konyberg***Re: 2.93 - A 'modified form of the usual division algorithm' - Wikipedia ***ica**,*norman***Re: 2.93 - A 'modified form of the usual division algorithm' - Wikipedia ***ica**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.93 - A 'modified form of the usual division algorithm' - Wikipedia ***ica**,*konyberg***Re: 2.93 - A 'modified form of the usual division algorithm' - Wikipedia ***ica**,*konyberg***Re: 2.93 - A 'modified form of the usual division algorithm' - Wikipedia ***ica**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.93 - A 'modified form of the usual division algorithm' - Wikipedia ***ica**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.93 - A 'modified form of the usual division algorithm' - Wikipedia ***ica**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.93 - A 'modified form of the usual division algorithm' - Wikipedia ***ica**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.93 - A 'modified form of the usual division algorithm' - Wikipedia ***ica**,*John Gabriel***division is just arithmetic, which is not a problem of *mathematica**,*Space998***Re: 2.93 - A 'modified form of the usual division algorithm' - Wikipedia ***ica**,*norman***acinoroM**,*Space998***pi >= 3**,*Space998***oh, oh-oh**,*Space998***base_seven calculation for the SVoP**,*Space998***the surfer's value of pi in a few bases**,*Space998***Re: 2.93 - A 'modified form of the usual division algorithm' - Wikipedia ***ica**,*norman***Re: 2.93 - A 'modified form of the usual division algorithm' - Wikipedia ***ica**,*konyberg*

**Re: 2.93 - A 'modified form of the usual division algorithm' - Wikipedia ***ica**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.93 - A 'modified form of the usual division algorithm' - Wikipedia ***ica**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.93 - A 'modified form of the usual division algorithm' - Wikipedia ***ica**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.93 - A 'modified form of the usual division algorithm' - Wikipedia ***ica**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.93 - A 'modified form of the usual division algorithm' - Wikipedia ***ica**,*konyberg***Re: 2.93 - A 'modified form of the usual division algorithm' - Wikipedia ***ica**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.93 - A 'modified form of the usual division algorithm' - Wikipedia ***ica**,*konyberg***Re: 2.93 - A 'modified form of the usual division algorithm' - Wikipedia ***ica**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.93 - A 'modified form of the usual division algorithm' - Wikipedia ***ica**,*konyberg***Re: 2.93 - A 'modified form of the usual division algorithm' - Wikipedia ***ica**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.93 - A 'modified form of the usual division algorithm' - Wikipedia ***ica**,*konyberg***Re: 2.93 - A 'modified form of the usual division algorithm' - Wikipedia ***ica**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.93 - A 'modified form of the usual division algorithm' - Wikipedia ***ica**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: 2.93 - A 'modified form of the usual division algorithm' - Wikipedia ***ica**,*konyberg***Re: 2.93 - A 'modified form of the usual division algorithm' - Wikipedia ***ica**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.93 - A 'modified form of the usual division algorithm' - Wikipedia ***ica**,*konyberg***Re: 2.93 - A 'modified form of the usual division algorithm' - Wikipedia ***ica**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.93 - A 'modified form of the usual division algorithm' - Wikipedia ***ica**,*konyberg***Re: 2.93 - A 'modified form of the usual division algorithm' - Wikipedia ***ica**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.93 - A 'modified form of the usual division algorithm' - Wikipedia ***ica**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.93 - A 'modified form of the usual division algorithm' - Wikipedia ***ica**,*konyberg***Re: 2.93 - A 'modified form of the usual division algorithm' - Wikipedia ***ica**,*konyberg***Re: 2.93 - A 'modified form of the usual division algorithm' - Wikipedia ***ica**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.93 - A 'modified form of the usual division algorithm' - Wikipedia ***ica**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.93 - A 'modified form of the usual division algorithm' - Wikipedia ***ica**,*konyberg***Re: 2.93 - A 'modified form of the usual division algorithm' - Wikipedia ***ica**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.93 - A 'modified form of the usual division algorithm' - Wikipedia ***ica**,*konyberg***Re: 2.93 - A 'modified form of the usual division algorithm' - Wikipedia ***ica**,*konyberg***Re: 2.93 - A 'modified form of the usual division algorithm' - Wikipedia ***ica**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.93 - A 'modified form of the usual division algorithm' - Wikipedia ***ica**,*konyberg***Re: 2.93 - A 'modified form of the usual division algorithm' - Wikipedia ***ica**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.93 - A 'modified form of the usual division algorithm' - Wikipedia ***ica**,*konyberg***Re: 2.93 - A 'modified form of the usual division algorithm' - Wikipedia ***ica**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.93 - A 'modified form of the usual division algorithm' - Wikipedia ***ica**,*konyberg***Re: 2.93 - A 'modified form of the usual division algorithm' - Wikipedia ***ica**,*konyberg***Re: 2.93 - A 'modified form of the usual division algorithm' - Wikipedia ***ica**,*konyberg***Re: 2.93 - A 'modified form of the usual division algorithm' - Wikipedia ***ica**,*Soap Research***Re: 2.93 - A 'modified form of the usual division algorithm' - Wikipedia ***ica**,*John Gabriel***you are just a tyro**,*Space998***Re: 2.93 - A 'modified form of the usual division algorithm' - Wikipedia ***ica**,*John Gabriel*

**Re: 2.93 - A 'modified form of the usual division algorithm' - Wikipedia ***ica**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.93 - A 'modified form of the usual division algorithm' - Wikipedia ***ica**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.93 - A 'modified form of the usual division algorithm' - Wikipedia ***ica**,*John Gabriel*

**les cleep du gahbahj**,*Space998***Re: les cleep du gahbahj**,*Space998*

**Re: Reals between 0,1 and n/d in integers**,*Space998***Re: Reals between 0,1 and n/d in integers**,*Ross A. Finlayson***Re: Reals between 0,1 and n/d in integers**,*Ross A. Finlayson***Re: Reals between 0,1 and n/d in integers**,*Ross A. Finlayson***Re: Reals between 0,1 and n/d in integers**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Reals between 0,1 and n/d in integers**,*Ross A. Finlayson***Re: Reals between 0,1 and n/d in integers**,*Ross A. Finlayson*

**Re: § 537 The diagonal argument requires that Cauchy sequences of irrational numbers contain their limit.**,*Zeit Geist***Re: § 537 The diagonal argument requires that Cauchy sequences of irrational numbers contain their limit.**,*mueckenh***Re: § 537 The diagonal argument requires that Cauchy sequences of irrational numbers contain their limit.**,*Virgil**Virgil**Zeit Geist**mueckenh**Zeit Geist**mueckenh**Ben Bacarisse**mueckenh***Re: § 537 The diagonal argument proves WM WRONG!**,*Virgil**Ben Bacarisse**mueckenh***Re: The diagonal argument requires that Cauchy sequences of irrational numbers have a limit.**,*Virgil***Re: The diagonal argument requires that Cauchy sequences of irrational numbers have a limit.**,*Zeit Geist***Re: The diagonal argument requires that Cauchy sequences of irrational numbers have a limit.**,*Virgil***Re: The diagonal argument requires that Cauchy sequences of irrational numbers have a limit.**,*Ralf Bader***Re: The diagonal argument requires that Cauchy sequences of irrational numbers have a limit.**,*Zeit Geist***Re: The diagonal argument requires that Cauchy sequences of irrational numbers have a limit.**,*Ralf Bader***Re: The diagonal argument requires that Cauchy sequences of irrational numbers have a limit.**,*Zeit Geist***Re: The diagonal argument requires that Cauchy sequences of irrational numbers have a limit.**,*mueckenh***Re: The diagonal argument requires that Cauchy sequences of irrational numbers have a limit.**,*Zeit Geist***Re: The diagonal argument requires that Cauchy sequences of irrational numbers have a limit.**,*John Gabriel***Re: The diagonal argument requires that Cauchy sequences of irrational numbers have a limit.**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: The diagonal argument requires that Cauchy sequences of irrational numbers have a limit.**,*Sam Sung***Re: The diagonal argument requires that Cauchy sequences of irrational numbers have a limit.**,*Zeit Geist***Re: The diagonal argument requires that Cauchy sequences of irrational numbers have a limit.**,*Ralf Bader***Re: The diagonal argument requires that Cauchy sequences of irrational numbers have a limit.**,*Sam Sung***Re: The diagonal argument requires that Cauchy sequences of irrational numbers have a limit.**,*Virgil***Re: The diagonal argument requires that Cauchy sequences of irrational numbers have a limit.**,*John Gabriel***Re: The diagonal argument requires that Cauchy sequences of irrational numbers have a limit.**,*mueckenh***Re: The diagonal argument requires that Cauchy sequences of irrational numbers have a limit.**,*Zeit Geist***Re: The diagonal argument requires that Cauchy sequences of irrational numbers have a limit.**,*mueckenh***Re: The diagonal argument requires that Cauchy sequences of irrational numbers have a limit.**,*Virgil***Re: The diagonal argument requires that Cauchy sequences of irrational numbers have a limit.**,*mueckenh***Re: The diagonal argument requires that Cauchy sequences of irrational numbers have a limit.**,*Virgil***Re: The diagonal argument requires that Cauchy sequences of irrational numbers have a limit.**,*Zeit Geist***Re: The diagonal argument requires that Cauchy sequences of irrational numbers have a limit.**,*Virgil***Re: The diagonal argument requires that Cauchy sequences of irrational numbers have a limit.**,*Virgil**Ben Bacarisse**Virgil**Virgil**Virgil*

- <Possible follow-ups>
*John Gabriel**Zeit Geist**John Gabriel**Zeit Geist**John Gabriel*

*John Gabriel**Zeit Geist**mueckenh**John Gabriel**mueckenh**John Gabriel**mueckenh**Virgil**mueckenh**John Gabriel***Re: WM says the set of rationals can't be listed but the set of reals can be listed**,*Virgil***Re: WM says the set of rationals can't be listed but the set of reals can be listed**,*mueckenh***Re: WM says the set of rationals can't be listed but the set of reals can be listed**,*Virgil***Re: WM says the set of rationals can't be listed but the set of reals can be listed**,*mueckenh***Re: WM says the set of rationals can't be listed but the set of reals can be listed**,*Virgil***Re: WM says the set of rationals can't be listed but the set of reals can be listed**,*mueckenh***Re: WM says the set of rationals can't be listed but the set of reals can be listed**,*Virgil***Re: WM says the set of rationals can't be listed but the set of reals can be listed**,*mueckenh***Re: WM says the set of rationals can't be listed but the set of reals can be listed**,*Virgil***Re: WM says the set of rationals can't be listed but the set of reals can be listed**,*mueckenh***Re: ? 537 The diagonal argument requires that Cauchy sequences of irrational numbers contain their limit.**,*YBM***Re: ? 537 The diagonal argument requires that Cauchy sequences of irrational numbers contain their limit.**,*Virgil***Re: ? 537 The diagonal argument requires that Cauchy sequences of irrational numbers contain their limit.**,*John Gabriel**Virgil**Virgil**mueckenh***Re: ï¿½ 537 The diagonal argument requires that Cauchy sequences of irrational numbers have a limit.**,*Virgil***Re: ï¿½ 537 The diagonal argument requires that Cauchy sequences of irrational numbers have a limit.**,*mueckenh***Re: The diagonal argument Proves WM WRONG!**,*Virgil*

*John Gabriel**John Gabriel**John Gabriel**konyberg**John Gabriel**konyberg**John Gabriel**mueckenh***Re: The diagonal argument requires that WM get his head examined**,*Virgil*

*mueckenh**John Gabriel**mueckenh**John Gabriel**mueckenh***Re: § 537 The diagonal argument requires that Cauchy sequences of irrational numbers converge on their limits.**,*Virgil**John Gabriel**konyberg**konyberg*

*John Gabriel**John Gabriel**John Gabriel**John Gabriel**John Gabriel**John Gabriel**John Gabriel**John Gabriel**FredJeffries**FredJeffries**John Gabriel**John Gabriel**FredJeffries**John Gabriel*

*John Gabriel**John Gabriel**John Gabriel**John Gabriel**Sam Sung**John Gabriel**John Gabriel*

**Re: Only for mathematicians, WM need not apply!**,*Ben Bacarisse***well, snip THAT**,*Space998***Re: Only for mathematicians, WM need not apply!**,*mueckenh***Re: Only for mathematicians, WM need not apply!**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Only for mathematicians, WM need not apply!**,*mueckenh***Re: Only for mathematicians, WM need not apply!**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Only for mathematicians, WM need not apply!**,*mueckenh***Re: Only for mathematicians, WM need not apply!**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Only for mathematicians, WM need not apply!**,*mueckenh***Re: Only for mathematicians, WM need not apply!**,*Virgil***Re: Only for mathematicians, WM need not apply!**,*Virgil***Re: Only for mathematicians, WM need not apply!**,*Virgil***Re: Only for mathematicians, WM need not apply!**,*Virgil*

**Re: Only for mathematicians, WM need not apply!**,*Virgil*

**Re: Only for mathematicians, WM need not apply!**,*mueckenh***Re: Only for mathematicians, WM need not apply!**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Only for mathematicians, WM need not apply!**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Only for mathematicians, WM need not apply!**,*mueckenh***Re: Only for mathematicians, WM need not apply!**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Only for mathematicians, WM need not apply!**,*mueckenh***Re: Only for mathematicians, WM need not apply!**,*FredJeffries***Re: Only for mathematicians, WM need not apply!**,*Virgil***Re: Only for mathematicians, WM need not apply!**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Only for mathematicians, WM need not apply!**,*mueckenh***Re: Only for mathematicians, WM need not apply!**,*FredJeffries***Re: Only for mathematicians, WM need not apply!**,*mueckenh***Re: Only for mathematicians, WM need not apply!**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Only for mathematicians, WM need not apply!**,*FredJeffries***Re: Only for mathematicians, WM need not apply!**,*mueckenh***Re: Only for mathematicians, WM need not apply!**,*FredJeffries***Re: Only for mathematicians, WM need not apply!**,*Virgil***Re: Only for mathematicians, WM need not apply!**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Only for mathematicians, WM need not apply!**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Only for mathematicians, WM need not apply!**,*mueckenh***Re: Only for mathematicians, WM need not apply!**,*Virgil***Re: Only for mathematicians, WM need not apply!**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Only for mathematicians, WM need not apply!**,*Virgil***Re: Only for mathematicians, WM need not apply!**,*mueckenh***Re: Only for mathematicians, WM need not apply!**,*Virgil***Re: Only for mathematicians, WM need not apply!**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Only for mathematicians, WM need not apply!**,*mueckenh***Re: Only for mathematicians, WM need not apply!**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Only for mathematicians, WM need not apply!**,*mueckenh***Re: Only for mathematicians, WM need not apply!**,*Virgil***Re: Only for mathematicians, WM need not apply!**,*"Jürgen R."***Re: Only for mathematicians, WM need not apply!**,*mueckenh***Re: Only for mathematicians, WM need not apply!**,*Ross A. Finlayson***Re: Only for mathematicians, WM need not apply!**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Only for mathematicians, WM need not apply!**,*mueckenh***Re: Only for mathematicians, WM need not apply!**,*Ralf Bader***Re: Only for mathematicians, WM need not apply!**,*Virgil***Re: Only for mathematicians, WM need not apply!**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Only for mathematicians, WM need not apply!**,*mueckenh***Re: Only for mathematicians, WM need not apply!**,*Virgil***Re: Only for mathematicians, WM need not apply!**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Only for mathematicians, WM need not apply!**,*Virgil***Re: Only for mathematicians, WM need not apply!**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Only for mathematicians, WM need not apply!**,*mueckenh***Re: Only for mathematicians, WM need not apply!**,*Virgil***Re: Only for mathematicians, WM need not apply!**,*YBM***Re: Only for mathematicians, WM need not apply!**,*Virgil***Re: Only for mathematicians, WM need not apply!**,*mueckenh***Re: Only for mathematicians, WM need not apply!**,*Virgil***Re: Only for mathematicians, WM need not apply!**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Only for mathematicians, WM need not apply!**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Only for mathematicians, WM need not apply!**,*mueckenh***Re: Only for mathematicians, WM need not apply!**,*Virgil***Re: Only for mathematicians, WM need not apply!**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Only for mathematicians, WM need not apply!**,*Virgil***Re: Only for mathematicians, WM need not apply!**,*mueckenh***Re: Only for mathematicians, WM need not apply!**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Only for mathematicians, WM need not apply!**,*Virgil***Re: Only for mathematicians, WM need not apply!**,*Virgil***Re: Only for mathematicians, WM need not apply!**,*Virgil***Re: Only for mathematicians, WM need not apply!**,*Zeit Geist*

**Re: Only for mathematicians, WM need not apply!**,*Virgil*

- <Possible follow-ups>
**Re: Only for mathematicians, WM need not apply!**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Only for mathematicians, WM need not apply!**,*mueckenh***Re: Only for mathematicians, WM need not apply!**,*Virgil***Re: Only for mathematicians, WM need not apply!**,*mueckenh***Re: Only for mathematicians, WM need not apply!**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Only for mathematicians, WM need not apply!**,*Virgil***Re: Only for mathematicians, WM need not apply!**,*Virgil***Re: Only for mathematicians, WM need not apply!**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Only for mathematicians, WM need not apply!**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Only for mathematicians, WM need not apply!**,*mueckenh***Re: Only for mathematicians, WM need not apply!**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Only for mathematicians, WM need not apply!**,*mueckenh***Re: Only for mathematicians, WM need not apply!**,*Virgil***Re: Only for mathematicians, WM need not apply!**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Only for mathematicians, WM need not apply!**,*Virgil*

**Re: Only for mathematicians, WM need not apply!**,*mueckenh***Re: Only for mathematicians, WM need not apply!**,*Virgil***Re: Only for mathematicians, WM need not apply!**,*mueckenh***Re: Only for mathematicians, WM need not apply!**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Only for mathematicians, WM need not apply!**,*mueckenh***Re: Only for mathematicians, WM need not apply!**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Only for mathematicians, WM need not apply!**,*mueckenh***Re: Only for mathematicians, WM need not apply!**,*Virgil***Re: Only for mathematicians, WM need not apply!**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Only for mathematicians, WM need not apply!**,*Virgil***Re: Only for mathematicians, WM need not apply!**,*Virgil***Re: Only for mathematicians, WM need not apply!**,*Zeit Geist*

**lim( X-->oo ) 2^X = oo ......... "ONLY SOMETIMES" ~ YBM**,*grahamcooper7***infinity has no definite parity in an odd base**,*Space998***lemmA of Hensel**,*Space998*

**Re: § 535 Solution of Berry's Paradox**,*YBM*- <Possible follow-ups>
**Re: § 535 Solution of Berry's Paradox**,*YBM***Re: § 535 Solution of Berry's Paradox**,*YBM*

**Re: § 535 Solution of Berry's Paradox**,*Zeit Geist***Re: § 535 Solution of Berry's Paradox**,*mueckenh***Re: § 535 Solution of Berry's Paradox**,*Virgil***Re: § 535 Solution of Berry's Paradox**,*Zeit Geist*

- <Possible follow-ups>
**Re: § 535 Solution of Berry's Paradox**,*Zeit Geist***Re: § 535 Solution of Berry's Paradox**,*Zeit Geist***Re: § 535 Solution of Berry's Paradox**,*mueckenh***Re: § 535 Solution of Berry's Paradox**,*Virgil***Re: § 535 Solution of Berry's Paradox**,*Zeit Geist***Re: § 535 Solution of Berry's Paradox**,*mueckenh***Re: § 535 Solution of Berry's Paradox**,*Zeit Geist***Re: § 535 Solution of Berry's Paradox**,*mueckenh***Re: § 535 Solution of Berry's Paradox**,*Virgil***Re: § 535 Solution of Berry's Paradox**,*Zeit Geist***Re: § 535 Solution of Berry's Paradox**,*Virgil*

**Re: § 535 Solution of Berry's Paradox**,*Zeit Geist***Re: § 535 Solution of Berry's Paradox**,*mueckenh***Re: § 535 Solution of Berry's Paradox**,*Virgil***Re: § 535 Solution of Berry's Paradox**,*Zeit Geist***Re: § 535 Solution of Berry's Paradox**,*mueckenh***Re: § 535 Solution of Berry's Paradox**,*Zeit Geist***Re: § 535 Solution of Berry's Paradox**,*mueckenh***Re: § 535 Solution of Berry's Paradox**,*Virgil***it's mot a paradox if you cannot see the solution**,*Space998***Re: it's mot a paradox if you cannot see the solution**,*freymudd***Re: § 535 Solution of Berry's Paradox**,*Zeit Geist***Re: § 535 Solution of Berry's Paradox**,*mueckenh***Re: § 535 Solution of Berry's Paradox**,*Virgil***Re: ï¿½ 535 Solution of Berry's Paradox**,*mueckenh***Re: ï¿½ 535 Solution of Berry's Paradox**,*Zeit Geist***Re: ï¿½ 535 Solution of Berry's Paradox**,*mueckenh***Re: ï¿½ 535 Solution of Berry's Paradox**,*Zeit Geist***Re: ï¿½ 535 Solution of Berry's Paradox**,*mueckenh***Re: ï¿½ 535 Solution of Berry's Paradox**,*Zeit Geist***Re: ï¿½ 535 Solution of Berry's Paradox**,*mueckenh***Re: ï¿½ 535 Solution of Berry's Paradox**,*Zeit Geist***Re: ï¿½ 535 Solution of Berry's Paradox**,*Zeit Geist***Re: ï¿½ 535 Solution of Berry's Paradox**,*mueckenh***Re: ï¿½ 535 Solution of Berry's Paradox**,*Zeit Geist***Re: ï¿½ 535 Solution of Berry's Paradox**,*mueckenh***Re: ï¿½ 535 Solution of Berry's Paradox**,*Zeit Geist***Re: § 535 Solution of Berry's Paradox**,*Zeit Geist***Re: § 535 Solution of Berry's Paradox**,*mueckenh***Re: § 535 Solution of Berry's Paradox**,*Zeit Geist***Re: § 535 Solution of Berry's Paradox**,*mueckenh***Re: § 535 Solution of Berry's Paradox**,*Zeit Geist***Re: § 535 Solution of Berry's Paradox**,*mueckenh***Re: § 535 Solution of Berry's Paradox**,*Zeit Geist***Re: § 535 Solution of Berry's Paradox**,*mueckenh***Re: § 535 Solution of Berry's Paradox**,*Zeit Geist***Re: § 535 Solution of Berry's Paradox**,*mueckenh***Re: § 535 Solution of Berry's Paradox**,*Virgil***every one's**,*Space998*

**Re: § 535 Solution of Berry's Paradox**,*mueckenh***Re: § 535 Solution of Berry's Paradox**,*Virgil***Re: § 535 Solution of Berry's Paradox**,*Zeit Geist***Re: § 535 Solution of Berry's Paradox**,*mueckenh***Re: § 535 Solution of Berry's Paradox**,*Zeit Geist***Re: § 535 Solution of Berry's Paradox**,*mueckenh***Re: § 535 Solution of Berry's Paradox**,*Virgil***Re: § 535 Solution of Berry's Paradox**,*Zeit Geist***Re: § 535 Solution of Berry's Paradox**,*mueckenh***Re: § 535 Solution of Berry's Paradox**,*Virgil***Re: § 535 Solution of Berry's Paradox**,*Virgil*

*Ben Bacarisse**mueckenh**Ben Bacarisse**mueckenh**Ben Bacarisse**mueckenh**Ben Bacarisse**Virgil**Space998***Re: WM falsely claims: The diagonal argument requires that Cauchy sequences of irrational numbers contain their limit.**,*Virgil*

**Re: The diagonal argument requires that WMytheology not be any part of mathematics**,*Virgil*

**Re: LIM (X-->oo) 2^X = ???**,*grahamcooper7***Re: LIM (X-->oo) 2^X = ???**,*YBM***Re: LIM (X-->oo) 2^X = ???**,*grahamcooper7***Re: LIM (X-->oo) 2^X = ???**,*Zeit Geist***Re: LIM (X-->oo) 2^X = ???**,*grahamcooper7*

**Re: LIM (X-->oo) 2^X = ???**,*Zeit Geist***Re: LIM (X-->oo) 2^X = ???**,*David Bernier***Re: LIM (X-->oo) 2^X = ???**,*grahamcooper7*

**Re: LIM (X-->oo) 2^X = ???**,*Martin Shobe***Re: LIM (X-->oo) 2^X = ???**,*Space998***Re: LIM (X-->oo) 2^X = ???**,*grahamcooper7***Re: LIM (X-->oo) 2^X = ???**,*Space998***Re: LIM (X-->oo) 2^X = ???**,*Space998***Re: LIM (X-->oo) 2^X = ???**,*Zeit Geist***Re: LIM (X-->oo) 2^X = ???**,*Ross A. Finlayson***Re: LIM (X-->oo) 2^X = ???**,*Zeit Geist***Re: LIM (X-->oo) 2^X = ???**,*Ross A. Finlayson***Re: LIM (X-->oo) 2^X = ???**,*grahamcooper7***Re: LIM (X-->oo) 2^X = ???**,*Virgil***Re: LIM (X-->oo) 2^X = ???**,*grahamcooper7***Re: LIM (X-->oo) 2^X = ???**,*Virgil***Re: LIM (X-->oo) 2^X = ???**,*grahamcooper7***Re: LIM (X-->oo) 2^X = ???**,*Virgil***Re: LIM (X-->oo) 2^X = ???**,*grahamcooper7***Re: LIM (X-->oo) 2^X = ???**,*YBM***Re: LIM (X-->oo) 2^X = ???**,*Zeit Geist***Re: LIM (X-->oo) 2^X = ???**,*grahamcooper7***Re: LIM (X-->oo) 2^X = ???**,*Zeit Geist***Re: LIM (X-->oo) 2^X = ???**,*grahamcooper7***Re: LIM (X-->oo) 2^X = ???**,*Zeit Geist***Re: LIM (X-->oo) 2^X = ???**,*grahamcooper7***Re: LIM (X-->oo) 2^X = ???**,*grahamcooper7***Re: LIM (X-->oo) 2^X = ???**,*Zeit Geist***Re: LIM (X-->oo) 2^X = ???**,*grahamcooper7***Re: LIM (X-->oo) 2^X = ???**,*Space998***Re: LIM (X-->oo) 2^X = ???**,*Zeit Geist***Re: LIM (X-->oo) 2^X = ???**,*grahamcooper7***Re: LIM (X-->oo) 2^X = ???**,*Zeit Geist***Re: LIM (X-->oo) 2^X = ???**,*grahamcooper7***Re: LIM (X-->oo) 2^X = ???**,*Zeit Geist***Re: LIM (X-->oo) 2^X = ???**,*Zeit Geist***Re: LIM (X-->oo) 2^X = ???**,*Ross A. Finlayson***Re: LIM (X-->oo) 2^X = ???**,*Ross A. Finlayson***Re: LIM (X-->oo) 2^X = ???**,*Ross A. Finlayson***Re: LIM (X-->oo) 2^X = ???**,*Martin Shobe***Re: LIM (X-->oo) 2^X = ???**,*Ross A. Finlayson*

- <Possible follow-ups>
**Re: LIM (X-->oo) 2^X = ???**,*Space998*

*Ralf Bader**mueckenh**Ralf Bader**mueckenh**Ralf Bader**mueckenh**Ralf Bader**mueckenh**"Jürgen R."**Ralf Bader**Virgil***Re: § 537 The diagonal argument requires that WM learn to think straight**,*Virgil**Zeit Geist**mueckenh**Zeit Geist**John Gabriel**mueckenh**Zeit Geist**mueckenh**Virgil**Virgil**Virgil**Michael Klemm*

*"Jürgen R."***Re: The diagonal argument requires only that Cauchy sequences of rational numbers define their limit.**,*Virgil***Re: The diagonal argument requires only that Cauchy sequences of rational numbers define their limit.**,*Ralf Bader***Re: The diagonal argument requires only that Cauchy sequences of rational numbers define their limit.**,*mueckenh**Ralf Bader**mueckenh**Ralf Bader**John Gabriel**mueckenh**Virgil**YBM**mueckenh**Michael Klemm**mueckenh**Michael Klemm**mueckenh**Michael Klemm**mueckenh**Michael Klemm**mueckenh**Zeit Geist**mueckenh**Zeit Geist**mueckenh**Zeit Geist**mueckenh**Virgil**mueckenh**konyberg**John Gabriel**konyberg**Virgil**John Gabriel**mueckenh**John Gabriel**John Gabriel**mueckenh**John Gabriel**John Gabriel**Michael Klemm**Ben Bacarisse**mueckenh**Ben Bacarisse**mueckenh**John Gabriel**mueckenh**John Gabriel**mueckenh**Ben Bacarisse**John Gabriel**Ben Bacarisse**John Gabriel**norman**"Jürgen R."**John Gabriel**mueckenh**John Gabriel**norman**Virgil**Virgil**Virgil**John Gabriel**norman**A Nony Mouse**Virgil**Virgil**Ben Bacarisse**mueckenh**Ben Bacarisse**mueckenh**Ben Bacarisse**mueckenh**Ben Bacarisse**Virgil**Virgil**Virgil**Virgil**mueckenh**Virgil**mueckenh**Virgil**mueckenh**Virgil**mueckenh**Virgil**mueckenh**Virgil**mueckenh**FredJeffries**Virgil**mueckenh**Virgil**mueckenh**Virgil**John Gabriel**K_h**mueckenh**Virgil**mueckenh**Virgil**mueckenh**Virgil**mueckenh**Virgil**mueckenh**Zeit Geist**mueckenh**Virgil**Zeit Geist**Ralf Bader**mueckenh**Virgil**Ralf Bader**Virgil**Sam Sung**mueckenh**Virgil**mueckenh**Zeit Geist**mueckenh**Virgil**mueckenh**Virgil**Sam Sung**mueckenh**Virgil**mueckenh**Virgil**K_h**mueckenh**Virgil**mueckenh**Virgil**mueckenh***Re: The diagonal argument requires only that Cauchy sequences of rational numbers define their limits.**,*Virgil***Re: The diagonal argument requires only that Cauchy sequences of rational numbers define their limits.**,*mueckenh***Re: The diagonal argument requires only that Cauchy sequences of rational numbers define their limits.**,*Virgil**mueckenh**Virgil**K_h**mueckenh**Virgil**mueckenh**Virgil**mueckenh**Sam Sung**Virgil**K_h**mueckenh**Virgil**Virgil**K_h**mueckenh**Virgil**Sam Sung**Sam Sung**K_h**mueckenh**Virgil**Zeit Geist**K-theory**mueckenh**Virgil**FredJeffries**mueckenh**Virgil**Ben Bacarisse**Sam Sung**mueckenh**Sam Sung**Ben Bacarisse**Sam Sung**Ben Bacarisse**mueckenh**Virgil**Ben Bacarisse**mueckenh**Ben Bacarisse**mueckenh**Virgil**mueckenh**Sam Sung**Virgil**Ben Bacarisse**mueckenh**Virgil**Ben Bacarisse**Virgil**mueckenh**Ben Bacarisse**mueckenh**"Jürgen R."**Sam Sung**mueckenh**Sam Sung**Virgil**Ben Bacarisse**Ben Bacarisse**mueckenh**Virgil**Ben Bacarisse**Virgil**Virgil**Sam Sung**Sam Sung**Virgil**Virgil**K_h**mueckenh**Virgil**mueckenh**Virgil**K_h**mueckenh**Virgil**Zeit Geist**mueckenh**Zeit Geist**Ben Bacarisse**Virgil**K_h**mueckenh**Virgil**mueckenh**Virgil**YBM**Sam Sung**mueckenh**Virgil**mueckenh**Zeit Geist**mueckenh**Zeit Geist**mueckenh**Virgil**mueckenh**Virgil**Virgil**Virgil**Zeit Geist**mueckenh**Zeit Geist**Virgil**mueckenh**Michael Klemm**mueckenh**"Jürgen R."**mueckenh**"Jürgen R."**Sam Sung**Zeit Geist**mueckenh**Zeit Geist**John Gabriel**norman**Port563**Ralf Bader**John Gabriel**John Gabriel**mueckenh**Virgil**mueckenh**John Gabriel**Virgil**mueckenh**Ben Bacarisse**mueckenh**Ben Bacarisse**mueckenh**Virgil**mueckenh**John Gabriel**Port563**mueckenh**John Gabriel**John Gabriel**Virgil**John Gabriel**mueckenh**Virgil**FredJeffries**mueckenh**Virgil**mueckenh**mueckenh**Ben Bacarisse**mueckenh**Ben Bacarisse**Ralf Bader**mueckenh**Ben Bacarisse**mueckenh**Ben Bacarisse**mueckenh**Ben Bacarisse**mueckenh**Ben Bacarisse**mueckenh**Ben Bacarisse**Ralf Bader**Ben Bacarisse**mueckenh**Michael Klemm**mueckenh**Michael Klemm**mueckenh**FredJeffries**John Gabriel**Zeit Geist**mueckenh**Zeit Geist**John Gabriel**mueckenh**John Gabriel**mueckenh**John Gabriel**mueckenh**Zeit Geist**mueckenh**Zeit Geist**mueckenh**Virgil**Zeit Geist**mueckenh**Virgil**Zeit Geist**mueckenh**Zeit Geist**mueckenh**Virgil**Virgil**mueckenh**Virgil**mueckenh**Virgil**Zeit Geist**mueckenh**John Gabriel**Virgil**Zeit Geist**mueckenh**Sam Sung**Zeit Geist**Virgil**Virgil**Virgil**FredJeffries**Virgil**John Gabriel**Virgil**mueckenh**"Jürgen R."**Sam Sung**John Gabriel**Sam Sung**John Gabriel**Sam Sung**Sam Sung**Sam Sung**Virgil**Michael Klemm**mueckenh**Virgil**Virgil**mueckenh**Virgil**John Gabriel**Virgil**Virgil**Virgil**Virgil**mueckenh**Ben Bacarisse**mueckenh**Ben Bacarisse**mueckenh**Ben Bacarisse**mueckenh**Ben Bacarisse**mueckenh**John Gabriel**Ben Bacarisse**mueckenh**Ben Bacarisse**mueckenh**Zeit Geist**Ben Bacarisse**Sam Sung**mueckenh**Virgil**mueckenh**John Gabriel**Virgil**Ben Bacarisse**mueckenh**Virgil**Ben Bacarisse**mueckenh**Virgil**Ben Bacarisse**Virgil**Ben Bacarisse**mueckenh**Ben Bacarisse**mueckenh**Ben Bacarisse**Virgil**John Gabriel**Virgil**mueckenh**"Jürgen R."**Virgil**Ben Bacarisse**mueckenh**Ben Bacarisse**mueckenh**Zeit Geist**Sam Sung**Ben Bacarisse**Sam Sung**Virgil**Ben Bacarisse**Virgil**mueckenh**John Gabriel**mueckenh**John Gabriel**Sam Sung**Virgil**mueckenh**Virgil**Virgil**mueckenh**Virgil**mueckenh**Virgil**Virgil**Virgil**mueckenh**Virgil**Zeit Geist**mueckenh**Zeit Geist**mueckenh**John Gabriel**mueckenh**John Gabriel**mueckenh**Virgil**Virgil**Virgil**mueckenh**Virgil**mueckenh**Virgil**Sam Sung**Virgil**Sam Sung**Virgil**mueckenh**Ben Bacarisse**mueckenh**Ben Bacarisse**mueckenh**Ben Bacarisse**Sam Sung**mueckenh**Sam Sung**Zeit Geist**Sam Sung**Zeit Geist**Sam Sung**Zeit Geist**Sam Sung**Zeit Geist**John Gabriel**John Gabriel**Virgil**mueckenh**John Gabriel**mueckenh**Virgil**John Gabriel**Sam Sung**Virgil**Ben Bacarisse**Virgil**John Gabriel**mueckenh**Virgil**Virgil**mueckenh**Virgil**John Gabriel**mueckenh**Virgil**Virgil**mueckenh**John Gabriel**YBM**Virgil**mueckenh**Virgil**Ben Bacarisse**Virgil**Virgil*