# sci.math

**Cal Tech Univ physics-math professors: invite Deriving Dirac & Schrodinger Equations from Maxwell Equations to arxiv**,*Archimedes Plutonium***My Named Negro Hater**,*Kevin Barry***Could Prime Numbers be detectable?**,*Michael Harrington***Re: Could Prime Numbers be detectable?**,*Peter Percival*

**What does Cantor's Diagonalization really prove?**,*Dick***A straight line can only be tangent to another straight line in mythmatics.**,*John Gabriel******* TROLL ALERT ******,*Dan Christensen***Re: A straight line can only be tangent to another straight line in mythmatics.**,*dullrich*

**Re: Newton did not give F =ma : Euler did in 1775, concrete proofs.**,*usaukoct***Please Simplify arccos( cosX * cosY ) ???**,*partso2***Re: Please Simplify arccos( cosX * cosY ) ???**,*quasi***Re: Please Simplify arccos( cosX * cosY ) ???**,*Roland Franzius***Re: Please Simplify arccos( cosX * cosY ) ???**,*Barry Schwarz*

**Proof of the Polignac conjecture which turns out to be messy #50 Correcting Math 4th ed**,*Archimedes Plutonium***An argument for Prof. Mueckenheim**,*Ben Bacarisse***EINSTEIN'S RELATIVITY CLASHES WITH REASON**,*Pentcho Valev***Re: EINSTEIN'S RELATIVITY CLASHES WITH REASON**,*usaukoct***Re: EINSTEIN'S RELATIVITY CLASHES WITH REASON**,*Pentcho Valev*

**My Negro Named Hater**,*Kevin Barry***Impulse on a Rotor**,*Kevin Barry***Re: § 417 An implication of actual infinity**,*Brian***Tullock auction equilibrium**,*david . pekker***Re: Tullock auction equilibrium**,*Col. Edmund Burke***Re: Tullock auction equilibrium**,*James Waldby*

**math professors Ecole Polytechnique: invite Proofs that 3rd dimension is the highest and last dimension to arxiv**,*Archimedes Plutonium***solutions manual, test bank for Financial Statement Analysis 11e Subramanyam contact directly at discountsmtb(at)hotmail(dot)com**,*piecutie056***WHEN IN NAM...............**,*Col. Edmund Burke***Re: WHEN IN NAM...............**,*samsoia**Message not available***Re: WHEN IN NAM...............**,*Col. Edmund Burke**Message not available***Re: WHEN IN NAM...............**,*Col. Edmund Burke*

**Not only writes like a mad person, but looks totally mad too.**,*Port563***Re: Not only writes like a mad person, but looks totally mad too.**,*Col. Edmund Burke***House of madness**,*Nimber***Re: House of madness**,*Nimber*

**math professors Univ Gottingen: invite Major Logical Flaw of the Riemann Hypothesis to arxiv**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Proofs that Fibonacci numbers, 2^n numbers and Champerowne numbers form finite sets #49 Correcting Math 4th ed**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Univ. Gottingen math professors: invite Major Logical Flaw of the Riemann Hypothesis to arxiv**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Engineering Mathematics question**,*曾雲楓***Re: Engineering Mathematics question**,*Peter Percival***Re: Engineering Mathematics question**,*曾雲楓***Re: Engineering Mathematics question**,*Peter Percival*

**Re: Engineering Mathematics question**,*曾雲楓***Re: Engineering Mathematics question**,*Peter Percival*

**The Law of Compensation**,*Kevin Barry***Ecole Polytechnique math professors: invite Proofs that 3rd dimension is the highest and last dimension to arxiv**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Re: Ecole Polytechnique math professors: invite Proofs that 3rd dimension is the highest and last dimension to arxiv**,*Dan Christensen*- <Possible follow-ups>
**Ecole Polytechnique math professors: invite Proofs that 3rd dimension is the highest and last dimension to arxiv**,*Archimedes Plutonium*

**Engineering Mathematics**,*曾雲楓***Re: Engineering Mathematics**,*曾雲楓***Re: Engineering Mathematics**,*Peter Percival***Re: Engineering Mathematics**,*Peter Percival***Re: Engineering Mathematics**,*Peter Percival*

**Engineering Mathematics**,*drhuang57***Engineering Mathematics**,*drhuang57***Engineering Mathematics**,*drhuang57***Engineering Mathematics**,*drhuang57***Re: Engineering Mathematics**,*Peter Percival***Re: Engineering Mathematics**,*drhuang57*

- <Possible follow-ups>
**Engineering Mathematics**,*曾雲楓*

**solutions manual, test bank for Managerial Accounting 2e Stacey Whitecotton Robert Libby Fred Phillips contact directly at discountsmtb(at)hotmail(dot)com**,*smtbhelp***Univ. Gottingen math professors: invite Major Logical Flaw of the Riemann Hypothesis to arxiv #2208 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***DigiWx BITCH Jennifer L. Racey Decker: PLEASE*** ME !!!**,*digiwx***Board games as illustrations of near-certainty in mathematics**,*Paul***Re: Board games as illustrations of near-certainty in mathematics**,*scattered***Re: Board games as illustrations of near-certainty in mathematics**,*Paul***Re: Board games as illustrations of near-certainty in mathematics**,*quasi***Re: Board games as illustrations of near-certainty in mathematics**,*Paul***Re: Board games as illustrations of near-certainty in mathematics**,*wpihughes***Re: Board games as illustrations of near-certainty in mathematics**,*quasi***Re: Board games as illustrations of near-certainty in mathematics**,*Peter Percival***Re: Board games as illustrations of near-certainty in mathematics**,*Port563***Re: Board games as illustrations of near-certainty in mathematics**,*Paul***Re: Board games as illustrations of near-certainty in mathematics**,*quasi***Re: Board games as illustrations of near-certainty in mathematics**,*Timothy Murphy***Re: Board games as illustrations of near-certainty in mathematics**,*Paul***Re: Board games as illustrations of near-certainty in mathematics**,*Paul***Re: Board games as illustrations of near-certainty in mathematics**,*Timothy Murphy***Re: Board games as illustrations of near-certainty in mathematics**,*Space998***Re: Board games as illustrations of near-certainty in mathematics**,*Paul***Re: Board games as illustrations of near-certainty in mathematics**,*Peter Percival*

**Cambridge Univ. math professors: invite No Odd Perfect & Finiteness of Perfect Numbers Set to arxiv**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Proofs that Mersenne, Fermat, and n^2 +1 primes are all finite sets #48 Correcting Math 4th ed**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Proofs that Perfect Numbers are finite while Primitive Pythagorean Triples are an infinite set #47 Correcting Math 4th ed**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Stanford Univ. math professors: invite Goldbach proof to arxiv**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Re: Stanford Univ. math professors: invite Goldbach proof to arxiv**,*Dan Christensen*

**I WORKED MY ASS OFF TODAY**,*Col. Edmund Burke***Re: I WORKED MY ASS OFF TODAY**,*mathedman***Re: I WORKED MY ASS OFF TODAY**,*Col. Edmund Burke*

**Power series reversion with constant term?**,*IV***In New Math, use Perfect Square density to tell if any set is finite or infinite #46 Correcting Math 4th ed**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Univ. Cincinnati math professors: invite Overhaul of Old Logic to New Logic to arxiv**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Research on FLT?**,*Paul***Re: Research on FLT?**,*Bill***Re: Research on FLT?**,*Space998***Re: Research on FLT?**,*Peter Percival***Re: Research on FLT?**,*Seymour J.***Re: Research on FLT?**,*Peter Percival*

**Recursive function call**,*Paul***Re: Recursive function call**,*Peter Percival***Re: Recursive function call**,*Paul***Re: Recursive function call**,*Peter Percival*

**Re: Recursive function call**,*David Bernier***Re: Recursive function call**,*Paul***Re: Recursive function call**,*Peter Percival***Re: Recursive function call**,*Paul***Re: Recursive function call**,*David Bernier***Re: Recursive function call**,*Bill***Re: Recursive function call**,*David Bernier***Re: Recursive function call**,*David Bernier***Re: Recursive function call**,*David Bernier***Re: Recursive function call**,*David Bernier***Re: Recursive function call**,*David Bernier***Re: Recursive function call**,*David Bernier***Re: Recursive function call**,*wpihughes***Re: Recursive function call**,*David Bernier***Re: Recursive function call**,*wpihughes***Re: Recursive function call**,*David Bernier***Re: Recursive function call**,*James Waldby*

**Re: Recursive function call**,*Bill***Re: Recursive function call**,*FredJeffries***Re: Recursive function call**,*wpihughes***Re: Recursive function call**,*David Bernier***Re: Recursive function call**,*Ben Bacarisse*

**Re: Recursive function call**,*Roland Franzius***Re: Recursive function call**,*Dick***Re: Recursive function call**,*Paul***Re: Recursive function call**,*Peter Percival***Re: Recursive function call**,*Paul***Re: Recursive function call**,*Peter Percival***Re: Recursive function call**,*Paul*

**Re: EINSTEIN'S RELATIVITY : THE SCIENCE OF SMUG CONDESCENSION**,*Pentcho Valev***Exploring ups and downs in the Collatz Tree**,*David Bernier***A recommendation of the Gowers blog**,*Paul***Inequality.**,*Port563***Re: Inequality.**,*quasi***Re: Inequality.**,*quasi***Re: Inequality.**,*quasi***Re: Inequality.**,*Port563***Re: Inequality.**,*Port563***Re: Inequality.**,*quasi***Re: Inequality.**,*Port563*

**Re: Inequality.**,*Phil Carmody***Re: Inequality.**,*quasi***Re: Inequality.**,*Phil Carmody*

**Re: Inequality.**,*Port563*

**Re: Inequality.**,*quasi*

**IS SPACETIME DOOMED ?**,*Pentcho Valev***Re: IS SPACETIME DOOMED ?**,*Pentcho Valev*

**In New Math, it is easy and simple to prove any given set is finite or infinite #45 Correcting Math 4th ed**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Axiom of Multiple Choice**,*William Elliot***Re: Axiom of Multiple Choice**,*David Hartley***Re: Axiom of Multiple Choice**,*William Elliot***Re: Axiom of Multiple Choice**,*David Hartley***Re: Axiom of Multiple Choice**,*William Elliot*

**Princeton Univ. math professors: invite-send Proofs of Beal & Fermat's Last Theorem to arxiv**,*Archimedes Plutonium***State of the Art proof that infinity borderline is 1*10^603 #44 Correcting Math 4th ed**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Re: State of the Art proof that infinity borderline is 1*10^603 #44 Correcting Math 4th ed**,*Efftard K. Donglemeier*

**A super fast factoring record on large semi-primes.**,*djoyce099***Everyone is cordially invited to attend**,*Nimber***A walk through a finite village: Turning Hilbert's Hotel on its head**,*Dan Christensen***Calculus in the US**,*jmfbahciv***Re: Calculus in the US**,*FredJeffries***Re: Calculus in the US**,*jmfbahciv*

**Re: Calculus in the US**,*FredJeffries***Re: Calculus in the US**,*FredJeffries*

**solutions manual, test bank for Information Technology for Management Advancing Sustainable Profitable Business Growth 9e Turban Linda Gregory contact directly at discountsmtb(at)hotmail(dot)com**,*smtbhelp***I TOLD PLEASANCE**,*Col. Edmund Burke***History of my discovery of the infinity borderline at 1*10^603 #43 Correcting Math 4th ed**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Poincare vs. Infinity**,*davidlpetry***Re: Poincare vs. Infinity**,*Roland Franzius***Re: Poincare vs. Infinity**,*Seymour J.***Re: Poincare vs. Infinity**,*davidlpetry***Re: Poincare vs. Infinity**,*Virgil*

**Re: Poincare vs. Infinity**,*Dan Christensen*

**Math mailing lists**,*Bill Taylor***Re: Math mailing lists**,*William Elliot***Re: Math mailing lists**,*Ken Pledger***Re: Math mailing lists**,*Peter Percival*

**whether a positron is just a electron with a opposite charge of magnetic monopole Re: Cal Tech Univ physics-math professors: invite Deriving Dirac & Schrodinger Equations from Maxwell Equations to arxiv #2207 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Broken Lines**,*William Elliot***Re: Broken Lines**,*Arturo Magidin***Re: Broken Lines**,*William Elliot*

**Ruled Surfaces**,*William Elliot***Re: Ruled Surfaces**,*samsoia***Re: Ruled Surfaces**,*wpihughes*

**The argument no mythmatician can refute**,*John Gabriel***Re: The argument no mythmatician can refute**,*John Gabriel***Re: The argument no mythmatician can refute**,*Glen Smith******* TROLL ALERT ******,*Dan Christensen***Re: The argument no mythmatician can refute**,*John Gabriel***Re: The argument no mythmatician can refute**,*dullrich***Re: The argument no mythmatician can refute**,*John Gabriel*

**Re: The argument no mythmatician can refute**,*John Gabriel***Re: The argument no mythmatician can refute**,*Port563***Re: The argument no mythmatician can refute**,*Mr Newsgroup*

**Re: The argument no mythmatician can refute**,*John Gabriel*

**Infinity is part of matheology.**,*John Gabriel******* TROLL ALERT ******,*Dan Christensen***Re: Infinity is part of matheology.**,*Nels Smith***Re: Infinity is part of matheology.**,*John Gabriel***Re: Infinity is part of matheology.**,*Dan Taylor*

**Wolfgang Mueckenheim - Open Question**,*Port563***Re: Wolfgang Mueckenheim - Open Question**,*Port563***Re: Wolfgang Mueckenheim - Open Question**,*mueckenh*

**History of my discovery of the infinity borderline, from 10^500 to 10^603 #42 Correcting Math 4th ed**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Force as MomentumXfrequency Re: MIT math professors: invite Maxwell Equations derive Peano axioms and Geometry axioms to arxiv #2206 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Hows does mathematica's RowReduce get rid of unknowns?**,*neillclift***Inverting power series where Lagrange inversion is not possible?**,*IV***Re: Inverting power series where Lagrange inversion is not possible?**,*Pirx42***Re: Inverting power series where Lagrange inversion is not possible?**,*davidlpetry***Re: Inverting power series where Lagrange inversion is not possible?**,*wpihughes***Re: Inverting power series where Lagrange inversion is not possible?**,*wpihughes***Re: Inverting power series where Lagrange inversion is not possible?**,*wpihughes*

**Simpler than it first appears**,*Port563***Re: Simpler than it first appears**,*Peter Percival***Re: Simpler than it first appears**,*wpihughes***Re: Simpler than it first appears**,*wpihughes*

**Re: Simpler than it first appears**,*Barry Schwarz***Re: Simpler than it first appears**,*Roland Franzius***Re: Simpler than it first appears**,*Port563*

**PORK BUTTS**,*Col. Edmund Burke***TIME OR MIND IS BENT IN EINSTEIN'S WORLD ?**,*Pentcho Valev***Differential equation (fwd)**,*William Elliot***Re: Differential equation (fwd)**,*IV***Re: Differential equation (fwd)**,*Bart Goddard***Re: Differential equation (fwd)**,*Peter Percival***Re: Differential equation (fwd)**,*Roland Franzius*

**A very strange quantum computing result**,*7***Re: A very strange quantum computing result**,*Col. Edmund Burke*

**Symmetry Breaking is Special Relativity of the Maxwell Equations Re: MIT math professors: invite Maxwell Equations derive Peano axioms and Geometry axioms to arxiv #2205 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Infinity is synonymous with "reaching the border of Finite" #41 Correcting Math 4th ed**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Supporting The Fastest Zoom**,*Kevin Barry***My head hurts**,*Poopy McStroodle***Re: My head hurts**,*Dexter*

**negation of a statement**,*Jean Dubois***Re: negation of a statement**,*samsoia***Re: negation of a statement**,*Peter Percival*

**Mathematicians galore learning their Guardian Angel's name**,*Clarence Who?***Vocabulary List for WM - Are you using the same definition that other people are?**,*PotatoSauce***Re: Vocabulary List for WM - Are you using the same definition that other people are?**,*Nimber***Re: Vocabulary List for WM - Are you using the same definition that other people are?**,*FredJeffries*

**A glimpse into the early years: How the New Calculus was conceived.**,*John Gabriel***Re: A glimpse into the early years: How the New Calculus was conceived.**,*Walt Smith***Re: A glimpse into the early years: How the New Calculus was conceived.**,*John Gabriel***Re: A glimpse into the early years: How the New Calculus was conceived.**,*John Gabriel***Re: A glimpse into the early years: How the New Calculus was conceived.**,*Jan***Re: A glimpse into the early years: How the New Calculus was conceived.**,*John Gabriel***Re: A glimpse into the early years: How the New Calculus was conceived.**,*Glen Smith***Re: A glimpse into the early years: How the New Calculus was conceived.**,*Jan***Re: A glimpse into the early years: How the New Calculus was conceived.**,*John Gabriel***Re: A glimpse into the early years: How the New Calculus was conceived.**,*Samsung***Re: A glimpse into the early years: How the New Calculus was conceived.**,*Freda Parkins***Re: A glimpse into the early years: How the New Calculus was conceived.**,*Jan***Re: A glimpse into the early years: How the New Calculus was conceived.**,*Freda Parkins***Re: A glimpse into the early years: How the New Calculus was conceived.**,*Freda Parkins***Re: A glimpse into the early years: How the New Calculus was conceived.**,*John Gabriel***Re: A glimpse into the early years: How the New Calculus was conceived.**,*Voltage***Re: A glimpse into the early years: How the New Calculus was conceived.**,*Jan***Re: A glimpse into the early years: How the New Calculus was conceived.**,*John Gabriel***Re: A glimpse into the early years: How the New Calculus was conceived.**,*Mr Newsgroup***Re: A glimpse into the early years: How the New Calculus was conceived.**,*Jan*

****** TROLL ALERT ******,*Dan Christensen***Re: A glimpse into the early years: How the New Calculus was conceived.**,*John Gabriel*

**Maxwell Equations would then show us hyperbolic geometry Re: MIT math professors: invite Maxwell Equations derive Peano axioms and Geometry axioms to arxiv #2204 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Re: Maxwell Equations would then show us hyperbolic geometry Re: MIT math professors: invite Maxwell Equations derive Peano axioms and Geometry axioms to arxiv #2204 Correcting Math**,*Dan Christensen***Re: Maxwell Equations would then show us hyperbolic geometry Re: MIT math professors: invite Maxwell Equations derive Peano axioms and Geometry axioms to arxiv #2204 Correcting Math**,*Space998*

**Tune into me at Space Time and the Universe.**,*John Gabriel***Re: Tune into me at Space Time and the Universe.**,*Walt Smith******* TROLL ALERT ******,*Dan Christensen***Re: Tune into me at Space Time and the Universe.**,*konyberg***Re: Tune into me at Space Time and the Universe.**,*John Gabriel***Re: Tune into me at Space Time and the Universe.**,*konyberg***Re: Tune into me at Space Time and the Universe.**,*John Gabriel***Re: Tune into me at Space Time and the Universe.**,*Nels Smith*

**Re: Tune into me at Space Time and the Universe.**,*John Gabriel***Re: Tune into me at Space Time and the Universe.**,*Victor Wesson*

**Re: Tune into me at Space Time and the Universe.**,*John Gabriel***Re: Tune into me at Space Time and the Universe.**,*Freda Parkins***Re: Tune into me at Space Time and the Universe.**,*Anton Figg*

**Re: Tune into me at Space Time and the Universe.**,*John Gabriel*

**news group mathHandbook is created**,*drhuang57***History of "Infinity borderline" at 1*10^603, math's first precision definition of infinity #40 Correcting Math 4th ed**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Maxwell Equations would then predict Infinite Numbers Re: MIT math professors: invite Maxwell Equations derive Peano axioms and Geometry axioms to arxiv #2203 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Re: Maxwell Equations would then predict Infinite Numbers Re: MIT math professors: invite Maxwell Equations derive Peano axioms and Geometry axioms to arxiv #2203 Correcting Math**,*Dan Christensen***Re: Maxwell Equations would then predict Infinite Numbers Re: MIT math professors: invite Maxwell Equations derive Peano axioms and Geometry axioms to arxiv #2203 Correcting Math**,*Vern Smith*

**Atheists dismiss World Series "miracle"**,*Keith Olbermann***Re: Atheists dismiss World Series "miracle"**,*wpihughes***Re: Atheists dismiss World Series "miracle"**,*Sam Jones*

**Women's Rights in Islam**,*bv4bv4bv4***Re: Formula needed**,*drhuang57***Re: Formula needed**,*Jim Burns***Re: Formula needed**,*Roland Franzius*

**Set limit and cardinality limit**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*wpihughes***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim*

**Set limit and cardinality limit**,*PotatoSauce***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*wpihughes***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*Virgil***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*PotatoSauce*

**Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*PotatoSauce***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*PotatoSauce***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*PotatoSauce***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*Virgil***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*Virgil***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*Virgil***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*PotatoSauce***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*PotatoSauce***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*Virgil***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*PotatoSauce***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*Virgil***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*Virgil***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*Virgil***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*Virgil***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*Virgil***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*PotatoSauce***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*PotatoSauce***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*Virgil***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*Virgil***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*Virgil***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*PotatoSauce***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*PotatoSauce***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*wpihughes***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*wpihughes***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*wpihughes***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*wpihughes***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*wpihughes***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*Virgil***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*Virgil***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*Virgil***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*Virgil***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*PotatoSauce***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*PotatoSauce***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*PotatoSauce***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*Virgil***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*Virgil***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*wpihughes***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*wpihughes***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*wpihughes***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*wpihughes***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*wpihughes***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*wpihughes***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*mueckenh***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*wpihughes***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*wpihughes***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*mueckenh***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*wpihughes***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*mueckenh***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*Virgil***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*wpihughes***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*mueckenh***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*wpihughes***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*mueckenh***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*wpihughes***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*mueckenh***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*wpihughes***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*mueckenh***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*wpihughes***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*mueckenh***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*wpihughes***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*mueckenh***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*wpihughes***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*Nimber***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*Virgil***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*Virgil***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*Virgil***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*Virgil***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*wpihughes***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*mueckenh***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*Sam Sung***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*wpihughes***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*Sam Sung***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*Virgil***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*Virgil***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*Virgil***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*Virgil***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*Virgil***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*Virgil***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*Virgil***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*Virgil***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*Virgil***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*Virgil***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*Virgil***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*Virgil***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*mueckenh***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*Virgil***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*Virgil***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*Virgil***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*Virgil***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*wpihughes***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*wpihughes***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*wpihughes***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*wpihughes***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*mueckenh***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*wpihughes***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*Pirx42***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*mueckenh***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*Pirx42***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*mueckenh***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*Virgil***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*Pirx42***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*mueckenh***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*Pirx42***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*Virgil***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*mueckenh***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*Virgil***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*Virgil***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*wpihughes***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*mueckenh***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*wpihughes***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*mueckenh***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*wpihughes***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*mueckenh***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*Virgil***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*mueckenh***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*Virgil***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*mueckenh***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*Virgil***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*wpihughes***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*mueckenh***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*wpihughes***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*mueckenh***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*wpihughes***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*Virgil***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*Sam Sung***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*Sam Sung***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*wpihughes***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*Sam Sung***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*Jim Burns***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*mueckenh***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*Virgil***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*Virgil***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*mueckenh***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*wpihughes***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*mueckenh***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*wpihughes***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*mueckenh***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*wpihughes***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*mueckenh***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*Virgil***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*wpihughes***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*WM***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*wpihughes***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*WM***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*wpihughes***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*WM***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*wpihughes***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*WM***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*YBM***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*wpihughes***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*WM***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*wpihughes***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*WM***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*WM***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*Virgil***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*Martin Shobe***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*wpihughes***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*WM***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*wpihughes***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*WM***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*wpihughes***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*WM***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*Virgil***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*Virgil***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*WM***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*YBM***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*Virgil***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*WM***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*Virgil***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*Virgil***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*Virgil***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*Virgil***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*Virgil***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*Virgil***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*Virgil***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*Virgil***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*WM***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*Virgil***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*Virgil***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*Virgil***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*Virgil***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*Virgil***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*Virgil***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*Virgil***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*Virgil***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*Virgil***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*Virgil***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*Virgil***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*mueckenh***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*Virgil***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*mueckenh***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*Virgil***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*mueckenh***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*Virgil***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*WM***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*YBM***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*Virgil***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*WM***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*Virgil***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*WM***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*Virgil***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*WM***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*Virgil***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*Virgil***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*wpihughes***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*wpihughes***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*wpihughes***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*wpihughes***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*Virgil***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*Nimber***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*Virgil***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*Virgil***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*Virgil***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*Virgil***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*Virgil***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*PotatoSauce***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*Virgil***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*PotatoSauce***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*Virgil***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*Virgil*

**Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*Virgil***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*Virgil***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*Virgil*

**Re: Set limit and cardinality limit**,*Nimber*

**Maxwell equations replace Peano & Hilbert axioms Re: MIT math professors: invite Maxwell Equations derive Peano axioms and Geometry axioms to arxiv #2202 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***mathHandbook.com online computer algebra system updated**,*drhuang57***Re: mathHandbook.com online computer algebra system updated**,*Chris M. Thomasson*

**Cal Tech vs Georgia Tech**,*Kevin Barry***product toplogy and projection function**,*honeypotmathman***Re: product toplogy and projection function**,*William Elliot***Re: product toplogy and projection function**,*Robin Chapman*

**Parallelogram rule equivalent Pythagorean theorem Re: MIT math professors: invite Maxwell Equations derive Peano axioms and Geometry axioms to arxiv #2201 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***refurbishing this request Re: MIT math professors: invite Maxwell Equations derive Peano axioms and Geometry axioms to arxiv #2200 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Elliptic Integrals and Quaternions**,*John Schutkeker***CURIOUS EQUATION**,*Col. Edmund Burke***You've heard the lie 1000 times over - "The calculus was made rigorous..."**,*John Gabriel******* TROLL ALERT ******,*Dan Christensen***Dan Christensen is a stoopid asswipe**,*Col. Edmund Burke***Re: Dan Christensen is a stoopid asswipe**,*John Gabriel***Re: Dan Christensen is a stoopid asswipe**,*Thad Jones*

**Re: You've heard the lie 1000 times over - "The calculus was made rigorous..."**,*dullrich***Re: You've heard the lie 1000 times over - "The calculus was made rigorous..."**,*John Gabriel***Re: You've heard the lie 1000 times over - "The calculus was made rigorous..."**,*Hank Jones***Re: You've heard the lie 1000 times over - "The calculus was made rigorous..."**,*John Gabriel***Re: You've heard the lie 1000 times over - "The calculus was made rigorous..."**,*John Gabriel***Re: You've heard the lie 1000 times over - "The calculus was made rigorous..."**,*Efftard K. Donglemeier*

**Re: You've heard the lie 1000 times over - "The calculus was made rigorous..."**,*John Gabriel***Re: You've heard the lie 1000 times over - "The calculus was made rigorous..."**,*John Gabriel***Re: You've heard the lie 1000 times over - "The calculus was made rigorous..."**,*John Gabriel***Re: You've heard the lie 1000 times over - "The calculus was made rigorous..."**,*dullrich***Re: You've heard the lie 1000 times over - "The calculus was made rigorous..."**,*John Gabriel***Re: You've heard the lie 1000 times over - "The calculus was made rigorous..."**,*Glen Smith***Re: You've heard the lie 1000 times over - "The calculus was made rigorous..."**,*dullrich***Re: You've heard the lie 1000 times over - "The calculus was made rigorous..."**,*John Gabriel***Re: You've heard the lie 1000 times over - "The calculus was made rigorous..."**,*Victor Wesson***Re: You've heard the lie 1000 times over - "The calculus was made rigorous..."**,*John Gabriel***Re: You've heard the lie 1000 times over - "The calculus was made rigorous..."**,*Anton Figg*

**Re: You've heard the lie 1000 times over - "The calculus was made rigorous..."**,*John Gabriel***Re: You've heard the lie 1000 times over - "The calculus was made rigorous..."**,*John Gabriel*

**EVEN MORE PROOF THAT THERE IS A GOD**,*Ed Conrad***Re: Solution manual to Principles of Managerial Finance 11th Ed., by Lawrence J. Gitman**,*neelamtauqeer16***Technical version of Kolmogorov's strong law of large numbers**,*Paul***Re: Technical version of Kolmogorov's strong law of large numbers**,*Roland Franzius***Re: Technical version of Kolmogorov's strong law of large numbers**,*Paul***Re: Technical version of Kolmogorov's strong law of large numbers**,*Roland Franzius***Re: Technical version of Kolmogorov's strong law of large numbers**,*Paul***Re: Technical version of Kolmogorov's strong law of large numbers**,*Roland Franzius***Re: Technical version of Kolmogorov's strong law of large numbers**,*Paul*

**Re: Technical version of Kolmogorov's strong law of large numbers**,*dullrich***Re: Technical version of Kolmogorov's strong law of large numbers**,*Paul***Re: Technical version of Kolmogorov's strong law of large numbers**,*David C. Ullrich***Re: Technical version of Kolmogorov's strong law of large numbers**,*Paul***Re: Technical version of Kolmogorov's strong law of large numbers**,*Paul***Re: Technical version of Kolmogorov's strong law of large numbers**,*dullrich***Re: Technical version of Kolmogorov's strong law of large numbers**,*Paul*

**Re: Technical version of Kolmogorov's strong law of large numbers**,*Ray Vickson***Re: Technical version of Kolmogorov's strong law of large numbers**,*dullrich***Re: Technical version of Kolmogorov's strong law of large numbers**,*Paul***Re: Technical version of Kolmogorov's strong law of large numbers**,*dullrich***Re: Technical version of Kolmogorov's strong law of large numbers**,*Peter Percival***Re: Technical version of Kolmogorov's strong law of large numbers**,*John Dawkins***Re: Technical version of Kolmogorov's strong law of large numbers**,*dullrich***Re: Technical version of Kolmogorov's strong law of large numbers**,*John Dawkins*

**well ordering a linear order**,*William Elliot***Re: well ordering a linear order**,*dullrich***Re: well ordering a linear order**,*Arturo Magidin***Re: well ordering a linear order**,*William Elliot***Re: well ordering a linear order**,*Arturo Magidin***Re: well ordering a linear order**,*William Elliot***Re: well ordering a linear order**,*Arturo Magidin***Re: well ordering a linear order**,*Arturo Magidin***Re: well ordering a linear order**,*William Elliot*

**Re: well ordering a linear order**,*Nimber***Re: well ordering a linear order**,*Herman Rubin*

**product topology**,*Mathman***Re: product topology**,*Robin Chapman*

**lower limit and standard topology**,*cootercrew***Re: lower limit and standard topology**,*smn***Re: lower limit and standard topology**,*cootercrew***Re: lower limit and standard topology**,*Herman Rubin***Re: lower limit and standard topology**,*Mathman***Re: lower limit and standard topology**,*cootercrew***Re: lower limit and standard topology**,*quasi*

**Re: lower limit and standard topology**,*quasi***Re: lower limit and standard topology**,*William Elliot*

**Univ. Cincinnati math professors: invite-ask Overhaul of Old Logic to New Logic to arxiv**,*Archimedes Plutonium***A straight line has no derivative. It has a slope.**,*John Gabriel***Re: A straight line has no derivative. It has a slope.**,*Boyd Smith******* TROLL ALERT *******,*Dan Christensen***Re: A straight line has no derivative. It has a slope.**,*John Gabriel*

**GeogebraTube bans John Gabriel for publishing truth.**,*John Gabriel******* TROLL ALERT ******,*Dan Christensen***Re: GeogebraTube bans John Gabriel for publishing truth.**,*John Gabriel***Re: GeogebraTube bans John Gabriel for publishing truth.**,*John Gabriel***Re: GeogebraTube bans John Gabriel for publishing truth.**,*John Gabriel*

**Chapter 2; Infinity borderline at 1*10^603, math's first precision definition of infinity #39 Correcting Math 4th ed**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Iowa State Univ. math professors: invite-ask True Representation of the Irrational Number to arxiv #2199 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***To WM**,*Sam Sung***Re: To WM**,*Nimber*

**Infinity: The Story So Far (Revised)**,*Dan Christensen***Re: Infinity: The Story So Far (Revised)**,*John Gabriel******* TROLL ALERT ******,*Dan Christensen***Re: **** TROLL ALERT ******,*John Gabriel***Re: **** TROLL ALERT ******,*Sam Jones*

**Re: Infinity: The Story So Far (Revised)**,*Port563*

**Space Aliens Aren't So Bad After All**,*Kevin Barry***I WISH MY BOWL WERE BIGGER**,*Col. Edmund Burke***Utah State Univ. math professors: invite-ask New Era Prime Number Theorem to arxiv #2198 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***A polynomial is**,*humbled survivor***what are solution for x*x+1<0 ?**,*drhuang57***Re: what are solution for x*x+1<0 ?**,*quasi***Re: what are solution for x*x+1<0 ?**,*John Gabriel***Re: what are solution for x*x+1<0 ?**,*Eric Smith***Re: what are solution for x*x+1<0 ?**,*Port563*

**Re: what are solution for x*x+1<0 ?**,*George Cornelius***Re: what are solution for x*x+1<0 ?**,*Carl Smith***Re: what are solution for x*x+1<0 ?**,*mathedman*

**Brainy Mathdoku -- need help and feedback**,*Jenny Davidson***Re: Brainy Mathdoku -- need help and feedback**,*Peter Percival***Re: Brainy Mathdoku -- need help and feedback**,*Jenny Davidson*

**Cal Tech Univ physics-math professors: invite-send Deriving Dirac & Schrodinger Equations from Maxwell Equations to arxiv**,*Archimedes Plutonium***John Gabriel doesn't play dice with mathematics.**,*John Gabriel******* TROLL ALERT ******,*Dan Christensen***Re: John Gabriel doesn't play dice with mathematics.**,*John Gabriel***Re: John Gabriel doesn't play dice with mathematics.**,*Walt Smith***Re: John Gabriel doesn't play dice with mathematics.**,*John Gabriel*

**Re: John Gabriel doesn't play dice with mathematics.**,*Tony Smith***Re: John Gabriel doesn't play dice with mathematics.**,*dullrich***Re: John Gabriel doesn't play dice with mathematics.**,*John Gabriel*

**Re: John Gabriel doesn't play dice with mathematics.**,*John Gabriel***Re: John Gabriel doesn't play dice with mathematics.**,*John Gabriel*

**There is no such thing as an 'instantaneous rate'. A straight line has no derivative.**,*John Gabriel***Re: There is no such thing as an 'instantaneous rate'. A straight line has no derivative.**,*John Gabriel******* TROLL ALERT ******,*Dan Christensen***Re: There is no such thing as an 'instantaneous rate'. A straight line has no derivative.**,*Carl Smith***Re: There is no such thing as an 'instantaneous rate'. A straight line has no derivative.**,*dullrich***Re: There is no such thing as an 'instantaneous rate'. A straight line has no derivative.**,*John Gabriel***Re: There is no such thing as an 'instantaneous rate'. A straight line has no derivative.**,*John Gabriel***Re: There is no such thing as an 'instantaneous rate'. A straight line has no derivative.**,*Port563***Re: There is no such thing as an 'instantaneous rate'. A straight line has no derivative.**,*Sam Jones***Re: There is no such thing as an 'instantaneous rate'. A straight line has no derivative.**,*John Gabriel***Re: There is no such thing as an 'instantaneous rate'. A straight line has no derivative.**,*Walt Smith***Re: There is no such thing as an 'instantaneous rate'. A straight line has no derivative.**,*Space998*

**Re: There is no such thing as an 'instantaneous rate'. A straight line has no derivative.**,*John Gabriel***Re: There is no such thing as an 'instantaneous rate'. A straight line has no derivative.**,*John Gabriel***Re: There is no such thing as an 'instantaneous rate'. A straight line has no derivative.**,*John Gabriel***Re: There is no such thing as an 'instantaneous rate'. A straight line has no derivative.**,*konyberg***Re: There is no such thing as an 'instantaneous rate'. A straight line has no derivative.**,*John Gabriel***Re: There is no such thing as an 'instantaneous rate'. A straight line has no derivative.**,*Voltage***Re: There is no such thing as an 'instantaneous rate'. A straight line has no derivative.**,*konyberg***Re: There is no such thing as an 'instantaneous rate'. A straight line has no derivative.**,*John Gabriel***Re: There is no such thing as an 'instantaneous rate'. A straight line has no derivative.**,*konyberg***Re: There is no such thing as an 'instantaneous rate'. A straight line has no derivative.**,*John Gabriel***Re: There is no such thing as an 'instantaneous rate'. A straight line has no derivative.**,*konyberg***Re: There is no such thing as an 'instantaneous rate'. A straight line has no derivative.**,*John Gabriel***Re: There is no such thing as an 'instantaneous rate'. A straight line has no derivative.**,*konyberg***Re: There is no such thing as an 'instantaneous rate'. A straight line has no derivative.**,*John Gabriel***Re: There is no such thing as an 'instantaneous rate'. A straight line has no derivative.**,*Mr Newsgroup*

**Re: There is no such thing as an 'instantaneous rate'. A straight line has no derivative.**,*Brian***Re: There is no such thing as an 'instantaneous rate'. A straight line has no derivative.**,*konyberg***Re: There is no such thing as an 'instantaneous rate'. A straight line has no derivative.**,*John Gabriel***Re: There is no such thing as an 'instantaneous rate'. A straight line has no derivative.**,*Space998*

**valid proofs of Euclid IP and Twin Primes, all three proofs alongside one another #38 Correcting Math 4th ed**,*Archimedes Plutonium***What is a number? (By a real mathematician - John Gabriel)**,*John Gabriel******* TROLL ALERT ******,*Dan Christensen***Re: What is a number? (By a real mathematician - John Gabriel)**,*Boyd Smith***Re: What is a number? (By a real mathematician - John Gabriel)**,*John Gabriel***Re: What is a number? (By a real mathematician - John Gabriel)**,*konyberg***Re: What is a number? (By a real mathematician - John Gabriel)**,*John Gabriel***Re: What is a number? (By a real mathematician - John Gabriel)**,*konyberg***Re: What is a number? (By a real mathematician - John Gabriel)**,*John Gabriel***Re: What is a number? (By a real mathematician - John Gabriel)**,*konyberg***Re: What is a number? (By a real mathematician - John Gabriel)**,*John Gabriel***Re: What is a number? (By a real mathematician - John Gabriel)**,*konyberg***Re: What is a number? (By a real mathematician - John Gabriel)**,*John Gabriel***Re: What is a number? (By a real mathematician - John Gabriel)**,*konyberg***Re: What is a number? (By a real mathematician - John Gabriel)**,*John Gabriel***Re: What is a number? (By a real mathematician - John Gabriel)**,*Walt Smith***Re: What is a number? (By a real mathematician - John Gabriel)**,*konyberg***Re: What is a number? (By a real mathematician - John Gabriel)**,*Space998***Re: What is a number? (By a real mathematician - John Gabriel)**,*John Gabriel***Re: What is a number? (By a real mathematician - John Gabriel)**,*konyberg***Re: What is a number? (By a real mathematician - John Gabriel)**,*konyberg***Re: What is a number? (By a real mathematician - John Gabriel)**,*John Gabriel***Re: What is a number? (By a real mathematician - John Gabriel)**,*John Gabriel***Re: What is a number? (By a real mathematician - John Gabriel)**,*Dan Taylor*

**Re: What is a number? (By a real mathematician - John Gabriel)**,*John Gabriel***Re: What is a number? (By a real mathematician - John Gabriel)**,*John Gabriel*

**Definitions before New Era Prime Number Theorem Re: Utah State Univ. math professors: send True Prime Number Theorem to arxiv #2197**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Re: Definitions before New Era Prime Number Theorem Re: Utah State Univ. math professors: send True Prime Number Theorem to arxiv #2197**,*Dan Christensen*

**I JUST TOOK A BIG SHIT**,*Col. Edmund Burke***FATAL ACCELERATION IN EINSTEIN'S SPECIAL RELATIVITY**,*Pentcho Valev***Re: FATAL ACCELERATION IN EINSTEIN'S SPECIAL RELATIVITY**,*Pentcho Valev***Re: FATAL ACCELERATION IN EINSTEIN'S SPECIAL RELATIVITY**,*Pentcho Valev***Re: FATAL ACCELERATION IN EINSTEIN'S SPECIAL RELATIVITY**,*Pentcho Valev*

**What is a number again? (revised)**,*Dan Christensen***Re: What is a number again? (revised)**,*Col. Edmund Burke***Re: What is a number again? (revised)**,*John Gabriel*

**FALLING LIGHT IN THE WORLDS OF NEWTON AND EINSTEIN**,*Pentcho Valev***Re: FALLING LIGHT IN THE WORLDS OF NEWTON AND EINSTEIN**,*Pentcho Valev*

**Why some progressions are fixed at infinity and series not Re: Utah State Univ. math professors: send True Prime Number Theorem to arxiv #2196**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Is 1/2 the same as 2/4 if m/n means "m divided by n"?**,*John Gabriel******* TROLL ALERT ******,*Dan Christensen***Re: Is 1/2 the same as 2/4 if m/n means "m divided by n"?**,*John Gabriel***Re: Is 1/2 the same as 2/4 if m/n means "m divided by n"? oh my god. who the hell cares. wibble.**,*Evan Smith***Re: Is 1/2 the same as 2/4 if m/n means "m divided by n"?**,*Freda Parkins***Re: Is 1/2 the same as 2/4 if m/n means "m divided by n"?**,*John Gabriel***Re: Is 1/2 the same as 2/4 if m/n means "m divided by n"?**,*John Gabriel*

**Infinity borderband 1*10^603 to 1.414..*10^603 Re: Utah State Univ. math professors: send True Prime Number Theorem to arxiv #2195**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Infinity fixing equality of convergency Re: Utah State Univ. math professors: send True Prime Number Theorem to arxiv #2194**,*Archimedes Plutonium***do you know geography?**,*RichD***Re: do you know geography?**,*samiso***Re: do you know geography?**,*George Cornelius***Re: do you know geography?**,*samsoia*

**Censorship of any kind is never good. GeogebraTube is a dishonest organisation.**,*John Gabriel***Re: Censorship of any kind is never good. GeogebraTube is a dishonest organisation.**,*John Gabriel***Re: Censorship of any kind is never good. GeogebraTube is a dishonest organisation.**,*Greg Smith***Re: Censorship of any kind is never good. GeogebraTube is a dishonest organisation.**,*Freda Parkins***Re: Censorship of any kind is never good. GeogebraTube is a dishonest organisation.**,*YBM******* TROLL ALERT ****.**,*Dan Christensen***Re: Censorship of any kind is never good. GeogebraTube is a dishonest organisation.**,*John Gabriel***Re: Censorship of any kind is never good. GeogebraTube is a dishonest organisation.**,*John Gabriel***Re: Censorship of any kind is never good. GeogebraTube is a dishonest organisation.**,*John Gabriel***Re: Censorship of any kind is never good. GeogebraTube is a dishonest organisation.**,*John Gabriel***Re: Censorship of any kind is never good. GeogebraTube is a dishonest organisation.**,*John Gabriel*

**Violations Of The Laws Of Physics**,*Kevin Barry***There Are No Safety Standards In Physics**,*Kevin Barry***Summary of Goldbach proof; Stanford Univ. math professors: send Goldbach proof to arxiv**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Wikipedia attempts at Euclid Infinitude of Primes proof through the years #37 Correcting Math 4th ed**,*Archimedes Plutonium*- <Possible follow-ups>
**Wikipedia attempts at Euclid Infinitude of Primes proof through the years #37 Correcting Math 4th ed**,*Archimedes Plutonium*

**Infinity fixing equality of convergency Re: Utah State Univ. math professors: send True Prime Number Theorem to arxiv #2193**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Solutions manual, Test bank for International Management Managing Across Borders and Cultures Text and Cases 8e Helen Deresky contact directly at discountsmtb(at)hotmail(dot)com**,*smtbhelp***Shitsplat Report: 10-20-14**,*Sergeant Haines***Re: Shitsplat Report: 10-20-14**,*samiso***Re: Shitsplat Report: 10-20-14**,*Col. Edmund Burke*

**Vector bases**,*William Elliot***Re: Vector bases**,*Arturo Magidin***Re: Vector bases**,*William Elliot***Re: Vector bases**,*Arturo Magidin*

**Univ Michigan math professors: invite Kepler Packing proof to arxiv**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Re: Univ Michigan math professors: invite Kepler Packing proof to arxiv**,*Dan Christensen***Re: Univ Michigan math professors: invite Kepler Packing proof to arxiv**,*Archimedes Plutonium*

- <Possible follow-ups>
**Univ Michigan math professors: invite Kepler Packing proof to arxiv**,*Archimedes Plutonium*

**Connected?**,*William Elliot***Re: Connected?**,*William Elliot***Re: Connected?**,*Mike Terry***Re: Connected?**,*William Elliot*

**ccc**,*William Elliot***summary of Beal & FLT proofs; Princeton Univ. math professors: invite Proofs of Beal & Fermat's Last Theorem to arxiv**,*Archimedes Plutonium***100759293214567 and 104899295810901231 agree in the last 61 steps of Collatz sequence until 1**,*David Bernier***Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*davidlpetry***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*X.Y. Newberry***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*Dan Christensen***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*Robin Chapman***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*davidlpetry*

**Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*samiso***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*Robin Chapman***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*mueckenh***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*X.Y. Newberry***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*davidlpetry***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*FredJeffries***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*Dan Christensen*

**Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*John Gabriel******* TROLL ALERT ******,*Dan Christensen***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*Chad Smith***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*Port563*

**Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*grahamcooper7***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*Virgil***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*Dan Christensen***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*Dan Christensen***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*Virgil***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*Dan Christensen***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*Virgil***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*Virgil***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*Virgil***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*Virgil***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*Virgil***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*Virgil***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*Virgil***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*grahamcooper7*

**Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*xcottcraver***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*Dan Christensen***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*davidlpetry***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*Dan Christensen***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*Tommy***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*davidlpetry***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*Jim Burns***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*Jim Burns***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*Jussi Piitulainen***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*Virgil***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*Robin Chapman***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*Virgil***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*Virgil***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*FredJeffries***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*FredJeffries***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*FredJeffries***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*Virgil***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*FredJeffries***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*FredJeffries***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*FredJeffries***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*mueckenh***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*Virgil***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*Virgil***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*Virgil***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*Virgil***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*Virgil***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*Virgil***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*Ralf Bader***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*Ralf Bader***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*Ralf Bader***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*Virgil***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*Ralf Bader***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*mueckenh***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*Ralf Bader***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*mueckenh***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*Ralf Bader***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*Virgil***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*YBM***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*mueckenh***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*YBM***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*WM***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*YBM***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*Virgil***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*YBM***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*WM***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*YBM***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*WM***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*YBM***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*WM***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*YBM***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*Virgil***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*Virgil***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*Virgil***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*Virgil***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*Virgil***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*Virgil***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*Virgil***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*davidlpetry***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*Tommy***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*davidlpetry***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*FredJeffries***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*Virgil***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*davidlpetry***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*Virgil***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*FredJeffries***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*FredJeffries***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*Virgil***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*FredJeffries***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*Virgil***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*Virgil***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*Virgil***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*Virgil***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*davidlpetry***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*Nimber***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*davidlpetry***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*Nimber***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*Virgil***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*mueckenh***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*Virgil***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*mueckenh***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*Virgil***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*Virgil***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*mueckenh***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*mueckenh***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*Virgil***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*FredJeffries***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*Virgil***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*mueckenh***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*Virgil***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*mueckenh***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*WM***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*Virgil***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*WM***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*Virgil***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*WM***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*Virgil***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*WM***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*Virgil***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*Virgil***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*Virgil***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*WM***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*Virgil***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*WM***Re: WM claims surjections from set S to set 2^S**,*Virgil***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*Virgil***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*mueckenh***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*FredJeffries***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*mueckenh***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*Virgil***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*Dan Christensen***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*mueckenh***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*Dan Christensen***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*mueckenh***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*Dan Christensen***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*mueckenh***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*Dan Christensen***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*Dan Christensen***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*WM***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*Dan Christensen***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*WM***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*Dan Christensen***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*WM***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*Dan Christensen***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*Virgil***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*WM***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*Dan Christensen***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*Dan Christensen***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*WM***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*Virgil***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*WM***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*Virgil***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*Dan Christensen***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*Virgil***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*Michael Klemm***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*WM***Galois Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*Michael Klemm***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*Nimber***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*Dan Christensen***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*Virgil***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*Virgil***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*WM***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*Virgil***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*WM***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*Virgil***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*WM***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*Virgil***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*WM***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*Virgil***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*Virgil***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*Virgil***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*Virgil***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*Nimber***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*Virgil***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*mueckenh***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*Virgil***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*WM***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*Virgil***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*mueckenh***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*Virgil***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*mueckenh***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*Virgil***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*WM***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*Virgil***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*WM***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*Virgil***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*YBM***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*mueckenh***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*Virgil***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*Nimber***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*Nimber***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*FredJeffries***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*mueckenh***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*Virgil***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*Dan Christensen***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*Virgil***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*Virgil***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*Virgil***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*xcottcraver***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*X.Y. Newberry*

**Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*X.Y. Newberry***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*xcottcraver***Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*X.Y. Newberry*

**Re: Dispute over Infinity in SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN**,*FredJeffries*

**WM and the paradoxes of definability**,*wpihughes***Re: WM and the paradoxes of definability**,*mueckenh***Re: WM and the paradoxes of definability**,*wpihughes***Re: WM and the paradoxes of definability**,*mueckenh***Re: WM and the paradoxes of definability**,*Virgil***Re: WM and the paradoxes of definability**,*wpihughes***Re: WM and the paradoxes of definability**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: WM and the paradoxes of definability**,*wpihughes***Re: WM and the paradoxes of definability**,*wpihughes***Re: WM and the paradoxes of definability**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: WM and the paradoxes of definability**,*wpihughes***Re: WM and the paradoxes of definability**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: WM and the paradoxes of definability**,*wpihughes***Re: WM and the paradoxes of definability**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: WM and the paradoxes of definability**,*Virgil***Re: WM and the paradoxes of definability**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: WM and the paradoxes of definability**,*Zeit Geist***Re: WM and the paradoxes of definability**,*Virgil***Re: WM and the paradoxes of definability**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: WM and the paradoxes of definability**,*Zeit Geist***Re: WM and the paradoxes of definability**,*Virgil***Re: WM and the paradoxes of definability**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: WM and the paradoxes of definability**,*Virgil***Re: WM and the paradoxes of definability**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: WM and the paradoxes of definability**,*Zeit Geist***Re: WM and the paradoxes of definability**,*Virgil***Re: WM and the paradoxes of definability**,*Virgil***Re: WM and the paradoxes of definability**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: WM and the paradoxes of definability**,*Virgil***Re: WM and the paradoxes of definability**,*Virgil***Re: WM and the paradoxes of definability**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: WM and the paradoxes of definability**,*Virgil***Re: WM and the paradoxes of definability**,*Virgil*

**Re: WM and the paradoxes of definability**,*Virgil*

**Re: WM and the paradoxes of definability**,*mueckenh***Re: WM and the paradoxes of definability**,*samiso***Re: WM and the paradoxes of definability**,*wpihughes*

**Dik T. Winter doing Euclid's Infinitude of Primes proof #36 Correcting Math 4th ed**,*Archimedes Plutonium***New zeta look-alikes Re: Utah State Univ. math professors: invite True Prime Number Theorem to arxiv #2191**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Particle Physics, Wormholes, and Paranormal Waves**,*Kevin Barry***Brain Fixing Part II**,*Kevin Barry***solutions manual, test bank for Corporate Finance 2nd Canadian Edition 2e Jonathan Berk Peter DeMarzo David Stangeland contact directly at discountsmtb(at)hotmail(dot)com**,*smtbhelp***THE WAVELENGTH FRAUD IN EINSTEIN'S RELATIVITY**,*Pentcho Valev***Re: THE WAVELENGTH FRAUD IN EINSTEIN'S RELATIVITY**,*Pentcho Valev*

**New zeta look-alikes Re: Utah State Univ. math professors: invite True Prime Number Theorem to arxiv #2188 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***SAMISCO IS GAY AS HELL**,*Col. Edmund Burke***Re: SAMISCO IS GAY AS HELL**,*John Gabriel***Re: SAMISCO IS GAY AS HELL**,*Col. Edmund Burke*

**The Marine Corps Is The Fourth Branch of Government**,*Kevin Barry***Re: The Marine Corps Is The Fourth Branch of Government**,*Col. Edmund Burke*

**A LETTER I RECEIVED FROM HOMELAND SECURITY**,*Col. Edmund Burke***Longest ladder in 3D**,*salonowiec***Re: Longest ladder in 3D**,*George Cornelius*

**3.23 - A lesson on fractions for professor and students of mythmatics.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 3.23 - A lesson on fractions for professor and students of mythmatics.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 3.23 - A lesson on fractions for professor and students of mythmatics.**,*Gary Smith******* TROLL ALERT ******,*Dan Christensen*

**Re: SPACETIME WRONG, THE LIGHT POSTULATE TRUE ?**,*Pentcho Valev***Riddled Plane**,*William Elliot***Re: Riddled Plane**,*quasi***Re: Riddled Plane**,*William Elliot***Re: Riddled Plane**,*quasi***Re: Riddled Plane**,*William Elliot***Re: Riddled Plane**,*quasi***Re: Riddled Plane**,*quasi***Re: Riddled Plane**,*quasi***Re: Riddled Plane**,*Niels Diepeveen***Re: Riddled Plane**,*quasi***Re: Riddled Plane**,*William Elliot***Re: Riddled Plane**,*quasi***Re: Riddled Plane**,*William Elliot***Re: Riddled Plane**,*Niels Diepeveen***Re: Riddled Plane**,*dullrich***Re: Riddled Plane**,*dullrich***Re: Riddled Plane**,*dullrich***Re: Riddled Plane**,*William Elliot*

**Cambridge Univ. math professors: invite No Odd Perfect & Finiteness of Perfect Numbers Set to arxiv #2188 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***History of the "quantum of action" (1900-1927) / by Socratus /**,*isocratus***Thomas' Calculus Early Transcendentals 11th ed by Thomas, Finney**,*peter***Re: Common Core Question Asks: 'There are 25 Sheep and 5 Dogs in a Flock. How Old is the Shepherd?'**,*John Gabriel*- <Possible follow-ups>
**Re: Common Core Question Asks: 'There are 25 Sheep and 5 Dogs in a Flock. How Old is the Shepherd?'**,*Pubkeybreaker***Re: Common Core Question Asks: 'There are 25 Sheep and 5 Dogs in a Flock. How Old is the Shepherd?'**,*John Gabriel*

**Re: who was the most handsome mathematician ever?**,*dobrowolska . urszula***Re: who was the most handsome mathematician ever?**,*samiso***Re: who was the most handsome mathematician ever?**,*Peter Percival*

**3.22 - When 1/2 is equal to 2/3.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 3.22 - When 1/2 is equal to 2/3.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 3.22 - When 1/2 is equal to 2/3.**,*Bill***Re: 3.22 - When 1/2 is equal to 2/3.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 3.22 - When 1/2 is equal to 2/3.**,*Bill*

**Re: 3.22 - When 1/2 is equal to 2/3.**,*Evan Smith***Re: 3.22 - When 1/2 is equal to 2/3.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 3.22 - When 1/2 is equal to 2/3.**,*Gary Smith*

**Re: 3.22 - When 1/2 is equal to 2/3.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 3.22 - When 1/2 is equal to 2/3.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 3.22 - When 1/2 is equal to 2/3.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 3.22 - When 1/2 is equal to 2/3.**,*John Gabriel*

**Re: 3.22 - When 1/2 is equal to 2/3.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 3.22 - When 1/2 is equal to 2/3.**,*Port563***Re: 3.22 - When 1/2 is equal to 2/3.**,*John Smith***Re: 3.22 - When 1/2 is equal to 2/3.**,*John Smith***Re: 3.22 - When 1/2 is equal to 2/3.**,*Space998***Re: 3.22 - When 1/2 is equal to 2/3.**,*John Smith***Re: 3.22 - When 1/2 is equal to 2/3.**,*John Smith***Re: 3.22 - When 1/2 is equal to 2/3.**,*Space998***Re: 3.22 - When 1/2 is equal to 2/3.**,*John Smith***Re: 3.22 - When 1/2 is equal to 2/3.**,*Port563***Re: 3.22 - When 1/2 is equal to 2/3.**,*John Smith*

**Re: 3.22 - When 1/2 is equal to 2/3.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 3.22 - When 1/2 is equal to 2/3.**,*John Gabriel*

****** TROLL ALERT ******,*Dan Christensen***Re: 3.22 - When 1/2 is equal to 2/3.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 3.22 - When 1/2 is equal to 2/3.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 3.22 - When 1/2 is equal to 2/3.**,*Chad Smith******* TROLL ALERT ******,*Dan Christensen*

**3.21 - The average is at the heart of calculus, not the fraudulent limit concept.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 3.21 - The average is at the heart of calculus, not the fraudulent limit concept.**,*FredJeffries******* TROLL ALERT ******,*Dan Christensen***Re: 3.21 - The average is at the heart of calculus, not the fraudulent limit concept.**,*dullrich***Re: 3.21 - The average is at the heart of calculus, not the fraudulent limit concept.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 3.21 - The average is at the heart of calculus, not the fraudulent limit concept.**,*Matt Smith***Re: 3.21 - The average is at the heart of calculus, not the fraudulent limit concept.**,*dullrich***Re: 3.21 - The average is at the heart of calculus, not the fraudulent limit concept.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 3.21 - The average is at the heart of calculus, not the fraudulent limit concept.**,*FredJeffries***Re: 3.21 - The average is at the heart of calculus, not the fraudulent limit concept.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 3.21 - The average is at the heart of calculus, not the fraudulent limit concept.**,*dullrich***Re: 3.21 - The average is at the heart of calculus, not the fraudulent limit concept.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 3.21 - The average is at the heart of calculus, not the fraudulent limit concept.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 3.21 - The average is at the heart of calculus, not the fraudulent limit concept.**,*dullrich***Re: 3.21 - The average is at the heart of calculus, not the fraudulent limit concept.**,*John Gabriel*

**Re: 3.21 - The average is at the heart of calculus, not the fraudulent limit concept.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 3.21 - The average is at the heart of calculus, not the fraudulent limit concept.**,*dullrich***Re: 3.21 - The average is at the heart of calculus, not the fraudulent limit concept.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 3.21 - The average is at the heart of calculus, not the fraudulent limit concept.**,*dullrich***Re: 3.21 - The average is at the heart of calculus, not the fraudulent limit concept.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 3.21 - The average is at the heart of calculus, not the fraudulent limit concept.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 3.21 - The average is at the heart of calculus, not the fraudulent limit concept.**,*Boyd Smith*

**Re: 3.21 - The average is at the heart of calculus, not the fraudulent limit concept.**,*John Gabriel*

**why zetas never converge, yet Prime Numbers do Re: Utah State Univ. math professors: invite True Prime Number Theorem to arxiv #2187 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***convergence is almost like sameness Re: why zetas never converge, yet Prime Numbers do**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Equality, Equivalence, and Convergency compared with examples**,*Archimedes Plutonium*

**Re: why zetas never converge, yet Prime Numbers do Re: Utah State Univ. math professors: invite True Prime Number Theorem to arxiv #2187 Correcting Math**,*Dan Christensen*

**Valid Infinitude of Primes along with Infinitude of Twin Primes proofs #35 Correcting Math 4th ed**,*Archimedes Plutonium***probably no math proof was ever checked for logical soundness**,*Archimedes Plutonium***My survey shows 84% of math professors fail in delivering a valid Infinitude of primes proof**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Re: My survey shows 84% of math professors fail in delivering a valid Infinitude of primes proof**,*Space998***easy to prove whether any set is finite or infinite**,*Archimedes Plutonium***twin primes Re: easy to prove whether any set is finite or infinite**,*Archimedes Plutonium*

**get over it**,*Space998*

**solutions manual, test bank for Essentials of Management Information Systems (MIS) 10e Kenneth Laudon Jane Laudon contact directly at discountsmtb(at)hotmail(dot)com**,*smtbhelp***The Omniscient God**,*Kevin Barry***I'M THE CZAR HERE**,*Col. Edmund Burke***Re: *** CRIMINAL DANIEL HEGGLIN EX MORGAN STANLEY HONG KONG & LONDON + ARRESTED MANY TIMES PAOLO BARRAI (MERCATO LIBERO): MAKING INSIDER DEALING & TRADING, NAZI, KKKK KILLERS FROM KU KLUK KLAN, BRIBED, THIEVES, MAFIA EURO WASHERS BY FINTER BANK**,*MEGLIO MORTO CHE BERLUSCONICCHIO***§ 545 A matter of notation?**,*mueckenh***Re: § 545 A matter of notation?**,*YBM***Re: § 545 A matter of notation?**,*mueckenh***Re: § 545 A matter of notation?**,*YBM***Re: § 545 A matter of notation?**,*Virgil***Re: § 545 A matter of notation?**,*samiso***Re: § 545 A matter of notation?**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: § 545 A matter of notation?**,*mueckenh***Re: § 545 A matter of notation?**,*Virgil***Re: § 545 A matter of notation?**,*John Gabriel***Re: § 545 A matter of notation?**,*Virgil***Re: § 545 A matter of notation?**,*Zeit Geist*

**Re: § 545 A matter of notation?**,*PotatoSauce***Re: § 545 A matter of notation?**,*PotatoSauce***Re: § 545 A matter of notation?**,*mueckenh***Re: § 545 A matter of notation?**,*Virgil***Re: ï¿½ 545 A matter of notation?**,*mueckenh***Re: ï¿½ 545 A matter of notation?**,*Virgil***Re: ï¿½ 545 A matter of notation?**,*mueckenh***Re: ï¿½ 545 A matter of notation?**,*Virgil***Re: ï¿½ 545 A matter of notation?**,*mueckenh***Re: ï¿½ 545 A matter of notation?**,*Virgil***Re: ï¿½ 545 A matter of notation?**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: ï¿½ 545 A matter of notation?**,*Zeit Geist***Re: ? 545 A matter of notation?**,*YBM***Re: ? 545 A matter of notation?**,*Virgil***Re: ? 545 A matter of notation?**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: ? 545 A matter of notation?**,*Virgil***Re: ? 545 A matter of notation?**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: ? 545 A matter of notation?**,*Virgil***Re: ? 545 A matter of notation?**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: ? 545 A matter of notation?**,*Virgil***Re: ? 545 A matter of notation?**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: ? 545 A matter of notation?**,*Virgil***Re: ? 545 A matter of notation?**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: ? 545 A matter of notation?**,*Virgil***Re: ? 545 A matter of notation?**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: ? 545 A matter of notation?**,*Virgil***Re: ? 545 A matter of notation?**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: WM is lying, again, as usual**,*Virgil***Re: WM is lying, again, as usual**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: WM is lying, again, as usual**,*Virgil***Re: ? 545 A matter of notation?**,*Zeit Geist***Re: ? 545 A matter of notation?**,*Virgil***Re: ? 545 A matter of notation?**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: ? 545 A matter of notation?**,*Virgil***Re: ? 545 A matter of notation?**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: ? 545 A matter of notation?**,*Virgil***Re: ? 545 A matter of notation?**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: ? 545 A matter of notation?**,*Virgil***Re: ? 545 A matter of notation?**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: ? 545 A matter of notation?**,*Virgil***Re: ? 545 A matter of notation?**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: ? 545 A matter of notation?**,*Virgil***Re: ? 545 A matter of notation?**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: ? 545 A matter of notation?**,*WM***Re: ? 545 A matter of notation?**,*Virgil***Re: ? 545 A matter of notation?**,*WM***Re: ? 545 A matter of notation?**,*Virgil***Re: ? 545 A matter of notation?**,*WM***Re: ? 545 A matter of notation?**,*Virgil***Re: ? 545 A matter of notation?**,*WM***Re: ? 545 A matter of notation?**,*WM***Re: ? 545 A matter of notation?**,*Virgil***Re: ? 545 A matter of notation?**,*WM***Re: ? 545 A matter of notation?**,*Virgil***Re: ? 545 A matter of notation?**,*WM***Re: ? 545 A matter of notation?**,*samsoia***Re: ï¿½ 545 A matter of notation?**,*Virgil***Re: ï¿½ 545 A matter of notation?**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: ï¿½ 545 A matter of notation?**,*Virgil***Re: ï¿½ 545 A matter of notation?**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: ï¿½ 545 A matter of notation?**,*Virgil*

**Re: § 545 A matter of notation?**,*Virgil***Re: § 545 A matter of notation?**,*Martin Shobe***Re: § 545 A matter of notation?**,*mueckenh***Re: § 545 A matter of notation?**,*Martin Shobe***Re: § 545 A matter of notation?**,*mueckenh***Re: § 545 A matter of notation?**,*Virgil***Re: § 545 A matter of notation?**,*Martin Shobe***Re: § 545 A matter of notation?**,*Virgil***Re: ï¿½ 545 A matter of notation?**,*mueckenh***Re: ï¿½ 545 A matter of notation?**,*Virgil***Re: ï¿½ 545 A matter of notation?**,*mueckenh***Re: ï¿½ 545 A matter of notation?**,*Virgil***Re: ï¿½ 545 A matter of notation?**,*mueckenh***Re: ï¿½ 545 A matter of notation?**,*Virgil***Re: ï¿½ 545 A matter of notation?**,*mueckenh***Re: ï¿½ 545 A matter of notation?**,*Virgil***Re: § 545 A matter of notation?**,*mueckenh***Re: § 545 A matter of notation?**,*Virgil***Re: § 545 A matter of notation?**,*Virgil*

**Re: § 545 A matter of notation?**,*Zeit Geist***Re: § 545 A matter of notation?**,*John Gabriel***Re: § 545 A matter of notation?**,*John Gabriel***Re: § 545 A matter of notation?**,*Space998*

**Nearly constant function**,*William Elliot***Re: Nearly constant function**,*quasi***Re: Nearly constant function**,*William Elliot***Re: Nearly constant function**,*quasi*

**HOW EINSTEIN RUINED SCIENCE**,*Pentcho Valev***Re: HOW EINSTEIN RUINED SCIENCE**,*Pentcho Valev*

**Precision defining Convergence Re: Utah State Univ. math professors: invite True Prime Number Theorem to arxiv #2186 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Re: Precision defining Convergence Re: Utah State Univ. math professors: invite True Prime Number Theorem to arxiv #2186 Correcting Math**,*Dan Christensen***Re: Precision defining Convergence Re: Utah State Univ. math professors: invite True Prime Number Theorem to arxiv #2186 Correcting Math**,*Space998*

**Point Removal Invarian Spaces**,*William Elliot***A PROPOSITION FOR WM [PART 2]**,*grahamcooper7***Re: A PROPOSITION FOR WM [PART 2]**,*Dan Christensen***Re: A PROPOSITION FOR WM [PART 2]**,*grahamcooper7***Re: A PROPOSITION FOR WM [PART 2]**,*Dan Christensen*

**Re: A PROPOSITION FOR WM [PART 2]**,*Zeit Geist***Re: A PROPOSITION FOR WM [PART 2]**,*grahamcooper7*

**Re: A PROPOSITION FOR WM [PART 2]**,*Dan Christensen*

**Re: Math...is just a**,*Space998***Re: Math...is just a**,*samiso***Re: Math...is just a**,*Space998*

- <Possible follow-ups>
**Re: Math...is just a**,*Bill**Message not available***Re: Math...is just a**,*Bill*

**Re: Math...is just a**,*Herman Rubin*

**Examples for transfinite induction**,*Nimber***Stillwell attempt at Euclid's Infinitude of Primes proof #34 Correcting Math 4th ed**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Can use 2 progression rather than 10 Re: Utah State Univ. math professors: invite True Prime Number Theorem to arxiv #2185 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***I REMAIN UNDEFEATED**,*Col. Edmund Burke***Proving an odd integer to be prime.**,*djoyce099***Re: Proving an odd integer to be prime.**,*PotatoSauce***Re: Proving an odd integer to be prime.**,*djoyce099***Re: Proving an odd integer to be prime.**,*quasi***Re: Proving an odd integer to be prime.**,*djoyce099*

**Re: Proving an odd integer to be prime.**,*Ben Bacarisse*

**YOU ARE MY ASSWORMS**,*Col. Edmund Burke***SONO ***ISSIMI ASSASSINI: ATTILIO VENTURA (EX BANCA LEONARDO ORA MEDIASET NAZISTSET MAFIASET CAMORRASET NDRANGASET ) E IENA OMICIDA GIANLUIGI MILLA (EX BANCA LEONARDO)! OLTRE CHE MEGA LAVA EURO MAFIOSI! HAN UCCISO-SUCIDATO 6 LORO SOTTOPOSTI ED ORA..**,*MICHELE CALZOLARI CREDIT SUISSE ASSOSIM***I'M THE BOSS OF THIS FROUP**,*Col. Edmund Burke***New Particle Is Both Matter And Antimatter. By Aiya-Oba**,*Aiya-Oba***§ 544 A countable number system**,*mueckenh***Re: § 544 A countable number system**,*Virgil***Re: § 544 A countable number system**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: § 544 A countable number system**,*mueckenh***Re: § 544 A countable number system**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: § 544 A countable number system**,*mueckenh***Re: § 544 A countable number system**,*Virgil***Re: § 544 A countable number system**,*mueckenh***Re: § 544 A countable number system**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: § 544 A countable number system**,*Virgil***Re: § 544 A countable number system**,*"Jürgen R."***Re: § 544 A countable number system**,*Virgil*

**Re: § 544 A countable number system**,*Ralf Bader***Re: § 544 A countable number system**,*mueckenh***Re: § 544 A countable number system**,*Virgil***Re: ï¿½ 544 A countable number system**,*mueckenh***Re: ï¿½ 544 A countable number system**,*Virgil***Re: ï¿½ 544 A countable number system**,*mueckenh***Re: ï¿½ 544 A countable number system**,*Virgil***Re: ï¿½ 544 A countable number system**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: i?? 544 A countable number system**,*Virgil***Re: ï¿½ 544 A countable number system**,*mueckenh***Re: ï¿½ 544 A countable number system**,*Virgil***Re: ï¿½ 544 A countable number system**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: ï¿½ 544 A countable number system**,*mueckenh***Re: ï¿½ 544 A countable number system**,*Virgil***Re: ï¿½ 544 A countable number system**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: ï¿½ 544 A countable number system**,*Zeit Geist*

**Re: § 544 A countable number system**,*wpihughes***Re: § 544 A countable number system**,*mueckenh***Re: § 544 A countable number system**,*wpihughes***Re: § 544 A countable number system**,*mueckenh***Re: § 544 A countable number system**,*Virgil***Re: § 544 A countable number system**,*Zeit Geist***Re: § 544 A countable number system**,*mueckenh***Re: § 544 A countable number system**,*Virgil***Re: § 544 A countable number system**,*Virgil*

**Re: § 544 A countable number system**,*FredJeffries***Re: § 544 A countable number system**,*John Gabriel***Re: § 544 A countable number system**,*Ross A. Finlayson***Re: § 544 A countable number system**,*John Gabriel***Re: § 544 A countable number system**,*Bill*

**Re: § 544 A countable number system**,*John Gabriel***Re: § 544 A countable number system**,*Dan Christensen***Re: § 544 A countable number system**,*Dan Christensen*

**Re: § 544 A countable number system**,*Dan Christensen***Re: § 544 A countable number system**,*mueckenh***Re: § 544 A countable number system**,*Dan Christensen***Re: § 544 A countable number system**,*mueckenh***Re: § 544 A countable number system**,*Dan Christensen***Re: § 544 A countable number system**,*mueckenh***Re: § 544 A countable number system**,*Virgil***Re: § 544 A countable number system**,*Virgil***Re: § 544 A countable number system**,*Virgil***Re: ï¿½ 544 A countable number system**,*mueckenh***Re: ï¿½ 544 A countable number system**,*Dan Christensen***Re: ï¿½ 544 A countable number system**,*Virgil*

**Re: § 544 A countable number system**,*Dan Christensen***Re: § 544 A countable number system**,*mueckenh***Re: § 544 A countable number system**,*Dan Christensen***Re: § 544 A countable number system**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: § 544 A countable number system**,*Virgil***Re: § 544 A countable number system**,*Dan Christensen***Re: § 544 A countable number system**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: § 544 A countable number system**,*Virgil***Re: § 544 A countable number system**,*Dan Christensen***Re: § 544 A countable number system**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: § 544 A countable number system**,*Virgil***Re: § 544 A countable number system**,*Dan Christensen***Re: § 544 A countable number system**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: § 544 A countable number system**,*Dan Christensen***Re: § 544 A countable number system**,*Virgil***Re: ï¿½ 544 A countable number system**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: ï¿½ 544 A countable number system**,*Virgil***Re: § 544 A countable number system**,*FredJeffries***Re: § 544 A countable number system**,*Virgil***Re: § 544 A countable number system**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: § 544 A countable number system**,*Virgil***Re: § 544 A countable number system**,*FredJeffries***Re: § 544 A countable number system**,*Ralf Bader***Re: § 544 A countable number system**,*Martin Shobe***Re: § 544 A countable number system**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: § 544 A countable number system**,*Martin Shobe***Re: § 544 A countable number system**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: § 544 A countable number system**,*Virgil***Re: § 544 A countable number system**,*Virgil*

**Harmonic series converges to approx 1388 at infinity Re: Utah State Univ. math professors: invite True Prime Number Theorem to arxiv #2184 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Refining the Convergence definition Re: Utah State Univ. math professors: invite True Prime Number Theorem to arxiv #2183 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Tracy-Widom distribution - Phase transitions - catastrophe/chaos - 'surface-fit'/'curve-fit' software**,*Peter Brooks***A challenge for WM!**,*Virgil***Re: A challenge for WM!**,*grahamcooper7***Re: A challenge for WM!**,*Virgil***Re: A challenge for WM!**,*grahamcooper7*

**zetas, Li(x), tangent, PPT, sqrt2? Re: Utah State Univ. math professors: invite True Prime Number Theorem to arxiv #2182 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Fixing A Broken Brain**,*Kevin Barry***Probility and voting**,*konyberg***Re: Probility and voting**,*George Cornelius***Re: Probility and voting**,*George Cornelius***Re: Probility and voting - update**,*George Cornelius***Re: Probility and voting - update**,*konyberg***Re: Probility and voting**,*Bill***Re: Probility and voting**,*konyberg*

**Probility**,*konyberg***Re: Probility**,*konyberg***Re: Probility**,*Roland Franzius***Re: Probility**,*Bill***Re: Probility**,*Jussi Piitulainen***Re: Probility**,*George Cornelius***Re: Probility**,*konyberg***Re: Probility**,*GCornelius***Re: Probility**,*Roland Franzius***Re: Probility**,*Bill*

**Re: Probility**,*Martin Shobe***Re: Probility**,*Bill***Re: Probility**,*Martin Shobe***Re: Probility**,*Virgil*

**Stewart attempt at Euclid's Infinitude of Primes proof #33 Correcting Math 4th ed**,*Archimedes Plutonium***10^n/exp(sqrt10) formula of Prime Number Theorem Re: Utah State Univ. math professors: invite True Prime Number Theorem to arxiv #2181 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***I BEAT SAMISO (YAY!)**,*Col. Edmund Burke***Re: I BEAT SAMISO (YAY!)**,*samiso***Re: I BEAT SAMISO (YAY!)**,*Col. Edmund Burke***Re: I BEAT SAMISO (YAY!)**,*samiso***Re: I BEAT SAMISO (YAY!)**,*Col. Edmund Burke*

**How many automorphism of a finite BA?**,*Peter Percival***Re: How many automorphism of a finite BA?**,*quasi***Re: How many automorphism of a finite BA?**,*Peter Percival***Re: How many automorphism of a finite BA?**,*Timothy Murphy***Re: How many automorphism of a finite BA?**,*quasi***Re: How many automorphism of a finite BA?**,*Peter Percival***Re: How many automorphism of a finite BA?**,*quasi***Re: How many automorphism of a finite BA?**,*Timothy Murphy***Re: How many automorphism of a finite BA?**,*scattered***Re: How many automorphism of a finite BA?**,*Timothy Murphy***Re: How many automorphism of a finite BA?**,*quasi***Re: How many automorphism of a finite BA?**,*scattered*

**Re: How many automorphism of a finite BA?**,*dullrich*

**MO FOLKS GETTIN' THE EBLOWLA**,*Col. Edmund Burke***Re: MO FOLKS GETTIN' THE EBLOWLA**,*mathedman***Re: MO FOLKS GETTIN' THE EBLOWLA**,*Pfsszxt*

**reaching final formula of Prime Number Theorem Re: Utah State Univ. math professors: invite True Prime Number Theorem to arxiv #2180 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Two wrong definitions**,*mueckenh***Re: Two wrong definitions**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Two wrong definitions**,*mueckenh***Re: Two wrong definitions**,*Ralf Bader***Re: Two wrong definitions**,*mueckenh***Re: Two wrong definitions**,*Virgil***Re: Two wrong definitions**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Two wrong definitions**,*mueckenh***Re: Two wrong definitions**,*Virgil***Re: Two wrong definitions**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Two wrong definitions**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: Two wrong definitions**,*Virgil***Re: Two wrong definitions**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Two wrong definitions**,*mueckenh***Re: Two wrong definitions**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Two wrong definitions**,*mueckenh***Re: Two wrong definitions**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Two wrong definitions**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Two wrong definitions**,*mueckenh***Re: Two wrong definitions**,*Virgil***Re: Two wrong definitions**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Two wrong definitions**,*mueckenh***Re: Two wrong definitions**,*Virgil***Re: Two wrong definitions**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Two wrong definitions**,*mueckenh***Re: Two wrong definitions**,*Virgil***Re: Two wrong definitions**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Two wrong definitions**,*mueckenh***Re: WM's two wrong definitions**,*Virgil***Re: Two wrong definitions**,*PotatoSauce***Re: Two wrong definitions**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Two wrong definitions**,*mueckenh***Re: Two wrong definitions**,*Martin Shobe***Re: Two wrong definitions**,*mueckenh***Re: Two wrong definitions**,*Virgil***Re: Two wrong definitions**,*Martin Shobe***Re: Two wrong definitions**,*Virgil***Re: Two wrong definitions**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: Two wrong definitions**,*Virgil***Re: Two wrong definitions**,*Martin Shobe***Re: Two wrong definitions**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: Two wrong definitions**,*Virgil***Re: Two wrong definitions**,*Martin Shobe***Re: Two wrong definitions**,*Virgil***Re: Two wrong definitions**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: Two wrong definitions**,*Virgil***Re: Two wrong definitions**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: Two wrong definitions**,*Virgil***Re: Two wrong definitions**,*Martin Shobe***Re: Two wrong definitions**,*Virgil***Re: Two wrong definitions**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Two wrong definitions**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Two wrong definitions**,*Virgil***Re: Two wrong definitions**,*mueckenh***Re: Two wrong definitions**,*Virgil***Re: Two wrong definitions**,*Virgil***Re: Two wrong definitions by WM!**,*Virgil*

**Re: Two wrong definitions**,*Dan Christensen***Re: Two wrong definitions**,*mueckenh***Re: Two wrong definitions**,*Dan Christensen***Re: Two wrong definitions**,*mueckenh***Re: Two wrong definitions**,*Dan Christensen***Re: Two wrong definitions**,*mueckenh***Re: Two wrong definitions**,*Dan Christensen***Re: Two wrong definitions**,*mueckenh***Re: Two wrong definitions**,*Dan Christensen***Re: Two wrong definitions**,*mueckenh***Re: Two wrong definitions**,*Dan Christensen***Re: Two wrong definitions**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: Two wrong definitions**,*Dan Christensen***Re: Two wrong definitions**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: Two wrong definitions**,*Dan Christensen***Re: Two wrong definitions**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: Two wrong definitions**,*Virgil***Re: Two wrong definitions**,*Dan Christensen***Re: Two wrong definitions**,*mueckenh***Re: Two wrong definitions**,*Dan Christensen***Re: Two wrong definitions**,*Virgil***Re: Two wrong definitions by WM**,*Virgil***Re: Two wrong definitions**,*YBM***Re: Two wrong definitions**,*Ralf Bader***Re: Two wrong definitions**,*mueckenh***Re: Two wrong definitions**,*Virgil***Re: Two wrong definitions**,*Virgil***Re: Two wrong definitions by WM**,*Virgil***Re: Two wrong definitions by WM**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: Two wrong definitions by WM**,*Virgil***Re: Two wrong definitions**,*Virgil***Re: Two wrong definitions**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: Two wrong definitions**,*Virgil***Re: Two wrong definitions**,*Virgil***Re: Two wrong definitions**,*Virgil***Re: Two wrong definitions**,*Virgil*

**Re: Two wrong definitions**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Two wrong definitions**,*mueckenh***Re: Two wrong definitions**,*Virgil***Re: Two wrong definitions**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: Two wrong definitions By WM**,*Virgil*

**Re: Two wrong definitions**,*Virgil***Re: Two wrong definitions**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: Two wrong definitions**,*Virgil*

**Re: Two wrong definitions**,*John Gabriel***Re: Two wrong definitions**,*John Gabriel***Re: Two wrong definitions**,*John Gabriel***Re: Two wrong definitions**,*Dan Christensen*

**what makes triangles special?**,*RichD***Re: what makes triangles special?**,*Bill***Re: what makes triangles special?**,*Peter Percival***Re: what makes triangles special?**,*Peter Percival***Re: what makes triangles special?**,*Space998*

**4 Forces -> 4 Eq Re: Cal Tech Univ physics-math professors invite: Deriving Dirac Equation from Maxwell Equations to arxiv #2179 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***AP lies again**,*Dan Christensen***Re: AP lies again**,*Space998*

**ANYBUDDY ELSE GOT THE EBLOWLA?**,*Col. Edmund Burke***I can't find MatheRealism**,*Nimber***Re: I can't find MatheRealism**,*Col. Edmund Burke***Re: I can't find MatheRealism**,*Seymour J.*

**3.20 - The problem with Cauchy's rot...**,*John Gabriel******* TROLL ALERT ******,*Dan Christensen***Re: 3.20 - The problem with Cauchy's rot...**,*Space998***Re: 3.20 - The problem with Cauchy's rot...**,*John Gabriel*

**Infinity Borderband fixs Li(x) Re: Utah State Univ. math professors: invite True Prime Number Theorem to arxiv #2178 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Re: Infinity Borderband fixs Li(x) Re: Utah State Univ. math professors: invite True Prime Number Theorem to arxiv #2178 Correcting Math**,*Dan Christensen***Re: Infinity Borderband fixs Li(x) Re: Utah State Univ. math professors: invite True Prime Number Theorem to arxiv #2178 Correcting Math**,*konyberg*

**Rose attempt at Euclid Infinitude of Primes #32 Correcting Math 4th ed.**,*Archimedes Plutonium***SAMISO'S GOT EBLOWLA**,*Col. Edmund Burke***Re: SAMISO'S GOT EBLOWLA**,*samiso*

**borderband to fix Li(x) Re: Utah State Univ. math professors: invite True Prime Number Theorem to arxiv #2177 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***AP lies again**,*Dan Christensen*

**New particle is both matter and antimatter**,*Aiya-Oba***Re: New particle is both matter and antimatter**,*Aiya-Oba***Re: New particle is both matter and antimatter**,*Chris M. Thomasson*

**SOME EINSTEINIANS VASTLY SMARTER THAN OTHERS**,*Pentcho Valev***WHERE THE HELL IS PHUKET?**,*Col. Edmund Burke***ABOUT SAMISO'S MOM**,*Col. Edmund Burke***ABOUT THE BIG PIMPLE ON MY ASS**,*Col. Edmund Burke***Ribenboim's attempt at Euclid's Infinitude of Primes proof #31 Correcting Math 4th ed.**,*Archimedes Plutonium***borderband to fix Li(x) Re: Utah State Univ. math professors: invite True Prime Number Theorem to arxiv #2176 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***3.19 - The single variable New Calculus in 2 applets!**,*John Gabriel******* TROLL ALERT ******,*Dan Christensen***Re: 3.19 - The single variable New Calculus in 2 applets!**,*Dave Smith***Re: 3.19 - The New Poop Calcuulus in 2 rotten applets malware!**,*samiso***Re: 3.19 - The single variable New Calculus in 2 applets!**,*Port563***Re: 3.19 - The single variable New Calculus in 2 applets!**,*John Gabriel***Re: 3.19 - The single variable New Calculus in 2 applets!**,*John Gabriel*

**two questions on dicrete (topologically) metric spaces**,*David Bernier***Re: two questions on dicrete (topologically) metric spaces**,*Mike Terry***Re: two questions on dicrete (topologically) metric spaces**,*David Bernier***Re: two questions on dicrete (topologically) metric spaces**,*David Bernier***Re: two questions on dicrete (topologically) metric spaces**,*David Hartley*

**Re: two questions on dicrete (topologically) metric spaces**,*William Elliot***Re: two questions on dicrete (topologically) metric spaces**,*David Hartley*

**WHAT IS .... AVERAGE( 0.9999... , 1 ) ?**,*grahamcooper7***Re: WHAT IS .... AVERAGE( 0.9999... , 1 ) ?**,*David Bernier***Re: WHAT IS .... AVERAGE( 0.9999... , 1 ) ?**,*grahamcooper7***Re: WHAT IS .... AVERAGE( 0.9999... , 1 ) ?**,*David Bernier*

**Re: WHAT IS .... AVERAGE( 0.9999... , 1 ) ?**,*YBM***Re: WHAT IS .... AVERAGE( 0.9999... , 1 ) ?**,*grahamcooper7*

**Re: WHAT IS .... AVERAGE( 0.9999... , 1 ) ?**,*John Gabriel***Usenet boob Graham Cooper asks, "What is average?"**,*Col. Edmund Burke***Re: Usenet boob Graham Cooper asks, "What is average?"**,*grahamcooper7***Re: Usenet boob Graham Cooper asks, "What is average?"**,*samiso***Re: Usenet boob Graham Cooper asks, "What is average?"**,*Col. Edmund Burke*

**The idiots in my Bozo Bin**,*Nimber***Re: The idiots in my Bozo Bin**,*grahamcooper7***Re: The idiots in my Bozo Bin**,*Col. Edmund Burke*

**borderband versus borderline Re: Utah State Univ. math professors: invite True Prime Number Theorem to arxiv #2175 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***AP lies again**,*Dan Christensen***Re: AP lies again**,*YBM*

**------- -------- ------- Value of pi**,*Deep***Re: ------- -------- ------- Value of pi**,*Robin Chapman***Re: ------- -------- ------- Value of pi**,*David Bernier*

**Re: ------- -------- ------- Value of pi**,*Ken Pledger***Re: ------- -------- ------- Value of pi**,*Jens Stuckelberger*

**A Logical Flaw in CANTORS MISSING SET!**,*grahamcooper7***Re: A Logical Flaw in CANTORS MISSING SET!**,*grahamcooper7*

**Polya attempt at Euclid's Infinitude of Primes proof #30 Correcting Math 4th ed**,*Archimedes Plutonium***solutions manual, test bank for Financial Accounting for MBAs 4e Easton contact directly at discountsmtb(at)hotmail(dot)com**,*piecutie056*- <Possible follow-ups>
**solutions manual, test bank for Financial Accounting for MBAs 4e Easton contact directly at discountsmtb(at)hotmail(dot)com**,*piecutie056*

**3.18 - The Auxiliary equation in the New Calculus**,*John Gabriel***Re: 3.18 - New Calculus is wrong**,*samiso***Re: 3.18 - The Auxiliary equation in the New Calculus**,*Space998******* TROLL ALERT ******,*Dan Christensen***Re: 3.18 - The Auxiliary equation in the New Calculus**,*John Gabriel***Re: 3.18 - The Auxiliary equation in the New Calculus**,*John Gabriel*

**dictionary length and Zipf's law**,*david . pekker***Re: dictionary length and Zipf's law**,*James Waldby*

**What is a numbscull?**,*"Jürgen R."***Re: What is a numbscull?**,*Col. Edmund Burke***Re: What is a numbscull?**,*John Gabriel*

**My Negro's Law**,*Kevin Barry***Matheology §546**,*"Jürgen R."***Re: 2200 ++ solution manuals**,*aahhalquzahy2011***Can someone explain this proof by induction?**,*Mathematisch***Re: Can someone explain this proof by induction?**,*Paul***Re: Can someone explain this proof by induction?**,*Martin Shobe***Re: Can someone explain this proof by induction?**,*Mathematisch***Re: Can someone explain this proof by induction?**,*Mathematisch***Re: Can someone explain this proof by induction?**,*pepstein5***Re: Can someone explain this proof by induction?**,*Mathematisch***Re: Can someone explain this proof by induction?**,*Paul***Re: Can someone explain this proof by induction?**,*Mike Terry*

**Re: Can someone explain this proof by induction?**,*Ray Vickson***Re: Can someone explain this proof by induction?**,*Mathematisch***Re: Can someone explain this proof by induction?**,*Leon Aigret*

**Mueckeology §545**,*"Jürgen R."***Re: Mueckeology §545**,*Nimber*

**An order for NxN**,*William Elliot***Re: An order for NxN**,*quasi***Re: An order for NxN**,*Mike Terry***Re: An order for NxN**,*quasi***Re: An order for NxN**,*William Elliot*

**INTRODUCING ... po(X,Y) ... a humble function in LOGIC!**,*grahamcooper7***Ivars Peterson attempt at Euclid's Infinitude of Primes proof #29 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***There is a reason the academic bourgeoisie want John Gabriel buried and forgotten**,*John Gabriel******* TROLL ALERT ******,*Dan Christensen***Re: There is a reason the academic bourgeoisie want John Gabriel buried and forgotten**,*John Gabriel***Re: There is a reason the academic bourgeoisie want John Gabriel buried and forgotten**,*John Gabriel***Re: There is a reason the academic bourgeoisie want John Gabriel buried and forgotten**,*John Gabriel***Re: There is a reason the academic bourgeoisie want John Gabriel buried and forgotten**,*Greg Smith***Re: There is a reason the academic bourgeoisie want John Gabriel buried and forgotten**,*John Gabriel***Re: There is a reason the academic bourgeoisie want John Gabriel buried and forgotten**,*Burt Smith***Re: There is a reason the academic bourgeoisie want John Gabriel buried and forgotten**,*John Gabriel***Re: There is a reason the academic bourgeoisie want John Gabriel buried and forgotten**,*Kent Smith***Re: There is a reason the academic bourgeoisie want John Gabriel buried and forgotten**,*John Gabriel***Re: There is a reason the academic bourgeoisie want John Gabriel buried and forgotten**,*Chad Smith*

**Re: There is a reason the academic bourgeoisie want John Gabriel buried and forgotten**,*John Gabriel***Re: There is a reason the academic bourgeoisie want John Gabriel buried and forgotten**,*John Gabriel***Re: There is a reason the academic bourgeoisie want John Gabriel buried and forgotten**,*John Gabriel***Re: There is a reason the academic bourgeoisie want John Gabriel buried and forgotten**,*John Gabriel***Re: There is a reason the academic bourgeoisie want John Gabriel buried and forgotten**,*John Gabriel***Re: There is a reason the academic bourgeoisie want John Gabriel buried and forgotten**,*Vern Smith***Re: There is a reason the academic bourgeoisie want John Gabriel buried and forgotten**,*dullrich***Re: There is a reason the academic bourgeoisie want John Gabriel buried and forgotten**,*John Gabriel***Re: There is a reason the academic bourgeoisie want John Gabriel buried and forgotten**,*dullrich***Re: There is a reason the academic bourgeoisie want John Gabriel buried and forgotten**,*John Gabriel***Re: There is a reason the academic bourgeoisie want John Gabriel buried and forgotten**,*Nels Smith*

**Re: There is a reason the academic bourgeoisie want John Gabriel buried and forgotten**,*John Gabriel*

**Transcendental function Re: Utah State Univ. math professors: invite True Prime Number Theorem & True Perfect Square Theorem to arxiv #2174 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***the Collatz sequence modulo 6 for the initial value 100,759,293,214,567**,*David Bernier***Re: Utah State Univ. math professors: invite True Prime Number Theorem & True Perfect Square Theorem to arxiv**,*Archimedes Plutonium***AP lies again**,*Dan Christensen*

**Univ. Cincinnati math professors: invite Overhaul of Old Logic to New Logic to arxiv #2174 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***AP lies again**,*Dan Christensen***Re: AP lies again**,*Space998*

**Numbers of prime factors.**,*Paul***Re: Numbers of prime factors.**,*Dick***Re: Numbers of prime factors.**,*Pubkeybreaker***Re: Numbers of prime factors.**,*pepstein5*

**A Symmetry Analysis of Pythaogras and Fermat's Last Theorem, Draft 18th Dec 2004 (10 yrs old but...)**,*richard miller***3.17 - The Nonsense that is called 'rigour' in calculus.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 3.17 -quACK new QUACK calculus QUAck .**,*samiso***Re: 3.17 - The Nonsense that is called 'rigour' in calculus.**,*dullrich******* TROLL ALERT ******,*Dan Christensen***Re: **** TROLL ALERT ******,*William Elliot***Re: **** TROLL ALERT ******,*Dan Christensen***Re: **** TROLL ALERT ******,*Space998***Re: **** TROLL ALERT ******,*William Elliot***Re: **** TROLL ALERT ******,*Dan Christensen***Re: **** TROLL ALERT ******,*Space998***Re: **** TROLL ALERT ******,*William Elliot***Re: **** TROLL ALERT ******,*Dan Christensen***Re: **** TROLL ALERT ******,*John Gabriel***Re: **** TROLL ALERT **** fk new calcupuss**,*samiso***Re: **** TROLL ALERT ******,*Dan Christensen*

**Re: 3.17 - The Nonsense that is called 'rigour' in calculus.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 3.17 - The Nonsense that is called 'rigour' in calculus.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 3.17 - The Nonsense that is called 'rigour' in calculus.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 3.17 - The Nonsense that is called 'rigour' in calculus.**,*John Gabriel*

**Do Space Aliens Exist?**,*Kevin Barry***Re: Do Space Aliens Exist?**,*Col. Edmund Burke*

**Column space of a matrix derived from arc paths through DAG**,*neillclift***AUCUNE CONTRADICTION DANS LE MONDE D'EINSTEIN**,*Pentcho Valev***Re: AUCUNE CONTRADICTION DANS LE MONDE D'EINSTEIN**,*Pentcho Valev*

**There is no non-zero integer solution a,b, and c for a^n + b^n = c^n such that n divides abc.**,*unnavigable***Re: There is no non-zero integer solution a,b, and c for a^n + b^n = c^n such that n divides abc.**,*Paul***Re: There is no non-zero integer solution a,b, and c for a^n + b^n = c^n such that n divides abc.**,*mrvmurray***Re: There is no non-zero integer solution a,b, and c for a^n + b^n = c^n such that n divides abc.**,*Paul***Re: There is no non-zero integer solution a,b, and c for a^n + b^n = c^n such that n divides abc.**,*unnavigable***Re: There is no non-zero integer solution a,b, and c for a^n + b^n = c^n such that n divides abc.**,*unnavigable***Re: There is no non-zero integer solution a,b, and c for a^n + b^n = c^n such that n divides abc.**,*Paul***Re: There is no non-zero integer solution a,b, and c for a^n + b^n = c^n such that n divides abc.**,*unnavigable***Re: There is no non-zero integer solution a,b, and c for a^n + b^n = c^n such that n divides abc.**,*Paul*

**Re: There is no non-zero integer solution a,b, and c for a^n + b^n = c^n such that n divides abc.**,*unnavigable***Re: There is no non-zero integer solution a,b, and c for a^n + b^n = c^n such that n divides abc.**,*quasi*

**The "Transcendental Formula" concept of Math #2169 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***improving concept of function also Re: The "Transcendental Formula" concept of Math #2170 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Re: The "Transcendental Formula" concept of Math #2171 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium*

**SET SPECIFICATION IN ZFC**,*grahamcooper7***YOU CAN'T DO MATHS WITH LOGIC!**,*grahamcooper7***Univ. Cincinnati math professors: invite Overhaul of Old Logic to New Logic to arxiv #2168 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***J.A. Paulos attempt at Euclid Infinitude of Primes proof #28 Correcting Math 4th ed.**,*Archimedes Plutonium***THE IDIOT WHO IS KEVIN BARRY**,*Col. Edmund Burke***The Military Is The Subject of Conquest**,*Kevin Barry***The Family's Consensus**,*Kevin Barry***Numbers for mathematicians**,*Nimber***What is a number?**,*mueckenh***Re: What is a number?**,*FredJeffries***Re: What is a number?**,*Virgil***Re: What is a number?**,*mueckenh***Re: What is a number?**,*Virgil***Re: What is a number?**,*mueckenh***Re: What is a number?**,*Virgil***Re: What is a number?**,*mueckenh***Re: What is a number?**,*Zeit Geist***Re: What is a number?**,*Virgil***Re: What is a number?**,*Ralf Bader***Re: What is a number?**,*mueckenh***Re: What is a number?**,*Virgil***Re: What is a number?**,*JohnF***Re: What is a number?**,*mueckenh***Re: What is a number?**,*Ralf Bader***Re: What is a number?**,*mueckenh***Re: What is a number?**,*Virgil***Re: What is a number?**,*mueckenh***Re: What is a number?**,*Virgil***Re: What is a number?**,*Ralf Bader***Re: What is a number?**,*mueckenh***Re: What is a number?**,*Virgil***Re: What is a number?**,*YBM***Re: What is a number?**,*mueckenh***Re: What is a number?**,*YBM***Re: What is a number?**,*mueckenh***Re: What is a number?**,*Virgil***Re: What is a number?**,*YBM***Re: What is a number?**,*Virgil***Re: What is a number?**,*Ralf Bader***Re: What is a number?**,*YBM***Re: What is a number?**,*mueckenh***Re: What is a number?**,*Virgil***Re: What is a number?**,*John Gabriel***Re: What is a number?**,*YBM***Re: What is a number?**,*Nimber***Re: What is a number?**,*Virgil***Re: What is a number?**,*YBM***Re: What is a number?**,*Zeit Geist***Re: What is a number?**,*Virgil***Re: What is a number?**,*Virgil***Re: What is a number?**,*mueckenh***Re: What is a number?**,*Virgil***Re: What is a number?**,*Virgil*

**Re: What is a number?**,*Dan Christensen***Re: What is a number?**,*Dan Christensen***Re: What is a number?**,*mueckenh***Re: What is a number?**,*Dan Christensen***Re: What is a number?**,*mueckenh***Re: What is a number?**,*Dan Christensen***Re: What is a number?**,*Ralf Bader***Re: What is a number?**,*Dan Christensen***Re: What is a number?**,*Martin Shobe***Re: What is a number?**,*Dan Christensen***Re: What is a number?**,*Nimber***Re: What is a number?**,*Dan Christensen***Re: What is a number?**,*mueckenh***Re: What is a number?**,*Dan Christensen***Re: What is a number?**,*mueckenh***Re: What is a number?**,*Dan Christensen***Re: What is a number?**,*mueckenh***Re: What is a number? WM doesn't know!**,*Virgil***Re: What is a number?**,*Zeit Geist***Re: What is a number?**,*Virgil***Re: What is a number?**,*mueckenh***Re: What is a number?**,*Dan Christensen***Re: What is a number?**,*mueckenh***Re: What is a number?**,*Dan Christensen***Re: What is a number?**,*mueckenh***Re: What is a number?**,*Dan Christensen***Re: What is a number?**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: What is a number?**,*Virgil***Re: What is a number?**,*Dan Christensen***Re: What is a number?**,*mueckenh***Re: What is a number?**,*Dan Christensen***Re: What is a number?**,*mueckenh***Re: What is a number?**,*Zeit Geist***Re: What is a number?**,*Dan Christensen***Re: What is a number?**,*Dan Christensen***Re: What is a number?**,*mueckenh***Re: What is a number?**,*Virgil***Re: What is a number?**,*Dan Christensen***Re: What is a number?**,*John Gabriel***Re: What is a number?**,*Space998***Re: What is a number?**,*Dan Christensen***Re: What is a number?**,*John Gabriel***Re: What is a number?**,*mueckenh***Re: What is a number? WM does not seem to know!**,*Virgil***Re: What is a number?**,*Dan Christensen***Re: What is a number?**,*PotatoSauce***Re: What is a number?**,*Dan Christensen***Re: What is a number?**,*mueckenh***Re: What is a number?**,*Virgil***Re: What is a number?**,*Dan Christensen***Re: What is a number?**,*mueckenh***Re: What is a number?**,*Virgil***Re: What is a number?**,*mueckenh***Re: What is a number?**,*Virgil***Re: What is a number?**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: What is a number?**,*Virgil***Re: What is a number?**,*Dan Christensen***Re: What is a number?**,*John Gabriel******* TROLL ALERT ******,*Dan Christensen***Re: **** TROLL ALERT ******,*John Gabriel***Re: What is a number?**,*Dan Christensen***Re: What is a number?**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: What is a number?**,*Virgil***Re: What is a number?**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: What is a number?**,*John Gabriel***Re: What is a number?**,*Dan Christensen***Re: What is a number?**,*Virgil***Re: What is a number?**,*Dan Christensen***Re: What is a number?**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: What is a number?**,*Dan Christensen***Re: What is a number?**,*John Gabriel***Re: What is a number?**,*Virgil***Re: What is a number?**,*Virgil***Re: What is a number?**,*Ralf Bader***Re: What is a number?**,*Virgil***Re: What is a number?**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: What is a number?**,*Virgil***Re: What is a number?**,*Dan Christensen***Re: What is a number?**,*mueckenh***Re: What is a number?**,*PotatoSauce***Re: What is a number?**,*Virgil***Re: What is a number?**,*John Gabriel***Re: What is a number?**,*mueckenh***Re: What is a number?**,*Virgil***Re: What is a number?**,*Virgil***Re: What is a number?**,*Virgil***Re: What is a number?**,*John Gabriel***Re: What is a number?**,*Space998***Re: What is a number? WM need to know!**,*Virgil***Re: What is a number?**,*John Gabriel***Re: What is a number?**,*mueckenh***Re: What is a number?**,*John Gabriel***Re: What is a number?**,*Virgil***Re: What is a number? WM doesn't know!**,*Virgil***Re: What is a number? WM doesn't know!**,*Virgil***Re: What is a number? WM doesn't know!**,*Virgil***Re: What is a number?**,*Virgil***Re: What is a number?**,*John Gabriel***Re: What is a number?**,*mueckenh***Re: What is a number?**,*Virgil***Re: What is a number?**,*Virgil*

**Re: What is a number?**,*John Gabriel***Re: What is a number?**,*Zeit Geist***Re: What is a number?**,*John Gabriel*

**Re: What is a number?**,*John Gabriel***Re: What is a number?**,*John Gabriel******* TROLL ALERT ******,*Dan Christensen*

**Re: What is a number?**,*John Gabriel***Re: What is a number?**,*Space998*

**Re: What is a number?**,*John Gabriel***Re: What is a number?**,*Dan Christensen*

**Matrices**,*Paolo Bentivenga***Re: Matrices**,*dullrich***Re: Matrices**,*Jordano Ignoto***Re: Matrices**,*dullrich*

**Re: Matrices**,*quasi***Re: Matrices**,*quasi***Re: Matrices**,*Pubkeybreaker***Re: Matrices**,*Christopher J. Henrich***Re: Matrices**,*David Bernier***Re: Matrices**,*Pubkeybreaker***Re: Matrices**,*David Bernier***Re: Matrices**,*Robin Chapman***Re: Matrices**,*dullrich***Re: Matrices**,*dullrich*

**Re: Matrices**,*dullrich*

**Re: Matrices**,*quasi***Re: Matrices**,*Nimber***Re: Matrices**,*Peter Percival***Re: Matrices**,*dullrich*

**Re: Matrices**,*Jordano Ignoto***Re: Matrices**,*Robin Chapman***Re: Matrices**,*Nimber*

**Re: Matrices**,*Jordano Ignoto***Re: Matrices**,*Roland Franzius***Re: Matrices**,*dullrich***Re: Matrices**,*Pubkeybreaker***Re: Matrices**,*David Bernier***Re: Matrices**,*quasi***Re: Matrices**,*Pubkeybreaker***Re: Matrices**,*dullrich***Re: Matrices**,*quasi***Re: Matrices**,*Pubkeybreaker***Re: Matrices**,*Pubkeybreaker***Re: Matrices**,*David Bernier*

**Re: Matrices**,*Timothy Murphy***Re: Matrices**,*Jim Burns***Re: Matrices**,*Timothy Murphy*

**Re: Matrices**,*Timothy Murphy*

**Re: Matrices**,*rfermat***Re: Matrices**,*Timothy Murphy***Re: Matrices**,*quasi***Re: Matrices**,*Timothy Murphy*

**Re: Matrices**,*dullrich*

**Re: Matrices**,*rfermat*

**Cal Tech Univ physics-math professors: invite Deriving Dirac & Schrodinger Equations from Maxwell Equations to arxiv #2167 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***AP lies again**,*Dan Christensen*

**Iowa State Univ. math professors: invite True Representation of the Irrational Number to arxiv #2166 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***AP lies again**,*Dan Christensen*

**EINSTEIN'S RELATIVITY : ABSURD OR WORSE ?**,*Pentcho Valev***Univ. Cincinnati math professors: invite Overhaul of Old Logic to New Logic to arxiv #2165 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Re: Univ. Cincinnati math professors: invite Overhaul of Old Logic to New Logic to arxiv #2165 Correcting Math**,*Dan Christensen***AP lies again**,*Dan Christensen*

**qn+1=p; can we generalise Sophie Germain's suggestion**,*unnavigable***Challenge of the week: interesting quantities associated with Markov chains**,*Vincent Granville***The New Calculus is the first and only rigorous formulation of calculus in human history.**,*John Gabriel***Re: The New Calculus is the first and only rigorous formulation of calculus in human history.**,*Jan******* TROLL ALERT ******,*Dan Christensen***Re: The New Calculus is the first and only rigorous formulation of calculus in human history.**,*Dave Smith***Re: **** TROLL ALERT ******,*Dan Christensen*

**Re: Poop Calculus**,*samiso***Re: Poop Calculus**,*Dan Christensen*

**Re: The New Calculus is the first and only rigorous formulation of calculus in human history.**,*dullrich***Re: The New Calculus is the first and only rigorous formulation of calculus in human history.**,*John Gabriel***Re: The New Calculus is the first and only rigorous formulation of calculus in human history.**,*John Gabriel*- <Possible follow-ups>
**The New Calculus is the FIRST and ONLY rigorous formulation of calculus in human history.**,*John Gabriel******* TROLL ALERT ******,*Dan Christensen***Re: The New Calculus is the FIRST and ONLY rigorous formulation of calculus in human history.**,*Boyd Smith***Re: The New Calculus is the FIRST and ONLY rigorous formulation of calculus in human history.**,*John Gabriel***Re: The New Calculus is the FIRST and ONLY rigorous formulation of calculus in human history.**,*John Gabriel***Re: The New Calculus is the FIRST and ONLY rigorous formulation of calculus in human history.**,*John Gabriel*

**Niven, Zuckerman, Montgomery attempt at Euclid Infinitude of Primes #27 Correcting Math 4th ed.**,*Archimedes Plutonium*- <Possible follow-ups>
**Niven, Zuckerman, Montgomery attempt at Euclid Infinitude of Primes #27 Correcting Math 4th ed.**,*Archimedes Plutonium*

**THE HYBRID THEORY OF ALBERT EINSTEIN**,*Pentcho Valev***Re: THE HYBRID THEORY OF ALBERT EINSTEIN**,*Pentcho Valev*

**Univ. Cincinnati math professors: invite Overhaul of Old Logic to New Logic to arxiv #2164 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Re: Univ. Cincinnati math professors: invite Overhaul of Old Logic to New Logic to arxiv #2164 Correcting Math**,*Dan Christensen***Re: Univ. Cincinnati math professors: invite Overhaul of Old Logic to New Logic to arxiv #2164 Correcting Math**,*Rosario193***Re: Univ. Cincinnati math professors: invite Overhaul of Old Logic to New Logic to arxiv #2164 Correcting Math**,*konyberg*

**O)h, Dear God! Not THIS again!**,*Yes, Virginia!***Re: O)h, Dear God! Not THIS again!**,*Zeit Geist*

**Dr. Amit Chakma, Dr. Andre Boivin UWO.ca; Reverse Identity Fraud; Dan Christensen**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Paranoid AP going off the deep end**,*Dan Christensen*

**Solutions manual, test bank for Managerial Accounting Creating Value in a Dynamic Business Environment 10e Ronald Hilton David Platt contact directly at discountsmtb(at)hotmail(dot)com**,*piecutie056***All proven maths statements cant be true-from Godels theorem**,****tozon***a logical flaw in godels proof - thus proof meaninglessness**,****tozon***Godel cant tells us what truth is so theorem is meaningless**,****tozon***0.9999... = 1 that means mathematics ends in contradiction**,****tozon***bilinear form positive definite matrix**,*novis***Univ. Cincinnati math professors: invite Overhaul of Old Logic to New Logic to arxiv #2162 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Utah State Univ. math professors: invite True Prime Number Theorem & True Perfect Square Theorem to arxiv #2161 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Yale math professors invite 5 Color Mapping and valid Jordan Curve theorem to arxiv #2161 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Univ. Cincinnati math professors invite: Overhaul of Old Logic to the New Logic to arxiv #2160 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***positive definite matrix**,*novis***Re: positive definite matrix**,*Roland Franzius***Re: positive definite matrix**,*novis***Re: positive definite matrix**,*novis***Re: positive definite matrix**,*Roland Franzius*

**Re: positive definite matrix**,*Pirx42*

**Re: positive definite matrix**,*quasi***Re: positive definite matrix**,*Herman Rubin***Re: positive definite matrix**,*David Bernier*

**True Perfect-Square Theorem alongside True Prime Number Theorem #2159 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Dr. David Dozois, Dr. Rhodri Cusak does Canada have 2 Dan Christensen in math?**,*Archimedes Plutonium***AP going off the deep end**,*Dan Christensen***Re: Dr. David Dozois, Dr. Rhodri Cusak does Canada have 2 Dan Christensen in math?**,*PotatoSauce*

**Cal Tech Univ physics-math professors invite: Deriving Dirac & Schrodinger Equations from Maxwell Equations to arxiv #2158 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Pop-math - Foci based coordinate system?**,*joshipura***The Return of Christ**,*Kevin Barry***Santa Is Monolithic**,*Kevin Barry***The Good Son**,*Kevin Barry***Mueckeology §544**,*"Jürgen R."***Re: 2.12 - Did Weierstrass know anything about Boolean logic?**,*John Gabriel***Re: 2.12 - Did Weierstrass know anything about Boolean logic?**,*David C. Ullrich***Re: 2.12 - Did Weierstrass know anything about Boolean logic?**,*Dave Smith*- <Possible follow-ups>
**Re: 2.12 - Did Weierstrass know anything about Boolean logic?**,*John Gabriel*

**Re: 1.23 - Gabriel's List - A Survey among sci.math visitors.**,*John Gabriel******* TROLL ALERT ******,*Dan Christensen***Re: **** TROLL ALERT ******,*Space998*

**Re: 1.23 - Gabriel's List - A Survey among sci.math visitors.**,*John Gabriel*- <Possible follow-ups>
**Re: 1.23 - Gabriel's List - A Survey among sci.math visitors.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 1.23 - Gabriel's List - A Survey among sci.math visitors.**,*John Gabriel******* TROLL ALERT ******,*Dan Christensen***Re: 1.23 - Gabriel's List - A Survey among sci.math visitors.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 1.23 - Gabriel's List - A Survey among sci.math visitors.**,*John Gabriel******* TROLL ALERT ******,*Dan Christensen*

**Re: 1.23 - Gabriel's List - A Survey among sci.math visitors.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 1.23 - Gabriel's List - A Survey among sci.math visitors.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 1.23 - Gabriel's List - A Survey among sci.math visitors.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 1.23 - Gabriel's List - A Survey among sci.math visitors.**,*John Gabriel***Re: 1.23 - Gabriel's List - A Survey among sci.math visitors.**,*Victor Wesson******* TROLL ALERT ******,*Dan Christensen*

**Re: 1.23 - Gabriel's List - A Survey among sci.math visitors.**,*John Gabriel*

**How the Mathematical Intelligencer article Prime Simplicity should have been written #26 Correcting Math 4th ed.**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Proprietary Functions and Their Analysis**,*google***Other equivalence classes for solving linear integer equations**,*neillclift***Van der Waerden bounds with a probabilistic parameter**,*Paul***Re: Van der Waerden bounds with a probabilistic parameter**,*David Bernier***Re: Van der Waerden bounds with a probabilistic parameter**,*David Bernier*

**The refutation of Gödel's incompleteness theorems**,*Gert Treiber***Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions (corrected)**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions (corrected)**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions (corrected)**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions (corrected)**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions (corrected)**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have representation as endless decimal fractions (corrected)**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions (corrected)**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions (corrected)**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions (corrected)**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions (corrected)**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions (corrected)**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions (corrected)**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions (corrected)**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions (corrected)**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions (corrected)**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions (corrected)**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions (corrected)**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions (corrected)**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions (corrected)**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions (corrected)**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions (corrected)**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions (corrected)**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions (corrected)**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions (corrected)**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions (corrected)**,*mueckenh***Re: WM has no representation as decimal fractions (corrected)**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions (corrected)**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions (corrected)**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions (corrected)**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions (corrected)**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions (corrected)**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions (corrected)**,*PotatoSauce***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions (corrected)**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions (corrected)**,*Ralf Bader***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions (corrected)**,*Nimber***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions (corrected)**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have representation as decimal sequences**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions (corrected)**,*PotatoSauce***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions (corrected)**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions (corrected)**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions (corrected)**,*PotatoSauce***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions (corrected)**,*Nimber***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions (corrected)**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions (corrected)**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions (corrected)**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions (corrected)**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions (corrected)**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions (corrected)**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions**,*YBM***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions**,*Space998***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have representation as endless decimals**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have representation as endless decimals**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have representation as endless decimals**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have representation as endless decimals**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have representation as endless decimals**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions**,*Zeit Geist***Re: SOME Irrational numbers have representation as decimals (corrected)**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have representations as endless decimals (corrected)**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions (corrected)**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions (corrected)**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions (corrected)**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions (corrected)**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions (corrected)**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have representations as non-terminating decimals (corrected)**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions (corrected)**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions (corrected)**,*Space998***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions (corrected)**,*YBM***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions (corrected)**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions (corrected)**,*Virgil*

**Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions (corrected)**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions (corrected)**,*John Gabriel*

**Re: Solutions manual to Fundamentals of Database Systems, 5E Ramez Elmasri,Shamkant B. Navathe**,*mehakagarwal8***EINSTEIN'S 1905 POLYGON SCENARIO**,*Pentcho Valev***Re: EINSTEIN'S 1905 POLYGON SCENARIO**,*Pentcho Valev***Re: EINSTEIN'S 1905 POLYGON SCENARIO**,*Pentcho Valev*

**Matheogogologogy § 543**,*"Jürgen R."***Re: Matheogogologogy § 543**,*Sam Sung*

**Re: kernel of identity, sole/self**,*Robin Chapman***Re: kernel of identity, sole/self**,*Col. Edmund Burke***Re: kernel of identity, sole/self**,*Brian M . Scott*

**Motz and Weaver attempt at Euclid proof #25 Correcting Math 4th ed**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Caculus Sin Problem**,*William Elliot***Re: Caculus Sin Problem**,*Arturo Magidin***Re: Caculus Sin Problem**,*quasi***Re: Caculus Sin Problem**,*quasi***Re: Caculus Sin Problem**,*William Elliot*

**Re: Caculus Sin Problem**,*Roland Franzius***Re: Caculus Sin Problem**,*dullrich***Re: Caculus Sin Problem**,*John Smith***Re: Caculus Sin Problem**,*Bart Goddard***Re: Caculus Sin Problem**,*John Smith***Re: Caculus Sin Problem**,*Bart Goddard***Re: Caculus Sin Problem**,*Roland Franzius***Re: Caculus Sin Problem**,*Bart Goddard***Re: Caculus Sin Problem**,*Sam Sung*

**Caculus Sin Problem**,*drhuang57*

**Brealey - Principles of corporate finance 11e Test bank is now available for sale. Buy now at affordable prices. Contact to buy this : testbanksbiz[at]gmail.com.**,*esolnow***Friendly Introduction To Analysis (2ndEd) - Kosmala - Solutions Manual is now available for sale. Buy now at affordable prices. Contact to buy this : testbanksbiz[at]gmail.com.**,*allsolutionmanuals11***The Narcissism of Santa Claus**,*Kevin Barry***Matheology § 542**,*"Jürgen R."***10:54:36 UT October 8 2014 (Wednesday) = Total Lunar Eclipse at "Greatest"**,*David Bernier***Cal Tech Univ physics-math professors invite: Deriving Dirac & Schrodinger Equations from Maxwell Equations to arxiv #2151 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Re: Cal Tech Univ physics-math professors invite: Deriving Dirac & Schrodinger Equations from Maxwell Equations to arxiv #2151 Correcting Math**,*Dan Christensen***Dr. Jody Culham and Dr. Brian Cornell is JD Christensen a liaring stalking professor trying to bounce people off of sci.math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***AP going off the deep end**,*Dan Christensen*

**Re: GLORIOUS CONFIRMATION OF TIME DILATION ?**,*Pentcho Valev***solutions manual, test bank for Financial Accounting An Introduction to Concepts Methods and Uses 14e Roman Weil Katherine Schipper Jennifer Francis contact directly at discountsmtb(at)hotmail(dot)com**,*piecutie056***Hey, Steve, I see you said there's NO God**,*Numbers Game***Re: Hey, Steve, I see you said there's NO God**,*Jens Stuckelberger*

**Orders for NxN**,*William Elliot***Re: Orders for NxN**,*quasi*

**(sin x)/x**,*William Elliot***Re: (sin x)/x**,*quasi***Re: (sin x)/x**,*William Elliot***Re: (sin x)/x**,*Bart Goddard***Re: (sin x)/x**,*quasi*

**Re: (sin x)/x**,*Roland Franzius***Re: (sin x)/x**,*dullrich***Re: (sin x)/x**,*Bart Goddard***Re: (sin x)/x**,*William Elliot***Re: (sin x)/x**,*Bart Goddard***Re: (sin x)/x**,*Mike Terry***Re: (sin x)/x**,*Bart Goddard*

**(sin x)/x**,*drhuang57***(sin x)/x**,*drhuang57***Re: (sin x)/x**,*Peter Percival*

**Re: (sin x)/x**,*John Gabriel***Re: (sin x)/x**,*dullrich***Re: (sin x)/x**,*John Gabriel***Re: (sin x)/x**,*drhuang57***Re: (sin x)/x**,*John Gabriel***Re: (sin x)/x**,*dullrich***Re: (sin x)/x**,*John Gabriel***Re: (sin x)/x**,*dullrich***Re: (sin x)/x**,*John Gabriel***Re: (sin x)/x**,*John Gabriel***Re: (sin x)/x**,*John Gabriel***Re: (sin x)/x**,*Zeit Geist***Re: (sin x)/x**,*drhuang57***Re: (sin x)/x**,*John Gabriel*

**Re: (sin x)/x**,*smn*

**xy=sin y**,*humbled survivor***Dan Christensen; Dr. Adam Cohen and Dr. Lorne Campbell of Univ Western Ontario; questions on bully stalking**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Re: Dan Christensen; Dr. Adam Cohen and Dr. Lorne Campbell of Univ Western Ontario; questions on bully stalking**,*PotatoSauce***AP going off the deep end**,*Dan Christensen***Re: Dan Christensen; Dr. Adam Cohen and Dr. Lorne Campbell of Univ Western Ontario; questions on bully stalking**,*konyberg***AP going off the deep end**,*Dan Christensen***Re: AP going off the deep end**,*konyberg***Re: AP going off the deep end**,*Dan Christensen***Re: AP going off the deep end**,*konyberg***Re: AP going off the deep end**,*Dan Christensen*

**Re: AP going off the deep end**,*Space998*

**Re: Dan Christensen; Dr. Adam Cohen and Dr. Lorne Campbell of Univ Western Ontario; questions on bully stalking**,*Space998***AP going off the deep end**,*Dan Christensen*- <Possible follow-ups>
**Dan Christensen; Dr. Adam Cohen and Dr. Lorne Campbell of Univ Western Ontario; questions on bully stalking**,*Archimedes Plutonium*

**Notre Dame Univ, Journal of Symbolic Logic, 1993 and Infinitude of Twin Primes #23 Correcting Math 4th ed**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Re: Notre Dame Univ, Journal of Symbolic Logic, 1993 and Infinitude of Twin Primes #23 Correcting Math 4th ed**,*Space998***can Arenstorf do a valid Infinitude of Twin Primes proof, reductio ad absurdum? #24 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***foorpy**,*Space998***Re: foorpy**,*Space998***Re: foorpy**,*Space998*

**bike locks and encryption**,*RichD***Re: bike locks and encryption**,*William Elliot***Re: bike locks and encryption**,*Richard Tobin***Re: bike locks and encryption**,*RichD***Re: bike locks and encryption**,*Richard Tobin***Re: bike locks and encryption**,*samiso*

**Re: bike locks and encryption**,*RichD***Re: bike locks and encryption**,*Space998*

**Re: bike locks and encryption**,*emptypost*

**Dr. Patrick Brown and Dr. Mike Atkinson Re: stalking in sci.math; Univ Western Ontario questions on stalking**,*Archimedes Plutonium***How To Kill A Vampire**,*Kevin Barry***Welcome to <sci.math>. These suggestions may help you.**,*Ken Pledger*- <Possible follow-ups>
**Welcome to <sci.math>. These suggestions may help you.**,*Ken Pledger*

**The improved Li(x) of the Prime Number Theorem does it converge yet? #2148 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Re: The improved Li(x) of the Prime Number Theorem does it converge yet? #2149 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Here is an example of the improved Li(x) that wants to achieve equality of primes at 1*10^603 #2150 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***achieving a true Prime Number Theorem with repeated convergencies #2152 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Re: achieving a true Prime Number Theorem with repeated convergencies #2153 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***building a true Prime Number Theorem with repeated convergencies #2154 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Re: building a true Prime Number Theorem with repeated convergencies #2155 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***what I was actually proving is that there can never be a Prime Number Theorem #2156 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***I should have focused more on the PPT progression of 1/(2pi) #2157 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Re: I should have focused more on the PPT progression of 1/(2pi) #2157 Correcting Math**,*Space998***Re: I should have focused more on the PPT progression of 1/(2pi) #2157 Correcting Math**,*Chris M. Thomasson***Re: I should have focused more on the PPT progression of 1/(2pi)**,*Archimedes Plutonium***what is the significance of one, two, or three zeroes in base-ten expansion of pi ;what about 0x00, 00x0, 0x0x0, 00x00 and so on**,*Space998***Re: what is the significance of one, two, or three zeroes in base-ten expansion of pi ;what about 0x00, 00x0, 0x0x0, 00x00 and so on**,*Space998*

**a twist on Collatz**,*David Bernier***Re: a twist on Collatz**,*David Bernier***Re: a twist on Collatz**,*David Bernier***Re: a twist on Collatz**,*David Bernier***Re: a twist on Collatz**,*David Bernier*

**Hartogs number**,*William Elliot***LA FIN DE EINSTEIN EN FRANCE**,*Pentcho Valev***Re: LA FIN DE EINSTEIN EN FRANCE**,*Pentcho Valev*

**analysis of some of the mistakes in Mathematical Intelligencer's "Prime Simplicity" 2009; #22 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***n doesn't divide abc of a^n +b^n = c^n**,*unnavigable***Re: n doesn't divide abc of a^n +b^n = c^n**,*William Elliot***Re: n doesn't divide abc of a^n +b^n = c^n**,*Paul***Re: n doesn't divide abc of a^n +b^n = c^n**,*William Elliot***Re: n doesn't divide abc of a^n +b^n = c^n**,*Paul***Re: n doesn't divide abc of a^n +b^n = c^n**,*quasi***Re: n doesn't divide abc of a^n +b^n = c^n**,*Peter Percival***Re: n doesn't divide abc of a^n +b^n = c^n**,*Paul***Re: n doesn't divide abc of a^n +b^n = c^n**,*Peter Percival*

**Re: n doesn't divide abc of a^n +b^n = c^n**,*Richard Tobin*

**Re: n doesn't divide abc of a^n +b^n = c^n**,*unnavigable***Re: n doesn't divide abc of a^n +b^n = c^n**,*unnavigable***Re: n doesn't divide abc of a^n +b^n = c^n**,*unnavigable*

**Re: n doesn't divide abc of a^n +b^n = c^n**,*unnavigable***Re: n doesn't divide abc of a^n +b^n = c^n**,*quasi***Re: n doesn't divide abc of a^n +b^n = c^n**,*unnavigable***Re: n doesn't divide abc of a^n +b^n = c^n**,*unnavigable***Re: n doesn't divide abc of a^n +b^n = c^n**,*quasi***Re: n doesn't divide abc of a^n +b^n = c^n**,*unnavigable***Re: n doesn't divide abc of a^n +b^n = c^n**,*quasi***Re: n doesn't divide abc of a^n +b^n = c^n**,*unnavigable*

**Re: Irrational numbers have representations as decimals.**,*Virgil***Graphical Function Analysis**,*google***Matheology § 541**,*mueckenh***Re: Matheology § 541**,*PotatoSauce***Re: Matheology § 541**,*mueckenh***Re: Matheology § 541**,*PotatoSauce***Re: Matheology § 541**,*mueckenh***Re: Matheology § 541**,*PotatoSauce***Re: Matheology § 541**,*mueckenh***Re: Matheology § 541**,*PotatoSauce***Re: Matheology § 541**,*mueckenh***Re: Matheology § 541**,*PotatoSauce***Re: Matheology § 541**,*mueckenh***Re: Matheology § 541**,*PotatoSauce***Re: Matheology § 541**,*mueckenh***Re: Matheology § 541**,*Virgil***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*mueckenh***Re: WMytheology Sucks**,*Virgil***Re: Matheology § 541**,*PotatoSauce***Re: Matheology § 541**,*mueckenh***Re: Matheology § 541**,*PotatoSauce***Re: Matheology § 541**,*mueckenh***Re: Matheology § 541**,*Virgil***Re: Matheology § 541**,*PotatoSauce***Re: Matheology § 541**,*mueckenh***Re: Matheology § 541**,*PotatoSauce***Re: Matheology § 541**,*mueckenh***Re: Matheology § 541**,*PotatoSauce***Re: Matheology § 541**,*mueckenh***Re: Matheology § 541**,*PotatoSauce***Re: Matheology § 541**,*mueckenh***Re: WMytheology § 541**,*Virgil***Re: Matheology § 541**,*PotatoSauce***Re: Matheology § 541**,*mueckenh***Re: Matheology § 541**,*PotatoSauce***Re: Matheology § 541**,*mueckenh***Re: Matheology § 541**,*Virgil***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*mueckenh***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*Virgil***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*mueckenh***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*Virgil***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*mueckenh***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*Virgil***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*mueckenh***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*Virgil***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*mueckenh***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*Virgil***Re: Matheology § 541**,*PotatoSauce***Re: Matheology § 541**,*mueckenh***Re: Matheology § 541**,*Virgil***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*mueckenh***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*Virgil***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*mueckenh***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*Virgil***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*mueckenh***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*Virgil***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*mueckenh***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*Virgil***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*Virgil***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*mueckenh***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*Virgil***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*mueckenh***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*Virgil***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*Virgil***Re: Matheology § 541**,*PotatoSauce***Re: Matheology § 541**,*mueckenh***Re: Matheology § 541**,*PotatoSauce***Re: Matheology § 541**,*mueckenh***Re: Matheology § 541**,*Virgil***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*mueckenh***Re: Matheology § 541**,*Virgil***Re: Matheology § 541**,*PotatoSauce***Re: Matheology § 541**,*mueckenh***Re: Matheology § 541**,*PotatoSauce***Re: Matheology § 541**,*mueckenh***Re: Matheology § 541**,*Virgil***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*mueckenh***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*Virgil***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*mueckenh***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*Virgil***Re: Matheology § 541**,*PotatoSauce***Re: Matheology § 541**,*mueckenh***Re: Matheology § 541**,*Virgil***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*mueckenh***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*Virgil***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*mueckenh***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*Virgil***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*mueckenh***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*Virgil***Re: Matheology § 541**,*PotatoSauce***Re: Matheology § 541**,*mueckenh***Re: Matheology § 541**,*Virgil***Re: Matheology § 541**,*PotatoSauce***Re: Matheology § 541**,*mueckenh***Re: Matheology § 541**,*Virgil***Re: Matheology § 541**,*PotatoSauce***Re: Matheology § 541**,*mueckenh***Re: Matheology § 541**,*PotatoSauce***Re: Matheology § 541**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: Matheology § 541**,*Virgil***Re: Matheology § 541**,*Martin Shobe***Re: Matheology § 541**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: Matheology § 541**,*Martin Shobe***Re: Matheology § 541**,*mueckenh***Re: Matheology § 541**,*Virgil***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*mueckenh***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*Virgil***Re: Matheology § 541**,*Martin Shobe***Re: Matheology § 541**,*mueckenh***Re: Matheology Â§ 541**,*Virgil***Re: Matheology § 541**,*Martin Shobe***Re: Matheology § 541**,*mueckenh***Re: Matheology § 541**,*Virgil***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*mueckenh***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*mueckenh***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*mueckenh***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*mueckenh***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*wpihughes***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*Virgil***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*Virgil***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*wpihughes***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*Virgil***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*Virgil***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*Virgil***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*Virgil***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*Virgil***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*FredJeffries***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*Virgil***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*Virgil***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*Virgil***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*Virgil***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*wpihughes***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*wpihughes***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*wpihughes***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*wpihughes***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*wpihughes***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*Virgil***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*Virgil***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*Virgil***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*Virgil***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*Virgil***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*Virgil***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*Virgil***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*Virgil***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*Virgil***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: WMytheology ï¿½ 541**,*Virgil***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*Ralf Bader***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*Virgil***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*Virgil***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*Virgil***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*Virgil***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*Virgil***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*wpihughes***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*wpihughes***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*wpihughes***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*Virgil***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*wpihughes***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*wpihughes***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*wpihughes***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*wpihughes***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*wpihughes***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*wpihughes***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*Virgil***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*Virgil***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*Virgil***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*Virgil***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*Virgil***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*Virgil***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*Virgil***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*Virgil***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*Virgil***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*Ralf Bader***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*Virgil***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*Virgil***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*Virgil***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*Virgil***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*Virgil***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*Virgil***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*Michael Klemm***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*Michael Klemm***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*Virgil***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*Michael Klemm***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*Virgil***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*Virgil***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*FredJeffries***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*FredJeffries***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*wpihughes***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*FredJeffries***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*FredJeffries***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*FredJeffries***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*Ralf Bader***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*Virgil***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*mueckenh***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*Virgil***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*FredJeffries***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*Virgil***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*Virgil***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*Virgil***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*Virgil***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*Virgil***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*Virgil***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*Virgil***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*Virgil***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*Virgil***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*Virgil***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*Virgil***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*Virgil***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*Virgil***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*Virgil***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*mueckenh***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*Virgil***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*Virgil***Re: Matheology § 541**,*PotatoSauce***Re: Matheology § 541**,*mueckenh***Re: Matheology § 541**,*Virgil***Re: Matheology § 541**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: Matheology § 541**,*Virgil***Re: Matheology § 541**,*PotatoSauce***Re: Matheology § 541**,*Nimber***Re: Matheology § 541**,*mueckenh***Re: Matheology § 541**,*Virgil***Re: Matheology § 541**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Matheology § 541**,*PotatoSauce***Re: Matheology § 541**,*mueckenh***Re: Matheology § 541**,*Virgil***Re: Matheology § 541**,*PotatoSauce***Re: Matheology § 541**,*mueckenh***Re: Matheology § 541**,*PotatoSauce***Re: Matheology § 541**,*mueckenh***Re: WMytheology § 541**,*Virgil***Re: Matheology § 541**,*PotatoSauce***Re: Matheology § 541**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: Matheology § 541**,*Virgil***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*Virgil***Re: Matheology § 541**,*PotatoSauce***Re: Matheology § 541**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: Matheology § 541**,*Virgil***Re: Matheology § 541**,*PotatoSauce***Re: Matheology § 541**,*John Gabriel***Re: Matheology § 541**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: Matheology § 541**,*PotatoSauce***Re: Matheology § 541**,*Virgil***Re: Matheology § 541**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: Matheology § 541**,*PotatoSauce***Re: Matheology § 541**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: Matheology § 541**,*Virgil***Re: Matheology § 541**,*PotatoSauce***Re: Matheology § 541**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: Matheology § 541**,*PotatoSauce***Re: Matheology § 541**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: Matheology § 541**,*Virgil***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*Virgil***Re: Matheology § 541**,*PotatoSauce***Re: Matheology § 541**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: Matheology § 541**,*PotatoSauce**Message not available***Re: Matheology § 541**,*Virgil***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*Virgil***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*Virgil***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*Virgil**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available***Re: Matheology § 541**,*Virgil***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*Virgil***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*Virgil**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available***Re: Matheology § 541**,*Virgil**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available***Re: Matheology § 541**,*Virgil**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available***Re: Matheology § 541**,*Virgil***Re: Matheology § 541**,*Virgil***Re: Matheology § 541**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Matheology § 541**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Matheology § 541**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: Matheology § 541**,*Virgil***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*Virgil***Re: Matheology § 541**,*Virgil***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*Virgil***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*Virgil***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*Virgil***Re: Matheology § 541**,*Virgil***Re: Matheology § 541**,*Virgil***Re: Matheology Â§ 541**,*Virgil***Re: Matheology § 541**,*Virgil***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*mueckenh***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*Virgil***Re: Matheology § 541**,*Virgil***Re: Matheology § 541**,*Virgil***Re: Matheology § 541**,*Virgil***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*mueckenh***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*Virgil***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*Virgil***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*Virgil***Re: Matheology § 541**,*Virgil***Re: Matheology § 541**,*Virgil***Re: WMYtheology § 541**,*Virgil***Re: Matheology § 541**,*Virgil***Re: Matheology § 541**,*FredJeffries***Re: Matheology § 541**,*mueckenh***Re: Matheology § 541**,*Virgil***Re: Matheology § 541**,*Virgil***Re: Matheology § 541**,*Virgil***Re: Matheology § 541**,*Virgil***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*FredJeffries***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*Virgil***Re: WMytheology § 541**,*Virgil***Re: WMytheology ï¿½ 541**,*stiefelwhitney***Re: WMytheology ï¿½ 541**,*mueckenh***Re: WMytheology ï¿½ 541**,*Virgil***Re: WMytheology § 541**,*Virgil***Re: Matheology § 541**,*Virgil***Re: Matheology ï¿½ 541**,*mueckenh***Re: WMytheology 541**,*Virgil***Re: WMytheology 541**,*mueckenh***Re: WMytheology 541**,*Virgil***Re: WMytheology 541**,*mueckenh***Re: WMytheology 541**,*Virgil*

**Re: Matheology § 541**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Matheology § 541**,*mueckenh***Re: Matheology § 541**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Matheology § 541**,*mueckenh***Re: Matheology § 541**,*Virgil***Re: Matheology § 541**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Matheology § 541**,*PotatoSauce***Re: Matheology § 541**,*mueckenh***Re: Matheology § 541**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Matheology Â§ 541**,*Virgil***Re: Matheology § 541**,*mueckenh***Re: WMytheology § 541, WM goofs again!**,*Virgil***Re: Matheology § 541**,*Virgil*

**Re: Matheology § 541**,*Virgil***Re: Matheology § 541**,*YBM***Re: Matheology § 541**,*PotatoSauce*

**Re: Matheology § 541**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Matheology § 541**,*Dan Christensen*

**(u-1)^n = u^n -1 (mod n^m); m>2**,*unnavigable***Re: (u-1)^n = u^n -1 (mod n^m); m>2**,*quasi***Re: (u-1)^n = u^n -1 (mod n^m); m>2**,*Arturo Magidin***Re: (u-1)^n = u^n -1 (mod n^m); m>2**,*quasi***Re: (u-1)^n = u^n -1 (mod n^m); m>2**,*Arturo Magidin*

**Re: (u-1)^n = u^n -1 (mod n^m); m>2**,*unnavigable***Re: (u-1)^n = u^n -1 (mod n^m); m>2**,*unnavigable***Re: (u-1)^n = u^n -1 (mod n^m); m>2**,*unnavigable***Re: (u-1)^n = u^n -1 (mod n^m); m>2**,*quasi***Re: (u-1)^n = u^n -1 (mod n^m); m>2**,*unnavigable*

**Re: (u-1)^n = u^n -1 (mod n^m); m>2**,*Port563*

**MathWorld's attempt at a Euclid Infinitude of Primes proof #21 Correcting Math 4th ed.**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Univ. Cincinnati math professors invite: Overhaul of Old Logic to the New Logic to arxiv #2145 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Re: Univ. Cincinnati math professors invite: Overhaul of Old Logic to the New Logic to arxiv #2145 Correcting Math**,*Port563***Re: Univ. Cincinnati math professors invite: Overhaul of Old Logic to the New Logic to arxiv #2145 Correcting Math**,*YBM***why disjunction has to be exclusive-or Re: Overhaul of Old Logic to the New Logic to arxiv #2146 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Re: Univ. Cincinnati math professors invite: Overhaul of Old Logic to the New Logic to arxiv #2145 Correcting Math**,*Space998**Dan Christensen*

**Narcissism 101**,*Kevin Barry***The Description of the Barrier Between Two Seas**,*BV***Squared Infinity**,*William Elliot***Re: Squared Infinity**,*David Hartley***Re: Squared Infinity**,*William Elliot*

**Re: Squared Infinity**,*Arturo Magidin***Re: Squared Infinity**,*William Elliot*

**solutions manual, test bank for Cornerstones of Managerial Accounting 5e Maryanne Mowen Don Hansen Dan Heitger contact directly at discountsmtb(at)hotmail(dot)com**,*piecutie056***history of the table of actual prime count; why Gauss-Hadamard were misled #2144 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***MUTUAL TIME DILATION UNSTINGED IN EINSTEIN'S WORLD**,*Pentcho Valev***Re: MUTUAL TIME DILATION UNSTINGED IN EINSTEIN'S WORLD**,*Pentcho Valev*

**Manin & Panchishkin attempt at Euclid's Infinitude of Primes proof #20 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***concerning numbers that take relatively many steps to reach 1 in the Collatz problem**,*David Bernier***Re: concerning numbers that take relatively many steps to reach 1 in the Collatz problem**,*David Bernier***Re: concerning numbers that take relatively many steps to reach 1 in the Collatz problem**,*David Bernier***Re: concerning numbers that take relatively many steps to reach 1 in the Collatz problem**,*David Bernier***Re: concerning numbers that take relatively many steps to reach 1 in the Collatz problem**,*David Bernier***Re: concerning numbers that take relatively many steps to reach 1 in the Collatz problem**,*David Bernier***Re: concerning numbers that take relatively many steps to reach 1 in the Collatz problem**,*David Bernier*

**Re: The Logic of Jesus**,*Kevin Barry***A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*PotatoSauce***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*PotatoSauce***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Dan Christensen***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*mueckenh***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Virgil***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Dan Christensen***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*mueckenh***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Zeit Geist***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Dan Christensen***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Zeit Geist***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Dan Christensen***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*mueckenh***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Dan Christensen***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*mueckenh***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Dan Christensen***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*mueckenh***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Dan Christensen***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Dan Christensen***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*mueckenh***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Dan Christensen***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Virgil***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Virgil***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Zeit Geist***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Virgil***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Virgil***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Virgil*

**Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*PotatoSauce***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*PotatoSauce***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*FredJeffries***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*mueckenh***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*mueckenh***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start? WM doesn't know how! See below!**,*Virgil***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*PotatoSauce***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*mueckenh***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*mueckenh***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*PotatoSauce***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*mueckenh***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Virgil***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*FredJeffries***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Virgil***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Virgil***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*mueckenh***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Virgil***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*mueckenh***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Virgil***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*PotatoSauce***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*mueckenh***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Virgil***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*PotatoSauce***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*mueckenh***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Martin Shobe***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*mueckenh***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Martin Shobe***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*mueckenh***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Martin Shobe***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*mueckenh***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Martin Shobe***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*mueckenh***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Virgil***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Martin Shobe***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Zeit Geist***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Virgil***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*mueckenh***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Virgil***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Virgil***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Martin Shobe***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Virgil***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*mueckenh***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Virgil***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Ralf Bader***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*mueckenh***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Michael Klemm***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*mueckenh***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Virgil***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Ralf Bader***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*mueckenh***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Virgil***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Michael Klemm***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Ralf Bader***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*mueckenh***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Virgil***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Ralf Bader***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*mueckenh***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Virgil***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Ralf Bader***Re: A Proposal for WM: Get your head straight!**,*Virgil***Re: A Proposal for WM: Shut up!**,*Virgil***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*mueckenh***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Virgil***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Martin Shobe***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*mueckenh***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Virgil***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Martin Shobe***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*mueckenh***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Virgil***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*mueckenh***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Virgil***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Virgil***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Virgil***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*mueckenh***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Virgil***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*mueckenh***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*mueckenh***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Ralf Bader***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*mueckenh***or N**,*Virgil***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Virgil***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*mueckenh***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*mueckenh***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*mueckenh***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Virgil***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*mueckenh***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Virgil***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*PotatoSauce***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Virgil***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*mueckenh***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Virgil***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Martin Shobe***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*mueckenh***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Virgil***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*grahamcooper7***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*YBM***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*grahamcooper7***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*YBM***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Martin Shobe***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*mueckenh***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Virgil***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Martin Shobe***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Virgil***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*grahamcooper7***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*mueckenh***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Martin Shobe***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*mueckenh***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Martin Shobe***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*mueckenh***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Virgil***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Martin Shobe***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*mueckenh***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Martin Shobe***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*grahamcooper7***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*mueckenh***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Martin Shobe***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Virgil***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Martin Shobe***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*mueckenh***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Martin Shobe***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*mueckenh***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Martin Shobe***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*mueckenh***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Virgil***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Martin Shobe***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*mueckenh***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Virgil***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Martin Shobe***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*mueckenh***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Martin Shobe***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*mueckenh***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Virgil***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Martin Shobe***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*mueckenh***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Virgil***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Martin Shobe***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*mueckenh***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Virgil***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*mueckenh***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Virgil***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Martin Shobe***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Virgil***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*mueckenh***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Virgil***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Virgil***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*YBM***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Virgil***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Zeit Geist***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Virgil***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Virgil***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Zeit Geist***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Virgil***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Virgil***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Zeit Geist***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Virgil***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*grahamcooper7***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*grahamcooper7***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Virgil***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*grahamcooper7***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Virgil***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*grahamcooper7***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*grahamcooper7***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Zeit Geist***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*grahamcooper7***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Zeit Geist***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*grahamcooper7***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Zeit Geist***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*grahamcooper7***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Zeit Geist***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*grahamcooper7***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Zeit Geist***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Zeit Geist***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*grahamcooper7***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Zeit Geist***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*grahamcooper7***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Zeit Geist***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*grahamcooper7***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*mueckenh***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Virgil***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*PotatoSauce***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*mueckenh***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Virgil***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*PotatoSauce***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*mueckenh***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Zeit Geist***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*mueckenh***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Virgil***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*grahamcooper7***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*YBM***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*grahamcooper7***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*grahamcooper7***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*mueckenh***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Zeit Geist***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Virgil***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*mueckenh***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Virgil***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Zeit Geist***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*mueckenh***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Virgil***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Zeit Geist***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Zeit Geist***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*mueckenh***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Zeit Geist***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Virgil***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Virgil***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*PotatoSauce***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*mueckenh***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Virgil***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Zeit Geist***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Zeit Geist***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Virgil***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*grahamcooper7***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*grahamcooper7***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*grahamcooper7***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*mueckenh***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Virgil***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*grahamcooper7***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*grahamcooper7***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Virgil***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*grahamcooper7***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Virgil***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Virgil***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Virgil***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Zeit Geist***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Zeit Geist***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*wolfgang . mueckenheim***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Zeit Geist***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*mueckenh***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Virgil***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*mueckenh***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Virgil***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Zeit Geist***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Virgil***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Martin Shobe***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*mueckenh***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Martin Shobe***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Virgil***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Zeit Geist***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Virgil***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*grahamcooper7***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*grahamcooper7***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Zeit Geist***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Virgil***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Zeit Geist***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Virgil***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*mueckenh***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Virgil***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*mueckenh***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Virgil***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*mueckenh***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Virgil***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Virgil***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*FredJeffries***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*PotatoSauce***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*mueckenh***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*PotatoSauce***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*mueckenh***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*PotatoSauce***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*mueckenh***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*PotatoSauce***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*mueckenh***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*PotatoSauce***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*mueckenh***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Virgil***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*PotatoSauce***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*mueckenh***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*FredJeffries***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*PotatoSauce***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*mueckenh***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Virgil***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*PotatoSauce***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*mueckenh***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*PotatoSauce***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*mueckenh***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*PotatoSauce***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*mueckenh***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Virgil***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Virgil***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*PotatoSauce***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*mueckenh***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Virgil***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*PotatoSauce***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*mueckenh***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Virgil***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*PotatoSauce***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*mueckenh***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*PotatoSauce***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*mueckenh***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Virgil***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*PotatoSauce***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Virgil***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Zeit Geist***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Virgil***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Virgil***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*PotatoSauce***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Virgil***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Virgil***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Virgil***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Virgil***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Zeit Geist***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Virgil***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Virgil***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Virgil***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*YBM***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*mueckenh***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*YBM***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*mueckenh***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*PotatoSauce***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*mueckenh***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*PotatoSauce***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Zeit Geist***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Virgil***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Virgil***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Virgil***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Virgil***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*mueckenh***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*PotatoSauce***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*mueckenh***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Zeit Geist***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*mueckenh***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Virgil***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Virgil***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Virgil***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*mueckenh***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Virgil***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Ralf Bader***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*mueckenh***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Ralf Bader***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Ralf Bader***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Virgil***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*PotatoSauce***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Tommy***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*mueckenh***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Tommy***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*mueckenh***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Virgil***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Virgil***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*mueckenh***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*PotatoSauce***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*mueckenh***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*PotatoSauce***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*mueckenh***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*PotatoSauce***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*mueckenh***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*PotatoSauce***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*mueckenh***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*PotatoSauce***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Virgil***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Virgil***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Zeit Geist***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*mueckenh***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Virgil***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Virgil***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Virgil***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Virgil***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Virgil***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Virgil***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Nimber*

**Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*FredJeffries***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Zeit Geist***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*PotatoSauce***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*mueckenh***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Virgil***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*mueckenh***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Michael Klemm***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*Virgil*

**Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*PotatoSauce*

**Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*PotatoSauce***Re: A Proposal for WM: Why don't you state your definitions clearly from the start?**,*grahamcooper7*

**Re: The Muecke Museum**,*PotatoSauce*- <Possible follow-ups>
**Re: The Muecke Museum**,*PotatoSauce***Re: The Muecke Museum**,*PotatoSauce***Re: The Muecke Museum**,*"Jürgen R."*

**Re: The Muecke Museum**,*Dan Christensen***Re: The Muecke Museum**,*Zeit Geist***Re: The Muecke Museum**,*Ralf Bader***Re: The Muecke Museum**,*Zeit Geist***Re: The Muecke Museum**,*Ralf Bader***Re: The Muecke Museum**,*Zeit Geist*

**Re: The Muecke Museum**,*PotatoSauce***Re: The Muecke Museum**,*"Jürgen R."***Re: The Muecke Museum**,*"Jürgen R."*

**Re: The Muecke Museum**,*Dan Christensen***Re: The Muecke Museum**,*Nimber***Re: The Muecke Museum**,*Dan Christensen*

**Re: The Muecke Museum**,*Dan Christensen*

**Those Who Live By The Sword**,*Kevin Barry***Re: Those Who Live By The Sword**,*Col. Edmund Burke*

**Saved By Grace**,*Kevin Barry***Re: Saved By Grace**,*Col. Edmund Burke***Re: Saved By Grace**,*Kevin Barry*

**Landau gives a valid direct Euclid IP proof #19 Correcting Math 4th ed.**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Cal Tech Univ physics-math professors invite: Deriving Dirac Equation from Maxwell Equations to arxiv**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Re: Cal Tech Univ physics-math professors invite: Deriving Dirac Equation from Maxwell Equations to arxiv**,*Archimedes Plutonium***What happened AP's endorsements from MIT, Harvard, Yale, Oxford and Cambridge???**,*Dan Christensen***Re: Cal Tech Univ physics-math professors invite: Deriving Dirac Equation from Maxwell Equations to arxiv**,*konyberg*

**Poetic inspiration**,*peter . h . m . brooks***Re: Poetic inspiration**,*samiso*

**anybody can solve this step by step**,*Brian Ernesthayward Hayward***Re: anybody can solve this step by step**,*Zeit Geist*

**Infinite Series and Generating Functions**,*PotatoSauce***Re: Infinite Series and Generating Functions**,*Tim Norfolk***Re: Infinite Series and Generating Functions**,*Bill Taylor*

**Kline attempt of Euclid's Infinitude of Primes proof #18 Correcting Math 4th ed.**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Banter: Increasing vs Strictly Increasing**,*PotatoSauce***Re: Banter: Increasing vs Strictly Increasing**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Banter: Increasing vs Strictly Increasing**,*PotatoSauce***Re: Banter: Increasing vs Strictly Increasing**,*Bill Taylor***Re: Banter: Increasing vs Strictly Increasing**,*PotatoSauce***Re: Banter: Increasing vs Strictly Increasing**,*Bill Taylor***Re: Banter: Increasing vs Strictly Increasing**,*Virgil***Re: Banter: Increasing vs Strictly Increasing**,*Zeit Geist*

**Re: Banter: Increasing vs Strictly Increasing**,*Peter Percival*

**INTRODUCING A HONESTY RULE IN EINSTEIN'S RELATIVITY**,*Pentcho Valev***Re: INTRODUCING A HONESTY RULE IN EINSTEIN'S RELATIVITY**,*Pentcho Valev*

**Re: English terms: 'composed/component/constituent function'?**,*IV***Cardinal Squared**,*William Elliot***Re: Cardinal Squared**,*scattered***Re: Cardinal Squared**,*Peter Percival***Re: Cardinal Squared**,*Peter Percival***Re: Cardinal Squared**,*scattered***Re: Cardinal Squared**,*Peter Percival***Re: Cardinal Squared**,*Arturo Magidin***Re: Cardinal Squared**,*Arturo Magidin***Re: Cardinal Squared**,*Peter Percival***Re: Cardinal Squared**,*Arturo Magidin***Re: Cardinal Squared**,*Peter Percival***Re: Cardinal Squared**,*Peter Percival*

**Re: Cardinal Squared**,*Arturo Magidin***Re: Cardinal Squared**,*William Elliot*

**Re: Cardinal Squared**,*dullrich***Re: Cardinal Squared**,*Herman Rubin*

**Overhauling even more of Logic with material implication and now disjunction #2139 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***AP's Wacky New Logic**,*Dan Christensen***DNA logic genetics #2140 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Re: DNA logic genetics #2140 Correcting Math**,*Dan Christensen*

**The Less Than Indomitable Will**,*Kevin Barry***Re: require 2 courses of Logic; Dunham on Euclid IP #11 the 4th ed. Correcting Math**,*Space998***Re: why chose Ore for Prime Simplicity in Mathematical Intelligencer? #12 the 4th ed. Correcting Math**,*Space998***Re: foorp fo ... gniht emos**,*Space998***Re: foorp fo ... gniht emos**,*Space998***Re: foorp fo ... gniht emos**,*Space998*

**how much of modern math is invalid if 84% fail in a simple proof of Euclid #17 Correcting Math 4th ed.**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Re: asking endorsement Utah State Univ. math professors: True Prime Number Theorem to arxiv #2129 Correcting Math**,*Space998***Harvard math professors einladen proof of Fundamental Theorem of Algebra to arxiv**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Katz rendition of Euclid's Infinitude of Primes proof #16 Correcting Math 4th ed.**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Pi for the masses**,*samiso***Re: Pi for the masses**,*bert***Re: Pi for the masses**,*samiso***or not equal to three**,*Space998***Re: or not equal to three**,*samiso***Re: or not equal to three**,*samiso***Re: or not equal to three**,*Space998***Re: or not equal to three**,*William Elliot***Re: or not equal to three**,*samiso***Re: or not equal to three**,*samiso***Re: or not equal to three**,*Space998***Re: or not equal to three**,*Space998***Re: or not equal to three**,*Space998***Re: or not equal to three**,*samiso***Re: or not equal to three**,*Space998***Re: or not equal to three**,*samiso***Re: or not equal to three**,*Space998*

**Re: Pi for the masses**,*Dan Christensen***Re: Pi for the masses**,*emptypost***Re: Pi for the masses**,*Space998***Re: Pi for the masses**,*emptypost*

**Re: Pi for the masses**,*joshipura***Re: Pi for the masses**,*Space998***Re: Pi for the masses**,*samiso*

**Re: Pi for the masses**,*samiso*

**Re: TINV functions**,*Andre ns*- <Possible follow-ups>
**Re: TINV functions**,*Paul*

**A question about models of ZFC**,*Peter Percival***Re: A question about models of ZFC**,*K-Theory***Re: A question about models of ZFC**,*Jim Burns*

**Re: A question about models of ZFC**,*dullrich***Re: A question about models of ZFC**,*David Hartley***Re: A question about models of ZFC**,*Herman Rubin***Re: A question about models of ZFC**,*David Hartley***Re: A question about models of ZFC**,*Peter Percival***Re: A question about models of ZFC**,*Herman Rubin***Re: A question about models of ZFC**,*David Hartley***Re: A question about models of ZFC**,*Herman Rubin***Re: A question about models of ZFC**,*David Hartley***Re: A question about models of ZFC**,*Peter Percival***Re: A question about models of ZFC**,*K_h***Re: A question about models of ZFC**,*dullrich*

**Re: A question about models of ZFC**,*Zeit Geist*

**Re: A question about models of ZFC**,*Peter Percival***Re: A question about models of ZFC**,*Peter Percival*

**Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions (2)**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions (2)**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions (2)**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions (2)**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions (2)**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions (2)**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions (2)**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions (2)**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions (2)**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions (2)**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Irrational numbers have representations as decimal fractions (2)**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions (2)**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions (2)**,*Virgil*

**Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions (2)**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions (2)**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions (2)**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions (2)**,*K-Theory***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions (2)**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions (2)**,*FredJeffries***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions (2)**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have representation as decimal fractions (2)**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions (2)**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions (2)**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have representations as decimal fractions (2)**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have representations as decimal fractions (2)**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have representations as decimal fractions (2)**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have representations as decimal fractions (2)**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have representations as decimal fractions (2)**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have representations as decimal fractions (2)**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Irrational numbers have representations as decimal fractions (2)**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have representations as decimal fractions (2)**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Irrational numbers have representations as decimal fractions (2)**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have representations as decimal fractions (2)**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Irrational numbers have representations as decimal fractions (2)**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have representations as decimal fractions (2)**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have representations as decimals (2)**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have representations as decimal fractions (2)**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have representations as decimals**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have representations as decimal fractions (2)**,*Space998***Re: Irrational numbers have representation as endless decimals**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions (2)**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions (2)**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions (2)**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions (2)**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions (2)**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions (2)**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions (2)**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions (2)**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions (2)**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions (2)**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions (2)**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions (2)**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have representations as decimals (2)**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have representation as decimals**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have representation as decimals**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have representation as decimals**,*PotatoSauce***Re: Irrational numbers have representation as decimals**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have representation as decimals**,*PotatoSauce***Re: Irrational numbers have representation as decimals**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have representation as decimals**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have representation as decimals**,*PotatoSauce***Re: Irrational numbers have representation as decimals**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have representation as decimals**,*PotatoSauce***Re: Irrational numbers have representation as decimals**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have representation as decimals**,*PotatoSauce***Re: Irrational numbers have representation as decimals**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have representation as decimals**,*PotatoSauce***Re: Irrational numbers have representation as decimals**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have representation as decimals**,*PotatoSauce***Re: Irrational numbers have representation as decimals**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have representation as decimals**,*PotatoSauce***Re: Irrational numbers have representation as decimals**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have representation as decimals**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have representation as decimals**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have representation as decimals**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have representation as decimals**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have representation as decimals**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have representation as decimals**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have representation as decimals**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have representation as decimals**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have representation as decimals**,*PotatoSauce***Re: Irrational numbers have representation as decimals**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have representation as decimals**,*PotatoSauce***Re: Irrational numbers have representation as decimals**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have representation as decimals**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Irrational numbers have representation as decimals**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have representation as decimals**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have representation as decimals**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have representation as decimals**,*PotatoSauce***Re: Irrational numbers have representation as decimals**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have representation as decimals**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have representation as decimals**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have representation as decimals**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have representation as decimals**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have representation as decimals**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have representation as decimals**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have representation as decimals**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have representation as decimals**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have representation as decimals**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have representation as decimals**,*K_h***Re: Irrational numbers have representation as decimals**,*K_h***Re: Irrational numbers have representation as decimals**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have representation as decimals**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have representation as decimals**,*K_h***Re: Irrational numbers have representation as decimals**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have representation as decimals**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have representation as decimals**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have representation as decimals**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Irrational numbers have representation as decimals**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions (2)**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions (2)**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have representation as decimals (2)**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions (2)**,*Zeit Geist*

**Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions (2)**,*Zeit Geist*

**overhauling Convergence theory of all its muck and mire #2137 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Re: overhauling Convergence theory of all its muck and mire #2137 Correcting Math**,*Dan Christensen***PPT accounting diverges at 10^6 from 1/2pi #2138 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium*

**remarkable, that Kac & Ulam had given a valid Indirect Euclid Infinitude of Primes proof #15 Correcting Math 4th ed.**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Re: Aleph? Correction & Retraction**,*William Elliot***Cambridge Univ math professors donner son aval No Odd Perfect & Finiteness of Perfect Numbers to arxiv**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Positions in Infinite Space II**,*netzweltler***Re: Positions in Infinite Space II**,*wpihughes***Re: Positions in Infinite Space II**,*netzweltler***Re: Positions in Infinite Space II**,*wpihughes***Re: Positions in Infinite Space II**,*netzweltler***Re: Positions in Infinite Space II**,*wpihughes***Re: Positions in Infinite Space II**,*netzweltler***Re: Positions in Infinite Space II**,*wpihughes***Re: Positions in Infinite Space II**,*netzweltler***Re: Positions in Infinite Space II**,*wpihughes***Re: Positions in Infinite Space II**,*netzweltler***Re: Positions in Infinite Space II**,*wpihughes***Re: Positions in Infinite Space II**,*netzweltler***Re: Positions in Infinite Space II**,*netzweltler***Re: Positions in Infinite Space II**,*wpihughes***Re: Positions in Infinite Space II**,*netzweltler***Re: Positions in Infinite Space II**,*wpihughes***Re: Positions in Infinite Space II**,*netzweltler*

**Re: Positions in Infinite Space II**,*William Elliot***Re: Positions in Infinite Space II**,*netzweltler***Re: Positions in Infinite Space II**,*William Elliot*

**Re: Positions in Infinite Space II**,*William Elliot*

**Re: A three-dimensional counterpart to the Koch curve**,*erkdemon***Re: A three-dimensional counterpart to the Koch curve**,*Chris M. Thomasson*- <Possible follow-ups>
**Re: A three-dimensional counterpart to the Koch curve**,*erkdemon***Re: A three-dimensional counterpart to the Koch curve**,*erkdemon*

**math challange**,*samiso***Re: math challange**,*Barry Schwarz***Re: math challange**,*samiso***Re: math challange**,*A N Niel*

**Re: math challange**,*William Elliot***Re: math challange**,*Roland Franzius***Re: math challange**,*Peter Percival*

**Missouri State University Problem Corner**,*Les***Knighthood vs Sainthood**,*Kevin Barry***Princeton Univ. math professors endorse Beal & FLT to arxiv: ask**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Re: Princeton Univ. math professors endorse Beal & FLT to arxiv: ask**,*Dan Christensen***Re: Princeton Univ. math professors endorse Beal & FLT to arxiv: ask**,*Dan Christensen***Re: Princeton Univ. math professors endorse Beal & FLT to arxiv: ask**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Re: Princeton Univ. math professors endorse Beal & FLT to arxiv: ask**,*Dan Christensen***Re: Princeton Univ. math professors endorse Beal & FLT to arxiv: ask**,*Space998***Re: Princeton Univ. math professors endorse Beal & FLT to arxiv: ask**,*Dan Christensen***Re: Princeton Univ. math professors endorse Beal & FLT to arxiv: ask**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Re: Princeton Univ. math professors endorse Beal & FLT to arxiv: ask**,*Dan Christensen***Re: Princeton Univ. math professors endorse Beal & FLT to arxiv: ask**,*Dan Christensen*

**Re: EINSTEINIANS TEACH DOPPLER EFFECT**,*Pentcho Valev***Re: EINSTEINIANS TEACH DOPPLER EFFECT**,*Pentcho Valev*

**space curvature**,*humbled survivor***2 /<= 3 /< pi (a Law of small numberS**,*Space998***Re: 2 /<= 3 /< pi (a Law of small numberS**,*Space998*

**solutions manual, test bank for Cengage Advantage Books Law for Business 16e John Ashcroft Janet Ashcroft contact directly at discountsmtb(at)hotmail(dot)com**,*smtbhelp***Strange quote about Isaac Newton**,*Paul***Re: Strange quote about Isaac Newton**,*Sam Sung*

**Re: puzzle on sqrt mod 2^k**,*Rosario193***Re: puzzle on sqrt mod 2^k**,*Arturo Magidin***Re: puzzle on sqrt mod 2^k**,*Rosario193***Re: puzzle on sqrt mod 2^k**,*Arturo Magidin***Re: puzzle on sqrt mod 2^k**,*Rosario193***Re: puzzle on sqrt mod 2^k**,*Rosario193***Re: puzzle on sqrt mod 2^k**,*Arturo Magidin***Re: puzzle on sqrt mod 2^k**,*Rosario193***Re: puzzle on sqrt mod 2^k**,*Arturo Magidin***Re: puzzle on sqrt mod 2^k**,*Rosario193***Re: puzzle on sqrt mod 2^k**,*Arturo Magidin***Re: puzzle on sqrt mod 2^k**,*Rosario193***Re: puzzle on sqrt mod 2^k**,*Rosario193***Re: puzzle on sqrt mod 2^k**,*Rosario193***Re: puzzle on sqrt mod 2^k**,*Rosario193*

**Re: AXIOM OF SUBSET**,*grahamcooper7***inverse of the student`s t-distribution**,*londo londos***Re: inverse of the student`s t-distribution**,*Roland Franzius*

**Re: Geometric Algebra at the start of learning higher math**,*Robert***Re: Geometric Algebra at the start of learning higher math**,*Robin Chapman*- <Possible follow-ups>
**Re: Geometric Algebra at the start of learning higher math**,*Robert***Re: Geometric Algebra at the start of learning higher math**,*richard miller***Re: Geometric Algebra at the start of learning higher math**,*richard miller*

**Re: Geometric Algebra at the start of learning higher math**,*Jan*

**Joyce and Heuer on Euclid Infinitude of Primes proof #15 Correcting Math 4th ed.**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Re: DEFINITION OF =**,*Charlie-Boo***Re: DEFINITION OF =**,*grahamcooper7*- <Possible follow-ups>
**Re: DEFINITION OF =**,*drhuang57***Re: DEFINITION OF =**,*Peter Percival*

**Re: DEFINITION OF =**,*Peter Percival*

**Cornell Univ. math professors ask: endorse Infinity Borderline Proof to arxiv**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Re: Aleph? Correction**,*William Elliot***Re: Aleph? Correction**,*dullrich***Re: Aleph? Correction**,*dullrich***Re: Aleph? Correction**,*Herman Rubin***Re: Aleph? Correction**,*dullrich***Re: Aleph? Correction**,*Herman Rubin***Re: Aleph? Correction**,*dullrich*

**Re: Aleph? Correction**,*dullrich*- <Possible follow-ups>
**Re: Aleph? Correction**,*William Elliot***Re: Aleph? Correction**,*dullrich***Re: Aleph? Correction**,*Peter Percival***Re: Aleph? Correction**,*Peter Percival***Re: Aleph? Correction**,*dullrich*

**Re: Aleph? Correction**,*dullrich*

**Yale math professors endorse 5 Color Mapping proof and valid Jordan Curve proof to arxiv**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Re: Yale math professors endorse 5 Color Mapping proof and valid Jordan Curve proof to arxiv**,*YBM***Re: Yale math professors endorse 5 Color Mapping proof and valid Jordan Curve proof to arxiv**,*Dan Christensen*

**Precision definition of Convergency #2134 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***Re: Precision definition of Convergency #2135 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium***the Euler & Riemann zeta never converge and never are equal #2136 Correcting Math**,*Archimedes Plutonium*

**Re: Irrational numbers have representation as decimals**,*Virgil*- <Possible follow-ups>
**Re: Irrational numbers have representation as decimals**,*Zeit Geist*

**G. H. Hardy attempt at proving Euclid's Infinitude of Primes proof #14 Correcting Math 4th ed**,*Archimedes Plutonium***AP: People who live in glass houses shouldn't throw stones**,*Dan Christensen***Re: solutions manual, test bank for Business Driven Information Systems 3rd Canadian Edition 3e Paige Baltzan Brian Detlor Cameron**,*samiso***Re: Area of an n-gon inscribing a circle (parallel to Heron's formula)?**,*Chris M. Thomasson***Re: Area of an n-gon inscribing a circle (parallel to Heron's formula)?**,*Chris M. Thomasson***Re: Area of an n-gon inscribing a circle (parallel to Heron's formula)?**,*Chris M. Thomasson*

**Re: Tne empty set and the disproof of the axiom of infinity**,*Peter Percival***Re: Tne empty set and the disproof of the axiom of infinity**,*Gert Treiber***Re: Tne empty set and the disproof of the axiom of infinity**,*Gert Treiber***Re: Tne empty set and the disproof of the axiom of infinity**,*Peter Percival***Re: Tne empty set and the disproof of the axiom of infinity**,*Gert Treiber***Re: Tne empty set and the disproof of the axiom of infinity**,*Peter Percival***Re: Tne empty set and the disproof of the axiom of infinity**,*Gert Treiber*

- <Possible follow-ups>
**Re: Tne empty set and the disproof of the axiom of infinity**,*K-Theory***Re: Tne empty set and the disproof of the axiom of infinity**,*Gert Treiber***Re: Tne empty set and the disproof of the axiom of infinity**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Tne empty set and the disproof of the axiom of infinity**,*Gert Treiber***Re: Tne empty set and the disproof of the axiom of infinity**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Tne empty set and the disproof of the axiom of infinity**,*Gert Treiber***Re: Tne empty set and the disproof of the axiom of infinity**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Tne empty set and the disproof of the axiom of infinity**,*Gert Treiber***Re: Tne empty set and the disproof of the axiom of infinity**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Tne empty set and the disproof of the axiom of infinity**,*Gert Treiber***Re: Tne empty set and the disproof of the axiom of infinity**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Tne empty set and the disproof of the axiom of infinity**,*Gert Treiber***Re: Tne empty set and the disproof of the axiom of infinity**,*Peter Percival***Re: Tne empty set and the disproof of the axiom of infinity**,*Gert Treiber***Re: Tne empty set and the disproof of the axiom of infinity**,*Peter Percival*

**Re: Tne empty set and the disproof of the axiom of infinity**,*K-Theory*

**Re: Irrational numbers have representations as decimals**,*Virgil*- <Possible follow-ups>
**Re: Irrational numbers have representations as decimals**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have representations as decimals**,*Virgil*

**A nasty problem - till you solve it.**,*Port563***Re: A nasty problem - till you solve it.**,*quasi***Re: A nasty problem - till you solve it.**,*quasi***Re: A nasty problem - till you solve it.**,*Port563***Re: A nasty problem - till you solve it.**,*quasi***Re: A nasty problem - till you solve it.**,*quasi***Re: A nasty problem - till you solve it.**,*Port563***Re: A nasty problem - till you solve it.**,*quasi***Re: A nasty problem - till you solve it.**,*Leon Aigret***Re: A nasty problem - till you solve it.**,*quasi***Re: A nasty problem - till you solve it.**,*Leon Aigret*

**Re: Have we seen the last of the lunatic?**,*samiso***Re: Irrational numbers have representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have representation as decimal fractions.**,*YBM***Re: Irrational numbers have representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have representation as decimal fractions.**,*YBM***Re: Irrational numbers have representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil*

**Re: Irrational numbers have representation as decimals.**,*FredJeffries*- <Possible follow-ups>
**Re: Irrational numbers have representation as decimals.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have representation as decimals.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have representation as decimals.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have representation as decimals.**,*FredJeffries***Re: Irrational numbers have representation as decimals.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have representation as decimals.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have representation as decimals.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have representation as decimals.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have representations as decimals.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have representations as decimals**,*Virgil*

**Re: Irrational numbers have representation as decimals.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have representation as decimals.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have representation as decimals.**,*Virgil*

**Re: puzzle**,*quasi***Re: puzzle**,*Timothy Murphy***Re: puzzle**,*Timothy Murphy***Re: puzzle**,*David Hartley***Re: puzzle**,*Timothy Murphy*

**Re: puzzle**,*PotatoSauce***Re: puzzle**,*Timothy Murphy*

- <Possible follow-ups>
**Re: puzzle**,*Thomas***Re: puzzle**,*Timothy Murphy***Re: puzzle**,*quasi***Re: puzzle**,*William Elliot***Re: puzzle**,*quasi***puzzle**,*William Elliot***Re: puzzle**,*quasi***Re: puzzle**,*Timothy Murphy*

**Re: puzzle**,*quasi***Re: puzzle**,*Timothy Murphy***Re: puzzle**,*Timothy Murphy***Re: puzzle**,*quasi*

**Re: puzzle**,*Rosario193***puzzle**,*RichD***Re: puzzle**,*Bart Goddard***Re: puzzle**,*quasi***Re: puzzle**,*Peter Percival***Re: puzzle**,*quasi***Re: puzzle**,*Space998***Re: puzzle**,*RichD*

**Re: puzzle**,*Arturo Magidin***Re: puzzle**,*Roland Franzius*

**Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil*- <Possible follow-ups>
**Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have representations as decimals**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*K_h***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*K_h***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*FredJeffries***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*YBM***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have representations as decimals**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil*

**Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Martin Shobe***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Martin Shobe***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re:Irrational numbers have representations as decimals**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Martin Shobe***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have representations as decimals**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Martin Shobe***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have representations as decimals**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Ralf Bader***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Martin Shobe***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Martin Shobe***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have representations as endless decimals**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Martin Shobe***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have representation as decimals.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Martin Shobe***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*PotatoSauce***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*PotatoSauce***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*PotatoSauce***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have representations as decimals outside of WM's worthless world of WMytheology**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*PotatoSauce***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*PotatoSauce***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have representations as endless decimals.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*PotatoSauce***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have representations as decimals**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have representations as decimals**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have representations as decimals**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*PotatoSauce***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*PotatoSauce***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*PotatoSauce***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Michael Klemm***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Michael Klemm***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***twenty-two sevenths in base-seven**,*Space998***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Michael Klemm***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Michael Klemm***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Sam Sung***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: WM has no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Cauchy Críterion Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Michael Klemm***Re: Cauchy Críterion Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Cauchy CrÃterion Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Cauchy Críterion Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*YBM***Re: Cauchy Críterion Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Michael Klemm***Re: Cauchy Críterion Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Cauchy Críterion Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Michael Klemm***Re: Cauchy Críterion Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Cauchy Crï¿½terion Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Cauchy Crï¿½terion Re: Irrational numbers have representations WM does not understand**,*Virgil***Re: Cauchy Crï¿½terion Re: Irrational numbers have representations WM does not understand**,*mueckenh***Re: Cauchy Crï¿½terion Re: Irrational numbers have representations WM does not understand**,*Virgil***Re: Cauchy Crï¿½terion Re: Irrational numbers have representations WM does not understand**,*mueckenh***Re: Cauchy Crï¿½terion Re: Irrational numbers have representations WM does not understand**,*Virgil***Re: Cauchy Crï¿½terion Re: Irrational numbers have representations WM does not understand**,*mueckenh***Re: Cauchy Crï¿½terion Re: Irrational numbers have representations WM does not understand**,*Virgil***Re: Cauchy Crï¿½terion Re: Irrational numbers have representations WM does not understand**,*mueckenh***Re: Cauchy Crï¿½terion Re: Irrational numbers have representations WM does not understand**,*Virgil***Re: Cauchy Crï¿½terion Re: Irrational numbers have representations WM does not understand**,*mueckenh***Re: Cauchy Criterion Re: Irrational numbers have representations WM does not understand**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have representations as decimals**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have representations as decimals**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have representations as decimals**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have representations as decimals**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have representations as decimals**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*PotatoSauce***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: WM has no representation as adecimal fraction.**,*Virgil***Re: WM has no representation as adecimal fraction.**,*mueckenh***Re: WM has no representation as a decimal fraction.**,*Virgil***Re: WM has no representation as a decimal fraction.**,*mueckenh***Re: WM has no representation as a decimal fraction.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*PotatoSauce***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*YBM***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***WM screws up again!**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*PotatoSauce***Re: WM's real numbers include all sorts of vector spaces.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*FredJeffries***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*FredJeffries***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have representation**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*FredJeffries***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Ralf Bader***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Ralf Bader***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Ralf Bader***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: IWM hs no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*PotatoSauce***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re:WM has no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*PotatoSauce***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*FredJeffries***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*FredJeffries***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*FredJeffries***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*FredJeffries***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have representation as WM.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational WM has no representation as a rational**,*Virgil***Re: WM f--ks up again!**,*Virgil***Re: WM f--ks up again!**,*Ralf Bader***Re: WM f--ks up again!**,*YBM***Re: WM f--ks up again!**,*Ben Bacarisse***Re: WM f--ks up again!**,*mueckenh***Re: WM f--ks up again!**,*Virgil***Re: WM f--ks up again!**,*mueckenh***Re: WM f--ks up again!**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Space998***Re: Irrational numbers have representations as endless decimals.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Michael Klemm***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Michael Klemm***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have representations as decimals**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have representations as decimals.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Martin Shobe***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*FredJeffries***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Martin Shobe***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Martin Shobe***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Martin Shobe***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Martin Shobe***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Some irrational numbers have representations as endless decimals.**,*Virgil***Re: Some irrational numbers have representations as endless decimals.**,*mueckenh***Re: Some irrational numbers have representations as endless decimals.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Martin Shobe***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have representation as decimals.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Martin Shobe***Re: WM lies again!**,*Virgil*

**Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*PotatoSauce***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*PotatoSauce***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*PotatoSauce***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*PotatoSauce***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have representations as decimals**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*PotatoSauce***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*PotatoSauce***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*PotatoSauce***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*PotatoSauce***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*PotatoSauce***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*PotatoSauce***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*PotatoSauce***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*PotatoSauce***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*PotatoSauce***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*PotatoSauce***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have representations as decimals.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have representations as non-terminating decimals**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have representations as decimals.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation in WMytheology**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation in WM's worthless world of WMytheology**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation in WM's worthless world of WMytheology**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation in WM's worthless world of WMytheology**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation in WM's worthless world of WMytheology**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation in WM's worthless world of WMytheology**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have representation as endless decimals**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have representation as unending decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have representations as decimals**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have representations as nonterminating decimals**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have representations as decimals**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have representations as decimals**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have representations as decimals**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have representations as decimals**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have representations as decimals**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have representations as decimals**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have representations as decimals**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have representations as decimals**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have representations as decimals**,*Zeit Geist*

**Irrational numbers have representations as decimals**,*Virgil*

**Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*wpihughes***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*wpihughes***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*wpihughes***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*wpihughes***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*wpihughes**Message not available***Re: Irrational numbers have representations as decimals**,*Virgil**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available***Re: Irrational numbers have representations as decimals**,*Virgil**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available***Re: Irrational numbers have representations as infinitely long decimals**,*Virgil**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available***Re: Irrational numbers have representations as decimals**,*Virgil**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available***Re: Irrational numbers have representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available***Re: Irrational numbers have representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available***Re: Irrational numbers have representations as decimals.**,*Virgil**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available***Re: Irrational numbers have representations as decimals**,*Virgil**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available***Re: Irrational numbers have representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available***Re: Irrational numbers have representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have representation as endless decimals**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have representation as decimal fractions.**,*Space998**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available***Re: Irrational numbers infinite representations as decimals**,*Virgil**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available**Message not available***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Michael Klemm***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Michael Klemm***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Euler's actual infinite number e Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Michael Klemm***Re: Euler's actual infinite number e Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Euler's number, e, is not what WM claims it is!**,*Virgil***Re: Euler's actual infinite number e Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Euler's actual infinite number e Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Michael Klemm**mueckenh**Michael Klemm**mueckenh***Re: Euler's actual infinite number e Re: Irrational numbers have representations as possibly endless decimal fractions.**,*Virgil**Michael Klemm**mueckenh**Michael Klemm**mueckenh**PotatoSauce**mueckenh**PotatoSauce**mueckenh**PotatoSauce**mueckenh***Re: Euler's actual infinite number e Re: Irrational numbers have representations as decimals.**,*Virgil***Re: Euler's actual infinite number e Re: Irrational numbers have representations as decimals.**,*mueckenh***Re: Euler's actual infinite number e Re: Irrational numbers have representations as decimals.**,*Virgil**PotatoSauce**mueckenh**Space998***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Laphroaig**Space998***Re: Euler's actual infinite number e is not infinite**,*Virgil**Virgil**Virgil***Re: Euler's actual infinite number e Re: Irrational numbers have representation as decimals.**,*Virgil***Re: Euler's actual infinite number e Re: Irrational numbers have representation as decimals.**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Euler's actual infinite number e Re: Irrational numbers have representation as decimals.**,*Virgil***Re: Euler's actual infinite number e , is not infinite outside of WMytheology**,*Virgil**Zeit Geist**mueckenh**Zeit Geist**mueckenh**Virgil**mueckenh**Virgil***Re: Euler's actual infinite number e Re: Irrational numbers have representations as decimals.**,*Virgil***Re: Euler's actual infinite number e Re: Irrational numbers have representations as decimals.**,*Virgil***Re: Euler's actual infinite number e**,*Virgil**Zeit Geist***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have representations as decimals**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have representations as decimals**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Ralf Bader***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have representations as decimals**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have representations as decimals**,*Virgil*

**Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*K_h***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have representations as decimals**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have representations as decimals**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*K_h***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*mueckenh***Re: Irrational numbers have representations as decimals**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Zeit Geist*

**Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*PotatoSauce***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Zeit Geist***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*Virgil***Re: Irrational numbers have no representation as decimal fractions.**,*federation2005*