Re: Canadian Institutes of Health announces trial registration requirement
From: Gregory Poon (mk.poon_at_utoronto.ca)
Date: 07/25/04
- Next message: Zee: "Bush blocks medical law suits: Eli Lilly and the Bush Family Part 11"
- Previous message: Sharon Hope: "Re: Minority Report on Obesity"
- In reply to: Robert: "Re: Canadian Institutes of Health announces trial registration requirement"
- Next in thread: Robert: "Re: Canadian Institutes of Health announces trial registration requirement"
- Reply: Robert: "Re: Canadian Institutes of Health announces trial registration requirement"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2004 04:40:09 GMT
> They eventually revolted against the King and totalitary rule..
> Canada still has a picture of the Queen so it is historically easier to
have
> the people there subserviant to socialistic systems like the UK system.
They
> never revolted to that type of system.
Take it easy here ... one minute it's totalitarian rule and one minute it's
socialist subserviance ... it can't be both ... in fact it's neither. There
was this minor event in history called the British Revolution that happened
a few years before the American Revolution and created something this little
thing called a constitutional monarchy. If you're not familiar with it
check it out ... you'll probably get a chuckle. The picture of the Queen is
just that ... a picture. When the boys in Boston had their Tea Party, they
were revolting against the taxation policies of the British Parliament on
colonial America. Got nothing to do with the King (he was probably too busy
relaxing to be totalitarian). I get this impression that you like to
associate Canada (or I guess the you've got thing against the rest of the
Commonwealth too) with all things archaic, and its people Medieval serfs or
something. Why we just elected a prime minister, I think. Oh yeah we did.
"Robert" <Robert@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:10g5i8njv4s3ge7@corp.supernews.com...
>
> "Gregory Poon" <mk.poon@utoronto.ca> wrote in message
> news:I1DCGw.E24@campus-news-reading.utoronto.ca...
> > > they totally ignore there own system. The American system has many
> > problems
> > > and the only solution will have to come from Americans. Americans want
> > > choice and not a socialistic system. That is historical and based on a
> > > distaste for communist ideologies and an open market enervative
society.
> >
> > Dude, when America came to being (1776), Marx wasn't even born (1818),
> never
> > mind communism. Historically Americans were "economic liberals" who
> > believed the pursuit of material success should be free and respected
and
> > capitalism is the way. Ok I'm no expert in American history but I'm
sure
> > your founding fathers were much more concerned with stupid British and
> > French imperialists; I doubt they'd have even heard of commies.
>
> Commies are recent history. The original concept of our founding fathers
was
> to escape to america to rid themselves of the socialist heatlth care
system
> in UK :)
> Religious freedom ie choice which repeated itself in the Independent State
> of Texas.
> >
> > "Robert" <Robert@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> > news:10g47t293ngav25@corp.supernews.com...
> > >
> > > "George Prager" <gtrvoxnospam@canoemail.com> wrote in message
> > > news:gPkMc.42145$Gf7.1460629@news20.bellglobal.com...
> > > >
> > > > Don't
> > > > > confuse a parlimentary system of government with a dictatorship,
or
> a
> > > > > one-tier system with having no say. Some may choose to call it
> > fairness
> > > > ...
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > I see absolutely no fairness in having to go to Buffalo or Detroit
to
> > > obtain
> > > > timely treatment; I see absolutely no fairness in not being able to
> pay
> > > for
> > > > the medical procedures I choose and I see absolutely no fairness in
> well
> > > > known politicians travelling to the U.S. for treatment and then
> > preaching
> > > to
> > > > the electorate about our superior, untouchable health care system.
> > > >
> > > > G.P.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > You can see how difficult it is for one to change one's own medical
> > delivery
> > > system in one's own country let alone to try and change someone
else's.
> > You
> > > have Canadian's commenting about the evil American system of greed
here
> > when
> > > Canada has a different point of view and it is up to Canada to deal
with
> > it.
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
- Next message: Zee: "Bush blocks medical law suits: Eli Lilly and the Bush Family Part 11"
- Previous message: Sharon Hope: "Re: Minority Report on Obesity"
- In reply to: Robert: "Re: Canadian Institutes of Health announces trial registration requirement"
- Next in thread: Robert: "Re: Canadian Institutes of Health announces trial registration requirement"
- Reply: Robert: "Re: Canadian Institutes of Health announces trial registration requirement"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|