Re: Canadian Institutes of Health announces trial registration requirement

From: Robert (Robert_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 07/25/04 

Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2004 00:28:25 -0700

"Gregory Poon" <mk.poon@utoronto.ca> wrote in message
news:JQGMc.57$urK.36@news04.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com...
> > They eventually revolted against the King and totalitary rule..
> > Canada still has a picture of the Queen so it is historically easier to
> have
> > the people there subserviant to socialistic systems like the UK system.
> They
> > never revolted to that type of system.
>
> Take it easy here ... one minute it's totalitarian rule and one minute
it's
> socialist subserviance ... it can't be both ... in fact it's neither.
There
> was this minor event in history called the British Revolution that
happened
> a few years before the American Revolution and created something this
little
> thing called a constitutional monarchy. If you're not familiar with it
> check it out ... you'll probably get a chuckle. The picture of the Queen
is
> just that ... a picture. When the boys in Boston had their Tea Party,
they
> were revolting against the taxation policies of the British Parliament on
> colonial America. Got nothing to do with the King (he was probably too
busy
> relaxing to be totalitarian). I get this impression that you like to
> associate Canada (or I guess the you've got thing against the rest of the
> Commonwealth too) with all things archaic, and its people Medieval serfs
or
> something. Why we just elected a prime minister, I think. Oh yeah we
did.

Not at all archaic or serfs only a different mind set because of historical
cultural events. You can elect a prime minister that is allowed to have a
mistress and we impeach a president for blowing off steam. You have this
bilingual stuff which makes no sense at all. Why not have trilingual
including indian dialects for your official languages?
Many other differences likes guns and such.

Relevant Pages
Quantcast