Re: Questions for Atkins....
From: Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD (andrew_at_heartmdphd.com)
Date: 08/12/04
- Next message: Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD: "Re: The Bullshit Parade"
- Previous message: fresh~horses: "Re: British druggists push OTC statins in pubs"
- In reply to: Bob (this one): "Re: Questions for Atkins...."
- Next in thread: Bob (this one): "Chunglish in action... WAS:Re: Questions for Atkins...."
- Reply: Bob (this one): "Chunglish in action... WAS:Re: Questions for Atkins...."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2004 07:33:21 -0400
Bob (this one) wrote:
>
> Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:
>
> > Bob (this one) wrote:
> >
> >> Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:
> >>
> >>> Bob (this one) wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:
>
> >>>>> Fwiw, the 2PD Approach was *not* part of the cited study.
> >>>>
> >>>> Anybody want to field this slow grounder... <LOL>
> >>>
> >>> When the aim is true and the feet are swift with
> >>> God-righteousness, that slow grounder is a home run.
> >>
> >> Oh, look. Chung has replied to one of my posts.
>
> >> Guess that big flounce about "I don't find anything worth
> >> reading in Bob's posts" thing he did a while back is no longer in
> >> effect.
> >
> > That depends on what you write.
>
> <LOL> I see. When I write about science, medicine, social issues,
> international conditions, you have nothing to say.
I had nothing to add to your obsessions about food.
> When I point out
> your nano-deep thinking, then it's worth a reply?
No.
> But only after
> waiting for months not noticing anything?
See above.
> >> Pity he wasted his big entrance on such a silly trifle.
> >
> > The truth is not a silly trifle.
>
> Usually. But this reply of yours is.
Sorry it bothered you so much.
> >> Particularly since it's linguistically, logically, figuratively
> >> and literally such patent nonsense.
> >>
> >> Identity expresses identity. A slow grounder is a slow grounder.
> >> Shame about the apparently desperate need for convoluted, smug
> >> self-congratulation.
> >
> > Sorry my simple comment bothered you enough to devote several lines
> > in your attempt to refute it.
>
> Go look up "refute." We'll all wait. Oh, jeez. It's gonna be another
> 4000 calorie bread fiasco where he can't grasp the idea that smart
> people have actually thought of it before he did and they were
> scientists, by contrast.
It seems you have been eating several pounds of bread with those
mushrooms. Is it any wonder you have not lost weight?
Would suggest you try the estimate of 4000 cals per 2 lbs of bread
instead.
> Interesting index you have for what "bothers" me. Actually, it was so
> extremely silly and superficial that I thought a little writing fun
> was in order. You're back to your abusive, fallacious self and I
> thought we could have some fun together, what with you posting
> nonsense and me poking fun at it. What a team we are.
In a word, delusion.
> >> The very real fact is that the 2PD isn't part of any study
> >
> > No kidding.
>
> <LOL> No kidding, indeed.
Another epitaph you could use on your grave stone.
> >> and isn't likely to be unless Chung does it,
> >
> > That remains to be seen.
>
> Duh.
And yet another.
> >> pays for it
> >
> > Why would I pay to prove an invention that I am giving away freely?
>
> Who knows why you do most of the things you do?
God does.
> In this case, probably
> for the sheer egotism of it all.
It seems that you are speaking for yourself being that you are a godless
person who worships food and only has self (stomach).
> It's one of your most endearing
That latter word (used by me to describe the stream of profane insults
that you threw an another) seems to have pierced your heart. Sorry
about the pain you have with the truth.
> attributes, your overweening egotism.
That would be difficult for a "hollow man."
> >> or otherwise prompts it.
> >
> > It is not clear to me what you mean by "prompts." Perhaps you are
> > referring to the following:
> >
> > http://www.heartmdphd.com/press.asp
>
> Hilarious. And so "humble." Not a bit of egotism there, huh, Sparky?
No.
> You really ought to hire a writer who could make it flow better and
> not sound quite so self-approving.
Sorry the language bothers you.
> >> It controls for a meaningless variable - that, over time, isn't
> >> even controlled, by his own explanation. After a while, you can
> >> eye what your meal should look like, he says. That has only the
> >> remotest possibility of working, if and only if, all your food is
> >> in a pile in front of you at once. Otherwise, you have to
> >> remember or log everything you eat all day. Or you're not doing
> >> his "plan" and adhering to 2 pounds a day. If all he means is "if
> >> you're fat, eat less" it's distantly on the right track, but
> >> inadequate for any lasting effect because of its indeterminacy.
> >
> > Sorry the 2PD Approach bothers you so much.
>
> The approach is merely silly and so full of logical and scientific
> holes that a short paragraph is enough to dismiss it. The really
> bizarre part is about the perfervid energy you put into selling your
> "brilliant" idea, based on a flawed premise, from a movie you
> misunderstood.
It would seem that you would have discouraged the inventor of the wheel
by saying he misunderstood the boulders rolling down a mountainside.
Good thing the inventor of the wheel did not listen to folks like you
and proceeded to share rather than sell his "brilliant" idea to others.
We are all better for it, per God's will and wonderful plan.
> That rewarding ego stroke from the boast is a kind of
> currency that all other excessive egotists like, too.
There is no room for ego when walking with Christ.
> I like how you didn't give the governor any data, either, just like
> when you post here.
Actually, he got data.
> When I think of scientist, I sure do think of you.
> Oh, and Barney the big purple dinosaur. Together. Doing science.
Your choice.
> I bet
> the governor makes the 2PD mandatory and everybody in Georgia turns
> out to be all skinny and perfect.
He has been informed. It will be his choice.
> No, seriously...
Another epitaph you could use on your grave marker.
> Bob
You remain in my prayers, dear neighbor whom I love.
Servant to the humblest person in the universe,
Andrew
-- Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD Board-Certified Cardiologist http://www.heartmdphd.com/ ** Who is the humblest person in the universe? http://makeashorterlink.com/?L26062048 What is all this about? http://makeashorterlink.com/?R20632B48 Is this spam? http://makeashorterlink.com/?N69721867
- Next message: Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD: "Re: The Bullshit Parade"
- Previous message: fresh~horses: "Re: British druggists push OTC statins in pubs"
- In reply to: Bob (this one): "Re: Questions for Atkins...."
- Next in thread: Bob (this one): "Chunglish in action... WAS:Re: Questions for Atkins...."
- Reply: Bob (this one): "Chunglish in action... WAS:Re: Questions for Atkins...."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
