Re: Pravachol verses Lipitor ?
From: Steve Marcus (smarcus_spamout__at_cox.net)
Date: 09/13/04
- Next message: Zee: "Flame warriors: your usenet personality"
- Previous message: Anna: "Re: Husband just had bypass - need support!"
- In reply to: Zee: "Re: Pravachol verses Lipitor ?"
- Next in thread: Caploc: "Re: Pravachol verses Lipitor ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2004 18:08:28 -0400
"Zee" <fresh~horses@despammed.com> wrote in message
news:ci439g$agj@odak26.prod.google.com...
>
>
>
> Steve Marcus wrote:
> > "Zee" <fresh~horses@despammed.com> wrote in message
> > news:ci25u7$ka2@odak26.prod.google.com...
> And you have absolutely no sense of humour.
>
> Zee
It is difficult to tell when a correspondent is intending a written comment
to be humorous, particularly when the correspondent is complaining that s/he
has been mistreated by one's posts. Hence, certain e-mail/Usenet
conventions such as :), or o) or ;) etc.
It is also difficult to entertain humor when the topic involves peoples'
lives, or at least the quality of their lives.
Steve
-- The above posting is neither a legal opinion nor legal advice, because we do not have an attorney-client relationship, and should not be construed as either. This posting does not represent the opinion of my employer, but is merely my personal view. To reply, delete _spamout_ and replace with the numeral 3
- Next message: Zee: "Flame warriors: your usenet personality"
- Previous message: Anna: "Re: Husband just had bypass - need support!"
- In reply to: Zee: "Re: Pravachol verses Lipitor ?"
- Next in thread: Caploc: "Re: Pravachol verses Lipitor ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|