The Friend of America's Enemies Is John KKKerry ~ Old arabic saying
From: Harry Hope (rivrvu_at_ix.netcom.com)
Date: 09/26/04
- Next message: Zee: "Re: Why do people want to try plant medicine?"
- Previous message: Mike: "Optimal Fish Oil Dosage?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2004 16:05:38 -0400
The Friend of America's Enemies Is John KKKerry ~ Old arabic saying
Insight on the News. A Death Blow To Kerry's Campaign. September 22,
2004.
By Adam Yoshida
....
We know that John Kerry met with the Vietnamese Communists because he
admitted it to us. We know that, as American boys fought and died in the
muck of Vietnam, John Kerry sat with their perfumed diplomats in Europe
and conspired to hand victory in the war to the Communists. We know this
to be true. We know it because John Kerry told it to us.
Let me quote him exactly, because it's important to get this right.
Kerry said, "I have been to Paris. I have talked with both delegations
at the peace talks, that is to say the Democratic Republic of Vietnam
and the Provisional Revolutionary Government." His words, ladies and
gentlemen. While the United States was at war, John Kerry went to Paris
and spoke with the enemies of the Republic.
....
Senator Kerry, as a nearly thirty year-old politician, travelled to a
foreign nation to meet with the enemies of this country while the nation
was at war and then returned in order to advocate that the United States
accept peace on the terms of the communist Vietnamese (or, in other
words, surrender)?
....
Even worse, this wasn't the only time that Senator Kerry allowed himself
to be deceived by foreign enemies of the United States, nor was it the
only time that Kerry was used to deliver the demands of an enemy of the
United States to the American government and people.
In 1985, the newly-elected Senator Kerry took a trip to Nicaragua, where
he met with the communist dictator of that country. When he returned to
the United States from that trip, the Senator had brought something with
him: the Sandinistas' offer for peace with the United States. Once more
John Forbes Kerry voluntarily conveyed the demands of a hostile foreign
power to his own government. Yet again John Kerry called upon the
President of the United States to accept, in whole, the terms offered by
an enemy of the Republic.
Once the American people know this history, once they've taken it all
in, they'll be left with the same frightful question that I've carried
with me for nine months: what happens if the person receiving that offer
is no longer Lieutenant Kerry or Senator Kerry, but President Kerry?
What happens if there's no one higher on up for Kerry to call upon to
accept the enemy's terms: what if Kerry himself is in a position to
accept the enemy's terms?
This is significant because the John Kerry of 2004 shows every sign of
being every bit as gullible as the John Kerry of 1985 and the John Kerry
of 1971. He's claimed that foreign leaders are eager to see him become
President. I'll bet they are.
All of this takes on even greater importance since Kerry proposes to, as
President, base his entire foreign policy upon seeking negotiated
solutions to the world's problems and since Senator Kerry apparently
believes that "negotiating" means "accepting uncritically whatever those
sophisticated foreigners tell me" this means that a President Kerry
would almost certainly have a foreign policy revolving around the
calculated sale of America's national interest.
....
The same is true on Iran. Senator Kerry talks about getting tough, and
yet his core proposal for dealing with Iran's nuclear ambitions involves
giving nuclear fuel to the Ayatollahs. No, I didn't make that up. Here's
Senator Kerry himself, "We should call their bluff, and organize a group
of states that will offer the nuclear fuel they need for peaceful
purposes and take back the spent fuel so they can't divert it to build a
weapon." He's so trusting (or stupid) that he's almost cute.
But, in truth, there's nothing cute about the fact that virtually every
time that Senator Kerry has dealt with an enemy of the United States (or
offered a proposal for dealing with an enemy) in the field of diplomacy,
his response has been to become an advocate of proposals favourable to
that enemy.
In 1971, John Kerry wanted the US to unilaterally begin withdrawing from
Vietnam and trust the North Vietnamese Communists to return US POW's of
their own volition.
In 2004, John Kerry wants to give "nuclear fuel" to Iran and trust that
they won't do anything bad with it, won't divert any portion of it, and
will give it all back just as they're supposed to.
John Kerry may trust the enemies of America but the American people just
can't trust John Kerry.
http://www.insightmag.com/news/2004/09/20/Commentary/A.Death.Blow.To.Kerrys.Campaign-726763.shtml
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
- Next message: Zee: "Re: Why do people want to try plant medicine?"
- Previous message: Mike: "Optimal Fish Oil Dosage?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
