Re: Merck Withdraws Arthritis Drug Vioxx
From: Orac (orac_usa_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 10/01/04
- Next message: MU: "GGary SELLS POTIONS TOO? (was: strange article)"
- Previous message: Luna: "Re: clinton surgery question"
- In reply to: Ilena Rose: "Re: Merck Withdraws Arthritis Drug Vioxx"
- Next in thread: Ruben Safir: "Re: Merck Withdraws Arthritis Drug Vioxx"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 00:11:02 GMT
In article <jibol0dn79ve7g3ugkgc09384llspo4qo1@4ax.com>,
Ilena Rose <ilena@san.rr.com> wrote:
> On 30 Sep 2004 08:01:27 -0700, MrPepper11@go.com (MrPepper11) wrote:
>
> >Lesson: The newer the drug - and the more TV commercials - the less
> >data they have.
>
>
> Well said ... take a look at this research:
>
> http://www.cancer-coverup.com/newsletter/print-version/prescription-drug-costs
> _08-2002.asp
Any particular reason you've wasted bandwidth reposting this so many
times?
(Cue Ilena to do nothing more in response to my post than to repost the
same article above yet another time. She's so predictable that way.)
--
Orac |"I am not interested in trying to compensate
| for your amazing lack of observation."
|
| Orac
- Next message: MU: "GGary SELLS POTIONS TOO? (was: strange article)"
- Previous message: Luna: "Re: clinton surgery question"
- In reply to: Ilena Rose: "Re: Merck Withdraws Arthritis Drug Vioxx"
- Next in thread: Ruben Safir: "Re: Merck Withdraws Arthritis Drug Vioxx"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]