John KKKerry Whipped by His Ugly Ass Bitch

From: Harry Hope (rivrvu_at_ix.netcom.com)
Date: 10/05/04 

Date: Mon, 04 Oct 2004 20:04:24 -0400

John KKKerry Whipped by His Ugly Ass Bitch

John KKKerry could have had his pick of many beautiful women, yet he
married Teresa.

If Teresa were not a billionaire and KKKerry had not divorced his
wealthy first wife -- becoming nearly broke in the process -- he could
be viewed as normal.

BUT NO! TERESA WAS A BILLIONAIRE AND HE WAS BROKE AND WANTED TO BE
PRESIDENT.

HOW TRANSPARENT CAN IT GET!

Ok, maybe John KKKerry thinks Teresa looks good barking orders at him in
French while wearing black spandex, stiletto heels and brandishing a
whip as he lies in bed handcuffed awaiting his daily spanking. KKKerry
does look like the girly-boy who likes to be spanked.

He'll get that on election night.

+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +

George W. Bush Protects Women + Children from Terrorists Foreign +
Domestic

The W stands for Women, and George W. Bush will appoint TOUGH JUDGES who
will PUNISH rapists, murderers, wife-batterers and other domestic
terrorists.

By contrast, girly-boy John KKKerry opposes the death penalty, girly-boy
John KKKerry supports rights for dirty muslim terrorists and criminals,
and girly-boy John KKKerry promises to appoint LIBERAL judges to the
U.S. Supreme Court.

Girly-boy John KKKerry wants us to be "sensitive" about terrorists'
"feelings" because girly-boy John KKKerry wants to win the "hearts and
minds" of dirty arab muslims. Hello! Dirty arab muslims who kill
innocent babies and children have NO hearts and NO minds!

+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +

The Case of Anne Marie Murphy: Are Pregnant Irish Girls Bombs?

What Demon-KKK-Rats like "Chappaqui***" Kennedy don't want you to know

Soccer Moms! Remember the poor Irish girl who was knocked up by an arab
sub-animal immigrant and then sent on a plane with (unbeknownst to her)
a bomb set to explode in flight. Thankfully, the plot, which was
pre-9/11 and yet another example of muslim terrorism, was foiled thanks
to excellent Israeli intel and profiling. See CBS 60 Minutes II,
"Profiling dirty arab terrorists works," 2002/01/16; see also, BBC News,
"Foiling dirty arabs," 2002/07/05.

"In 1986, Anne Marie Murphy, a young Irish woman, was planning to take
an El Al flight from London to Tel Aviv to meet the parents of her
fiance, a Palestinian. Murphy, who was pregnant, had no idea that the
man she was planning to marry had hidden plastic explosives and a
detonator in one of her suitcases. Israeli profilers interviewing Murphy
found out about her boyfriend, got suspicious, and then discovered the
bomb before the jumbo jet took off."

"[S]ecurity experts ... point to an attempt in 1986 by a Jordanian to
send his Irish girlfriend on to an El Al flight with a bomb concealed in
her hand luggage without her knowledge. / The woman, Anne-Marie Murphy,
was preparing to board an Israel-bound flight at London's Heathrow
airport, when she was quizzed by a ticket agent trained to screen
passengers. / Since the agent thought her story didn't add up, screeners
re-examined her baggage, which an X-ray had cleared and found seven
pounds of explosives in the lining."

+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +

Another White FemiNazi Bitch Says Freeing Women from Shari'a Law Is
"Imperialist"

Duke Feminist Gives Thumbs Up To Taliban

By Cinnamon Stillwell

September 27, 2004

Afghanistan's Taliban was one of the most oppressive regimes in the
world, and doubly so when it came to women's rights. For years, various
activists expressed concern about the situation of Afghan women and
supported the efforts of RAWA, the Revolutionary Association of the
Women of Afghanistan [1], to try and affect reform. So when the
opportunity arose to overthrow that brutal regime, it was expected that
RAWA activists would naturally back the insurrection.

However, it turned out these activists were more opposed to U.S.
military intervention than they were in favor of getting rid of the
Taliban, even if it meant that Afghanistan's women remained in a state
of perpetual slavery. And among those who subscribe to such views is
Duke University Professor Miriam Cooke. Cooke is a Professor of Asian
and African Languages and Literature and President of the Association
for Middle East Women's Studies, an international organization staunchly
opposed to what they call on their website the "new imperialism,"[2] and
a disciple of the theory of post-colonialism. [3] Cooke is also a strong
proponent of "Islamic feminism."[4]

Islamic feminism holds that Muslim women should enact social change from
within the confines of their own culture and religion. Western powers
are viewed as having purely imperialistic designs and, as a result,
their intervention is unwelcome. Such is the "logic" that caused Cooke,
a longtime proponent of Muslim women writers, activists, and
intellectuals, to oppose the U.S. overthrow of the Taliban, as well as
the democratization of the Middle East.

During a talk at a forum on the future of Iraq at the John Hope Franklin
Center on March 26th, 2003, [5] Cooke rejected the liberation of Afghan
women as a reason to go to war. Rather than being grateful for calling
attention to the suffering of fellow women, she castigated First Lady
Laura Bush for her radio address on behalf of the women of Afghanistan.
Cooke accused Laura Bush of furthering "the imperial project in her
highly gendered appeal to a world conscience."

Of course, this never was the principal reason for overthrowing the
Taliban, but rather a welcome side effect. As for the al-Qaeda terrorist
training camps dotting the Afghanistan countryside, Cooke said nothing.
She is equally silent today on the ten million Afghans who are now
registered to vote - forty percent of them women - in the upcoming
election.[6]

In the same talk, Cooke mocked "the campaign to democratize the Middle
East," that she claimed, "deployed women as victims to save or to
empower." Empowering Muslim women would seem to be a good thing, but
according to Cooke, if Western interests are involved, women's
liberation is no longer valid. Cooke opposed the war in Iraq for this
very reason, fatalistically predicting that Iraqi women would end up
"like the Shiite women who were driven out of their homes in southern
Iraq in March, 1991, to enter refugee camps in Saudi Arabia and then
went on to exilic futures outside the Middle East."[7]

In fact, none of this happened and the numbers of asylum-seekers from
Iraq and Afghanistan have been drastically reduced from pre-war
levels.[8] Most importantly, no longer are Iraqi women captive to Saddam
Hussein's rape rooms, or to having their husbands taken away in the
middle of night.[9] And six female ministers in the new Iraqi government
demonstrate that women are making strides in that country.[10] But for
Cooke, none of this seems to matter. All that matters is keeping those
nasty "imperialists" (America) at bay.

So what exactly does Cooke have to offer to Muslim women as a concrete
course of action to better their lives? It turns out, not much. Not only
are her ideas vague and overly academic, all too often she falls back on
concepts steeped in the terminology of Islamism. For instance,
throughout her career, Cooke has written extensively about the idea of a
"women's jihad."

During a lecture at Wellesley College in November, 2003, Cooke
elaborated on this concept. [11] This jihad, she maintained, is not for
an "Islamist state," but rather for "an Islamic community." Subscribing
to a pacifist model, she insisted that women's role within the Islamic
world should be "drawing attention to the consequences of war, not
advocating violence." Yet somewhat contradictorily, she also sanctioned,
"the defense of the community when attacked by outsiders." Which
outsiders exactly she was referring to is unknown; but it's a safe guess
that American soldiers and their allies were involved.

Indeed, Israeli civilians appear to be fair game for this "women's
jihad." When Wafa Idris, a 27-year old Palestinian woman, perpetrated a
suicide bombing, killing an 80 year-old man in January, 2000, Cooke's
thesis about women and war were put to the test. But Cooke managed to
justify this atrocity by falling back on her old "blame the
imperialists" mindset. In typically garbled language, Cooke said, "for
those of us who really are concerned with women's role in the Arab
public square, in the way in which women have been trying to empower
themselves vis-a-vis the U.S., vis-a-vis old colonial powers, vis-a-vis
their own men, the situation has become so desperate that now women's
participation in war is a mark of absolute hopelessness. [12]

As usual, Cooke jumps through hoops to blame anyone other than the
culture that created suicide bombers - female or otherwise. And she
conveniently overlooks the use of sexism in Palestinian society to
coerce women into becoming suicide bombers as penance for the shame of
having sex out of wedlock, being raped or unable to marry.

Beyond teaching her own courses, Cooke is very active in Duke's Islamic
Studies Department. She is co-director of the university's Center for
the Study of Muslim Networks (CSMN), [13] as well as being involved in
the 2003-2004 Carolina Seminar on Comparative Islamic Studies.[14] She
accompanied a group of students on a trip to Lebanon in 2002 [15] and
has taken part in various local film festivals in the past few
years.[16] As such, Cooke has a lot of influence over the way Duke
students experience Islamic culture and particularly its relationship to
women.

Unfortunately, instead of learning about women's liberation, these
students are receiving a lesson in women's oppression, and especially
oppression caused by the United States. And as long as Islamic studies
professors like Miriam Cooke serve as apologists for backwardness and
repression, they will continue being part of the problem instead of the
solution.

NOTES

[1] Revolutionary Association of the Women of Afghanistan (RAWA):
http://rawa.fancymarketing.net/index.html

[2] Association for Middle East Women's Studies:
http://www.amews.org/announcements/valmessage.htm

[3] Kay S. Hymowitz, "Why Feminism is AWOL on Islam," City Journal,
Winter 2003. City-Journal.org:
http://www.city-journal.org/html/13_1_why_feminism.html

[4] Omaima Abou-Bakr, "Islamic Feminism? What's in a Name?" Association
for Middle East Women's Studies, MEWS Review Articles, Winter/Spring
2001: http://www.amews.org/review/reviewarticles/islamicfeminism.htm

[5] Miriam Cooke, "Crusade! I Mean Democracy! You Know: Women!" Duke
News, April 3, 2003: http://tinyurl.com/4mj3c

[6] "Powell on Afghanistan," Voice of America, September 20, 2004,
VOA.com: http://tinyurl.com/5xh6x

[7] Miriam Cooke, "Crusade! I Mean Democracy! You Know: Women!" Duke
News, April 3, 2003: http://tinyurl.com/4mj3c

[8] Jeff Jacoby, "What's Going on in Iraq?" June 21, 2004. Townhall.com:
http://www.townhall.com/columnists/jeffjacoby/jj20040621.shtml

[9] Office of International Women's Issues, "Iraqi Women Under Saddam's
Regime: A Population Silenced," Fact ***, March 20, 2003. U.S.
Department of State: http://www.state.gov/g/wi/rls/18877.htm

[10] "Iraqi Women Celebrate Larger Presence in New Government," Agency
France-Presse, June 15, 2004. Yahoo!News.com http://tinyurl.com/7x5lr

[11] Nitya Nayar, "Cooke Discusses North African Women's Notions of
Jihad," The Wellesley News, November 13, 2003:
http://www.wellesley.edu/Newspaper/archives/10137/articles/10137n5.html

[12] Arts & Sciences and Trinity College News, Miriam Cooke, June 2003:
http://www.aas.duke.edu/news/faculty/cooke.php

[13] Center for the Study of Muslim Networks, Duke University:
http://www.duke.edu/web/muslimnets/csmn_about.html

[14] Carolina Seminar on Comparative Islamic Studies, Upcoming Events on
the Middle East and Muslim Civilizations, 2003-2004:

http://www.unc.edu/depts/islamsem/2004.htm

[15] "Learning in Lebanon," Duke Magazine, May-June 2002:
http://www.dukemagazine.duke.edu/dukemag/issues/050602/depgaz3.html

[16] David M. Lewkowict, "Staff, Students 'Duke' It Out Over Film
Festival," March 12, 2003, FoxNews.com:
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,80849,00.html

+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +

Feminists Silent on Freedom for Iraqi Women by Lisa De Pasquale

http://www.cblpolicyinstitute.org/silenceoniraqiwomen.htm

The transfer of sovereignty to the Iraqi government marks a new day for
Iraqi women. Thanks to the courageous action taken by the Bush
administration and its allies, Iraqi women have renewed freedom. The
administration has insisted that women receive educational and small
business opportunities, as well as active participation in government.
For months radical feminists have been silent on the plight of Iraqi
women. Instead this hypocritical bunch has condemned the war in Iraq and
its subsequent liberation of women simply because the war is supported
by conservatives.

In March feminists gathered in front of the White House to protest
military action against Saddam Hussein. The protest was called "Code
Pink: Women's Pre-Emptive Strike for Peace." On the other side of the
world, Iraqi women were being denied the most basic (Indian)n lived in
fear knowing that Iraqi law freely allowed male relatives to murder them
in the name of honor. In Iraqi prisons, women were raped and tortured
for being related to Iraqi opposition activists. Videotapes of the acts
were sent to the families.

Despite obvious human rights violations and limits on freedom,
feminists, led by the National Organization for Women, ignored Saddam
Hussein's reprehensible treatment of women. Under the Saddam Hussein
regime Iraqi women were not allowed to work outside the home. Feminists,
on the other hand, talked about America's "tyrants" and the threat of
"tyranny in our homes, our workplaces and our schools."

Radical feminists witnessed a legitimate case of tyranny and violence
against women in Iraq, but they remained steadfastly against policies
and actions taken by America and the Bush administration that helped
these women. NOW President Kim Gandy stated, "The real terrorism is the
Bush administration's disregard for international law and destruction of
civil liberties at home. This has become an issue of one dictator versus
another."

Feminists are more comfortable allowing Iraqi women to endure torture
than supporting the Bush Administration. For example, a report by
Amnesty International documented the beheading of 50 young women in
Baghdad. The report also said, "The heads of these women were hung on
the doors of their houses for a few days." Saddam's son Uday led the
group of men who beheaded the women and terrorized their families.

The US State Department reports that human rights organizations receive
continuous testimony on the psychological trauma women have suffered
after being tortured and raped by Iraqi military personnel. Despite this
overwhelming evidence, feminists in the US praised Iraq and cited a
suspicious United Nations report that said Iraq "scored highest in
women's empowerment." Before the capture of Saddam, NOW stated in a
press release posted on their website that Iraqi women "currently enjoy
more rights and freedoms than women in other Gulf nations, such as Saudi
Arabia."

At an International Alliance for Justice press conference in 2002, Safia
al-Souhail, an Iraqi woman whose father was murdered for opposing
Saddam, said, "We are here begging the support of the free world to
liberate us from the nightmare we have been living in for the past three
decades." Al-Souhail also said, "Disarmament alone will not end our
suffering. This regime should be indicted for its crimes against
humanity."

NOW and their cohorts were deaf to these women's pleas and still condemn
the war in Iraq. Feminists invent problems in the US and ignore the real
problems faced by women around the world. NOW accuses President Bush of
"reversing women's rights here and abroad." Feminist Majority leader
Eleanor Smeal odiously said that the Bush Administration "needs to
construct a foreign policy as if women mattered."

The deceptively titled March for Women's Lives in April brought
thousands of feminists and leftist supporters to Washington, DC. Rather
than march against the atrocities and violence against women in Iraq and
other countries around the world, feminists waved coat hangers and
demanded taxpayer-funded abortions. Cybill Shepherd held a sign that
said, "Too bad John Ashcroft's mother didn't believe in abortion." Amid
"Fire Bush," "Tarts for Choice" and other placards feminist icon Gloria
Steinem told the crowd, "This government is the greatest danger on
earth!"

Echoing the hateful and hysterical rhetoric, Senator Hillary Clinton,
with no apparent sense of irony regarding the previous administration,
said she was there to criticize President Bush for "not upholding laws
against sexual harassment and discrimination."

These radical feminists' stance on military action in Iraq and the
global war on terrorism illustrate how they have consistently fallen
short of their purported mission to "eliminate sexism and eliminate all
oppression." Their motives are clearly political and not based on
advancing the rights of women around the world. When faced with a war
that liberated the Iraqi people, a majority of whom are women, feminists
would much rather turn a blind eye to the horrors of Saddam than support
America and the Bush Administration.

+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +

Miranda Devine. "Racist rapes: Finally the truth comes out." The
Sun-Herald. July 14 2002.

So now we know the facts, straight from the Supreme Court, that a group
of Lebanese Muslim gang rapists from south-western Sydney hunted their
victims on the basis of their ethnicity and subjected them to hours of
degrading, dehumanising torture. The young women, and girls as young as
14, were "sluts" and "Aussie pigs", the rapists said. So now that some
of the perpetrators are in jail, will those people who cried racism and
media "sensationalism" hang their heads in shame? Hardly.

The journalists, academics, legal brains and politicians who tried to
claim last August that the gang rapes of south-western Sydney were just
a run-of-the-mill police blotter story being beaten up by racists,
scaremongers and political opportunists don't ever want to acknowledge
the truth about that ugly episode in Australian history. They don't want
to acknowledge the fear and tension that ran through a part of Sydney
they rarely visit and can never understand.

This newspaper was the first to report the story, which had been common
knowledge in police and media circles, and it has never censored the
race element.

Even last week, with the conviction of two brothers for their part in
the gang rape of Miss D, who was 16 when she was held at gunpoint in a
Greenacre park, there were media outlets that downplayed the story and
air-brushed race from it.

Yet the victims have been crying out for the truth to be told. In court
on Friday, one victim gave another a card on which she had written

In August, when Judge Megan Latham handed out laughably lenient
sentences to three men in one gang rape case, which were later more than
doubled on appeal, she made a special point of debunking the race link:
"There is no evidence before me of any racial element in the commission
of these offences," she said. "There is nothing said or done by the
offenders which provides the slightest basis for imputing to them some
discrimination in terms of the nationality of their victims."

Except that later one of the victims complained her victim impact
statement had been "censored" of any "ethnic" references by prosecutors
intent on a plea bargain. She was convinced she was raped because of her
ethnicity. "You deserve it because you're an Australian," the rapists
told her during the five-hour attack.

It's just so inconvenient of the victims to insist on telling the truth.

"I looked in his eyes. I had never seen such indifference," one
18-year-old victim, codenamed Miss C, told the court, remembering one of
the 14 men who called her "Aussie pig", gang raped her 25 times over a
six-hour period in Bankstown and Chullora, and then turned a hose on
her. "I'm going to f*** you Leb style," he said.

Fourteen gang rapists have been convicted, or pleaded guilty, thanks to
the courage of seven victims who testified for days in court as their
tormentors smirked nearby, the men's families threatened them and
defence lawyers suggested they had enjoyed the rapes.

"They're very brave, very strong and very courageous young women," said
Salvation Army Major Joyce Harmer, who held the hands of many of the
victims through the trials. "They knew this was something they had to
do."

These were racist crimes. They were hate crimes. The rapists chose their
victims on the basis of race. That fact is crucial to this story. If the
perpetrators had been Anglo-Celtic Australians, the furore would have
been enormous. No newspaper would have left out that fact and you can
bet the guilt and shame would have been spread far and wide.

+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +

How dirty muslims rape young girls "Down Under"

Or what happens when Australia banned guns

PROTECT THE 2nd AMENDMENT TO THE U.S. CONSTITUTION!

Janet Albrechtsen. The Australian. 7 July 2002.

THE French call it tournantes or "take your turn" -- the French term for
the pack-rape of white girls by young Muslim men.

For 20 years the French ignored the ethnic causes of these barbaric
crimes for fear of offending multicultural man. Along the way, more
innocent young girls were pack-raped. Xenophobia divided communities.
And finally, voters punished a Centre-Left government for assuming that
the electorate was not grown up enough to discuss race without being
racist.

Last year Sylvie Lotteau, a magistrate from Bobigny, a northern Paris
suburb, described tournantes: "Their technique was to pick up a young
girl -- a white girl -- and once she had become the girlfriend of one of
the members, he would allow his mates to make use of her."

Now it's in Australia. Last week two Muslim brothers were found guilty
of the gang-rape of a young Australian girl. The victim knew one of the
brothers. She was invited for a drive but taken to a secluded park and
gang-raped while 14 Muslim boys watched.

Racially motivated gang-rape first hit the radar screen in August last
year. After the first trial, ethnic leaders such as Sheik Tajedinne
Hamed el Hilaly, imam at Lakemba mosque, said the ethnicity of the
rapists was irrelevant and simply incited racist attacks on Muslims.

But the Muslim community flogged the wrong racists -- those Muslim
rapists played the race card in the most horrific and demeaning way,
taunting victims with "you deserve it because you're Australian" and
threats to "f--- you Leb style".

And when the judge in the first trial, Megan Latham, tried to douse the
flames in an increasingly heated debate about ethnic crime with her
gratuitous comments about there being "no racial element", she simply
turned up the heat.

Since then, evidence on ethnicity-based gang-rapes has mounted. Horrific
attacks across Sydney's southwest reveal the same modus operandi as the
French tournantes. Our reaction? Like the French, we pander to
sensitivities about race and cultural issues. And so we extend the
social and political nightmare of race-based gang-rape.

A year ago the barbaric French phenomenon looked vaguely relevant. Now
it looks scary and prophetic. When 11 young Muslim men were accused of
pack raping a 14-year-old French girl in a cellar, politicians, judges
and sociologists finally began to expose and explore the terror of
tournantes.

"It's the group effect. They can't let themselves down in front of their
friends, who are urging them to commit the act," said a police commander
of a northern Paris suburb.

Pack-rape of white girls is an initiation rite of passage for a small
section of young male Muslim youth, said Jean-Jacques Rassial, a
psychotherapist at Villetaneuse University. "Fraternal bonding now
dominates. It is the law of the gang, shorn of any sexual morals," he
said.

Denmark presents a similar story. Last year, Flemming Balvig, a
criminologist at Copenhagen University, confirmed the French experience
of this barbaric rite of passage into manhood for some of these young
men.

French and Danish experts say perpetrators of gang-rape flounder between
their parents' Islamic values and society's more liberal democratic
values falling back on the most basic pack mentality of violence and
self-gratification. The progressive Danes offer immigrants advice about
the nature of Danish culture and how Denmark's liberal sexual attitudes
cannot be equated with Danish girls "asking for it".

Even the wider Arab world is confronting the costs of a culture that can
treat women as second-class citizens. Two weeks ago a ground-breaking
report by Arab scholars, commissioned by the UN, revealed that half of
all Arab women can neither read nor write. The Arab Human Development
Report 2002 found that Arab women's participation in political and
economic life rates the lowest in the world.

Transplanted to countries such as Australia, a culture which places so
little value on gender equality was always going to have problems when
faced with women who not only read and write but think and assume
control of their lives. Each of those barbaric gang-rapists showed utter
disdain for their young Western victims.

Yet in Australia racially motivated gang-rape is met by gutless
censorship from multicultural man. And like our Muslim leaders,
Australian feminists have been unusually quiet on this gender issue.

Ignoring it exacerbates it. A large group of Muslim boys involved in
these gang-rapes is still at large. The Muslim community's refusal to
acknowledge cultural issues spells disaster for more innocent young
women terrorised by Muslim boys hiding behind their ethnicity. Silence
also spells disaster politically. Suppressing frank discussion gives a
free kick to the next Jean-Marie Le Pen or Pauline Hanson.

At the community level, ignoring the link between crime and ethnicity
raises the red flag to rednecks who wish to blame all Muslims for the
barbarity of a few. This undermines a peaceful, tolerant future for the
vast majority of immigrants who embrace Australian values.

Discussing race or ethnicity is neither racist nor xenophobic. Tackling
problems head on can only encourage further immigration; ignoring them
will be immigration's death knell. Our tolerance of these Muslim
pack-rapists simply feeds their intolerance of us. It took the French 20
years to work that out. How long will it take us?

+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +

10 Tips to Avoid Being Gang Raped by muslims

Mark Steyn. "Battered Westerner Syndrome inflicted by myopic muslim
defenders." Jewish World Review. 15 Elul, 5762.

Last Thursday, in Sydney, the pack leader of a group of Lebanese Muslim
gang-rapists was sentenced to 55 years in jail. I suppose I ought to say
"Lebanese-Australian" Muslim gang-rapists, since the accused were
Australian citizens. But, identity-wise, the rambunctious young lads
considered themselves heavy on the Lebanese, light on the Australian.
During their gang rapes, the lucky lady would be told she was about to
be "f---ed Leb style" and that she deserved it because she was an
"Australian pig."

But, inevitably, it's the heavy sentence that's "controversial." After
September 11th, Americans were advised to ask themselves, "Why do they
hate us?" Now Australians need to ask themselves, "Why do they rape us?"
As Monroe Reimers put it on the letters page of The Sydney Morning
Herald:

"As terrible as the crime was, we must not confuse justice with revenge.
We need answers. Where has this hatred come from? How have we
contributed to it? Perhaps it's time to take a good hard look at the
racism by exclusion practiced with such a vengeance by our community and
cultural institutions."

...

Mr. Reimers, though, will be happy to know his view is echoed across the
hemispheres. Five days before 9/11, the Norwegian newspaper Dagbladet
reported that 65% of the country's rapes were committed by "non-Western"
immigrants -- a category which, in Norway, is almost wholly Muslim. A
professor at the University of Oslo explained that one reason for the
disproportionate Muslim share of the rape market was that in their
native lands "rape is scarcely punished" because it is generally
believed that "it is women who are responsible for rape."

So Muslim immigrants to Norway should be made aware that things are a
little different in Scandinavia? Not at all! Rather, the professor
insisted, "Norwegian women must take their share of responsibility for
these rapes" because their manner of dress would be regarded by Muslim
men as inappropriate. "Norwegian women must realize that we live in a
multicultural society and adapt themselves to it." Or to modify Queen
Victoria's wedding-night advice to her daughter: Lie back and think of
Yemen.

France? Well, I can't bring you any ethnic rape statistics from the
Fifth Republic because the authorities go to great lengths not to keep
any. But, even though the phenomenon of immigrant gang rape does not
exist, there's already a word for it: the "tournante" -- or "take your
turn." Last year, 11 Muslim men were arrested for enjoying a grand old
tournante with a 14-year old girl in a cellar.

Denmark? "Three quarters of rapes are carried out by non-Danes," says
Peter Skaarup, chairman of the People's Party, a member of the governing
coalition.

+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +

Quantcast