Re: Reverse coronary calcium deposits?

From: Phil Scott (philscott888_at_sf.sbcglobal.net)
Date: 10/19/04 

Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2004 00:25:44 GMT

"Robert" <RobertJ@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:10n8j22isfqt9d5@corp.supernews.com...
> Do me a favor Phil and do a search on the net for "Crap" and
you will find
> plenty of it. Your posts included. Now I am too smart to do
it for you
> because I know all the answers and you will just have to
find them for
> yourself. That makes me infallible as you must find your
own answers.
> Phil, I guess you don't believe in the Zen philosophy that
"the harder you
> look the more difficult it will be to be found."
> You need to empty your brain before it can be filled.
> The answer should come to everyone without effort otherwise
it is not true.
> Deceit takes a lot of hard work and it takes the form of a
lie being told
> over and over in order for people to believe it.
> Go back to your hours of research in the net and you get
hours of crap
> because you already have a preconceived notion of what you
are looking for.

ahhh I see that you have entered the Essay category of the
Awards. Well done. And not a bad start.

   I was unclear on a few of your points however,. could you
please go over some of these to clarify?. Possibly you can
tell me how *my very limited research, and conclusions, a
single viewpoint of the many thousands in the world, would
constitute any valid source of information for anyone.

  I can't see that. to me it seems that I would simply be an
undocumented source of an unverified opinion. Thats pretty
thin. Only and idiot would accept that as worth more than
mouse pee. Not someones data point.... at least that I can
see.

To me, these data points are founded across a very broad
spectrum and the only way to get that spread is to go to the
sources of this research and read up....

  Is there something you see wrong with a person doing thier
own research? Mabye I missed something.

What I think though is that you are a SERIOUS Awards
candidate and it would be grossly inappropriate of me to
interfere with you while you are 'in contest' so to speak.

Regardless. I salute you.

Phil Scott
(gives a salute.. of sorts)
>
>
>