Re: Reverse coronary calcium deposits?
From: Robert (RobertJ_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 10/19/04
- Previous message: Richard Periut: "Re: How to Become a Christian, Version 1.01"
- In reply to: Phil Scott: "Re: Reverse coronary calcium deposits?"
- Next in thread: Phil Scott: "Re: Reverse coronary calcium deposits?"
- Reply: Phil Scott: "Re: Reverse coronary calcium deposits?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2004 14:11:13 -0700
"Phil Scott" <philscott888@sf.sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:FIcdd.7744$6q2.2254@newssvr14.news.prodigy.com...
>
> "Robert" <RobertJ@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:10n9njl6tmlr452@corp.supernews.com...
> >
> > "Phil Scott" <philscott888@sf.sbcglobal.net> wrote in
> message
> > news:FN1dd.15886$nj.8152@newssvr13.news.prodigy.com...
> > >
> > > "Robert" <RobertJ@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> > >
> > > > You are full of anti-mainstream medical practice that
> you
> > > are and will
> > > > always be useless. No one in their right mind would or
> can
> > > follow any of
> > > > your sensless suggestions.
> > >
> > >
> > > NICE Revearsal Robert! Very good. Spinning advice
> to
> > > simply "look up and read the university research" into
> > > 'anti- mainstream medical practice'.... wow.
> > >
> > > Thats exciting.
> > >
> > > Maybe you can clarify...Im still fuzzy. Who is harmed
> by
> > > doing research or studying the latest advances around the
> > > world?
> >
> > You mean the latest research advances around the world most
> of which are
> > sponsored by drug companies don't you?
>
> Robert it must be difficult for you with an IQ under
> 35... you are not doing badly with it though.
>
> Of course much research is sponsored by the drug
> companies (plural) and they compete against one another so
> much good research gets out regardless,,,because of the
> competion,,, and also you said 'most'...that was accurate.
> that leaves the door open for research in countries such as
> say china and japan for instance that do not cater to the drug
> companies.
Cater to the drug companies? If you have a new med you need to have research
done on it and it won't be by third parties. Are you saying that japan does
not do drug research?
Try looking for the Lescol launch in Japan.
>
> then Robert a person must have the intellectual capacity to
> parse the lies and bogus testing from the rest of the research
> and also come to understand the boiphysics him or herself...at
> that point the analysis and crap detection abiility allows one
> to eventually but not always see though bad research.
Bad research is not limited to the private sector but is by all means
research in general.
The phrase "good enough for government work", means something.
>
> No one said it was easy Robert....
>
> And I have found that even if you give a half wit good data
> he will not be able to separate it from all the bogus notions
> regardless...so we get arguments such as yours then...wishing
> to be fed data so you can trash it with your bogus notions.
The process you just described is call "research". People read it in
journals and others trash it. Only the ones that stand the test of time
still stand.
>
> thats a waste of time Robert... but not entirely... those
> going for the Darwin Award in that fashion benefit and the
> world benefits as these finally achieve thier full potential.
>
>
> Lacking an inate ability to do your own research and
> evaluate other research you will not do well in other areas
> Robert... especially if you make a practice of trashing
> anything said to you except 'trust yer doctor'...
No as I learned from you that all doctors are whores from the drug
companies. I learned a lot of useless information from you.
>
> Robert, there are as many illiterate, incompetent,
> fraudulent, doctors in the world as there are in the general
> poplulation on a percentage basis.......... if you were up to
> doing your own research and reading the broad spectrum of the
> rest, this would be abundantly clear to you.
Most of them are in the government as it is hard to sue a government doctor
compared to private practice.
>
> Of course what ive said is eitehr not clear to you, or you
> are one of the drug companies hired idiots, paid to discourage
> a look at thier trillion dollar rip offs.
They pay me a million dollares a year to post here. You guys really scare
them when people stop their meds and they don't paid. Phil, don't take your
heart medicine because you will make some drug rep rich. That really is a
scary message. Please stop it.
That's a very powerful message, don't take your meds because somebody will
get rich, especially when you don't even pay for it meds as most insurance
companies do.
>
> Regardless Robt, I understand.
>
> Most people though are capable of good research if they put
> thier mind to it. It takes an ability to simply not believe
> anything and to just gather data, and then as it accumulates
> see what fits...and over time the full picture develops.
Data is corrupt remember. All data is biased either against or for. That has
always happened with research.
>
> Those looking to be told though are not prone to integration
> of data, they go into 'either / or ' mode... and either accept
> or reject...this creates thier problem. Truth is most
> often a broad collage...there is some truth usually found in
> the fatally flawed areas....and there are fatal flaws in some
> of the best thinking.
It's better not to do any thinking and just use nice phrases that people
will remember like "all doctors are whores for the drug companies". That
says it all and does not need critical thinking.
>
> If you are in black and white thinking mode, or a trasher
> moron looking for targets, you become unable to parse net
> reality... and THIS is why the Darwing Awards program was
> begun in the first place you see?
You are the one thinking in terms of black and white. Drugs are bad and
doctors are whores. Private research is all invalid.
>
> The process of data alignment, factoring and integration is
> not complex Robert.... it just takes genuine interest.
>
> Genuine interest to these levels requires personal
> *integrity... lacking that Robert there is no hope what so
> ever for the person in life, unless of course he or she comes
> to develop integrity later in life.
>
> Phil Scott
Good rhetoric Phil as a hospital worker being in charge of your life I will
take into consideration all you have said and treat you accordingly.
- Previous message: Richard Periut: "Re: How to Become a Christian, Version 1.01"
- In reply to: Phil Scott: "Re: Reverse coronary calcium deposits?"
- Next in thread: Phil Scott: "Re: Reverse coronary calcium deposits?"
- Reply: Phil Scott: "Re: Reverse coronary calcium deposits?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|