Re: Dr. Atkins' Dietetic Revolution: Mu Critique?

From: Don Kirkman (donkirk_at_covad.net)
Date: 12/21/04 

Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2004 12:51:25 -0800

It seems to me I heard somewhere that John Smyth®© wrote in article
<vqqdnS1BOd1CRVrcRVn-uw@comcast.com>:

>"Don Kirkman" <donkirk@covad.net> wrote in message
>news:4hh9s0paacmh4pg39p8hf9qpc5vllptp67@4ax.com...
>> It seems to me I heard somewhere that Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote
>> in article <1103255315.f29dfe6120788f82543c12c4993a36f6@teranews>:

>>>Don Kirkman wrote:

>>>> It seems to me I heard somewhere that Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote
>>>> in article <1102702794.c6bd5774ee877a3e0006348000395b77@teranews>:

[...]

>>>My ability to understand things arises from God's gift of intellect.

>>>Hope this information enlightens you.

>> It doesn't because you didn't answer the question. In fact, you changed
>> to a totally unrelated topic. You claimed some reason to believe a
>> certain legal doctrine, and I want to know exactly the basis for your
>> claim. Intuition/brain chemistry/tradition/dream states/etc. don't play
>> out well in legal matters.

>> What *precisely* is your basis for "understanding that it is legally
>> impossible for someone to anonymously (i.e. under a pseudonym) steal
>> credit for anything"?

>> My reasons for not believing your claim include a few years as an
>> investigator in the criminal legal system, and several more years
>> working in a law office with a couple hundred lawyers, working on
>> committees that included US Attorneys (one of whom became head of the
>> DEA and a judge and another who became head of the FBI), Immigration and
>> correctional agents, numerous police chiefs, prosecutors, public
>> defenders, and judges, some of whom now sit on state and federal appeals
>> courts. I'll put my "God's gift of intellect" against yours any day on
>> legal principles even though I'm not a lawyer.

>Wow! You are indeed most amazing. This begs the question oh almightly
>enlightened one - can you pee standing up?

Do you have even the faintest idea of what's at issue here? You may not
know, but I'm sure Chung does, that even St. Paul was driven to boast at
times when his credibility and authority were questioned. I've simply
demonstrated that I have a basis for my opinions on legal matters, while
Chung has not demonstrated any such basis and doesn't seem inclined to
offer any. 

-- 
Don
donkirk@covad.net

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Right, Im Off
    ... and I think they're cunts of the highest order. ... Oh, so you don't ever judge people on appearances, except when you do? ... does it simply become non-cunty if you're judging people on the basis of how ... the basis of other's cunty prejudices just seems like the most cunty thing ...
    (uk.sport.football)
  • Re: Traveling with a head, or Nobody gives a shit about my rider
    ... On the basis that it's in your contract/rider they agreed to and signed? ... I don't need a head anymore so I'm saving them money on the ... me the name and phone number for the sound company I usually get it. ...
    (alt.guitar.bass)
  • Re: Unfair Parking Fine - Can I appear in court for my Dad?
    ... If you could, however, it would be perverse for a judge to ... rule that the balance of probabilities lay in favour of the remaining ... It generally works on the basis that it is up to the claimant to prove ...
    (uk.legal)
  • Re: Lady Gaga..."shes" a tranny, right?
    ... Quickest way to tell that someone is a moron is if they judge someone completely based upon the physical appearance solely. ... that as the basis of our judgment of her as a human being. ... She was accepted to the Tisch school, ... Brett Ratner went to their film school and has directed movies ...
    (rec.sport.pro-wrestling)
  • Re: Lady Gaga..."shes" a tranny, right?
    ... Speak for yourself. ... Quickest way to tell that someone is a moron is if they judge someone completely based upon the physical appearance solely. ... that as the basis of our judgment of her as a human being. ...
    (rec.sport.pro-wrestling)