Re: Dr. Atkins' Dietetic Revolution: Mu Critique?
From: Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD (andrew_at_heartmdphd.com)
Date: 12/24/04
- Next message: Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD: "Re: Merry Xmas Andrew"
- Previous message: Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD: "Re: ok--- what NSAID now??"
- In reply to: Don Kirkman: "Re: Dr. Atkins' Dietetic Revolution: Mu Critique?"
- Next in thread: Don Kirkman: "Re: Dr. Atkins' Dietetic Revolution: Mu Critique?"
- Reply: Don Kirkman: "Re: Dr. Atkins' Dietetic Revolution: Mu Critique?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2004 23:11:55 -0500
Don Kirkman wrote:
>
> It seems to me I heard somewhere that Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote
> in article <1103664391.a261860136f1982303186ae8457f7ac7@teranews>:
>
> >Don Kirkman wrote:
>
> >> It seems to me I heard somewhere that Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote
> >> in article <1103635847.ddaaa719bae97388b192743d7a9cc2f1@teranews>:
>
> >> >"John Smyth®©" wrote:
>
> >> >> "Don Kirkman" <donkirk@covad.net> wrote in message
> >> >> news:4hh9s0paacmh4pg39p8hf9qpc5vllptp67@4ax.com...
> >> >> > It seems to me I heard somewhere that Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote
> >> >> > in article <1103255315.f29dfe6120788f82543c12c4993a36f6@teranews>:
>
> >> >> >>Don Kirkman wrote:
>
> >> >> >>> It seems to me I heard somewhere that Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote
> >> >> >>> in article <1102702794.c6bd5774ee877a3e0006348000395b77@teranews>:
>
> >> >> > What *precisely* is your basis for "understanding that it is legally
> >> >> > impossible for someone to anonymously (i.e. under a pseudonym) steal
> >> >> > credit for anything"?
<someone's comments about your arrogance snipped probably because of
your embarrassment>
> >> >Thusly are the fruits of self-worship.
>
> >> The word would be "thus," not "thusly."
>
> >From the on-line Webster's:
>
> >Main Entry: thus·ly
> >Pronunciation: -lE
> >Function: adverb
> >: in this manner : THUS
>
> The print Webster's Collegiate doesn't even list "thusly," and your
> usage is not as an adverb but as a demonstrative pronoun, "thus," akin
> to that, those, these.
It is my choice to use the word thusly. Sorry this offends you.
> >> >Hope my comment enlightens those who need enlightening.
>
> >> Your answer to the question I asked *would* be enlightening, but I don't
> >> expect I'll ever see it.
>
> >Here it is again because you claimed to have missed it:
>
> >http://makeashorterlink.com/?Z27D3641A
>
> You mean this, your contribution to that message (and which in fact I
> have not gotten in smc)?
>
> [Begin]
> Then try the following analogies on for size:
>
> Judge (to the defendant): You are charged with being a "peeping tom."
> How do you plead?
> [DK] No, the issue was theft, not peeping.
This is an analogy, Don.
> Defendant: Definitely not guilty.
>
> Judge: How can you be so certain?
>
> Defendant: I am blind.
>
> Analogously:
>
> Judge (to imaginary anonymous defendant): You are charged with putting
> your name on something authored by someone else. How do you plead?
> [DK] No, the issue was appropriating the work of another
> without credit.
When someone appropriates the work of another without credit, s/he does
this by putting his/her name on something authored by someone else.
> Defendant: Definitely not guilty.
>
> Judge: How can you be so certain?
>
> Defendant: I have no name.
> [DK] No, in this instance the alleged thief has a name but
> instead of using it adopts an alias or uses no name.
As far as the judge is concerned, there is no name because the defendant
either refuses to give it or has given up his name (ie as Prince did for
a while). Indeed, the alias could be "no name."
> Hope the above analogies enlighten you and others.
> [End]
>
> THAT is supposed to be an answer to why you think an anonymous person
> cannot steal someone else's intellectual property?
A person with no name is as able to steal intellectual property as
someone with no hands is able to pick-pocket.
> >Hope the above information helps you.
>
> It helps build the record of your evasiveness, but please answer the
> question I asked or simply say you have no factual basis for your
> opinion.
You have a history of being unable to accept answers you do not like
(shrug).
May God bless those who read the following:
http://makeashorterlink.com/?I24E5151A
And, may what I have written enlighten you and others.
Such is the work being done here for Christ's glory
(http://makeashorterlink.com/?U1E13130A).
Servant to the humblest person in the universe,
Andrew
-- Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD Board-Certified Cardiologist http://www.heartmdphd.com/ ** Who is the humblest person in the universe? http://makeashorterlink.com/?L26062048 What is all this about? http://makeashorterlink.com/?K6F72510A Is this spam? http://makeashorterlink.com/?D13B21FF9
- Next message: Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD: "Re: Merry Xmas Andrew"
- Previous message: Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD: "Re: ok--- what NSAID now??"
- In reply to: Don Kirkman: "Re: Dr. Atkins' Dietetic Revolution: Mu Critique?"
- Next in thread: Don Kirkman: "Re: Dr. Atkins' Dietetic Revolution: Mu Critique?"
- Reply: Don Kirkman: "Re: Dr. Atkins' Dietetic Revolution: Mu Critique?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
