Re: Gout from Lipitor damage? NAPROXEN increases heart attack risk. BEWARE

From: zwalanga (zwalanga_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 12/26/04


Date: 26 Dec 2004 06:10:39 -0800


Don Kirkman wrote:
> It seems to me I heard somewhere that zwalanga wrote in article
> <1104012962.659790.43240@c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>:
>
> >Don Kirkman wrote:
> >> It seems to me I heard somewhere that zwalanga wrote in article
> >> <1103946428.336622.50320@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com>:
>
> >> >Don Kirkman wrote:
> >> >> It seems to me I heard somewhere that Sharon Hope wrote in
article
> >> >> <mANyd.281110$HA.94857@attbi_s01>:
>
> >> [...]
>
> >> >> >Thus the synonymous "cardiovascular event" , "myocardial
> >> >infarction", and
> >> >> >the common vernacular "heart attack"
>
> >> >> The definition of "heart attack" and its cognates is not at
issue;
> >> >you
> >> >> said the FDA *warned* of additional risk of heart attack.
Where
> >is
> >> >that
> >> >> warning to be found?
>
> >> >This warning, couched as carefully as it has been, will most
> >certainly
> >> >have been done to give away as little as possible,while still
> >meeting
> >> >requisites for legal disclaimer should some unfortunate soul(s)
> >ever
> >> >decide Naproxen damage constitutes a class action. But having
played
> >> >big game law, you knew that, didn't you Don.
>
> >> Couched so carefully it can't be found, Zee. A suggestion is not
a
> >> warning, either in law or in common sense. And don't misinterpret
> >what
> >> I wrote early as my having "played big game law;" I specifically
said
> >I
> >> am not a lawyer though I worked with and among lawyers and other
> >justice
> >> system folks for most of my career.
>
> >I did not misinterpret what you did Don. ~Heh~ I know the
difference.
>
> <G>
>
> >I also know, and you know too, that this statement would be
presented
> >as having been warning in a law suit undertaken on behalf of one
> >injured by naproxen. And it would be presented as such by the
> >defendents.
>
> >This advisory is a warning. Legally. And that is just why it was
done.
> >So that in the event of law suits, pharma can say it warned. And
then
> >legally, the burden bounces back to the injured. Whether or not a
case
> >could be won or lost on this alone is moot.
>
> >This is warning. This is legal.
>
> Can you give me a case citation or a reference to legislation
equating
> advise with warning? What legislature or what court deemed an
advisory
> to be a warning?
>
> >Split hairs all you like. Pharma warned. They're clear from here on
for
> >anyone taking that medication NOW.
> >Sharon had it right.
>
> I'm not splitting hairs, I'm parsing English statements.
> --
> Don
> donkirk@covad.net

If it wasn't perceived as a legal threat they wouldn't be doing this.
The next step will be a stronger "advisory" warning people, or an
"advisory" pulling the drug. The document is the advisory. What it is
doing is warning.

This is legal telling communications "say this".
And the reason they are doing it is legal.
 

Zee



Relevant Pages

  • [UNIX] Compaq Tru64 UNIX Multiple Buffer Overflows
    ... The following security advisory is sent to the securiteam mailing list, and can be found at the SecuriTeam web site: http://www.securiteam.com ... overflows in multiple system libraries and binaries. ... warning: PC value 0x504030200 not valid, ...
    (Securiteam)
  • Re: New Met Office warnings live
    ... First new warning is an advisory for heavy rain in the south this ... themselves indicate the type of event (severe or extreme) other than ... early or flash) nor do they indicate any one level ...
    (uk.sci.weather)
  • Re: Springs + Rain + Southerly gales for the South Coast on Saturday = flooding?
    ... possbility warning (advisory, orange warning, or whatever) should be ... Finally a flood warning out and it's for my area. ... The winds SW here in west Cornwall, not a direction likely ...
    (uk.sci.weather)
  • Re: New Met Office warnings live
    ... First new warning is an advisory for heavy rain in the south this ... On the 'yellow' advisory is a moderate risk of severe weather ...
    (uk.sci.weather)
  • Re: OT: Wierd e-mail I got
    ... the National Security Agency may have ... read this email without warning, warrant, or notice, and certainly without ... been following the Congressional activity surrounding the legislation that proposes these "emergency" measures be made permanent? ...
    (rec.pets.cats.anecdotes)