Re: Atkins a Playboy?
From: Roger Zoul (rogerzoul2_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 01/11/05
- Next message: maison.mousse: "Re: keeping cholesterol low?"
- Previous message: Zee: "Re: CRP Theory: Cleeman and conflict of interests"
- In reply to: MU: "Re: Atkins a Playboy?"
- Next in thread: Jane Lumley: "Re: Atkins a Playboy?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2005 10:57:51 -0500
MU wrote:
||| In article <1m9wuivt730hv.18v11mmlon63v.dlg@40tude.net>, MU
||| <munospam@fastmail.fm> writes
|||| When you do you will find that he had been chasing skirts since he
|||| was in high school. Sorry, Roger, that was way before low-carb.
|||| Atkins was a self-indulged, egocentric freak in a white coat.
||
|| On Tue, 11 Jan 2005 10:51:48 +0000, Jane Lumley wrote:
||
||| Oh, honestly. Who cares? What matters is that the diet works and
||| that it helps people. Who cares who Atkins boinked?
||
|| His patients cared and any decent, normal thinking person who is on
|| his diet ought to care that they are living the same failure set
|| that Atkins sex life was about.
MU, that's just silly. There are many aspects that go into a person.
Plenty of people can adopt Atkin's LC ideas without being JUST like him.
Your obvious bias against him really lowers you.
||
|| I bet his wife cared, ya' think?
||
I hope she did.
|| I care because I had heard the "rumors" for years that he was a
|| sexual scumbag. How many lives did he ruin outside of his diet we
|| will never know.
||
After reading most of that new book (the uncorrected proof), it seems that
many women came to his practice simply to get in bed with him. And when he
approached his patients (the one who came as honestly patients for help), he
helped them. If he asked one out, they certainly had the opportunity to
say no.
|| How many wittle illegitimate Bobbies are out there we will never
|| know.
You don't have data to extrapolate.
||
|| Oh, honestly.
||
|| The fact that you flip off this charlatan with so little caring for
|| all those he injured says tons about you.
The fact that you try to nail his coffin shut with so little caring for all
those he helped and with so little info about all those he supposedly
injured says tons about you, MU.
- Next message: maison.mousse: "Re: keeping cholesterol low?"
- Previous message: Zee: "Re: CRP Theory: Cleeman and conflict of interests"
- In reply to: MU: "Re: Atkins a Playboy?"
- Next in thread: Jane Lumley: "Re: Atkins a Playboy?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|