Re: Is Plavix Really Better Than Aspirin?
From: Steve Marcus (smarcus_spamout__at_cox.net)
Date: 01/29/05
- Next message: Steve Marcus: "Re: Is Plavix Really Better Than Aspirin?"
- Previous message: al: "Re: Test results"
- In reply to: Zee: "Re: Is Plavix Really Better Than Aspirin?"
- Next in thread: Jim Chinnis: "Re: Is Plavix Really Better Than Aspirin?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2005 10:36:09 -0500
"Zee" <zwalanga@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1106933203.166601.253110@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
> You two are hilarious. Log on, adjust your crotches at each other, log
> off.
>
Keep those ad hominems coming. With every post you make in which you do not
reply to the critical comments someone else wrote and/or post absurd
accusations of being stalked and/or reply with ad hominems alone or in
combination with your non-responses or accustations, you damage your own
credibility.
BTW, in a post on another thread you opined that with millions of statin
users out there, there had to be hundreds of thousands suffering from
adverse side effects. Care to support that with any data?
Steve
-- The above posting is neither a legal opinion nor legal advice, because we do not have an attorney-client relationship, and should not be construed as either. This posting does not represent the opinion of my employer, but is merely my personal view. To reply, delete _spamout_ and replace with the numeral 3 <old stuff left it since it confirms, with Zee's own posts, the truth of what I've written in the first paragraph above.> > > > > Steve Marcus wrote: >> "Zee" <zwalanga@yahoo.com> wrote in message >> news:1106870686.790568.253410@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com... >> > >> > Steve Marcus wrote: >> >> "Zee" <zwalanga@yahoo.com> wrote in message >> >> news:1106846025.915866.311790@c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com... >> >> > Your comment Steve to me. This is really getting pathetic. Apply >> > this >> >> > to what you did this morning when you log on to jump on me, when >> > you >> >> > have completely misread and misinterpreted because of your blind >> >> > prejudice. >> >> >> >> You have too high an opinion of yourself. I didn't "log on to > jump" >> > you. I >> >> logged on, perused the messages, and decided to comment on your > post. >> >> >> >> > >> >> > life permits one to inform >> >> >> oneself, learn to distinguish prudent behavior from imprudent >> >> > behavior, and >> >> >> to behave accordingly. >> >> > >> >> > Yes Steve. Inform yourself before you log on and make a fool of >> >> > yourself. Again. >> >> >> >> Well, then take responsibility for your having used "I" in this >> > sense: "The >> >> *I* is everyman: the patient." I can only read what you post, not >> > what you >> >> were thinking when you posted it. If your post really meant "I" > when >> > you >> >> wrote "I", then my response was quite appropriate. And, since you >> > believe >> >> that you are helping people when you post, perhaps you ought to >> > re-consider >> >> who the fool is, you for writing something that required you to >> > explain what >> >> you _really_ meant, or someone reading it who simply took what was >> > written >> >> at face value. >> >> >> >> > >> >> > Zee >> >> >> >> Steve >> > >> > With every correction you make of any error *I* make, you prove my >> > point: once I was accepted to law school; once I was a crack > writer. No >> > more. But it is coming back Steve. That I use the technique without >> > thinking shows me my writing chops are coming back. Of course, they >> > will never be what they were. But still, enough to mop the floor > with >> > you. >> >> Riiigggghhhttt. >> >> Post something totally nonresponsive to what I wrote (which pointed > out an >> error in your thought process as per the quote below, and a flaw in > how you >> expressed yourself) and then claim "victory." Coupled with your > propensity >> to claim that people are "abusing" or stalking you" (see your: > "Apply this >> to what you did this morning when you log on to jump on me.") when > you >> cannot reply on the merits to a bit of criticism, and you have the > makings >> of a fine journalist. >> >> BTW. Do you really think that there's someone in North America who > takes >> medication and hasn't heard about avoiding grapefruit juice? Or that > >> there's a doctor who doesn't provide that caution to a patient when >> prescribing medications that could be interferred with by grapefruit > juice? >> If you do, then do you think that we should pull those drugs because > people >> are uninformed? Or that you should prevent the interaction by > grapefruit >> juice by scaring people away from beneficial drugs? >> >> You truly are a piece of work. >> >> > >> > >> > >> > Zee >> > >> >> Steve >> -- >> The above posting is neither a legal opinion nor legal advice, >> because we do not have an attorney-client relationship, and >> should not be construed as either. This posting does not >> represent the opinion of my employer, but is merely my personal >> view. To reply, delete _spamout_ and replace with the numeral 3 >> >> <old stuff snipped> >
- Next message: Steve Marcus: "Re: Is Plavix Really Better Than Aspirin?"
- Previous message: al: "Re: Test results"
- In reply to: Zee: "Re: Is Plavix Really Better Than Aspirin?"
- Next in thread: Jim Chinnis: "Re: Is Plavix Really Better Than Aspirin?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
