Re: Two pounds a day
From: Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD (andrew_at_heartmdphd.com)
Date: 02/16/05
- Next message: Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD: "Re: All about Chung - "On Bull***", Harry G. Frankfurt, PrincetonUniversityPress,ISBN: 0-691-12294-6"
- Previous message: Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD: "Re: Two pounds a day"
- In reply to: Bob (this one): "Re: Two pounds a day"
- Next in thread: Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD: "Re: Two pounds a day"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 00:30:46 -0500
It remains painful to watch you judge yourself.
You will remain in my prayers, dear Bob, whom I love, in Lord Christ's
holy name.
May you accept Him as your personal Lord and Savior, someday, so that
you too will have eternal life and the unimaginable riches of His
infinite kingdom.
Here's how:
http://makeashorterlink.com/?I22222129
Please note that God truly made this special link describing that He is
the great "I am" and that His message is as simple as the number 2 which
is a number between 1 to 9 and reminds us of His 2 commandments, the 2
arms of the cross, the 2nd part of the Trinity, the 2 finger sign of the
Prince of Peace [who remains *V*ictorious over death and satan], and the
2PD Approach. Let it not ever be written that Christ did not make His
presence known here on Usenet :-)
Also, note that Exodus 16:16 continues to remind us that 16 oz plus 16
oz makes 2 pounds, which is "a certain measure of weight," which is what
"omer" literally means in Hebrew.
Enter the 2PD-OMER Approach:
http://www.heartmdphd.com/wtloss.asp
At His service,
Andrew
-- Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD Board-Certified Cardiologist ** Suggested Reading: (1) http://makeashorterlink.com/?L26062048 (2) http://makeashorterlink.com/?O2F325D1A (3) http://makeashorterlink.com/?X1C62661A (4) http://makeashorterlink.com/?U1E13130A (5) http://makeashorterlink.com/?K6F72510A (6) http://makeashorterlink.com/?I24E5151A (7) http://makeashorterlink.com/?I22222129 "Bob (this one)" wrote: > > Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote: > > GaryG wrote: > > > >>"Bob (this one)" <Bob@nospam.com> wrote in message > >>news:1114nuj2s0pu569@corp.supernews.com... > >> > >>>GaryG wrote: > >>> > >>>>"Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <andrew@heartmdphd.com> wrote in message > >>>>news:1108494950.9f4f0a5b0634d3f4cb27bd204a3906c4@teranews... > >>>> > >>>>>GaryG wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>>"Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <andrew@heartmdphd.com> wrote in message > >>>>>>news:1108493664.14f812f7b924003164fac48e9ad11e07@teranews... > >>>>>> > >>>>>>>However, as an FYI, bearing false witness is a sin. > >>>>>> > >>>>>>Like when you claimed that Bob is a fan of Hitler? > >>>>> > >>>>>And so you choose to continue to bear false witness. > >>>> > >>>>To refresh your memory, here's what you said when you bore false witness > >>>>against Bob: > >>>> > >>>>"<hiss sputter hiss hiss Hitler ate two pounds of chocolate a day hiss > >>>>sputter hiss hiss He's my hero hiss sputter hiss hiss>" > >>>> > >>>>Were these not your words? Or, did satan cause you to lie about dear Bob, > >>>>whom you love? > >>> > >>><LOL> Gary, can't you see the pure and honest love emanating from the > >>>Chungster? Our fantastic and fantasizing, fuzzy-cuddly Warrior of the > >>>Cross is correct in all things... or didn't you get the memo? > >>> > >>>Chung will weasel around that capital "H" in "He's" to claim that you > >>>don't really understand. He won't say, he'll just try to poke you with > >>>it. But against the backdrop of his many, many other examples, it's > >>>all very clear. Sleazy guy can't spot his own blatant patterns. > >> > >>Yeah...he tried to imply that previously, without stating who the "He" is. > >>Unfortunately for him, his statement was succint and there is no other > >>possible interpretation as to its meaning. > > > > In truth, I left both the implied object of admiration and the admirer > > vague. You could have chosen to interpret what was written to imply > > that Bob admired satan. > > <LOL> Like that's better. The slime fairly drips off Chung. The simple > fact of the matter - the "truth" in other words - is that Chung's > intent was to besmirch, to imply, to smarmily hint at *some* negative. > Namecalling of a rather blatant sort. > > >>And Chung, in case you're reading this - it's OK to confess your sins. > > > > Obeying God is not a sin. > > NO. But lying is. And so is deliberately trying to hurt others. > Especially egregious given the professional oath all doctors take. > > > Yes, I have sinned and I am thankful that my Lord has chosen to wash > > those sins off of me. > > Sure. But you can't just keep doing the same things and continue to > expect that free "Get Out of Hell Free" card. > > >>>The poor sap can't seem to grasp the notion that his voluminous, > >>>cumulative words and actions provide a perfectly reasonable and > >>>sufficient basis for evaluation of his veracity, his stability, his > >>>Christianity and his rationality. Not good news for him. > > > > >>However, I'm beginning to feel sorry for him (especially too for Mrs. Chung, > >>if she's still in the picture). With his latest manifestation, he seems even > >>more unbalanced than previously. > >> > >>Accusing you of being a Nazi is either an indication that he's lost touch > >>with reality, or that you're making him really angry but he's unable to > >>express himself (except in his quote snipping, cross-posting, > >>passive-aggressive, Christian "love" way). > > > > Fyi, bearing false witness remains a sin. > > <LOL> Could Chung make a better case for his falsity? Could he more > obviously agree with the assessment in that last paragraph by action? > > Poor, poor, delusional Chung. > > Bob
- Next message: Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD: "Re: All about Chung - "On Bull***", Harry G. Frankfurt, PrincetonUniversityPress,ISBN: 0-691-12294-6"
- Previous message: Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD: "Re: Two pounds a day"
- In reply to: Bob (this one): "Re: Two pounds a day"
- Next in thread: Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD: "Re: Two pounds a day"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]