Re: Informed Consent Discussion
From: Joel M. Eichen (joeleichen_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 03/27/05
- Next message: zee: "Re: FDA, User Fees, Adverse Effects, and Safety"
- Previous message: Joel M. Eichen: "Re: Informed Consent Discussion"
- In reply to: clintonz_at_prodigy.net: "Re: Informed Consent Discussion"
- Next in thread: clintonz_at_prodigy.net: "Re: Informed Consent Discussion"
- Reply: clintonz_at_prodigy.net: "Re: Informed Consent Discussion"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2005 12:55:14 -0500
On 27 Mar 2005 07:06:37 -0800, clintonz@prodigy.net wrote:
>Actually as you are probably aware some dentists do read "cavities"
>or "cavitations" by echo, its called a cavitat and is based on
>sound wave technology. Of course the technology is questionable so in
>essence these dentists get paid for reading what may not be there.
So far, science has entirely discounted this ... sorry DUDE!
This goes along with EAV../... electroaccupuncture according to Voll.
That's nonsense too.
Joel
- Next message: zee: "Re: FDA, User Fees, Adverse Effects, and Safety"
- Previous message: Joel M. Eichen: "Re: Informed Consent Discussion"
- In reply to: clintonz_at_prodigy.net: "Re: Informed Consent Discussion"
- Next in thread: clintonz_at_prodigy.net: "Re: Informed Consent Discussion"
- Reply: clintonz_at_prodigy.net: "Re: Informed Consent Discussion"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|