Re: 'Polish Atkins diet'
From: Mirek Fidler (cxl_at_volny.cz)
Date: 03/29/05
- Next message: Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD: "Re: 'Polish Atkins diet'"
- Previous message: Hawki63_at_sbcglobal.net: "Re: FDA, User Fees, Adverse Effects, and Safety"
- In reply to: Jim Chinnis: "Re: 'Polish Atkins diet'"
- Next in thread: Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD: "Re: 'Polish Atkins diet'"
- Reply: Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD: "Re: 'Polish Atkins diet'"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 23:13:46 +0200
> I think you are adding in "high-calories." I haven't seen that
> mentioned, though people on the "Polish/Optimal" diet may be
> consuming more calories. I had assumed they were consuming fewer
> if they were losing weight.
Quote:
DAILY TOTAL: 254 grams of fat and 2,923 calories
Does not seem very low-calorie to me :)
Of course, question is how much of that food is really eaten and how
much of rest is absorbed, but still, people DO lose weight on diet like
this - something that breaks a lot of low-fat dogmas.
This might not be the best diet for humankind, but the sole fact that
weight loss happens on highfat unrestricted diet is more than interesting.
Mirek
- Next message: Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD: "Re: 'Polish Atkins diet'"
- Previous message: Hawki63_at_sbcglobal.net: "Re: FDA, User Fees, Adverse Effects, and Safety"
- In reply to: Jim Chinnis: "Re: 'Polish Atkins diet'"
- Next in thread: Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD: "Re: 'Polish Atkins diet'"
- Reply: Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD: "Re: 'Polish Atkins diet'"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
|