Re: Causes for a .5 mm ST depression

X-No-Archive: Yes

Don Kirkman wrote:
> It seems to me I heard somewhere that listener wrote in article
> <Xns9628D602B608Dsome1outthere@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>
> >Don Kirkman <donkirk@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in
> >news:g8sj41p3ubu9voks1e1v9591ldrgj81rvu@xxxxxxx:
>
> >[snip]
>
> >> I will thank you for that also. My newsreader threads very well,
but
> >> when there are a few lines or paragraphs of relevant material and
I find
> >> a three-sentence response at the end of a 250-line message it
makes for
> >> rather slow reading.
>
> >My newsreader, Xnews, allows color-coding to 8 levels which makes
reading
> >multi-level, inserted replies relatively easy.
>
> My appreciation is not because I will be able to distinguish the
> authorship of the relevant portions but because I can stop having to
> scan a hundred or more lines of stuff irrelevant to the message I'm
> reading, picking out the grain from the chaff. :-)



What then should one do when replying to you Don: Top post; take out
all but what I am replying to; just leave previous posters names at
top. I am still having trouble getting google to be consistent.

But also, different posters want different things. And I seem to recall
being taken to task for taking out what I was not responding to.

How about what I have done here?

And also; this post and yours are not (strictly speaking) on topic. So,
should I OT things like this?

I want to err on the side of caution...

Zee



> >Nonetheless, I too appreciate elgoog's response.
> --
> Don
> "I do not feel obliged to believe that the same God who has endowed
> us with senses, reason, and intellect has intended us to forgo their
> use. --Galileo Galilei

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Poor fellow ...
    ... not showing the post you are replying to makes it not worth reading ... >Who else would I be responding than to the post I'm replying to? ... Or are you saying that your reading retention is so low you can't ... >original facts in the original post get lost within the thread. ...
    (misc.news.internet.discuss)
  • Re: On behalf of RST ...
    ... reading his messages and then you wouldn't be replying to them! ... It wouldn't take long for him to see that no one is responding to his ... posts. ...
    (rec.sport.tennis)
  • Re: OT Hillarys bedtime prayer
    ... It amazes me that some posters claim to have "plonked" other posters ... and yet evidently keep reading and responding to them. ... are Aussie morons. ...
    (rec.music.classical.recordings)
  • Re: Who is Bernie - The - Bolt?
    ... but laugh when your resident buffoons annihilate it while trying (and ... reading a post you just move on to the next one and you don't bother ... The fact that he's replying proves he's reading every last ...
    (uk.sport.football.clubs.liverpool)
  • Re: Top posting
    ... Someone else reading that email would not be able to make sense of it, without first scrolling down and reading the cause or your response, or at least some part of it. ... After your trim the quoted text to just what reminds any observer what prompted your response, you go up to the top and trim all the unnecessary attributions (that refer to posters you have completely trimmed out. ... The question you have to ask yourself is are you willing to expend enough effort to make your posts into a contribution to Usenet, or are you just satisfying an urge? ...
    (sci.electronics.design)